稠油热采废水回用电站锅炉补给水工艺

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.12.046

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 4407-4414.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.12.046

稠油热采废水回用电站锅炉补给水工艺

王璟^1,2, 毛进², 赵剑强¹, 蒲平³, 郭维忠³, 李亚娟², 刘亚鹏²

1 长安大学环境科学与工程学院, 陕西西安 710064;
2 西安热工研究院有限公司, 陕西西安 710032;
3 华能新疆能源开发有限公司, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830017

收稿日期:2015-06-17 修回日期:2015-08-27 出版日期:2015-12-05 发布日期:2015-12-05
通讯作者: 赵剑强,教授。E-mail626710287@qq.com。
作者简介:王璟(1975—),男,博士研究生,研究员,研究方向为电厂水处理技术。E-mailwangjing@tpri.com.cn。
基金资助:
中国华能集团公司总部科技项目(HNKJ13-H12)。

Process of heavy oil thermal recovery wastewater reused as power plant boiler make-up water

WANG Jing^1,2, MAO Jin², ZHAO Jianqiang¹, PU Ping³, GUO Weizhong³, LI Yajuan², LIU Yapeng²

1 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China;
2 Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi, China;
3 Hua'neng Xinjiang Energy Development Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830017, Xinjang, China

Received:2015-06-17 Revised:2015-08-27 Online:2015-12-05 Published:2015-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 常规稠油热采废水处理采用除油软化工艺,出水水质较低,仅能用于直流小注汽锅炉补水。由于小注汽锅炉参数低,排污量大,能耗高,造成采油蒸汽成本高。针对该问题,开发了预处理-蒸发-生物处理-膜处理-混床工艺处理稠油热采废水,并通过实验对工艺各子系统运行性能进行研究以提高处理效果,使系统处理出水可用于电站高参数锅炉补给水,达到以热电联产机组取代小注汽锅炉,降低采油蒸汽费用的目的。研究结果表明,采用该工艺对稠油热采废水进行处理,各子系统运行稳定;废水经除硅软化预处理及蒸发后,产水TOC平均约22mg/L;曝气生物滤池产水TOC平均约6mg/L;再经超滤-反渗透处理后产水TOC含量小于0.15mg/L;继续经混床处理,最终出水电导率≤0.15μS/cm、二氧化硅≤10μg/L、TOC≤200μg/L,满足电站高参数锅炉补水水质要求,每吨水直接运行费用为8.05元。

关键词: 废水, 蒸发, 二氧化硅, 稠油, 电站锅炉, 曝气生物滤池, 反渗透, 运行费用

Abstract: The traditional heavy oil thermal recovery wastewater treatment process is comprised of oil eliminating and softening. The effluent quality is comparably poor which can only be used as make up water for once-through small steam injection boiler. Because the parameter of small steam injection boiler is low,both the boiler blowdown and energy consumption are high. The oil extraction steam cost is raised subsequently. Aimed at the problem,a novel heavy oil thermal recovery wastewater treatment process that comprises of pretreatment,bio-treatment,membrane,and mixed bed technology was developed. Operating performance of individual sub-system was investigated by model experiments to enhance the treatment efficiency and to make it possible to reuse the product water as high parameter power plant unit make up water. As a result,the objective to replace the small steam injection boiler by combined heat and power generation unit to reduce the oil extraction steam fee could be achieved. Results show that the operating performance of all sub-system is stable when the heavy oil thermal recovery wastewater was treated by the new process. The average TOC[w1] was about 22mg/L when the wastewater was treated by the silica removal and softening pretreatment system and the evaporator. The TOC was decreased to about 6mg/L in the BAF[w2] effluent,and it was continued to decrease to about 0.15mg/L in the UF-RO effluent. The conductivity,silica and TOC of the final product water were less than 0.15μS/cm,10μg/L and 200μg/L respectively when the UF-RO effluent was treated by mixed bed ion exchanger subsequently. This water quality could meet the demand of high parameter power plant boiler and the direct operating cost is 8.05yuan/ton of product water.

