Optimization and conceptual design of carbon source/carbon sink supply chain planning: CCUS-enhanced oil recovery technology application in Dongying area

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-1638

Abstract

Abstract:

In the context of a carbon neutrality energy strategy, the application of carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS)-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology is a significant measure for synergistically advancing carbon reduction and improving oilfield production. To address the slow development of the domestic CCUS-EOR industry and the insufficient consideration of the techno-economic aspects of carbon source/carbon sink matching, this study proposed an optimization and design method for the carbon source/carbon sink supply chain planning based on a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) model. The modeling strategies included spatial grid partitioning, geographic coordinate quantification, path planning, transportation mode identification, and economic analysis of CO₂ capture processes. The goal function for maximizing the economic benefits of CCUS-EOR projects was derived, with the application of CCUS-EOR technology in the Dongying area serving as a case study. The planning and design results indicated that within a five-year planning period, the CCUS-EOR layout in the Dongying area could achieve an environmental benefit of 6×10⁶t/a of CO₂ reduction and an economic benefit of 95.38×10⁸CNY/a. The analysis of environmental and economic benefits under different boundary factors and parameters revealed the impact patterns of CO₂ transportation modes, planning period time effects, and the depth of carbon reduction on the planning and design of the carbon source/carbon sink supply chain. The research findings could provide valuable decision-making references for planning and deploying the CCUS-EOR technology industry in the Dongying area.

Key words: carbon dioxide, petroleum, optimal design, supply chain planning, carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS)

摘要：

碳中和能源战略背景下，碳捕集、利用与封存（CCUS）驱油技术的应用是碳减排与油田提质增产协同推进的重要举措。针对国内CCUS驱油产业发展缓慢、碳源/碳汇匹配技术经济性考虑不足的问题，本文提出混合整数非线性规划模型（MINLP）为主要特征的碳源/碳汇供应链规划优化与设计方法，采用空间平面网格划分、地理坐标量化、路径规划、输送方式识别、CO₂捕集工艺经济分析等建模策略，推导CCUS驱油项目经济效益最大化的目标函数，并以东营地区CCUS驱油技术应用为案例开展研究。规划设计结果表明，五年规划周期内东营地区布局CCUS驱油产业可实现CO₂减排约6×10⁶t/a的环境效益和95.38×10⁸CNY/a的经济效益。在不同边界因素和参数下对环境经济效益进行分析，揭示CO₂输运方式、规划周期时间效应及碳减排深度对碳源/碳汇供应链规划与设计的影响规律，研究结果为东营地区规划布局CCUS驱油技术产业决策提供参考。

关键词: 二氧化碳, 石油, 优化设计, 供应链规划, 碳捕集、利用与封存

CLC Number:

TE357

PU Tian, HU Jianqing, WEI Juan, ZHOU Hongjun, XU Chunming, ZHOU Ying. Optimization and conceptual design of carbon source/carbon sink supply chain planning: CCUS-enhanced oil recovery technology application in Dongying area[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2025, 44(11): 6270-6281.

蒲田, 胡建清, 危娟, 周红军, 徐春明, 周颖. 碳源/碳汇供应链规划优化与概念设计：以东营地区CCUS驱油技术应用为例[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(11): 6270-6281.

