基于Aspen Plus抚顺式油页岩干馏过程模拟方法研究

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017.01.016

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (01): 121-128.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017.01.016

基于Aspen Plus抚顺式油页岩干馏过程模拟方法研究

柏静儒¹, 李启凡¹, 吴海涛¹, 白章², 王擎¹

1 东北电力大学油页岩综合利用教育部工程研究中心, 吉林吉林 132012;
2 中国科学院工程热物理研究所, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2016-06-14 修回日期:2016-07-07 出版日期:2017-01-05 发布日期:2017-01-05
通讯作者: 柏静儒(1973-),女,博士,教授,主要从事油页岩综合利用技术方面的研究工作。E-mail:bai630@mail.nedu.edu.cn。
作者简介:柏静儒(1973-),女,博士,教授,主要从事油页岩综合利用技术方面的研究工作。E-mail:bai630@mail.nedu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
吉林省重点科技公关项目（20140204004SF）。

Simulation of Fushun type retort for oil shale processing method using Aspen Plus

BAI Jingru¹, LI Qifan¹, WU Haitao¹, BAI Zhang², WANG Qing¹

1 Engineering Research Centre of Ministry of Education for Comprehensive Utilization of Oil Shale, Northeast Dianli University, Jilin 132012, Jilin, China;
2 Institute of Engineering Thermal Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2016-06-14 Revised:2016-07-07 Online:2017-01-05 Published:2017-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用Aspen Plus软件对抚顺式油页岩干馏过程进行模拟，采用带Fortran气化动力学子程序的自定义反应模型来代替Gibbs反应器，通过与文献中实验数据对比来验证模拟结果的准确性，结果吻合良好。利用该模型研究了主风量和主风饱和度等参数对气体组分、气体热值、气化效率和热效率的影响。研究结果表明：随着气化温度的增加，CO的含量增加，而H₂和CH₄的含量减少，同时气体的热值呈现出逐渐降低的趋势；提高主风量，气化效率、干发生气热效率（η_d）和湿发生气热效率（η_w）均有显著提高，但是过量空气的通入将会造成烧油，建议主风量控制在7.38×10⁴~8.61×10⁴m³/h最佳；提高主风饱和度，气化温度呈线性下降；当主风饱和度为90℃时，湿发生气热效率（η_w）达到最大，为37.08%；但是综合考虑实际过程中的合理运行，建议主风饱和度选取80℃为宜。

关键词: 油页岩, 抚顺式干馏过程, Aspen Plus, 模拟

Abstract: In this paper,Aspen Plus was used to simulate Fushun type retort for oil shale processing using a user-defined model with gasification kinetics of Fortran subroutines to replace Gibbs reactor.The accuracy of results was verified by comparing document of the experimental data and simulation of the data,which indicated that the results were in good agreement.Meanwhile,the effects of the air volume as well as saturation of feeding air on the gas component,the calorific value of the gas,the gasification efficiency and the thermal efficiency were systematically studied.The results showed that the increase of gasification temperature could decrease H₂ and CH₄ fractions and promote the generation of CO. Furthermore, the high temperature gasification would lead to a decrease of heating value. The increase of the air volume could raise the gasification efficiency and the thermal efficiency(η_w)as well as the thermal efficiency(η_d). Because the excess air may cause oil firing,it was suggested that the air volume was best in the range of 7.38×10⁴-8.61×10⁴m³/h. The gasification temperature declined linearly when the saturation of feeding air increased. When the saturation of feeding air maintained 90℃,the thermal efficiency(η_w)reached the maximum value of 37.08%.But considering the reasonable operation in the actual process,the saturation of air of 80℃ was recommended.

Key words: oil shale, Fushun type retort process, Aspen Plus, simulation

中图分类号:

TE662

柏静儒, 李启凡, 吴海涛, 白章, 王擎. 基于Aspen Plus抚顺式油页岩干馏过程模拟方法研究[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(01): 121-128.

BAI Jingru, LI Qifan, WU Haitao, BAI Zhang, WANG Qing. Simulation of Fushun type retort for oil shale processing method using Aspen Plus[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2017, 36(01): 121-128.

