基于盲目反卷积算法的X90管线钢腐蚀声发射信号分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0650

化工进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 60-71.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0650

基于盲目反卷积算法的X90管线钢腐蚀声发射信号分析

苗嘉旭¹(), 陈仙江², 周洋洋¹, 贠智强³, 张玉红¹, 毕海胜¹()

^1.青岛科技大学机电工程学院, 山东青岛 266061
^2.新疆油田公司，新疆克拉玛依 834000
^3.山东省特种设备检验研究院有限公司，山东济南 250014

收稿日期:2022-04-13 修回日期:2022-05-25 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-11-10
通讯作者: 毕海胜
作者简介:苗嘉旭（1998—），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为油气储运安全。E-mail：mjx040017@163.com。
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金(ZR2017BEE068);山东省油气储运安全重点实验室开放基金;中央高校基本科研业务费专项(19CX05007A);国家重点研发计划(2021YFB3401403)

Corrosion acoustic emission signal analysis of X90 pipeline steel based on blind deconvolution algorithm

MIAO Jiaxu¹(), CHEN Xianjiang², ZHOU Yangyang¹, YUN Zhiqiang³, ZHANG Yuhong¹, BI Haisheng¹()

^1.College of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China
^2.Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China
^3.Shandong Special Equipment Inspection Institute Co. , Ltd. , Jinan 250014, Shandong, China

Received:2022-04-13 Revised:2022-05-25 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-11-10
Contact: BI Haisheng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

油气管道腐蚀具有随机性，且腐蚀声发射源信号在传播过程中还会发生一定的衰减和畸变，致使管道腐蚀声发射信号的特征提取与准确识别相当困难。本文通过构建X90钢腐蚀声发射监测实验系统，采集腐蚀声发射原位信号和衰减信号进行对比分析。并通过时频分析，小波分解与重构以及盲目反卷积复原对信号进行进一步的分析。结果表明，盲目反卷积算法对于小波变换处理后的腐蚀声发射的复原十分有效，信号频率主要集中在130~170kHz，部分高频频率峰值在200kHz和250kHz，衰减的高频信号得到较好的恢复，从而使检测信号更加逼近X90钢腐蚀源信号的特征。信号复原对现场油气管道腐蚀声发射检测与评价具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: X90钢, 腐蚀, 声发射, 盲目反卷积算法, 信号复原

Abstract:

The corrosion of oil and gas pipelines is random, and the corrosion acoustic emission source signal will have some attenuation and distortion in the propagation process, and thus it is quite difficult to extract and identify the characteristics of the corrosion acoustic emission signal of pipelines. The corrosion acoustic emission monitoring experiment systems of X90 steel were constructed to collect in-situ and attenuated corrosion acoustic emission signals, and conducted comparative analysis. The signal was further analyzed by time-frequency analysis, wavelet decomposition and reconstruction and blind deconvolution restoration. The results showed that the blind deconvolution algorithm was very effective for the restoration of corrosion acoustic emission after wavelet transform processing. The signal frequency was mainly concentrated in 130—170kHz, and part of the high frequency peak was in 200kHz and 250kHz. The attenuated high frequency signal can be recovered well so that the detection signal was closer to the characteristics of the corrosion source signal of X90 steel. Signal recovery had important guiding significance for acoustic emission detection and evaluation of oil and gas pipeline corrosion.

Key words: X90 steel, corrosion, acoustic emission, blind deconvolution algorithm, signal recovery

中图分类号:

TE88

苗嘉旭, 陈仙江, 周洋洋, 贠智强, 张玉红, 毕海胜. 基于盲目反卷积算法的X90管线钢腐蚀声发射信号分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 60-71.

MIAO Jiaxu, CHEN Xianjiang, ZHOU Yangyang, YUN Zhiqiang, ZHANG Yuhong, BI Haisheng. Corrosion acoustic emission signal analysis of X90 pipeline steel based on blind deconvolution algorithm[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(S1): 60-71.

