不同溶液对地下水中甲基叔丁基醚溶解过程影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.10.043

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 3799-3803,3813.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.10.043

不同溶液对地下水中甲基叔丁基醚溶解过程影响

李洪^1,2, 赵雷¹, 高鑫^1,2, 李鑫钢^1,2, 丛山²

1 天津大学化工学院, 天津 300072;
2 精馏技术国家工程研究中心, 天津 300072

收稿日期:2015-03-24 修回日期:2015-04-30 出版日期:2015-10-05 发布日期:2015-10-05
通讯作者: 丛山,副研究员。E-mailcongshan@tju.edu.cn。
作者简介:李洪(1980—),女,副研究员。E-maillihong.tju@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41201497)。

Effects of different solution on MTBE dissolution in subsurface

LI Hong^1,2, ZHAO Lei¹, GAO Xin^1,2, LI Xingang^1,2, CONG Shan²

1 School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2 National Engineering Research Centre of Distillation Technology, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2015-03-24 Revised:2015-04-30 Online:2015-10-05 Published:2015-10-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用实验室小型二维砂箱对地下水流动过程中甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)溶解过程进行模拟实验,主要考察了非离子型表面活性剂聚乙氧基油酸山梨糖醇(Tween80)、阴离子表面活性剂十二烷基苯磺酸钠(SDBS)与助溶剂乙醇对MTBE溶解过程的影响。结果表明,Tween80在其临界胶束浓度(CMC)以上能够对MTBE起到增溶的效果而且在所研究浓度范围存在最佳增溶浓度10g/L;低于临界胶束浓度条件下的SDBS并没有增强MTBE迁移反而会延缓MTBE的溶解;乙醇可以增大MTBE的溶出浓度,而且随着含量提高增溶效果加强。通过比较各种条件下最佳的MTBE累积去除率可以得出,当MTBE去除率达到80%之前,对MTBE溶解增强效果由大到小顺序依次为:非离子型表面活性剂Tween80> 助溶剂乙醇> 水> 阴离子表面活性剂SDBS;而去除率80%以后,增溶效果的顺序则为乙醇> Tween80> 水> SDBS。

关键词: 甲基叔丁基醚, 溶液, 表面活性剂, 助溶剂, 溶解

Abstract: A two-dimension laboratory scale sandbox was manufactured to model the dissolution process of methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE)in subsurface. A serial of experiments were conducted to investigate the influences of nonionic surfactant Polysorbate 80(Tween80), anionic surfactant Sodium Dodecylbenzenesulfonate(SDBS)and cosolvent ethanol on MTBE dissolution. The results indicated that Tween80 can promote MTBE dissolution above Critical Micelle Concentration(CMC)and the optimal concentration was 10g/L within the experimental concentration range;SDBS prolonged the time for complete dissolution of MTBE without enhancement of MTBE mobility below Critical Micelle Concentration;ethanol can enhance MTBE dissolution byhigh dissolution concentration and effectiveness was increased with the increase of ethanol content. By comparing the best MTBE removals under different conditions, the following results were obtained. Before 80% of MTBE was dissolved, the descending order for enhancement effects of MTBE dissolution was:nonionic surfactant Tween80> cosolvent ethanol> water> anionic surfactant SDBS. However, after removal rate was greater than80%, the order was:cosolvent ethanol> nonionic surfactant Tween80> water> anionic surfactant SDBS.

Key words: methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE), solution, surfactants, cosolvent, dissolution

中图分类号:

李洪, 赵雷, 高鑫, 李鑫钢, 丛山. 不同溶液对地下水中甲基叔丁基醚溶解过程影响[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(10): 3799-3803,3813.

LI Hong, ZHAO Lei, GAO Xin, LI Xingang, CONG Shan. Effects of different solution on MTBE dissolution in subsurface[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(10): 3799-3803,3813.

参考文献

[1] Fortin J,Jury W A,Anderson M A.Enhanced removal of trapped nonaqueous phase liquids from saturated soil using surfactant solutions[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,1997,24(3):247-267.

[2] Dekker T J,Abriola L M.The influence of field-scale heterogeneity on the surfactant-enhanced remediation of entrapped nonaqueous phase liquids[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2000,42(2):219-251.

[3] Renshaw C E,Zynda G D,Fountain J C. Permeability reductions induced by sorption of surfactant[J]. Water Resources Research,1997,33(3):371-378.

[4] Abdul A S,Gibson T L,Ang C C,et al. In situ surfactant washing of polychlorinated biphenyls and oils from a contaminated site[J]. Groundwater,1992,30(2):219-231.

[5] Abdul A S,Ang C C. In situ surfactant washing of polychlorinated biphenyls and oils from a contaminated field site:Phase Ⅱ. Pilot study[J]. Groundwater,1994,32(5):727-734.

