基于符号有向图分析的炼油厂中渣油催化裂化危险与可操作性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.04.048

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 1178-1182.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.04.048

• 应用技术 • 上一篇

基于符号有向图分析的炼油厂中渣油催化裂化危险与可操作性

IFTIKAR Maria¹, 翟持¹, 孙巍¹, 杜增智², 王健红²

1. 北京化工大学化学工程学院膜分离过程与技术北京重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. 北京化工大学过程模拟优化中心, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2014-09-05 修回日期:2014-09-28 出版日期:2015-04-05 发布日期:2015-04-05
通讯作者: 王健红,教授,博士生导师.E-mail WJHMASTER@263.net.
作者简介:IFTIKAR Maria(1990—),女,硕士研究生,主要从化工系统工程的研究.

SDG analysis of residue fluid cracking in an oil refinery for HAZOP study purposes

IFTIKAR Maria¹, ZHAI Chi¹, SUN Wei¹, DU Zengzhi², WANG Jianhong²

1. Beijing Key Lab of Membrane Science and Technology, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Process Simulation and Optimization Center, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2014-09-05 Revised:2014-09-28 Online:2015-04-05 Published:2015-04-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为危险与可操作性(HAZOP)研究的一门辅助技术,符号有向图(SDG)分析技术迅速得到普及.仿真工厂数据是流程工业在线数据最理想的近似,能够体现过程变量之间的相互关系.本文以石油化工典型的渣油催化裂化装置为例,将SDG分析与基于机理模型的动态流程模拟仿真工厂结合起来,通过仿真工厂数据形成专家经验,进而在SDG辅助平台实施HAZOP分析,此外,分析结果也可以进一步作为HAZOP分析的知识库.同时,仿真工厂又可以验证事故传播路径,从而起到筛选SDG生成的事故序列的作用.相比于传统的专家组会议而言,将仿真工厂模拟数据运用于SDG分析中,能大幅缩短HAZOP分析时间,减少人员及投资,并且获得更为全面、准确的分析结果.

关键词: 安全, 动态, 计算机模拟, HAZOP分析, SDG分析

Abstract: Signed digraph(SDG)analysis is quickly gaining popularity as an aiding technique for hazard and operability(HAZOP[LL1] ) analysis. The data from a dynamic process monitoring platform is the closest substitute to online data in process industry since it can reflect the relationship between the process variables. This paper obtained model based dynamic process simulation platform to gain expert experiences,using residue catalytic cracking unit typical in petroleum industry as an example for analysis. The model was used in performing the HAZOP study of an existing plant with SDG tools. The process monitoring platform can also be used to check and select the accident path; therefore,the sequence of accidents generated by SDG tools can be determined. The application of process monitoring platform with SDG tools in HAZOP analysis can reduce analysis time and obtain more comprehensive results.

Key words: safety, dynamic, computer simulation, HAZOP analysis, SDG analysis

中图分类号:

X937

IFTIKAR Maria, 翟持, 孙巍, 杜增智, 王健红. 基于符号有向图分析的炼油厂中渣油催化裂化危险与可操作性[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(04): 1178-1182.

IFTIKAR Maria, ZHAI Chi, SUN Wei, DU Zengzhi, WANG Jianhong. SDG analysis of residue fluid cracking in an oil refinery for HAZOP study purposes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(04): 1178-1182.

