Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 603-613.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1208
Previous Articles Next Articles
DUAN Yihang(), GAO Ningbo(), QUAN Cui
Received:
2022-06-28
Revised:
2022-08-18
Online:
2023-03-13
Published:
2023-02-25
Contact:
GAO Ningbo
通讯作者:
高宁博
作者简介:
段一航(1994—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为含油污泥资源化利用。E-mail:yihangduan@foxmail.com。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
DUAN Yihang, GAO Ningbo, QUAN Cui. Effect of hydrothermal treatment on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of oily sludge[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(2): 603-613.
段一航, 高宁博, 全翠. 水热处理对含油污泥热解特性及动力学影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 603-613.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://hgjz.cip.com.cn/EN/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1208
样品 | 工业分析/% | 元素分析/% | 热值/MJ·kg-1 | 含油率/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水分 | 挥发分 | 灰分 | 固定碳 | C | H | O | N | S | |||
OS | 54.4 | 26.35 | 19.04 | 0.21 | 22.80 | 3.17 | 29.88 | 0.43 | 1.89 | 8.48 | 23.87 |
样品 | 工业分析/% | 元素分析/% | 热值/MJ·kg-1 | 含油率/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水分 | 挥发分 | 灰分 | 固定碳 | C | H | O | N | S | |||
OS | 54.4 | 26.35 | 19.04 | 0.21 | 22.80 | 3.17 | 29.88 | 0.43 | 1.89 | 8.48 | 23.87 |
样品 | β①/K·min-1 | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ti1②/K | Tp1③/K | -Rp1④/%·min-1 | Ti2/K | Tp2/K | -Rp2/%·min-1 | Ti3/K | Tp3/K | -Rp3/%·min-1 | ||
原样 | 10 | 106.11 | 343.11 | 13.28 | 343.11 | 510.11 | 11.90 | 510.11 | 650.09 | 3.67 |
160-10 | 10 | 110.15 | 338.06 | 13.83 | 338.06 | 505.01 | 11.02 | 505.01 | 658.16 | 3.92 |
200-10 | 10 | 107.88 | 338.03 | 13.95 | 338.03 | 506.04 | 9.91 | 395.26 | 655.90 | 4.34 |
240-10 | 10 | 110.04 | 335.14 | 14.76 | 335.14 | 505.04 | 9.55 | 505.04 | 650.19 | 4.50 |
样品 | β①/K·min-1 | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ti1②/K | Tp1③/K | -Rp1④/%·min-1 | Ti2/K | Tp2/K | -Rp2/%·min-1 | Ti3/K | Tp3/K | -Rp3/%·min-1 | ||
原样 | 10 | 106.11 | 343.11 | 13.28 | 343.11 | 510.11 | 11.90 | 510.11 | 650.09 | 3.67 |
160-10 | 10 | 110.15 | 338.06 | 13.83 | 338.06 | 505.01 | 11.02 | 505.01 | 658.16 | 3.92 |
200-10 | 10 | 107.88 | 338.03 | 13.95 | 338.03 | 506.04 | 9.91 | 395.26 | 655.90 | 4.34 |
240-10 | 10 | 110.04 | 335.14 | 14.76 | 335.14 | 505.04 | 9.55 | 505.04 | 650.19 | 4.50 |
转化率(α) | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol--1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | |
0.20 | 85.35 | 97.94 | 151.89 | 145.66 | 177.58 | 200.61 |
0.25 | 87.80 | 100.68 | 156.48 | 149.32 | 179.48 | 202.69 |
0.30 | 90.65 | 103.84 | 155.76 | 153.72 | 177.34 | 200.45 |
0.35 | 92.61 | 106.08 | 158.29 | 157.63 | 176.08 | 199.28 |
0.40 | 95.71 | 109.49 | 162.56 | 160.79 | 175.13 | 198.37 |
0.45 | 95.31 | 109.16 | 167.86 | 161.54 | 170.94 | 194.13 |
0.50 | 98.63 | 112.90 | 174.18 | 167.03 | 169.44 | 192.63 |
0.55 | 100.13 | 114.48 | 184.45 | 173.93 | 165.88 | 189.06 |
0.60 | 100.92 | 115.48 | 188.80 | 179.75 | 163.91 | 186.98 |
0.65 | 103.37 | 118.47 | 187.62 | 186.06 | 159.87 | 182.82 |
0.70 | 105.51 | 120.55 | 192.20 | 191.55 | 157.66 | 180.66 |