[6] 陈伟伟,王国庆,章瑞英,等. Tween80对DDTs污染场地土壤的增溶洗脱效果研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2010,29(2):276-281.

[7] Zhao Y S,Li L L,Su Y,et al. Laboratory evaluation of the use of solvent extraction for separation of hydrophobic organic contaminants from surfactant solutions during surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2014,127:53-60.

[8] Saba T,Illangasekare T H,Ewing J. Investigation of surfactant-enhanced dissolution of entrapped nonaqueous phase liquid chemicals in a two-dimensional groundwater flow field[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2001,51(1):63-82.

[9] 白静. 表面活性剂强化地下水循环井技术修复NAPL污染含水层研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2013.

[10] Douroumis D,Fahr A. Drug Delivery Strategies for Poorly Water-soluble Drugs[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,2012.

[11] Imhoff P T,Gleyzer S N,McBride J F,et al. Cosolvent-enhanced remediation of residual dense nonaqueous phase liquids:Experimental investigation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,1995,29(8):1966-1976.

[12] Johnson R,Pankow J,Bender D,et al. Peer reviewed:MTBE-to what extent will past releases contaminate community water supply wells?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2000,34(9):210A-217A.

[13] Nambi I M,Powers S E. NAPL dissolution in heterogeneous

systems:An experimental investigation in a simple heterogeneous system[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2000,44(2):161-184.

[14] Schmidt T C,Duong H A,Berg M,et al. Analysis of fuel oxygenates in the environment[J]. Analyst,2001,126(3):405-413.

[15] 章苏宁,张健,宋晓秋,等. 稳态荧光探针法测定Tween系列非离子表面活性剂临界胶束浓度[J]. 光谱实验室,2010,27(4):1231-1236.

[16] 韩晓霞,高作宁,白莉,等. 用吸附伏安法测定十二烷基苯磺酸钠水溶液体系的临界胶束浓度[J]. 宁夏大学学报:自然科学版,2005,26(4):356-359.

[17] Kang S,Jeong H Y. Sorption of a nonionic surfactant Tween80 by minerals and soils[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2015,284:143-150.

[18] Paria S. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science,2008,138(1):24-58.

不同溶液对地下水中甲基叔丁基醚溶解过程影响

Effects of different solution on MTBE dissolution in subsurface

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[2]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[3]	王谨航, 何勇, 史伶俐, 龙臻, 梁德青. 气体水合物阻聚剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4587-4602.
[4]	王琦, 寇丽红, 王冠宇, 王吉坤, 刘敏, 李兰廷, 王昊. 焦化废水生物出水中可溶解性有机物的分子识别[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[5]	俞俊楠, 俞建峰, 程洋, 齐一搏, 化春键, 蒋毅. 基于深度学习的变宽度浓度梯度芯片性能预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3383-3393.
[6]	于静文, 宋璐娜, 刘砚超, 吕瑞东, 武蒙蒙, 冯宇, 李忠, 米杰. 一种吲哚基超交联聚合物In-HCP对水中碘的吸附作用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3674-3683.
[7]	杨扬, 孙志高, 李翠敏, 李娟, 黄海峰. 静态条件下表面活性剂OP-13促进HCFC-141b水合物生成[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2854-2859.
[8]	贺山明, 潘界昌, 徐国钻, 李文君, 梁勇. 粗钨酸钠溶液亚铁盐沉淀法除铬、钒的热力学分析及实验验证[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2171-2179.
[9]	范思涵, 于国熙, 来超超, 何欢, 黄斌, 潘学军. 非生物改性对厌氧微生物产物光化学活性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2180-2189.
[10]	高婷婷, 蒋振, 吴晓毅, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 微乳液脉动热管应用于锂离子电池的散热性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1167-1177.
[11]	姚稳, 张雨晨, 滕文馨, 黎江玲. 表面活性剂对制备Ca掺杂β-In₂S₃微观结构的影响及其光催化降解甲基橙性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 774-782.
[12]	毕强, 梅毅, 夏举佩. 磷Ⅱ型无水石膏制备及活性联合激发基础研究[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5427-5435.
[13]	刘玉龙, 胡南, 陈祥标, 陈森才, 曾冰勇, 丁德馨. 强碱性阴离子树脂对铀的循环吸附-淋洗性能及动力学分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5574-5583.
[14]	邓权龙, 丁厚成, 徐远迪, 蒋仲安, 杨岚, 孙雪霏. 表面活性雾滴联合金属网栅增效除尘[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 546-552.
[15]	张清清, 毕海普, 舒中俊, 欧红香, 王尚彬, 王钧奇, 潘煜. 泡沫灭火剂中全氟辛烷磺酸类物质的管控行为及替代物研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 340-350.