气液喷射器的结构设计与性能分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-1235

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

喷射式环流反应器是一种高效的多相反应器，由于其具有良好的传热、传质和混合特性，目前已被广泛应用于生物、化学、制冷和环境保护等工程领域。气液喷射器作为喷射式环流反应器的核心部件之一，其结构尺寸对环流反应器的传质特性和适用环境都具有显著影响。为考察结构尺寸对喷射器性能的影响，本文根据其工作原理，设计了一台模试气液喷射器，并通过冷模试验对其进行性能测试研究。试验结果表明：气液喷射器的引气能力主要取决于其混合喉管与喷嘴出口截面比f₃/f₁以及喷射器进出口压力降Δp_p/Δp_c，而环流反应器的气含率仅与喷射器的液相射流量和气体引射量有关。相同液相流量条件下，喷射器的最大引射空气量随截面比f₃/f₁的增大而增大，反应器内的平均气含率随之增加；提高液相射流与引射气体的速度差能够加强两股流体间的剪切作用，使气泡更易发生破碎。当喷射器的气液比大于2.6时，反应器内的混合流体可达到乳化状态。

关键词: 喷射器, 气液两相流, 气体引射量, 气含率, 气泡

Abstract:

Jet loop reactors (JLR) are widely used in industry, such as biochemical, chemical, refrigerant processes and environmental protection, due to their favorable heat and mass transfer and mixing characteristics. As one of the core components of the jet loop reactor, the structure size of the gas-liquid ejector has significant influence on mass transfer characteristics and application environment of the jet loop reactor. For the purpose of exploring the effect of structure size on the ejector performance, a bench-scale gas-liquid ejector was designed according to its working principle, and its performance was tested by a cold model experiment. The results showed that the gas entrainment capacity of the ejector depends on the cross-section ratio of its mixing throat and nozzle outlet (f₃/f₁), as well as the pressure drop at the inlet and outlet pressure of the ejector (Δp_p/Δp_c), while the gas holdup of the loop reactor is only related to the liquid flow rate and the gas entrainment rate. Under the same liquid flow conditions, the maximum gas entrainment rate of the ejector increases with the rise of the section ratio f₃/f₁, and the average gas holdup in the reactor increases accordingly. The shear effect between the two fluids can be enhanced through increasing the velocity difference between the liquid jet and the ejector gas, which can also make the bubbles more susceptible to breakage. The study also found that the mixed fluid in the reactor can reach the emulsifying state in the case of the gas-liquid ratio of the ejector is greater than 2.6.

Key words: ejector, gas-liquid flow, gas entrainment rate, gas holdup, bubble

中图分类号:

TQ052.5

何磊,苏毅,揭涛,梁健,唐昭帆,杨冰冰,张世程. 气液喷射器的结构设计与性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(4): 1245-1251.

Lei HE,Yi SU,Tao JIE,Jian LIANG,Zhaofan TANG,Bingbing YANG,Shicheng ZHANG. Structural design and performance analysis of gas-liquid ejector[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(4): 1245-1251.