Key words: wastewater, evaporation, silica, heavy oil, power plant boiler, biological aerated filter, reverse osmosis, operating cost

中图分类号:

X741

王璟, 毛进, 赵剑强, 蒲平, 郭维忠, 李亚娟, 刘亚鹏. 稠油热采废水回用电站锅炉补给水工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(12): 4407-4414.

WANG Jing, MAO Jin, ZHAO Jianqiang, PU Ping, GUO Weizhong, LI Yajuan, LIU Yapeng. Process of heavy oil thermal recovery wastewater reused as power plant boiler make-up water[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(12): 4407-4414.

参考文献

[1] 郝晶,王为民,李思宁,等. 稠油开采技术的发展[J]. 当代化工,2013,42(10):1434-1436.
[2] 谭克,王帅,曹放. 稠油、超稠油热采技术研究进展[J]. 当代化工,2014,43(1):97-99.
[3] 骆伟,王爱军,张志庆,等. 新疆油田稠油污水处理资源化利用技术[J]. 油气田地面工程,2009,28(9):62-63.
[4] 王鸽,边田镇,孙万里. 超稠油污水深度处理工艺技术[J]. 油气田环境保护,2009,19(s1):32-36.
[5] 于永辉,孙承林,杨旭,等. 稠油污水低温多效蒸发深度处理回用热采锅炉中试研究[J]. 水处理技术,2010,36(12):98-102.
[6] 马晓雁,庞维海,李青松,等. 稠油废水混凝法除硅工艺研究[J]. 给水排水,2008,34(11):183-186.
[7] Garbutt C. Innovative treating processes allow steamflooding with poor quality oilfield water[C]//proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,1997.
[8] Heins W,Peterson D. Use of evaporation for heavy oil produced water treatment[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2005,44(1):26-30.
[9] Fakhru'l-Razi A,Pendashteh A,Abdullah L C,et al. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,170(2-3):530-551.
[10] Heins W F. Operational data from the world's first SAGD facilities using evaporators to treat produced water for boiler feedwater[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2008,47(9):32-39.
[11] Heins W F. Technical advancements in SAGD evaporative produced water treatment[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2009,48(11):27-32.
[12] Heins W F. Is a Paradigm shift in produced water treatment technology occurring at SAGD facilities?[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2010,49(1):10-15.
[13] Zeng Y B,Yang C Z,Pu W H,et al. Removal of silica from heavy oil wastewater to be reused in a boiler by combining magnesium and zinc compounds with coagulation[J]. Desalination,2007,216(1-3):147-159.
[14] Luo F,Dong B,Xie J,et al. Scaling tendency of boiler feedwater without desiliconization treatment[J]. Desalination,2012,302:50-54.
[15] Xu Y,Dong B,Dai X. Effect of the silica-rich,oilfield-produced water with different degrees of softening on characteristics of scales in steam-injection boiler[J]. Desalination,2015,361:38-45.
[16] Wang N,Chen D Z,Zou L S. Influence of non-thermal plasma pre-treatment on the scaling characteristics of viscous oil wastewater during evaporation[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2015,75:779-788.
[17] Bahadori A,Vuthaluru H B. Prediction of silica carry-over and solubility in steam of boilers using simple correlation[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2010,30(2-3):250-253.
[18] Rajaković-Ognjanović V N,Živojinovic D Z,Grgur B N,et al. Improvement of chemical control in the water-steam cycle of thermal power plants[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2011,31(1):119-128.
[19] Vidojkovic S,Onjia A,Matovic B,et al. Extensive feedwater quality control and monitoring concept for preventing chemistry-related failures of boiler tubes in a subcritical thermal power plant[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2013,59(1-2):683-694.
[20] 朱志平,黄可龙,周艺,等. 汽轮机初凝区腐蚀机理分析[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术,2006,18(1):20-23.
[21] 李金林. 稠油采出水再生回用技术及其应用[J]. 中国给水排水,2005,21(12):91-93.
[22] 曾玉彬,杨昌柱,张报,等. 化学混凝法去除稠油废水中的硅[J]. 化工环保,2007,27(2):172-176.
[23] 曾玉彬,王益军,张学鲁,等. 稠油污水回用热采锅炉的中试研究[J]. 工业水处理,2007,27(7):20-23.
[24] 张依,邹龙生,陈德珍,等. 低温等离子体预处理对油田废水蒸发及蒸馏水品质的影响[J]. 化工进展,2013,32(1):214-221.
[25] Huuha T S,Kurniawan T A,Sillanpaa M E T. Removal of silicon from pulping whitewater using integrated treatment of chemical precipitation and evaporation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2010,158(3):584-592.
[26] Milne N A,O'reilly T,Sanciolo P,et al. Chemistry of silica scale mitigation for RO desalination with particular reference to remote operations[J]. Water Research,2014,65:107-133.
[27] Rahardianto A,Gao J,Gabelich C J,et al. High recovery membrane desalting of low-salinity brackish water:Integration of accelerated precipitation softening with membrane RO[J]. Journal of Membrane Science,2007,289(1-2):123-137.
[28] Pan Y,Si F,Xu Z,et al. An integrated theoretical fouling model for convective heating surfaces in coal-fired boilers[J]. Powder Technology,2011,210(2):150-156.
[29] Gill J S,Varsanik R G. Precipitation equilibrium during evaporation of water containing high dissolved salts[J]. Desalination,1986,60(1):1-8.