图/表 12

图1 管线钢腐蚀声发射监测实验系统

图2 声发射检测仪和探头

图3 背景噪声测试

图4 A、B、C、D的时频域波形图

图5 基于盲目反卷积算法复原的信号时频域波形图

图6 传感器A信号小波变换后时频域波形图

图7 小波重构后的时频域波形图

图8 不同位置的信号小波分解的时频域波形图

图9 cd2信号小波重构后的声发射信号时频域波形图

图8 （续）

图10 不同位置基于小波重构的信号盲反卷复原时频域波形图

参考文献 31

1	毕海胜, 李自力, 胡德栋, 等. 储罐底板钢点蚀过程中声发射信号的聚类分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6): 145-152.
	BI Haisheng, LI Zili, HU Dedong, et al. Cluster analysis of acoustic emission signals during tank bottom steel pitting corrosion process[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(6): 145-152.
2	王枭, 杨剑锋, 陈良超. 声发射技术在压力容器裂纹检测中的应用[J]. 化学工程师, 2019, 33(12): 57-59.
	WANG Xiao, YANG Jianfeng, CHEN Liangchao. Application of acoustic emission technology in crack detection of pressure vessels[J]. Chemical Engineer, 2019, 33(12): 57-59.
3	梁伟, 张来斌, 王朝晖. 声发射检测技术在管道泄漏信号识别中的应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2007, 7(8): 1596-1601.
	LIANG Wei, ZHANG Laibin, WANG Zhaohui. Application of acoustic emission technique in pipeline leak detection[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2007, 7(8): 1596-1601.
4	雷哲, 王志刚, 刘昌明, 等. 耐火材料声发射源信号的盲反卷恢复[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2015(6): 91-94.
	LEI Zhe, WANG Zhigang, LIU Changming, et al. Blind deconvolution of refractory acoustic emission source signal[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2015(6): 91-94.
5	任聪静, 陈敏, 曹翌佳, 等. 声发射技术在化工过程中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(5): 918-929.
	REN Congjing, CHEN Min, CAO Yijia, et al. Application of passive acoustic emission measurement in chemical processes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2011, 30(5): 918-929.
6	刘子龙. 关于盲信号处理技术发展研究[J]. 电子测试, 2017(13): 55-56.
	LIU Zilong. Research on the development of blind signal processing technology[J]. Electronic Test, 2017(13): 55-56.
7	MOHEBBIAN M R, ALAM M W, WAHID K A, et al. Single channel high noise level ECG deconvolution using optimized blind adaptive filtering and fixed-point convolution kernel compensation[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2020, 57: 101673.
8	Jürgen FREUDENBERGER, STENZEL Sebastian. Time-frequency masking for convolutive and noisy mixtures[C]//2011 Joint Workshop on Hands-free Speech Communication and Microphone Arrays. May 30 - June 1, 2011, Edinburgh, UK. IEEE, 2011: 104-108.
9	毕海胜, 李自力, 程远鹏, 等. 声发射检测技术在油气储运系统中的应用[J]. 化工机械, 2014, 41(3): 286-290.
	BI Haisheng, LI Zili, CHENG Yuanpeng, et al. Application of acoustic emission technology in oil and gas storage and transportation system[J]. Chemical Engineering & Machinery, 2014, 41(3): 286-290.
10	CHOI S, CICHOCKI A, PARK H, et al. Blind source separation and independent analysis: A review[J].Neutral Information Processing, 2005, 6(1): 1-57.
11	KOCUR G K. Deconvolution of acoustic emissions for source localization using time reverse modeling[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 387: 66-78.
12	毕海胜, 贠智强, 李慧瑶, 等. 基于盲目反卷积算法的声发射源信号复原研究进展[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2021, 58(6): 73-83.
	BI Haisheng, YUN Zhiqiang, LI Huiyao, et al. Research progress of acoustic emission signal recovery based on blind deconvolution algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(6): 73-83.
13	PAN Nan, WU Xing, GUO Yu. Bearing compound fault acoustic diagnosis based on improved blind deconvolution algorithm[J]. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 39(3): 657-667.
14	BO Z, YANAN Z, CHANGZHENG C. Acoustic emission detection of fatigue cracks in wind turbine blades based on blind deconvolution separation[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2017, 40(6): 959-970.
15	雷哲. 基于盲反卷的耐火材料声发射源信号恢复研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2015.
	LEI Zhe. The research of acoustic emission signal recovery based on blind deconvolution[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2015.
16	杨军, 毕宗岳, 王雪怡, 等. X90高强管线钢应变时效行为及敏感时间研究[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2022, 29(1): 167-176.
	YANG Jun, BI Zongyue, WANG Xueyi, et al. Strain aging behavior and sensitive time of X90 high-strength pipeline steel[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2022, 29(1): 167-176.
