江阴市某建筑地源热泵系统性能的数值模拟

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-0120

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 4037-4042.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-0120

江阴市某建筑地源热泵系统性能的数值模拟

刘广平^1,2,3,4, 骆超^1,2,3, 龚宇烈^1,2,3, 邱泽晶^5,6, 郑鑫^5,6

1. 中国科学院广州能源研究所, 广东广州 510640;
2. 中国科学院可再生能源重点实验室, 广东广州 510640;
3. 广东省新能源和可再生能源研究开发与应用重点实验室, 广东广州 510640;
4. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
5. 南瑞集团公司(国网电力科学研究院), 江苏南京 211000;
6. 南瑞(武汉)电气设备与工程能效测评中心, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2017-01-19 修回日期:2017-07-03 出版日期:2017-11-05 发布日期:2017-11-05
通讯作者: 龚宇烈,博士,研究员,研究方向为地热能的能量转换技术。
作者简介:刘广平(1991-),男,硕士研究生。
基金资助:
国家电网公司科学技术项目（SGTYHT/15-JS-191）。

The ground source heat pump numerical simulation of a building in Jiangyin

LIU Guangping^1,2,3,4, LUO Chao^1,2,3, GONG Yulie^1,2,3, QIU Zejing^5,6, ZHENG Xin^5,6

1. Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
3. Guangdong Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
5. Nari Group Corporation(State Grid Electric Power Research Institute), Nanjing 211000, Jiangsu, China;
6. Nari(Wuhan) Electrical Equipment & Engineering Efficiency Evaluation Center, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China

Received:2017-01-19 Revised:2017-07-03 Online:2017-11-05 Published:2017-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对江阴市某建筑的地源热泵系统，利用TRNSYS软件，分别模拟不同埋管深度和不同冷热负荷比情况下，运行30年土壤平均温度的变化情况，分析了冬夏季供暖空调期内系统性能系数COP及热泵机组部分负荷率的变化情况，模拟结果表明，100m埋管深度比60m和80m埋管深度温度波动较小且温降较小，稳定性较好；在分别只满足热负荷和冷负荷需求的情况下，土壤平均温度分别下降了2.67℃和上升了2.15℃，而在满足冷热负荷需求时温度只下降了0.66℃，此时系统的稳定性最好；热泵机组供暖空调期内系统的供暖平均COP为2.75，制冷平均COP为3.28，热泵机组部分负荷率处于较低水平，这也导致了系统全年的COP偏低的现象。该别墅的地源热泵系统的数值模拟结果为长江三角区地源热泵系统工程提供了技术支撑。

关键词: 再生能源, 地源热泵, 数值模拟, 地埋管换热器, 性能系数, 稳定性

Abstract: This paper introduces the ground-source heat pump for a construction in Jiangyin. Using the software of TRNSYS,the underground soil average temperature in 30 years was simulated under the different depths and ratios of cooling and heating loads. The annual trend of COP of the system and part load ratio of heat pump unit in heating and cooling period werer analyzed. The result showed that the performance of buried pipe at 100m depth had a smaller temperature drop and fluctuation than that at 80m and 60m depths. So the deeper the buried pipes were,the more stable of soil average temperatures were. To meet the demand of heating load only,the soil average temperature fell by 2.67℃,while the soil average temperature increased by 2.15℃ to meet the demand of cooling load nly. If to meet the demand of both heating and cooling loads,the soil average temperature fell by just 0.66℃. The averaged COP of the heat pump system was 3.28 in the summer and 2.75 in the winter;and the part load ratio of heat pump unit was low,which resulted in the lower COP of the system. The simulation results provided the basic data for the heat pump project in Yangtze River area.

Key words: renewable energy, ground-source heat pump, numerical simulation, ground heat exchanger, coefficient of performance(COP), stability

中图分类号:

TK529

刘广平, 骆超, 龚宇烈, 邱泽晶, 郑鑫. 江阴市某建筑地源热泵系统性能的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(11): 4037-4042.

LIU Guangping, LUO Chao, GONG Yulie, QIU Zejing, ZHENG Xin. The ground source heat pump numerical simulation of a building in Jiangyin[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(11): 4037-4042.