参考文献

[1] Cui L,Shu Y D,Zhao J S,et al. HASILT:An intelligent software platform for HAZOP,LOPA,SRS and SIL verification[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2012,108:56-64.
[2] Tyler B J. HAZOP study training from the 1970s to today[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2012,90(5):419-423.
[3] Labovský J,Vandova Z Š,Markos j,et al. Model-based HAZOP study of a real MTBE plant[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2007,20(3):230-237.
[4] McCoy S A,Wakeman S J,Larkin F D,et al. HAZID,a computer aid for hazard identification[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,1999,77(6):317-327.
[5] McCoy S A,Wakeman S J,Larkin F D,et al. HAZID,a computer aid for hazard identification:2. Unit model system[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,1999,77(6):328-334.
[6] McCoy S A,Wakeman S J,Larkin F D,et al. HAZID,a computer aid for hazard identification:3. The fluid model and consequence evaluation systems[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,1999,77(6):335-353.
[7] McCoy S A,Wakeman S J,Larkin F D,et al. Hazid,a computer aid for hazard identification:4. Learning set,main study system,output quality and validation trials[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2000,78(2):91-119 .
[8] McCoy S A,Wakeman S J,Larkin F D,et al. Hazid,a computer aid for hazard identification:5. Future development topics and conclusions[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2000,78(2):120-142.
[9] Zhao J S,Cui L,Zhao L H,et al. Learning HAZOP expert system by case-based reasoning and ontology[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering,2009,33(1):371-378.
[10] Cui L,Zhao J S,Qiu T,et al. Layered digraph model for HAZOP analysis of chemical processes[J]. Process Safety Progress,2008,27(4):293-305.
[11] Rodríguez M,de Ia Mata J L. Automating HAZOP studies using D-higraphs[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering,2012,45:102-113.
[12] Wang H,Chen B,He X,et al. SDG-based HAZOP analysis of operating mistakes for PVC process[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2009,87(1):40-46.
[13] Zheng J,Wang L. Safety evaluation of emulsion explosives production line based on SDG-HAZOP[J]. Procedia Engineering,2012,45:144-151.
[14] Zhang Chunyang,Zhang Pei,Yang Zongxiao,et al. Safety assessment modeling for thermal power plants using hierarchical SDG-HAZOP method[J]. Computing and Intelligent Systems,2009,3:144-148.
[15] Cui L,Zhao J,Zhang R. The integration of HAZOP expert system and piping and instrumentation diagrams[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2010,88(5):327-334.
[16] Sharma R K,Gurjar B R,Wate S R,et al. Assessment of an accidental vapour cloud explosion:Lessons from the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. accident at Jaipur,India[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2013,26(1):82-90.
[17] Mishra K B. Lessons learned from recent fuel storage fires[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2013,107:166-172.
[18] Atkinson G,Cusco L. Buncefield:A violent,episodic vapour cloud explosion[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2011,89(6):360-370.
[19] Mishra K B. Amuay refinery disaster:The aftermaths and challenges ahead[J]. Fuel Processing Technology. 2014,119:198-203.
[20] Wang Hangzhou,Chen Bingzhen,He Xiaorong,et al. SDG based HAZOP analysis of operationg mistakes for PVC process[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,Tans. IChemE Part B,2009,87(1):40-46.

基于符号有向图分析的炼油厂中渣油催化裂化危险与可操作性

SDG analysis of residue fluid cracking in an oil refinery for HAZOP study purposes

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[2]	张振, 李丹, 陈辰, 吴菁岚, 应汉杰, 乔浩. 吸附树脂对唾液酸的分离纯化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4153-4158.
[3]	吴正浩, 周天航, 蓝兴英, 徐春明. 人工智能驱动化学品创新设计的实践与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3910-3916.
[4]	郭晋, 张耕, 陈国华, 朱鸣, 谭粤, 李蔚, 夏莉, 胡昆. 车载液氢气瓶设计技术的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4221-4229.
[5]	乔旭, 张竹修. 化工本征安全技术发展路径的思考与探索[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3319-3324.
[6]	李蓝宇, 黄新烨, 王笑楠, 邱彤. 化工科研范式智能化转型的思考与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3325-3330.
[7]	吴展华, 盛敏. 绝热加速量热仪在反应安全风险评估应用中的常见问题[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3374-3382.
[8]	王俊杰, 潘艳秋, 牛亚宾, 俞路. 分子水平催化重整装置模型构建及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3404-3412.
[9]	单雪影, 张濛, 张家傅, 李玲玉, 宋艳, 李锦春. 阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.
[10]	汪嘉欣, 潘勇, 熊欣怡, 万晓月, 王建超. 甲苯一步催化硝化制备二硝基甲苯反应过程及危险性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3420-3430.
[11]	余希希, 张金帅, 雷文, 刘承果. 基于动态共价键自修复的光固化高分子材料研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3589-3599.
[12]	赵景斌, 王彦富, 王涛, 马伟恺, 王琛. 基于蒙特卡洛模拟和动态事件树的储罐脆弱性评估[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2751-2759.
[13]	刘广平, 陆振能, 龚宇烈. 高温热泵蒸汽系统的动态响应及扰动优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1719-1727.
[14]	闫兴清, 戴行涛, 喻健良, 李岳, 韩冰, 胡军. 高压氢气泄漏射流研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1118-1128.
[15]	张艺璇, 胡伟, 刘梦瑶, 鞠敬鸽, 赵义侠, 康卫民. 聚合物电解质在锌离子电池中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1397-1410.