17	王国丽, 管伟, 韩景宽, 等. X100、X90管线钢管在高压输气管道中应用的方案研究[J]. 石油规划设计, 2015, 26(2): 1-6, 50.
	WANG Guoli, GUAN Wei, HAN Jingkuan, et al. Application research on X100 and X90 steel in the high pressure gas pipeline[J]. Petroleum Planning & Engineering, 2015, 26(2): 1-6, 50.
18	冯耀荣, 吉玲康, 李为卫, 等. 中国X80管线钢和钢管研发应用进展及展望[J]. 油气储运, 2020, 39(6): 612-622.
	FENG Yaorong, JI Lingkang, LI Weiwei, et al. Progress and prospects of research and application of X80 pipeline steel and steel pipe in China[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(6): 612-622.
19	张鹏林, 王汝姣, 姜宜成, 等. X60管线钢腐蚀过程的声发射监测实验[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2016, 42(6): 9-13.
	ZHANG Penglin, WANG Rujiao, JIANG Yicheng, et al. Research of acoustic emission monitoring in corrosion process of X60 pipeline steel[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2016, 42(6): 9-13.
20	李小巍, 徐连勇, 韩永典. 基于声发射的电化学充氢时间对X100管线钢力学性能和断裂韧度的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(20): 160-167.
	LI Xiaowei, XU Lianyong, HAN Yongdian. Effect of electrochemical charging time on mechanical property, fracture toughness of X100 pipeline steel based on acoustic emission monitoring[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(20): 160-167.
21	李颖. FRP复合材料结垢损伤声发射信号传播特性研究[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2014.
	LI Ying. Research on acoustic emission signal propagation characteristic of FRP composite material construction in the process of damage[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2014.
22	李云龙. 声发射检测技术在油气储运系统中的应用[J]. 石化技术, 2018, 25(11): 65.
	LI Yunlong. Application of acoustic emission detection technology in oil and gas storage and transportation system[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2018, 25(11): 65.
23	杨洪银, 王泽旭, 陈祎平, 等. 基于声发射的油气管道腐蚀检测[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2015, 34(9): 34-35, 38.
	YANG Hongyin, WANG Zexu, CHEN Yiping, et al. Corrosion detection of oil and gas pipeline based on acoustic emission [J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2015, 34(9): 34-35, 38.
24	JR H. Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity[M]. A. A. Balkema Publishers, 2005.
25	NI Qingqing, IWAMOTO Masaharu. Wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals in failure of model composites[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2002, 69(6): 717-728.
26	杜刚, 靳世久, 付铜玲, 等. 基于平均频谱的储油罐罐底腐蚀声发射特征分析[J]. 纳米技术与精密工程, 2011, 9(2): 157-161.
	DU Gang, JIN Shijiu, FU Tongling, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of tank bottom corrosion based on average spectrum[J]. Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering, 2011, 9(2): 157-161.
27	史慧扬, 李海洋, 王召巴, 等. 基于小波包能量谱的声发射信号处理技术[J]. 测试技术学报, 2019, 33(3): 201-208.
	SHI Huiyang, LI Haiyang, WANG Zhaoba, et al. Acoustic emission signal processing technology based on wavelet packet energy spectrum[J]. Journal of Test and Measurement Technology, 2019, 33(3): 201-208.
28	DIETZEN Thomas, SPRIET Ann, TIRRY Wouter, et al. Comparative analysis of generalized sidelobe cancellation and multi-channel linear prediction for speech dereverberation and noise reduction[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2019, 27(3): 544-558.
29	丁穗坤. 斜拉桥关键构件腐蚀损伤声发射监测技术[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2011.
	DING Suikun. Acoustic emission monitoring technology of key members corrosion damage for the cable-stayed bridge[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2011.
30	齐添添, 陈尧, 何才厚, 等. 损伤声发射信号小波包神经网络特征识别方法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2021, 44(1): 124-130.
	QI Tiantian, CHEN Yao, HE Caihou, et al. A wavelet packet neural network feature recognition method for damage acoustic emission signals[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2021, 44(1): 124-130.
31	HAN Cong, YANG Guoan, WANG Jianye, et al. The research on propagation characteristics of acoustic emission signals in stiffened plates based on the multipath propagation model[J]. Ultrasonics, 2020, 108: 106177.