稠油热采废水回用电站锅炉补给水工艺

Process of heavy oil thermal recovery wastewater reused as power plant boiler make-up water

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张祚群, 高扬, 白超杰, 薛立新. 二次界面聚合同步反扩散原位生长ZIF-8纳米粒子制备聚酰胺混合基质反渗透（RO）膜[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[2]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[3]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[4]	王尚彬, 欧红香, 薛洪来, 曹海珍, 王钧奇, 毕海普. 黄原胶和纳米二氧化硅对无氟泡沫性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4856-4862.
[5]	王晨, 白浩良, 康雪. 大功率UV-LED散热与纳米TiO₂光催化酸性红26耦合系统性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4905-4916.
[6]	王琦, 寇丽红, 王冠宇, 王吉坤, 刘敏, 李兰廷, 王昊. 焦化废水生物出水中可溶解性有机物的分子识别[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[7]	史天茜, 石永辉, 武新颖, 张益豪, 秦哲, 赵春霞, 路达. Fe²⁺对厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[8]	郑梦启, 王成业, 汪炎, 王伟, 袁守军, 胡真虎, 何春华, 王杰, 梅红. 菌藻共生技术在工业废水零排放中的应用与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4424-4431.
[9]	陈娜, 张肖静, 张楠, 马冰冰, 张涵, 杨浩洁, 张宏忠. 淬灭酶对亚硝化-混合自养脱氮系统的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3816-3823.
[10]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[11]	李吉焱, 景艳菊, 邢郭宇, 刘美辰, 龙永, 朱照琪. 耐盐型太阳能驱动界面光热材料及蒸发器的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3611-3622.
[12]	杨家添, 唐金铭, 梁恣荣, 黎胤宏, 胡华宇, 陈渊. 新型淀粉基高吸水树脂抑尘剂的制备及其应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3187-3196.
[13]	李白雪, 信欣, 朱羽蒙, 刘琴, 刘鑫. SASD-A体系构建及进水不同S/N对脱氮工艺的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3261-3271.
[14]	杨红梅, 高涛, 鱼涛, 屈撑囤, 高家朋. 高铁酸盐处理难降解有机物磺化酚醛树脂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3302-3308.
[15]	赵尧, 周志辉, 吴红丹, 胡传智, 张国春, 吴睿鹏. Silicalite-1分子筛膜渗透蒸发条件的响应面分析与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2586-2594.