基于CO2稀释的旋流无焰燃烧理论判别方法

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2192

化工进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 1272-1282.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2192

• 二氧化碳的捕集、封存及利用 • 上一篇下一篇

基于CO₂稀释的旋流无焰燃烧理论判别方法

冯乐乐¹^,²(), 周思博¹, 董脉帆¹, 刘杰¹, 吴玉新²

^1.中国矿业大学安全工程学院，江苏徐州 221116
^2.清华大学能源与动力工程系热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室，北京 100084

收稿日期:2021-10-26 修回日期:2021-12-07 出版日期:2022-03-23 发布日期:2022-03-28
通讯作者: 冯乐乐
作者简介:冯乐乐（1994—），男，博士，副研究员，硕士生导师，研究方向为清洁燃烧技术。E-mail： fenglele@cumt.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52106189)

Theoretical criterion of swirl flameless combustion based on CO₂ dilution

FENG Lele¹^,²(), ZHOU Sibo¹, DONG Maifan¹, LIU Jie¹, WU Yuxin²

^1.School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
^2.Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2021-10-26 Revised:2021-12-07 Online:2022-03-23 Published:2022-03-28
Contact: FENG Lele

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于温度判据和时间判据，本文建立了考虑旋流入口条件和CO₂稀释的无焰燃烧理论判别方法并进行验证，进而讨论了结构参数和操作参数对燃烧模式和火焰稳定性的影响。模型预测的旋流无焰燃烧临界氧浓度与文献中实验数据相比，最大相对误差不超过8%。降低氧浓度、减小当量比或提高入口流量时，温度判据1变化不大，而时间判据更易满足，因此有利于实现无焰燃烧；低旋流数条件下，无焰燃烧稳定性较差。增大燃烧室高度时，温度判据1更易满足，而时间判据更难满足，温度判据1分界线下移更快，有利于形成无焰燃烧；减小燃烧室截面积时，温度判据1变化不大，而时间判据更易满足，有利于实现无焰燃烧；增大燃烧器出口面积时，温度判据1和时间判据均更难满足，且时间判据分界线下移更快，不利于形成无焰燃烧。

关键词: 无焰燃烧, 二氧化碳利用, 旋流入口, 反应时间尺度, 火焰稳定性

Abstract:

Theoretical identification method of flameless combustion was established and validated considering the swirl inlet and CO₂ dilution based on temperature criterion and time criterion. The effects of structural and operational parameters on the combustion mode and flame stability were discussed. The critical oxygen concentration for swirl flameless combustion had an error within 8% compared to those reported in literature. With decreasing oxygen concentration, reducing equivalence ratio, or increasing flow rate, the temperature criterion barely changed, while the time criterion was easier to be satisfied, which was good for flameless combustion. The flame stability was worse for flameless combustion with a lower swirl number. As the height of combustion chamber increased, the temperature criterion was easier to be satisfied, while the time criterion was more difficult to be satisfied and the boundary corresponding to the temperature criterion moved downwards faster, which was good for flameless combustion. As the intersecting surface of combustion chamber decreased, the temperature criterion changed little, while the time criterion was easier to be satisfied, which was good for flameless combustion. As the outlet surface of combustor increased, both the temperature criterion and time criterion were more difficult to be satisfied, while the boundary corresponding to the time criterion moved downwards faster, which was bad for flameless combustion.

Key words: flameless combustion, carbon dioxide utilization, swirl inlet, reaction time scale, flame stability

中图分类号:

冯乐乐, 周思博, 董脉帆, 刘杰, 吴玉新. 基于CO₂稀释的旋流无焰燃烧理论判别方法[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1272-1282.

FENG Lele, ZHOU Sibo, DONG Maifan, LIU Jie, WU Yuxin. Theoretical criterion of swirl flameless combustion based on CO₂ dilution[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1272-1282.

图/表 10

表1 计算工况所用参数

分组	d₁/m	d₂/m	h/m	Q/kW	S	T/K	Φ	$x O 2$ /%	氧化剂
第1组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.77	300	0.6~0.9	11~21	空气+N₂/CO₂
第2组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.77	300~700	0.9	11~21	空气+N₂/CO₂
第3组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	11~21	O₂+CO₂
第4组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.3~0.8	21	O₂+CO₂
第5组	0.02	0.06	0.2	2~6	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	21	O₂+CO₂
第6组	0.02	0.06	0.1~0.3	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	15	O₂+CO₂
第7组	0.02	0.02~0.10	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	15	O₂+CO₂
第8组	0.018~0.026	0.06	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	15	O₂+CO₂

表1 计算工况所用参数

分组	d₁/m	d₂/m	h/m	Q/kW	S	T/K	Φ	$x O 2$ /%	氧化剂
第1组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.77	300	0.6~0.9	11~21	空气+N₂/CO₂
第2组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.77	300~700	0.9	11~21	空气+N₂/CO₂
第3组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	11~21	O₂+CO₂
第4组	0.02	0.06	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.3~0.8	21	O₂+CO₂
第5组	0.02	0.06	0.2	2~6	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	21	O₂+CO₂
第6组	0.02	0.06	0.1~0.3	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	15	O₂+CO₂
第7组	0.02	0.02~0.10	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	15	O₂+CO₂
第8组	0.018~0.026	0.06	0.2	3	0.1~1.3	300~900	0.9	15	O₂+CO₂