0.75 | 108.11 | 123.46 | 190.07 | 193.46 | 156.01 | 179.08 |
0.80 | 112.38 | 128.12 | 193.62 | 195.96 | 153.08 | 176.17 |
均值 | 98.19 | 112.36 | 174.14 | 170.49 | 167.88 | 190.99 |
转化率(α) | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol--1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | |
0.20 | 85.35 | 97.94 | 151.89 | 145.66 | 177.58 | 200.61 |
0.25 | 87.80 | 100.68 | 156.48 | 149.32 | 179.48 | 202.69 |
0.30 | 90.65 | 103.84 | 155.76 | 153.72 | 177.34 | 200.45 |
0.35 | 92.61 | 106.08 | 158.29 | 157.63 | 176.08 | 199.28 |
0.40 | 95.71 | 109.49 | 162.56 | 160.79 | 175.13 | 198.37 |
0.45 | 95.31 | 109.16 | 167.86 | 161.54 | 170.94 | 194.13 |
0.50 | 98.63 | 112.90 | 174.18 | 167.03 | 169.44 | 192.63 |
0.55 | 100.13 | 114.48 | 184.45 | 173.93 | 165.88 | 189.06 |
0.60 | 100.92 | 115.48 | 188.80 | 179.75 | 163.91 | 186.98 |
0.65 | 103.37 | 118.47 | 187.62 | 186.06 | 159.87 | 182.82 |
0.70 | 105.51 | 120.55 | 192.20 | 191.55 | 157.66 | 180.66 |
0.75 | 108.11 | 123.46 | 190.07 | 193.46 | 156.01 | 179.08 |
0.80 | 112.38 | 128.12 | 193.62 | 195.96 | 153.08 | 176.17 |
均值 | 98.19 | 112.36 | 174.14 | 170.49 | 167.88 | 190.99 |
转化率(α) | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2(FWO) | R2(KAS) | R2(FWO) | R2(KAS) | R2(FWO) | R2(KAS) | |
0.20 | 0.9957 | 0.9954 | 0.9601 | 0.9989 | 0.9653 | 0.9895 |
0.25 | 0.9959 | 0.9939 | 0.9671 | 0.9994 | 0.9738 | 0.9898 |
0.30 | 0.9936 | 0.9943 | 0.9657 | 0.9992 | 0.981 | 0.9891 |
0.35 | 0.9924 | 0.9939 | 0.9676 | 0.9998 | 0.9861 | 0.9878 |
0.40 | 0.9872 | 0.9953 | 0.9733 | 0.9999 | 0.9913 | 0.9871 |
0.45 | 0.9884 | 0.9959 | 0.9764 | 0.9999 | 0.9967 | 0.9858 |
0.50 | 0.9799 | 0.9964 | 0.971 | 0.9999 | 0.9982 | 0.9836 |
0.55 | 0.9759 | 0.9942 | 0.9811 | 0.9999 | 0.9989 | 0.9829 |
0.60 | 0.9715 | 0.994 | 0.9809 | 0.9998 | 0.9998 | 0.9841 |
0.65 | 0.9703 | 0.9949 | 0.9826 | 0.9992 | 0.9999 | 0.9856 |
0.70 | 0.9683 | 0.9963 | 0.9849 | 0.999 | 0.9996 | 0.9886 |
0.75 | 0.9683 | 0.9956 | 0.986 | 0.999 | 0.9987 | 0.9894 |
0.80 | 0.9631 | 0.9959 | 0.9844 | 0.9983 | 0.9985 | 0.9918 |
均值 | 0.9808 | 0.9951 | 0.9755 | 0.9994 | 0.99135 | 0.9875 |
转化率(α) | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2(FWO) | R2(KAS) | R2(FWO) | R2(KAS) | R2(FWO) | R2(KAS) | |
0.20 | 0.9957 | 0.9954 | 0.9601 | 0.9989 | 0.9653 | 0.9895 |
0.25 | 0.9959 | 0.9939 | 0.9671 | 0.9994 | 0.9738 | 0.9898 |
0.30 | 0.9936 | 0.9943 | 0.9657 | 0.9992 | 0.981 | 0.9891 |
0.35 | 0.9924 | 0.9939 | 0.9676 | 0.9998 | 0.9861 | 0.9878 |
0.40 | 0.9872 | 0.9953 | 0.9733 | 0.9999 | 0.9913 | 0.9871 |
0.45 | 0.9884 | 0.9959 | 0.9764 | 0.9999 | 0.9967 | 0.9858 |
0.50 | 0.9799 | 0.9964 | 0.971 | 0.9999 | 0.9982 | 0.9836 |
0.55 | 0.9759 | 0.9942 | 0.9811 | 0.9999 | 0.9989 | 0.9829 |
0.60 | 0.9715 | 0.994 | 0.9809 | 0.9998 | 0.9998 | 0.9841 |
0.65 | 0.9703 | 0.9949 | 0.9826 | 0.9992 | 0.9999 | 0.9856 |
0.70 | 0.9683 | 0.9963 | 0.9849 | 0.999 | 0.9996 | 0.9886 |
0.75 | 0.9683 | 0.9956 | 0.986 | 0.999 | 0.9987 | 0.9894 |
0.80 | 0.9631 | 0.9959 | 0.9844 | 0.9983 | 0.9985 | 0.9918 |
均值 | 0.9808 | 0.9951 | 0.9755 | 0.9994 | 0.99135 | 0.9875 |
转化率(α) | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | |
0.20 | 65.75 | 76.99 | 128.03 | 145.66 | 170.07 | 166.53 |