参考文献

[1] 钱家麟,王剑秋,李术元. 世界油页岩综述[J]. 中国能源,2006,28(8):16-19. QIAN J L,WANG J Q,LI S Y.World oil shale[J].Energy of China,2006,28(8):16-19.
[2] 马玲,尹秀英,孙昊,等. 世界油页岩资源开发利用现状与发展前景[J]. 世界地质,2012,31(4):772-777. MA L,YIN X Y,SUN H,et al. Present status of oil shale resource utilization in the world and its development prospects[J]. Global Geology,2012,31(4):772-777.
[3] 钱家麟,尹亮. 油页岩-石油的补充能源[M]. 北京:中国石化出版社,2008. QIAN J L,YIN L. Oil shale-petroleum alternative[M]. Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2008.
[4] DUNG N V,BENITO R G. Modeling of oil shale retorting block using ASPEN process simulator[J]. Fuel,1990,69(90):1113-1118.
[5] YAN H M,ZHANG D K. Modeling of a low temperature pyrolysis process using Aspen Plus[J]. Dev. Chem. Eng. Mineral Process,1999,7(5/6):577-591.
[6] 柏静儒,白章,李少华,等. 油页岩低温干馏过程的Aspen Plus模拟[J]. 现代化工,2012,32(3):85-88. BAI J R,BAI Z,LI S H,et al. Modeling of low temperature retorting process for oil shale using Aspen Plus[J]. Modern Chemical Industry,2012,32(3):85-88.
[7] 柏静儒,白章,王擎,等. 基于Aspen Plus的桦甸式油页岩干馏工艺系统模拟[J]. 化工学报,2012,63(12):4075-4081. BAI J R,BAI Z,WANG Q,et al. Process simulation for Huadian-type oil shale retorting system by Aspen Plus[J]. CIESC Journal,2012,63(12):4075-4081.
[8] 代正华,龚欣,王辅臣,等. 气流床粉煤气化的Gibbs自由能最小化模拟[J]. 燃料化学学报,2005,33(2):129-133. DAI Z H,GONG X,WANG F C,et al. Thermodynamic analysis of entrained-flow pulverized coal gasification by Gibbs free energy minimization[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2005,33(2):129-133.
[9] 张巍巍,陈雪莉,王辅臣,等. 基于Aspen Plus模拟生物质气流床气化工艺过程[J]. 太阳能学报,2007,28(12):1360-1364. ZHANG W W,CHEN X L,WANG F C,et al. Process simulation of biomass entrained flow gasification based on Aspen Plus[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2007,28(12):1360-1364.
[10] 白章,柏静儒,王擎,等. 抚顺式油页岩干馏工艺系统模拟及分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2014,34(14):2228-2234. BAI Z,BAI J R,WANG Q,et al. Process simulation and analysis of the Fushun-type oil shale retorting system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,2014,34(14):2228-2234.
[11] 陈世豪,曹志凯,师佳,等. 基于ASPEN PLUS的固定床煤气化稳态模拟方法研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2012(s1):167-172. CHEN S H,CAO Z K,SHI J,et al. Steady-state simulation of fixed bed for coal gasification using ASPEN PLUS[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2012(s1):167-172.
[12] 向银花,王洋,张建民,等. 煤气化动力学模型研究[J]. 燃料化学学报,2002,30(1):21-26. XIANG Y H,WANG Y,ZHANG J M,et al. A study on kinetic models of char gasification[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2002,30(1):21-26.
[13] 项友谦,张利平. 固定床煤气化过程的数学模型与模拟计算[J].煤气与热力,1999(5):8-11. XIANG Y Q,ZHANG L P. Mathematical model and simulate calculation for fixed-bed coal gasification[J]. Gas & Heat,1999(5):8-11.
[14] MCCARTHY D J,CLOSE R C. A preliminary study of the gasification kinetics of the residue from retorting a lignitic oil shale[J]. Fuel,1988,67(5):1083-1090.
[15] Aspen Plus. Aspen Plus getting started customizing unit operation models[M]. Cambridge,MA:Aspen Technology,Inc. 2001.

基于Aspen Plus抚顺式油页岩干馏过程模拟方法研究

Simulation of Fushun type retort for oil shale processing method using Aspen Plus

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[2]	徐若思, 谭蔚. C形管池沸腾两相流流场模拟与流固耦合分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 47-55.
[3]	张凤岐, 崔成东, 鲍学伟, 朱炜玄, 董宏光. 胺液吸收-分步解吸脱硫工艺的设计与评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[4]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[5]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[6]	李梦圆, 郭凡, 李群生. 聚乙烯醇生产中回收工段第三、第四精馏塔的模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[7]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[8]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[9]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[10]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[11]	许友好, 王维, 鲁波娜, 徐惠, 何鸣元. 中国炼油创新技术MIP的开发策略及启示[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4465-4470.
[12]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[13]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[14]	张帆, 陶少辉, 陈玉石, 项曙光. 基于改进恒热传输模型的精馏模拟初始化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4550-4558.
[15]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.