参考文献

[1] 鲍旭明. 地源热泵国内外发展状况对比[J]. 山西建筑,2016,42(2):126-128. BAO X M. The development comparison of ground source heat pump at home and abroad[J]. Shanxi Architecture,2016,42(2):126-128.
[2] ZENG Heyi, DIAO Nairen,FANG Zhaohong. Heat transferanalysis of boreholes in vertical ground heat exchangers[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2003,46(1):4467-4481.
[3] 曹馨雅. 地源热泵系统冷热负荷不平衡对土壤温度的影响[D]. 上海:东华大学,2012. CAO X Y. The influence exerted by the imbalance of cooling and heating load on the soil temperature in GSHP[D].Shanghai:Donghua University,2012.
[4] 寇利. 上海某教学楼地源热泵系统性能测试分析[J]. 建筑节能,2016,44(8):6-9. KOU L. Performance test of ground-source heat pump system for a teaching building in Shanghai[J]. Building Energy Efficiency,2016, 44(8):6-9.
[5] 汪洪军,李新国,赵军,等. 地下耦合地源热泵机组冬季供热性能分析与实验研究[J]. 流体机械,2003,31(19):51-54. WANG H J,LI X G,ZHAO J,et al. Experimental study and analysis on heating operation of GCHP[J]. Fluid Machinery,2003,31(19):51-54.
[6] 魏唐棣,胡鸣明,丁勇,等. 地源热泵冬季供暖测试及传热模型[J]. 暖通空调,2000,30(1):12-14. WEI T D, HU M M, DING Y, et al. Measurement and heat transfer modelling of a shallow buried ground source heat pump in winter heating operation[J]. Journal of HV & AC,2000,30(1):12-14.
[7] 杨少刚. 基于TRNSYS地埋管地源热泵变流量系统仿真研究[D]. 济南:山东建筑大学,2016. YANG S G. The simulation study of ground-source heat pump variable flowrate system based on TRNSYS[D]. Jinan:Shandong Jianzhu University,2016.
[8] HYDEMAM M,GILLESPIE K L. Tools and techniques to calibrate electric chiller component model[J]. ASHRAE Transactions,2002,108(1):733-741.
[9] 刘宪英,胡鸣明. 地热源热泵地下埋管换热器传热模型的综述[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报,1999,21(5):85-92. LIU X Y,HU M M. Development of modeling of the underground heat exchanger for GSHP[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University,1999,21(5):85-92.
[10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 民用建筑供暖通风与空气调节设计规范:GB50736-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Design code for heating ventilation and air conditioning of civil buildings:GB50736-2012[S]. Beijing:China Building Industry Press,2012.
[11] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 公共建筑节能设计标准:GB50189-2015[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Design standard for energy efficiency of public buildings:GB50189-2015[S]. Beijing:China Building Industry Press,2015.

[1]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[2]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[3]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[4]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[5]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[6]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[7]	叶振东, 刘涵, 吕静, 张亚宁, 刘洪芝. 基于钙镁二元盐的热化学储能反应器的性能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4307-4314.
[8]	王鑫, 王兵兵, 杨威, 徐志明. 金属表面PDA/PTFE超疏水涂层抑垢与耐腐蚀性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4315-4321.
[9]	陆洋, 周劲松, 周启昕, 王瑭, 刘壮, 李博昊, 周灵涛. CeO₂/TiO₂吸附剂煤气脱汞产物的浸出规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3875-3883.
[10]	吴展华, 盛敏. 绝热加速量热仪在反应安全风险评估应用中的常见问题[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3374-3382.
[11]	俞俊楠, 俞建峰, 程洋, 齐一搏, 化春键, 蒋毅. 基于深度学习的变宽度浓度梯度芯片性能预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3383-3393.
[12]	单雪影, 张濛, 张家傅, 李玲玉, 宋艳, 李锦春. 阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.
[13]	王硕, 张亚新, 朱博韬. 基于灰色预测模型的水煤浆输送管道冲蚀磨损寿命预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3431-3442.
[14]	周龙大, 赵立新, 徐保蕊, 张爽, 刘琳. 电场-旋流耦合强化多相介质分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3443-3456.
[15]	薛凯, 王帅, 马金鹏, 胡晓阳, 种道彤, 王进仕, 严俊杰. 工业园区分布式综合能源系统的规划与调度[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3510-3519.

江阴市某建筑地源热泵系统性能的数值模拟

The ground source heat pump numerical simulation of a building in Jiangyin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价