0.25 | 67.17 | 78.65 | 131.43 | 149.32 | 171.73 | 168.69 |
0.30 | 69.39 | 81.23 | 135.46 | 153.72 | 172.29 | 169.27 |
0.35 | 70.65 | 82.72 | 139.09 | 157.63 | 172.68 | 169.44 |
0.40 | 73.02 | 85.38 | 142.02 | 160.79 | 174.26 | 169.27 |
0.45 | 75.07 | 87.71 | 142.65 | 161.54 | 173.55 | 169.19 |
0.50 | 76.42 | 89.29 | 147.79 | 167.03 | 172.92 | 167.11 |
0.55 | 77.13 | 90.21 | 154.19 | 173.93 | 172.13 | 165.86 |
0.60 | 78.32 | 91.54 | 159.64 | 179.75 | 170.94 | 164.95 |
0.65 | 78.87 | 92.28 | 165.57 | 186.06 | 169.36 | 164.70 |
0.70 | 79.90 | 93.53 | 170.70 | 191.55 | 169.04 | 165.61 |
0.75 | 82.11 | 95.94 | 172.36 | 193.46 | 169.12 | 165.61 |
0.80 | 83.77 | 97.85 | 174.66 | 195.96 | 167.38 | 163.78 |
均值 | 75.20 | 87.95 | 151.04 | 170.49 | 171.19 | 166.92 |
转化率(α) | 第一阶段 | 第二阶段 | 第三阶段 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | E(FWO)/kJ·mol-1 | E(KAS)/kJ·mol-1 | |
0.20 | 65.75 | 76.99 | 128.03 | 145.66 | 170.07 | 166.53 |
0.25 | 67.17 | 78.65 | 131.43 | 149.32 | 171.73 | 168.69 |
0.30 | 69.39 | 81.23 | 135.46 | 153.72 | 172.29 | 169.27 |
0.35 | 70.65 | 82.72 | 139.09 | 157.63 | 172.68 | 169.44 |
0.40 | 73.02 | 85.38 | 142.02 | 160.79 | 174.26 | 169.27 |
0.45 | 75.07 | 87.71 | 142.65 | 161.54 | 173.55 | 169.19 |
0.50 | 76.42 | 89.29 | 147.79 | 167.03 | 172.92 | 167.11 |
0.55 | 77.13 | 90.21 | 154.19 | 173.93 | 172.13 | 165.86 |
0.60 | 78.32 | 91.54 | 159.64 | 179.75 | 170.94 | 164.95 |
0.65 | 78.87 | 92.28 | 165.57 | 186.06 | 169.36 | 164.70 |
0.70 | 79.90 | 93.53 | 170.70 | 191.55 | 169.04 | 165.61 |
0.75 | 82.11 | 95.94 | 172.36 | 193.46 | 169.12 | 165.61 |
0.80 | 83.77 | 97.85 | 174.66 | 195.96 | 167.38 | 163.78 |
均值 | 75.20 | 87.95 | 151.04 | 170.49 | 171.19 | 166.92 |
1 | DUAN Yihang, GAO Ningbo, SIPRA Ayesha Tariq, et al. Characterization of heavy metals and oil components in the products of oily sludge after hydrothermal treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 424: 127293. |
2 | ZHOU Lingsheng, JIANG Xiumin, LIU Jianguo. Characteristics of oily sludge combustion in circulating fluidized beds[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 170(1): 175-179. |
3 | SILVA L J DA, ALVES F C, DE FRANÇA F P. A review of the technological solutions for the treatment of oily sludges from petroleum refineries[J]. Waste Management & Research, 2012, 30(10): 1016-1030. |
4 | TANG Siqi, ZHENG Chunmiao, YAN Feng, et al. Product characteristics and kinetics of sewage sludge pyrolysis driven by alkaline earth metals[J]. Energy, 2018, 153: 921-932. |
5 | ZUBAIDY E A H, ABOUELNASR D M. Fuel recovery from waste oily sludge using solvent extraction[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2010, 88(5): 318-326. |
6 | PUASA S W, ISMAIL K N, MUSMAN M Z A, et al. Enhanced oily sludge dewatering using plant-based surfactant technology[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2019, 19: 1159-1165. |
7 | MANARA P, ZABANIOTOU A. Towards sewage sludge based biofuels via thermochemical conversion—A review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(5): 2566-2582. |
8 | GAO Ningbo, DUAN Yihang, LI Zongyang, et al. Hydrothermal treatment combined with in situ mechanical compression for floated oily sludge dewatering[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 402: 124173. |