Figures/Tables 12

References 41

[1]	MIKHAYLOV Alexey, MOISEEV Nikita, ALESHIN Kirill, et al. Global climate change and greenhouse effect[J]. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2020, 7(4): 2897-2913.
[2]	World Meteorological Association. State of the global climate 2021: WMO provisional report[R]. Geneva: WMO, 2022: 5.
[3]	SCHLEUSSNER Carl-Friedrich, ROGELJ Joeri, SCHAEFFER Michiel, et al. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(9): 827-835.
[4]	SUN Mingyang, LIU Tianze, WANG Xinlei, et al. Roles of thermal energy storage technology for carbon neutrality[J]. Carbon Neutrality, 2023, 2(1): 12.
[5]	周红军, 周颖, 徐春明. 中国碳中和目标下CO₂转化的思考与实践[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3381-3385.
	ZHOU Hongjun, ZHOU Ying, XU Chunming. Exploration of the CO₂ conversion under China’s carbon neutrality goal[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(6): 3381-3385.
[6]	黄晟, 王静宇, 郭沛, 等. 碳中和目标下能源结构优化的近期策略与远期展望[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 5695-5708.
	HUANG Sheng, WANG Jingyu, GUO Pei, et al. Short-term strategy and long-term prospect of energy structure optimization under carbon neutrality target[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(11): 5695-5708.
[7]	武强, 涂坤, 曾一凡. “双碳”目标愿景下我国能源战略形势若干问题思考[J]. 科学通报, 2023, 68(15): 1884-1898.
	WU Qiang, TU Kun, ZENG Yifan. Research on China’s energy strategic situation under the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2023, 68(15): 1884-1898.
[8]	COONEY Gregory, LITTLEFIELD James, MARRIOTT Joe, et al. Evaluating the climate benefits of CO₂-enhanced oil recovery using life cycle analysis[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(12): 7491-7500.
[9]	DOWELL Niall MAC, FENNELL Paul S, SHAH Nilay, et al. The role of CO₂ capture and utilization in mitigating climate change[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(4): 243-249.
[10]	杨勇. 中国碳捕集、驱油与封存技术进展及发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 325-338.
	YANG Yong. Technology progress and development direction of carbon capture, oil-flooding and storage in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(1): 325-338.
[11]	袁士义, 马德胜, 李军诗, 等. 二氧化碳捕集、驱油与埋存产业化进展及前景展望[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4): 828-834.
	YUAN Shiyi, MA Desheng, LI Junshi, et al. Progress and prospects of carbon dioxide capture, EOR-utilization and storage industrialization[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(4): 828-834.
[12]	康宇龙, 白艳伟, 江绍静, 等. 延长石油碳捕集、利用与封存全流程技术特色与工程实践[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49(7): 1768-1771, 1775.
	KANG Yulong, BAI Yanwei, JIANG Shaojing, et al. Technical features and engineering practice of Yanchang full-chain carbon capture, utilization and storage project[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(7): 1768-1771, 1775.
[13]	陈婉. 搭建碳循环模式提升碳减排能力中国石化开建我国首个百万吨级CCUS项目[J]. 环境经济, 2021(13): 58-59.
	CHEN Wan. Build a carbon cycle model to enhance carbon emission reduction capacity. China Petrochemical started the first million-ton CCUS project in China[J]. Environmental Economy, 2021(13): 58-59.
[14]	舒华文. 胜利油田百万吨级CCUS输注采关键工程技术[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 10-17, 41.
	SHU Huawen. Key engineering technologies of one-million-ton CCUS transportation-injection-extraction in Shengli oilfield[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 10-17, 41.
[15]	李欣泽, 邹炜杰, 孙晨, 等. 新疆油田某超临界CO₂管道安全停输时间预测[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2823-2833.
	LI Xinze, ZOU Weijie, SUN Chen, et al. Prediction of safe shutdown time of a supercritical CO₂ pipeline in Xinjiang oilfield[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(5): 2823-2833.
[16]	刘克峰, 刘陶然, 蔡勇, 等. 二氧化碳捕集技术研究和工程示范进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 2901-2914.
	LIU Kefeng, LIU Taoran, CAI Yong, et al. Progress in research and engineering demonstration of CO₂ capture technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(6): 2901-2914.
[17]	GLOBAL CCS Institute. Technology readiness and costs of CCS[R]. Melbourne: Global CCS institute, 2021: 6.
[18]	AGENCY International Energy. Energy technology perspectives 2020-special report on carbon capture utilisation and storage: CCUS in clean energy transitions[R]. Paris: IEA, 2020: 103-108.
[19]	MCCOY Sean T. The economics of CO₂ transport by pipeline and storage in saline aquifers and oil reservoirs[D]. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, 2009.
[20]	ONYEBUCHI V E, KOLIOS A, HANAK D P, et al. A systematic review of key challenges of CO₂ transport via pipelines[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81: 2563-2583.
[21]	YANG Christopher, OGDEN Joan. Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 268-286.