图/表 2

参考文献 19

1	杨高东, 刘小鹃, 吴平铿, 等. 喷射环流反应器应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(9): 1878-1883.
	YANG Gaodong, LIU Xiaojuan, WU Pingkeng, et al. Research progress of application of jet-loop-reactor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2011, 30(9): 1878-1883.
2	丁富新, 李飞, 袁乃驹. 环流反应器的发展和应用[J]. 石油化工, 2004, 33(9): 801-807.
	DING Fuxin, LI Fei, YUAN Naiju. Application and development of airlift loop reactor[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2004, 33(9): 801-807.
3	李小杰, 杨阿三, 孙勤, 等. 两级喷射式环流反应器流体力学与传质特性研究[J]. 化学工程, 2018, 46(8): 64-68.
	LI Xiaojie, YANG Asan, SUN Qin, et al. Study on hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics of two-stage jet loop reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering, 2018, 46(8): 64-68.
4	范军领, 李帅, 韩雷, 等. 回路反应器工业应用及研究现状[J]. 石油化工设备, 2018, 47(2): 34-37.
	FAN Junling, LI Shuai, HAN Lei, et al. Industrial application and research status of jet loop reactor[J]. Petro-Chemical Equipment, 2018, 47(2): 34-37.
5	陈阿强, 黄青山, 耿淑君, 等. 喷射反应器内气液两相流体动力学特征[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(4): 1257-1266.
	CHEN Aqiang, HUANG Qingshan, GENG Shujun, et al. Hydrodynamic characteristics of gas-liquid two phase flow in jet reactors[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(4): 1257-1266.
6	MATHPATI C S, DESHPANDE S S, JOSHI J B. Computational and experimental fluid dynamics of jet loop reactor[J]. AIChE Journal, 2010, 55(11): 2526-2544.
7	HE S, LI Y, WANG R Z. Progress of mathematical modeling on ejectors[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(8): 1760-1780.
8	OPLETAL M, NOVOTNÝ P, LINEK V, et al. Gas suction and mass transfer in gas-liquid up-flow ejector loop reactors. Effect of nozzle and ejector geometry[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 353: 436-452.
9	谢兰漪, 刘斌, 姜燕, 等. 液体喷射式环流反应器冷模与热模实验研究[J]. 沈阳化工大学学报, 2003, 17(2): 118-122.
	XIE Lanyi, LIU Bin, JIANG Yan, et al. Study of liquid jet loop reactor’s cold model and pilot scale experiment[J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Chemical Technology, 2003, 17(2): 118-122.
10	YADAV R L, PATWARDHAN A W. Design aspects of ejectors: effects of suction chamber geometry[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(15): 3886-3897.
11	CRAMERS P H M R, BEENACKERS A A C M. Influence of the ejector configuration, scale and the gas density on the mass transfer characteristics of gas-liquid ejectors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2001, 82(1): 131-141.
12	SHARMA D V, PATWARDHAN A W, RANADE V V. Estimation of gas induction in jet loop reactors: influence of nozzle designs[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2017, 125: 24-34.
13	MANDAL A, KUNDU G, MUKHERJEE D. Gas-holdup distribution and energy dissipation in an ejector-induced downflow bubble column: the case of non-Newtonian liquid[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(13): 2705-2713.
14	索科洛夫, 津格尔. 喷射器[M]. 黄秋云, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1977.
	SOKOLOV E Я, JINGEL H M. Ejector[M]. HUANG Qiuyun, trans. Beijing: Science Press, 1977.
15	TINGE J T, CASADO A J R. Influence of pressure on the gas hold-up of aqueous activated carbon slurries in a down flow jet loop reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(17): 3575-3580.
16	郭秋丽, 赵德智, 刘永民, 等. 气升式环流反应器特性参数的研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2017, 46(4): 765-769.
	GUO Qiuli, ZHAO Dezhi, LIU Yongmin, et al. Research progress on characteristic parameters of airlift loop reactor[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2017, 46(4): 765-769.
17	KOUTITA K, LIZZUL A M, CAMPOS L C, et al. A theoretical fluid dynamic model for estimation of the hold-up and liquid velocity in an external loop airlift bioreactor[J]. International Journal of Applied, 2015, 5(4): 11-29.
18	毕荣山, 杨青青, 陈宸, 等. 下喷式环流反应器环隙气含率影响因素[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(4): 1696-1701.
	BI Rongshan, YANG Qingqing, CHEN Chen, et al. Study on effects of annular gas holdup in reversed flow jet loop reactor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(4): 1696-1701.
19	李宝璋, 尚龙安, 姜信真, 等. 下喷式环流反应器气含率研究[J]. 化工学报, 1991, 42(2): 147-154.
	LI Baozhang, SHANG Long'an, JIANG Xinzhen, et al. The gas hold-up of downflow liquid jet loop reactor[J]. CIESC Journal, 1991, 42(2): 147-154.

[1]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[2]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[3]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[4]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[5]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[6]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[7]	奚永兰, 王成成, 叶小梅, 刘洋, 贾昭炎, 曹春晖, 韩挺, 张应鹏, 田雨. 微纳米气泡在厌氧消化中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4414-4423.
[8]	陈蔚阳, 宋欣, 殷亚然, 张先明, 朱春英, 付涛涛, 马友光. 矩形微通道内液相黏度对气泡界面的作用机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3468-3477.
[9]	章凯, 金捍宇, 刘思宇, 王帅. 鼓泡流态化气泡间相互作用下相间传质过程的模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2828-2835.
[10]	刘厚励, 顾中浩, 阳康, 张莉. 3D打印槽道结构槽宽对池沸腾传热特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2282-2288.
[11]	庞力平, 袁虎, 丘文生, 段立强, 李文学. 深度调峰锅炉水动力特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1708-1718.
[12]	谢迎春, 王倩倩, 马永丽, 孙国强, 刘明言. 超声波与紫外线耦合脱气杀菌[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1629-1637.
[13]	陈磊, 田科, 曾力, 张俊丰, 黄妍, 何峰. 焦化脱硫废杂盐资源化新技术[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 480-487.
[14]	陈二军, 张玉玲, 路少磊, 段海洋, 靳文章. 空气纳米气泡的稳定性及理化特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4673-4681.
[15]	张猛, 李树谦, 张东, 马坤茹. 微细通道内蒸汽直接接触间歇凝结汽液相界面运动特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4644-4652.