9 | XU Menghan, ZHANG Jie, LIU Haifeng, et al. The resource utilization of oily sludge by co-gasification with c oal[J]. Fuel, 2014, 126: 55-61. |
10 | 董向元, 郭淑青, 杨继涛, 等. 玉米秸秆水热焦热解及动力学特性研究[J]. 林产化学与工业, 2018, 38(3): 83-89. |
DONG Xiangyuan, GUO Shuqing, YANG Jitao, et al. Pyrolysis and kinetic characteristics of corn stalk char from hydrothermal carbonization[J]. Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products, 2018, 38(3): 83-89. | |
11 | 邢献军, 杨静, 范方宇, 等. 木屑及其水热炭的热解特性和动力学对比[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(4): 258-264. |
XING Xianjun, YANG Jing, FAN Fangyu, et al. Comparison of pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of sawdust and its hydrochar[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(4): 258-264. | |
12 | WANG Shule, WEN Yuming, SHI Ziyi, et al. Effect of hydrothermal carbonization pretreatment on the pyrolysis behavior of the digestate of agricultural waste: A view on kinetics and thermodynamics[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 431: 133881. |
13 | ZHANG Jingmiao, XIA Ao, ZHU Xianqing, et al. Co-production of carbon quantum dots and biofuels via hydrothermal conversion of biomass[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2022, 232: 107276. |
14 | 高昌胜, 魏茂, 蒋文广, 等. 基于含油污泥热解残渣的路基材料制备与性能评价[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(6): 1895-1900. |
GAO Changsheng, WEI Mao, JIANG Wenguang, et al. Preparation and performance evaluation of roadbed materials based on pyrolysis residue of oily sludge[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(6): 1895-1900. | |
15 | 张秀霞, 贾宏宇, 刘炳琨. 超声处理对污泥热解特性及反应动力学影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1): 171-176. |
ZHANG Xiuxia, JIA Hongyu, LIU Bingkun. Effects of ultrasonic treatment on pyrolysis characteristics and reaction kinetics of municipal sludge[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2022, 46(1): 171-176. | |
16 | 刘承飞, 李江平, 刘大方, 等. 废旧电脑印刷电路板的热解特性及动力学分析[J]. 有色金属科学与工程, 2022, 13(1): 38-43. |
LIU Chengfei, LI Jiangping, LIU Dafang, et al. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics analysis of waste computer printed circuit board[J]. Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering, 2022, 13(1): 38-43. | |
17 | MIAN Inamullah, LI Xian, JIAN Yiming, et al. Kinetic study of biomass pellet pyrolysis by using distributed activation energy model and Coats Redfern methods and their comparison[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 294: 122099. |
18 | QIN Linbo, HAN Jun, HE Xiang, et al. Recovery of energy and iron from oily sludge pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 154: 177-182. |
19 | XU Guiying, CAI Xinghui, WANG Shan, et al. Characteristics, kinetics, infrared analysis and process optimization of co-pyrolysis of waste tires and oily sludge[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 316: 115278. |
20 | NAQVI Salman Raza, TARIQ Rumaisa, SHAHBAZ Muhammad, et al. Recent developments on sewage sludge pyrolysis and its kinetics: Resources recovery, thermogravimetric platforms, and innovative prospects[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2021, 150: 107325. |