[22]	KNOOPE M M J, RAMÍREZ A, FAAIJ A P C. The influence of uncertainty in the development of a CO₂ infrastructure network[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 158: 332-347.
[23]	M M Faruque HASAN, FIRST Eric L, BOUKOUVALA Fani, et al. A multi-scale framework for CO₂ capture, utilization, and sequestration: CCUS and CCU[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2015, 81: 2-21.
[24]	BERGHOUT Niels, KURAMOCHI Takeshi, VAN DEN BROEK Machteld, et al. Techno-economic performance and spatial footprint of infrastructure configurations for large scale CO₂ capture in industrial zones: A case study for the Rotterdam Botlek area (part A)[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 39: 256-284.
[25]	BERGHOUT Niels, VAN DEN BROEK Machteld, FAAIJ André. Deployment of infrastructure configurations for large-scale CO₂ capture in industrial zones: A case study for the Rotterdam Botlek area (part B)[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 60: 24-50.
[26]	Federico D’AMORE, BEZZO Fabrizio. Economic optimisation of European supply chains for CO₂ capture, transport and sequestration[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 65: 99-116.
[27]	CALDERÓN Andrés J, PAPAGEORGIOU Lazaros G. Key aspects in the strategic development of synthetic natural gas (BioSNG) supply chains[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2018, 110: 80-97.
[28]	MIDDLETON Richard S, Sean YAW. The cost of getting CCS wrong: Uncertainty, infrastructure design, and stranded CO₂ [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 70: 1-11.
[29]	Hélène PILORGÉ, MCQUEEN Noah, MAYNARD Daniel, et al. Cost analysis of carbon capture and sequestration of process emissions from the U.S. industrial sector[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(12): 7524-7532.
[30]	SUN Xiaolong, ALCALDE Juan, BAKHTBIDAR Mahdi, et al. Hubs and clusters approach to unlock the development of carbon capture and storage—Case study in Spain[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 300: 117418.
[31]	GUNAWAN Tubagus Aryandi, LUO Hongxi, GREIG Chris, et al. Shared CO₂ capture, transport, and storage for decarbonizing industrial clusters[J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 359: 122775.
[32]	QING Qinli, ZHENG Dengxiang, BING Liu. Ecological risk characterization and assessment of PHAS in the Shengli oil field[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2011, 10: 1685-1691.
[33]	WU Bo, GUO Shuhai, WANG Jianing. Spatial ecological risk assessment for contaminated soil in oiled fields[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403: 123984.
[34]	SARMA Sayan Sen, SINHA Koushik, Chayanon SUB-R-PA, et al. Optimal distribution of traffic in Manhattan Road networks for minimizing routing-time[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 22(11): 6799-6820.
[35]	赵小令, 肖晋宇, 侯金鸣, 等. 中国二氧化碳捕集利用和封存技术经济性与规模预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3): 657-668.
	ZHAO Xiaoling, XIAO Jinyu, HOU Jinming, et al. Economic and scale prediction of CO₂ capture, utilization and storage technologies in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3): 657-668.
[36]	蔡博峰, 李琦, 林千果, 等. 中国二氧化碳捕集、利用与封存(CCUS)报告(2019)[R]. 北京: 生态环境部环境规划院气候变化与环境政策研究中心, 2020: 17-30.
	CAI Bofeng, LI Qi, LIN Qianguo, et al. China carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) report (2019)[R]. Beijing: Research Center of Climate Change and Environmental Policy, Environmental Planning Institute, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2020: 17-30.
[37]	秦晶晶. 二氧化碳管道输送技术经济模型研究[J]. 低碳世界, 2023, 13(7): 169-171.
	QIN Jingjing. Study on technical and economic model of carbon dioxide pipeline transportation[J]. Low Carbon World, 2023, 13(7): 169-171.
[38]	东营市自然资源和规划局. 东营市矿产资源总体规划[EB/OL]. (2012-10-18) [2024-07-26]. .
	Dongying Natural Resources and Planning Bureau. Overall planning of mineral resources in Dongying city[EB/OL]. (2012-10-18) [2024-07-26]. .
[39]	中国石化胜利油田. 齐鲁石化-胜利油田百万吨级CCUS项目入选能源绿色低碳转型典型案例[EB/OL]. (2024-05-21) [2024-08-09]. .
	Sinopec Shengli Oilfield. The million-ton CCUS project of Qilu Petrochemical-Shengli Oilfield was selected as a typical case of energy green and low-carbon transformation[EB/OL]. (2024-05-21) [2024-08-09]. .
[40]	赵鲁涛, 顾启宇, 曲直, 等. 2024年国际原油价格分析与趋势预测[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(2): 55-58.
	ZHAO Lutao, GU Qiyu, QU Zhi, et al. Analysis and projection of international crude oil price in 2024[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 26(2): 55-58.
[41]	BESTUZHEVA Ksenia, CHMIELA Antonia, Benjamin MÜLLER, et al. Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs with SCIP 8[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2025, 91(2): 287-310.

编号	碳排放量 /t·a^-1	碳源类型	捕集成本 /CNY·t^-1
1	2.2×10⁵	升级改造装置和生产过程排放	260
2	1.68×10⁴	高温高压余热锅炉系统	340
3	1.2×10⁵	外购蒸汽、电力	412
4	1.0×10⁶	原油加工、燃料气燃烧	120
5	1.5×10⁴	厌氧发酵产沼气，通过内燃机并网发电	109
6	1.02×10⁶	燃煤锅炉发电、供汽	245
7	1.3×10³	焚烧炉	412
8	1.05×10⁶	电解槽/电解盐水、生产烧碱	112
9	1.2×10⁴	生活垃圾焚烧发电项目	405
10	1.365×10⁵	生产线、焚烧炉	364
11	2.4×10⁵	生物质燃烧	105
12	2.08×10⁵	加热炉	265
13	1.37×10⁴	燃煤锅炉	248
14	5.15×10⁶	原油加工、燃料气燃烧	104
15	3.6×10⁶	电力、燃煤锅炉	218
16	4.58×10⁶	电力、燃煤锅炉	204
17	2.08×10⁶	原油加工、燃料气燃烧	110
18	1.8×10⁶	化学产品制造、燃料气燃烧	215

编号	碳排放量 /t·a^-1	碳源类型	捕集成本 /CNY·t^-1
1	2.2×10⁵	升级改造装置和生产过程排放	260
2	1.68×10⁴	高温高压余热锅炉系统	340
3	1.2×10⁵	外购蒸汽、电力	412
4	1.0×10⁶	原油加工、燃料气燃烧	120
5	1.5×10⁴	厌氧发酵产沼气，通过内燃机并网发电	109
6	1.02×10⁶	燃煤锅炉发电、供汽	245
7	1.3×10³	焚烧炉	412
8	1.05×10⁶	电解槽/电解盐水、生产烧碱	112
9	1.2×10⁴	生活垃圾焚烧发电项目	405
10	1.365×10⁵	生产线、焚烧炉	364
11	2.4×10⁵	生物质燃烧	105
12	2.08×10⁵	加热炉	265
13	1.37×10⁴	燃煤锅炉	248
14	5.15×10⁶	原油加工、燃料气燃烧	104
15	3.6×10⁶	电力、燃煤锅炉	218
16	4.58×10⁶	电力、燃煤锅炉	204
17	2.08×10⁶	原油加工、燃料气燃烧	110
18	1.8×10⁶	化学产品制造、燃料气燃烧	215

序号	碳源位置	碳汇位置	CO₂输运量/t·d^-1	管道建设费用/CNY	管道输运费用/CNY·d^-1	罐车输运费用/CNY·d^-1
1	4	3	1500	4.205×10⁷	1.58×10⁴	0
2	4	14	1046	0	0	8.9×10⁴
3	5	9	41	0	0	9.2×10²
4	8	7	1500	3.362×10⁷	1.263×10⁴	0
5	8	9	117	0	0	4.58×10³
6	8	10	660	9.6×10⁶	1.5×10³	0
7	8	11	600	1.923×10⁷	2.8×10³	0
8	11	9	264	0	0	1.6×10⁴
9	11	14	94	0	0	3.68×10³
10	11	20	300	0	0	2.1×10⁴
11	14	1	1080	7.562×10⁷	2.1×10⁴	0
12	14	2	1260	7.569×10⁷	2.4×10⁴	0
13	14	4	420	0	0	2.5×10⁴
14	14	12	540	0	0	9.83×10³
15	14	13	1200	2.045×10⁷	6.0×10³	0
16	14	16	420	0	0	1.0×10⁴
17	14	17	900	4.443×10⁷	1.0×10⁴	0
18	14	21	300	0	0	3.23×10⁴
19	17	5	1500	0	0	8.19×10⁴
20	17	6	1740	6.128×10⁷	2.7×10⁴	0
21	17	8	600	2.281×10⁷	3.4×10³	0
22	17	9	59	0	0	2.54×10³
23	17	15	540	0	0	2.34×10⁴
24	17	18	840	3.726×10⁷	7.8×10³	0
25	17	19	420	0	0	3.0×10⁴

序号	碳源位置	碳汇位置	CO₂输运量/t·d^-1	管道建设费用/CNY	管道输运费用/CNY·d^-1	罐车输运费用/CNY·d^-1
1	4	3	1500	4.205×10⁷	1.58×10⁴	0
2	4	14	1046	0	0	8.9×10⁴
3	5	9	41	0	0	9.2×10²
4	8	7	1500	3.362×10⁷	1.263×10⁴	0
5	8	9	117	0	0	4.58×10³
6	8	10	660	9.6×10⁶	1.5×10³	0
7	8	11	600	1.923×10⁷	2.8×10³	0
8	11	9	264	0	0	1.6×10⁴
9	11	14	94	0	0	3.68×10³
10	11	20	300	0	0	2.1×10⁴
11	14	1	1080	7.562×10⁷	2.1×10⁴	0
12	14	2	1260	7.569×10⁷	2.4×10⁴	0
13	14	4	420	0	0	2.5×10⁴
14	14	12	540	0	0	9.83×10³
15	14	13	1200	2.045×10⁷	6.0×10³	0
16	14	16	420	0	0	1.0×10⁴
17	14	17	900	4.443×10⁷	1.0×10⁴	0
18	14	21	300	0	0	3.23×10⁴
19	17	5	1500	0	0	8.19×10⁴
20	17	6	1740	6.128×10⁷	2.7×10⁴	0
21	17	8	600	2.281×10⁷	3.4×10³	0
22	17	9	59	0	0	2.54×10³
23	17	15	540	0	0	2.34×10⁴
24	17	18	840	3.726×10⁷	7.8×10³	0
25	17	19	420	0	0	3.0×10⁴