[1]	赵巍, 赵德银, 李世瀚, 刘洪达, 孙进, 郭艳秋. 三嗪型天然气管道缓蚀型减阻剂合成与应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 391-399.
[2]	王鑫, 王兵兵, 杨威, 徐志明. 金属表面PDA/PTFE超疏水涂层抑垢与耐腐蚀性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4315-4321.
[3]	刘战剑, 付雨欣, 任丽娜, 张曦光, 袁中涛, 杨楠, 汪怀远. 超疏水涂层在防腐阻垢领域研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2999-3011.
[4]	李瑞东, 黄辉, 同国虎, 王跃社. 原油精馏塔中铵盐吸湿特性及其腐蚀行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2809-2818.
[5]	路思佳, 李晓良, 赵会艳, 田志娟, 郑兴. 电化学对循环冷却水系统碳钢的结垢与腐蚀影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2142-2150.
[6]	何阳, 李思盈, 李传强, 袁小亚, 郑旭煦. 热还原氧化石墨烯/环氧树脂复合涂层的防腐性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1983-1994.
[7]	杜保宁, 赵珊, 刘向卿, 张毅, 肖雅茹, 张少飞, 李田田, 孙金峰. 纳米多孔CuMn基氧化物电极的制备及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1484-1492.
[8]	阳清正, 张太亮, 刘从胜, 白毅, 程鑫, 郑存川. 双子型咪唑啉季铵盐缓蚀剂的制备及缓蚀机理[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5436-5444.
[9]	李博申, 魏铭, 胡瑶瑶, 董月林, 董群锋, 杨立峰. 改性h-BN/聚氨酯丙烯酸酯涂料的制备与性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3194-3202.
[10]	王新宇, 黄亚继, 徐力刚, 李志远, 李偲, 刘晓东. 调节同层二次风以缓解双切圆锅炉高温腐蚀的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2292-2300.
[11]	张立胜, 黄山, 刘师承, 周屈兰, 裴爱霞, 李娜. 克劳斯工艺防腐蚀涂层数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 327-333.
[12]	王凯, 黄慧, 南翠红, 王跃社, 卢金玲. 油水分层流条件下腐蚀动力学特性模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 40-47.
[13]	王亮才, 陈宇, 赵曼淇, 吴杰龙, 王哲, 马欢欢, 周建斌. 稻壳基SiO₂的提取及其含量对铜基摩擦材料性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4397-4405.
[14]	姚久提, 魏铭, 刘晓芳, 胡可, 叶桐, 董群锋, 杨立峰. 氟硅改性无溶剂环氧涂料的制备与性能[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4421-4427.
[15]	叶桐, 魏铭, 刘晓芳, 姚久提, 董群锋, 杨立峰. 磷酸酯反应型乳化剂在叔丙乳液中的应用及防腐性能[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4413-4420.

基于盲目反卷积算法的X90管线钢腐蚀声发射信号分析

Corrosion acoustic emission signal analysis of X90 pipeline steel based on blind deconvolution algorithm

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价