21 | LEE Sangho, KIM Young Min, SIDDIQUI Muhammad Zain, et al. Different pyrolysis kinetics and product distribution of municipal and livestock manure sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 285: 117197. |
22 | 王君. 基于热处理的含油污泥资源化利用技术[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018. |
WANG Jun. Resource recovery from oily sludge through thermal treatment technology[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018. | |
23 | 杨天华, 佟瑶, 李秉硕, 等. SDS联合亚临界水预处理对污泥水热液化制油的影响[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(5): 477-482. |
YANG Tianhua, TONG Yao, LI Bingshuo, et al. Combined(SDS+subcritical water) pretreatment effect on hydro-liquefaction of municipal sludge[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021, 42(5): 477-482. | |
24 | Nebojša MANIĆ, Bojan JANKOVIĆ, DODEVSKI Vladimir. Model-free and model-based kinetic analysis of Poplar fluff (Populus alba) pyrolysis process under dynamic conditions[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021, 143(5): 3419-3438. |
25 | WANG Qiuju, ZHANG Zhao, XU Guoren, et al. Pyrolysis behaviors of antibiotic fermentation residue and wastewater sludge from penicillin production: Kinetics, gaseous products distribution, and nitrogen transformation[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2021, 158: 105208. |
26 | MPHAHLELE Katlego, MATJIE Ratale Henry, OSIFO Peter Ogbemudia. Thermodynamics, kinetics and thermal decomposition characteristics of sewage sludge during slow pyrolysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 284: 112006. |
27 | ZHAO Ming, RAHEEM Abdul, MEMON Zaki Mohammad, et al. Iso-conversional kinetics of low-lipid micro-algae gasification by air[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 207: 618-629. |
28 | XU G, GAI X, WANG S, et al. Characteristics, kinetics, infrared analysis and process optimization of co-pyrolysis of waste tires and oily sludge[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 316: 115278. |
29 | WANG Fei, GUO Chennan, LIU Xiangyue, et al. Revealing carbon-iron interaction characteristics in sludge-derived hydrochars under different hydrothermal conditions[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 300: 134572. |
30 | Gamzenur ÖZSIN, Esin APAYDıN-VAROL, Murat KıLıÇ, et al. Pyrolysis of petroleum sludge under non-isothermal conditions: Thermal decomposition behavior, kinetics, thermodynamics, and evolved gas analysis[J]. Fuel, 2021, 300: 120980. |
31 | Leena PAULINE A, JOSEPH Kurian. Hydrothermal carbonization of oily sludge for solid fuel recovery-investigation of chemical characteristics and combustion behaviour[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2021, 157: 105235. |
[1] | GU Yongzheng, ZHANG Yongsheng. Dynamic behavior and kinetic model of Hg0 adsorption by HBr-modified fly ash [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509. |
[2] | WANG Peng, ZHANG Yang, FAN Bingqiang, HE Dengbo, SHEN Changshuai, ZHANG Hedong, ZHENG Shili, ZOU Xing. Process and kinetics of hydrochloric acid leaching of high-carbon ferrochromium [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 510-517. |