图1 当量比对临界氧浓度的影响

图2 预热温度对临界氧浓度的影响

图3 不同氧浓度下的燃烧模式图谱

图4 不同当量比下的燃烧模式图谱

图5 不同燃料输入率下的燃烧模式图谱

图6 不同燃烧室高度下的燃烧模式图谱

图7 不同燃烧室截面直径下的燃烧模式图谱

图8 不同燃烧器出口直径下的燃烧模式图谱

图9 典型气氛下的燃烧模式图谱

参考文献 19

1	黄强, 张立麒, 周栋, 等. 富氧燃烧烟气压缩净化的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(3): 1152-1160.
	HUANG Qiang, ZHANG Liqi, ZHOU Dong, et al. Research and development on the purification of oxy-fuel combustion flue gas in the process of compression[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(3): 1152-1160.
2	朱晓宇, 杨卫娟, 张兴, 等. 带压环境中CO₂/H₂O/N₂气体稀释对合成气层流火焰速度的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(11): 4357-4366.
	ZHU Xiaoyu, YANG Weijuan, ZHANG Xing, et al. Effect of CO₂/H₂O/N₂ gas dilution on laminar flame speeds of syngas at elevated pressure[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(11): 4357-4366.
3	SAHA M, DALLY B B, CHINNICI A, et al. Effect of co-flow oxygen concentration on the MILD combustion of pulverised coal[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2019, 193: 7-18.
4	ZHANG Shuwei, LU Jianyi, LIU Chunjing, et al. Characterization of micro-crystalline structure and particle size distribution of soot generated from MILD-OCC flame[J]. Fuel, 2020, 267: 117259.
5	ZHANG Tingyao, HU Zhongfa, ZHOU Yuegui. Numerical analysis on the characteristic chemical time scale and combustion regime of natural gas MILD combustion[J]. Fuel, 2020, 282: 118811.
6	HUANG Mingming, LI Ruichuan, XU Jikang, et al. Effect of thermal input, excess air coefficient and combustion mode on natural gas MILD combustion in industrial-scale furnace[J]. Fuel, 2021, 302: 121179.
7	LI P, WANG F, TU Y, et al. Moderate or intense low-oxygen dilution oxy-combustion characteristics of light oil and pulverized coal in a pilot-scale furnace[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(2): 1524-1535.
8	ZENG Zhukai, ZHANG Tingyao, ZHENG Shankai, et al. Ignition and combustion characteristics of coal particles under high-temperature and low-oxygen environments mimicking MILD oxy-coal combustion conditions[J]. Fuel, 2019, 253: 1104-1113.
9	宋民航, 黄云, 黄骞, 等. 旋流煤粉燃烧器低负荷稳燃技术探讨[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(13): 4552-4566.
	SONG Minhang, HUANG Yun, HUANG Qian, et al. Discussion on low-load stable combustion technology of swirl pulverized-coal burner[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(13): 4552-4566.
10	KHALIL A E E, GUPTA A K. Fostering distributed combustion in a swirl burner using prevaporized liquid fuels[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 211: 513-522.
11	KHALIL A E E, GUPTA A K. Towards colorless distributed combustion regime[J]. Fuel, 2017, 195: 113-122.
12	张扬, 张琦, 吴玉新, 等. 基于PSR的非绝热MILD燃烧研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40(1): 229-232.
	ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Qi, WU Yuxin, et al. On non-adiabatic MILD combustion based on the PSR model[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(1): 229-232.
13	EVANS M J, MEDWELL P R, WU H, et al. Classification and lift-off height prediction of non-premixed MILD and autoignitive flames[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(3): 4297-4304.
14	FENG Lele, ZHANG Qi, WU Yuxin, et al. Theoretical analysis on the criteria of MILD coal combustion[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(11): 11923-11931.
15	刘丽丽, 崔永安, 乔晓磊, 等. 低浓度瓦斯与煤粉耦合体系着火温度实验研究[J]. 热力发电, 2016, 45(10): 60-63, 69.
	LIU Lili, CUI Yongan, QIAO Xiaolei, et al. Experimental study on ignition temperature of coupling system of low-concentration gas and pulverized coal[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2016, 45(10): 60-63, 69.
16	秦裕琨, 孙锐, 李争起, 等. 径向浓淡旋流煤粉燃烧器气流湍流特性的冷态试验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2001, 22(1): 111-114.
	QIN Yukun, SUN Rui, LI Zhengqi, et al. Experimental study on the turbulent properties of isothermal flow from radial bias combustion swirl burner[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2001, 22(1): 111-114.
17	蒋平, 郭印诚, 张会强, 等. 矩形射流扩散火焰近区拟序结构的周期性研究[C]//中国工程热物理学会第十一届燃烧学学术会议, 2005.
	JIANG Ping, GUO Yincheng, ZHANG Huiqiang, et al. Periodic study on near zone coherent structure of rectangular jet diffusion flame[C]//The 11th Academic Conference on combustion of Chinese society of Engineering Thermophysics, 2005.
18	KARYEYEN S, FESER J S, JAHODA E, et al. Development of distributed combustion index from a swirl-assisted burner[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 268: 114967.
19	WEIDMANN M, HONORÉ D, VERBAERE V, et al. Experimental characterization of pulverized coal MILD flameless combustion from detailed measurements in a pilot-scale facility[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 168: 365-377.

[1]	尚丽, 刘双, 沈群, 张凌云, 孙楠楠, 魏伟. 典型二氧化碳利用技术的低碳成效综合评估[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1199-1208.
[2]	李函珂, 党成雄, 杨光星, 曹永海, 王红娟, 彭峰, 余皓. 面向二氧化碳捕集的过程强化技术进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(12): 4919-4939.

基于CO₂稀释的旋流无焰燃烧理论判别方法

Theoretical criterion of swirl flameless combustion based on CO₂ dilution

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 19

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价