[3] | LI Zhiyuan, HUANG Yaji, ZHAO Jiaqi, YU Mengzhu, ZHU Zhicheng, CHENG Haoqiang, SHI Hao, WANG Sheng. Characterization of heavy metals during co-pyrolysis of sludge with PVC [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4947-4956. |
[4] | WANG Junjie, PAN Yanqiu, NIU Yabin, YU Lu. Molecular level catalytic reforming model construction and application [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3404-3412. |
[5] | LI Haidong, YANG Yuankun, GUO Shushu, WANG Benjin, YUE Tingting, FU Kaibin, WANG Zhe, HE Shouqin, YAO Jun, CHEN Shu. Effect of carbonization and calcination temperature on As(Ⅲ) removal performance of plant-based Fe-C microelectrolytic materials [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3652-3663. |
[6] | YANG Ziyu, ZHU Ling, WANG Wenlong, YU Chaofan, SANG Yimin. Research and application progress of smoldering combustion technology for oily sludge [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3760-3769. |
[7] | YAO Liming, WANG Yazhuo, FAN Honggang, GU Qing, YUAN Haoran, CHEN Yong. Treatment status of kitchen waste and its research progress of pyrolysis technology [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3791-3801. |
[8] | ZHANG Shan, ZHONG Zhaoping, YANG Yuxuan, DU Haoran, LI Qian. Enrichment of heavy metals in pyrolysis of municipal solid waste by phosphate modified kaolin [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3893-3903. |
[9] | LI Ruolin, HE Shaolin, YUAN Hongying, LIU Boyue, JI Dongli, SONG Yang, LIU Bo, YU Jiqing, XU Yingjun. Effect of in-situ pyrolysis on physical properties of oil shale and groundwater quality [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3309-3318. |
[10] | LI Dongxian, WANG Jia, JIANG Jianchun. Producing biofuels from soapstock via pyrolysis and subsequent catalytic vapor-phase hydrotreating process [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 2874-2883. |
[11] | WANG Zhiwei, GUO Shuaihua, WU Mengge, CHEN Yan, ZHAO Junting, LI Hui, LEI Tingzhou. Recent advances on catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(5): 2655-2665. |
[12] | LIANG Yijing, MA Yan, LU Zhanfeng, QIN Fusheng, WAN Junjie, WANG Zhiyuan. Experimental investigation on the anti-coking performance of La1-x Sr x MnO3 perovskite coating [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 1769-1778. |
[13] | GE Weitong, LIAO Yalong, LI Mingyuan, JI Guangxiong, XI Jiajun. Preparation and dechlorination kinetics of Pd-Fe/MWCNTs bimetallic catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 1885-1894. |
[14] | LIU Jing, LIN Lin, ZHANG Jian, ZHAO Feng. Research progress in pore size regulation and electrochemical performance of biomass-based carbon materials [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 1907-1916. |
[15] | YANG Ziqiang, LI Fenghai, GUO Weijie, MA Mingjie, ZHAO Wei. Review on phosphorus migration and transformation during municipal sewage sludge heat treatment [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 2081-2090. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号 Copyright © Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, All Rights Reserved. E-mail: hgjz@cip.com.cn Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd |