Research progress on test methods and inhibition strategies of asphalt fumes

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-0402

Abstract

Abstract:

Asphalt materials will release a large amount of solid particles and harmful gases during the mixing, transportation and paving stages, collectively known as asphalt fumes. In order to alleviate the adverse effects of asphalt fumes and promote the rapid development of green transportation, domestic and foreign scholars have carried out extensive research on the indoor and outdoor detection methods, release characteristics and suppression measures of asphalt fumes. Due to the differences in fumes detection methods and evaluation indicators adopted by different scholars, the correlation between detection data and evaluation results is low. Additionally, there is a lack of systematic research on the formation mechanism of asphalt fumes and the mechanism of fumes suppression, which makes the fumes suppression asphalt insufficient in terms of inhibition effect and road performance. This paper reviewed the research status of asphalt fumes at home and abroad, summarized the existing asphalt fumes detection methods, and compared the advantages and disadvantages of each detection method and the scope of application. The release characteristics of asphalt fumes were described from three aspects: asphalt type, temperature and heating time. The fumes suppression effect and suppression mechanism of various suppression measures were compared and analyzed. Finally, it was proposed that the future asphalt fumes suppression technology should be studied from the aspects of developing efficient and standardized fumes detection technology, exploring the evolution mechanism and transformation relationship of various substances in fumes, developing new composite porous suppression materials, and environmental benefits and health risk assessment, which laid a foundation for achieving efficient emission reduction of asphalt fumes.

Key words: asphalt, asphalt fumes, test methods, releasing characteristics, inhibition strategies

摘要：

沥青材料在拌和、运输以及摊铺阶段会释放大量的固体颗粒物与有害气体，统称为沥青烟气。为缓解沥青烟气的不良影响，推动绿色交通快速发展，国内外学者主要从沥青烟气的室内外检测方法、释放特性以及抑制措施等方面展开了广泛研究。由于不同学者采用烟气检测方法和评价指标的差异，导致检测数据和评价结果的相关性较低；同时，在沥青烟气生成机理以及烟气抑制机制方面缺乏系统性研究，使得抑烟沥青在抑制效果与路用性能方面存在不足。本文综述了沥青烟气的国内外研究现状，总结归纳了现有的沥青烟气检测方法，并对比了各检测方法的优缺点及适用范围，从沥青种类、温度与加热时间三个方面阐述了沥青烟气的释放特性，对比分析了各类抑制措施的烟气抑制效果及抑制机理，最后提出了未来沥青抑烟技术应从开发高效规范的烟气检测技术、探究烟气中各物质的演变机制与转化关系、研发新型复合多孔抑制材料以及环境效益与健康风险评估等方面开展研究，为实现沥青烟气高效减排奠定基础。

关键词: 沥青, 沥青烟气, 检测方法, 释放特性, 抑制措施

CLC Number:

TU535

LIU Yanyan, ZHOU Shuai, HE Ziqi, LYU Yi. Research progress on test methods and inhibition strategies of asphalt fumes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2025, 44(3): 1632-1650.

刘燕燕, 周帅, 何紫琪, 吕艺. 沥青烟气检测方法及抑制措施研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(3): 1632-1650.

Figures/Tables 18

References 106

1	中华人民共和国交通运输部. 2022年交通运输行业发展统计公报[J]. 中国水运, 2023(13): 29-33.
	Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Statistical bulletin on the development of transportation industry in 2022[J]. China Water Transport, 2023(13): 29-33.
2	WANG Meng, LI Ping, NIAN Tengfei, et al. An overview of studies on the hazards, component analysis and suppression of fumes in asphalt and asphalt mixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 289: 123185.
3	谢辉端. 净味沥青及混合料环境影响评价方法研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2022.
	XIE Huiduan. Research on the environmental impact assessment method of fresh asphalt and mixes[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2022.
4	王亚萍. 温拌抑烟沥青制备及其混合料性能研究[D]. 天津: 河北工业大学, 2021.
	WANG Yaping. Study on preparation and properties of warm-mixing smoky-suppression asphalt mixture[D]. Tianjin: Hebei University of Technology, 2021.
5	王俐栋. 环保型抑烟沥青及其混合料性能研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2013.
	WANG Lidong. Research on the performance of inhibit-smoke asphalt and asphalt mixture[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2013.
6	鲍金奇. 光催化材料对道路沥青烟气抑制作用的研究[D]. 抚顺: 辽宁石油化工大学, 2020.
	BAO Jinqi. Study on the inhibition effect of photocatalytic materials on road asphalt fume[D]. Fushun: Liaoning Petrochemical University, 2020.
7	CUI Peng, SCHITO Gabriella, CUI Qingbin. VOC emissions from asphalt pavement and health risks to construction workers[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 244: 118757.
8	李婷婷. 沥青生产及铺路过程中VOCs的排放特征与控制对策研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2020.
	LI Tingting. VOCs emission characteristics and control countermeasures in the asphalt production and asphalt pavement construction[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2020.
9	WANG Fusong, LI Na, HOFF Inge, et al. Characteristics of VOCs generated during production and construction of an asphalt pavement[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 87: 102517.
10	MO Shicong, WANG Yuhong, XIONG Feng, et al. Effects of asphalt source and mixing temperature on the generated asphalt fumes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 371: 342-351.
11	LI Na, JIANG Qi, WANG Fusong, et al. Emission behavior, environmental impact and priority-controlled pollutants assessment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during asphalt pavement construction based on laboratory experiment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 398: 122904.
12	徐永丽, 杨松翰, 周吉森, 等. 基于重量法的沥青烟释放量影响因素研究[J]. 森林工程, 2022, 38(2): 119-124, 132.
	XU Yongli, YANG Songhan, ZHOU Jisen, et al. Research on influencing factors of asphalt fume release based on quality method[J]. Forest Engineering, 2022, 38(2): 119-124, 132.
13	叶伟. 抑烟沥青抑烟性能定量评价的对比实验研究[J]. 公路工程, 2015, 40(2): 244-248.
	YE Wei. Contrast experimental study on smoke suppression performance of smoke suppression asphalt by quantitative evaluation[J]. Highway Engineering, 2015, 40(2): 244-248.
14	WANG Huan, LIU Quantao, WU Shaopeng, et al. Study of synergistic effect of diatomite and modified attapulgite on reducing asphalt volatile organic compounds emission[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 400: 132827.
15	PENG Xuya, LI Zhiyang. Study on regularity of fumes emitting from asphalt[J]. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 2010, 16(5): 833-839.
16	XIAO Fei, ZHANG Hongzhang, ZHANG Xinyu, et al. Fume suppression agents for environmental-friendly asphalt pavement[J]. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 2010, 16(5): 805-813.
17	赖淏, 蔡相连, 高伟, 等. 阻燃抑烟沥青混合料研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2023, 52(4): 1237-1242.
	LAI Hao, CAI Xianglian, GAO Weiet al. Research progress in flame retardant and smoke suppressor asphalt mixtures[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2023, 52(4): 1237-1242.
18	中华人民共和国生态环境部. 固定污染源排气中沥青烟的测定重量法: [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2004.
	Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Stationary source emission—Determination of asphaltic smoke—Gravimetric method: [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2004.
19	李澳. 橡胶沥青净味机理及性能评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
	LI Ao. Deodorization mechanism and performance evaluation of rubber asphalt[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.
20	孙吉书, 王亚萍, 王鹏飞, 等. 抑烟环保型沥青性能试验分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2428-2436.
	SUN Jishu, WANG Yaping, WANG Pengfei, et al. Performance test analysis of smoke suppression environment-friendly asphalt[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 40(7): 2428-2436.
21	王鹏飞, 王亚萍, 孙吉书. 不同添加剂对沥青抑烟效果影响的试验研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2022, 22(2): 932-940.
	WANG Pengfei, WANG Yaping, SUN Jishu. Experimental research on the influence of different additives on asphalt smoke suppression[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2022, 22(2): 932-940.
22	李萍, 陈修乐, 张强, 等. 抑烟沥青复掺配比优化及抑烟效果评价[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(4): 1923-1933.
	LI Ping, CHEN Xiule, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Optimization of compounding ratio of fume-suppressing asphalt and evaluation of its effect of fume suppression[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(4): 1923-1933.
23	陈修乐. 热拌抑烟沥青复配比优化及抑烟减排效果评价[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2023.
	CHEN Xiule. Optimization of compound ratio of hot mix fume-suppressing asphalt and its evaluation of fume suppression and emission reduction effect[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2023.
24	WANG Guangchen, YANG Xiaolong, YANG Deyu, et al. Effect of heating history on the emission of volatile organic compounds from asphalt materials[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 900: 165692.
25	叶伟. 隧道抑烟沥青的研制与抑烟沥青混合料路用性能研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2014.
	YE Wei. Development of tunnel smoke suppression asphalt and study on road performance of smoke suppression asphalt mixture[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2014.
26	乔志, 陈谦, 王朝辉, 等. 新型电气石复合材料及其沥青烟吸附性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(8): 126-131, 149.
	QIAO Zhi, CHEN Qian, WANG Chaohui, et al. New tourmaline composite and its asphalt smoke adsorption performance[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2021, 40(8): 126-131, 149.
27	莫菊青. 紫外分光光度法测定空气中沥青烟[J]. 理化检验-化学分册, 2014, 50(4): 498-499.
	MO Juqing. Determination of asphalt smoke in air by ultraviolet spectrophotometry[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part B: Chemical Analysis), 2014, 50(4): 498-499.
28	李晓虹. 沥青烟的紫外分光光度测定[J]. 煤炭技术, 2002, 21(9): 57.
	LI Xiaohong. Ultraviolet spectrophotometry determination of bituminous smoke[J]. Coal Technology, 2002, 21(9): 57.
29	郑海琴. 紫外分光光度法测定水中石油沥青质的方法[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2021, 47(9): 102-104.
	ZHENG Haiqin. Method of petroleum asphaltene in water by ultraviolet spectrophotometry[J]. Chemical Engineering Design Communications, 2021, 47(9): 102-104.
30	SHARMA Ajit, LEE Byeong-Kyu. A novel nanocomposite of Ca(OH)₂-incorporated zeolite as an additive to reduce atmospheric emissions of PM and VOCs during asphalt production[J]. Environmental Science: Nano, 2017, 4(3): 613-624.
31	SHARMA Ajit, LEE Byeong-Kyu. Energy savings and reduction of CO₂ emission using Ca(OH)₂ incorporated zeolite as an additive for warm and hot mix asphalt production[J]. Energy, 2017, 136: 142-150.
32	陈硕秋. 隧道路面用环保型沥青抑烟效果与路用性能研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2023.
	CHEN Shuoqiu. Research on the smoke suppression effect and road performance of environmentally friendly asphalt used in tunnel pavement[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2023.
33	LIANG Hehao, ZHAO Pu, XU Ruifeng, et al. Influence of smoke suppressant on the smoke inhibition effect and properties of different types of asphalt[J]. Frontiers in Materials, 2023, 10: 1205050.
34	ESPINOZA Javier, MEDINA Cristian, Alejandra CALABI-FLOODY, et al. Evaluation of reductions in fume emissions (VOCs and SVOCs) from warm mix asphalt incorporating natural zeolite and reclaimed asphalt pavement for sustainable pavements[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(22): 9546.
35	LIN Shiying, HUNG Wingtat, LENG Zhen. Air pollutant emissions and acoustic performance of hot mix asphalts[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 129: 1-10.
36	TANG Naipeng, ZHANG Zhiyu, DONG Ruikun, et al. Emission behavior of crumb rubber modified asphalt in the production process[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 340: 130850.
37	龙永双, 吴少鹏, 肖月, 等. 基于PY-GC-MS的沥青VOCs挥发规律研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2018, 42(1): 1-6.
	LONG Yongshuang, WU Shaopeng, XIAO Yue, et al. Volatilization law research of asphalt VOCs based on PY-GC-MS[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2018, 42(1): 1-6.
38	常郗文. 沥青VOCs的全组分定量分析及沸石的VOCs抑制研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2020.
	CHANG Xiwen. Research on quantitative analysis of asphalt VOCs and inhibitor contribution of zeolites[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2020.
39	董前坤. 热拌沥青路面全生命周期VOCs排放评估模型研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2021.
	DONG Qiankun. Research on VOCs emission evaluation model for whole life cycle of hot mix asphalt pavement[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2021.
40	张瑞. 沥青材料有机排放物逃逸行为与抑制研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2023.
	ZHANG Rui. Research on the emission behaviour and inhibition of organic emissions from asphalt materials[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2023.
41	RHOMBERG Lorenz R, MAYFIELD David B, PRUEITT Robyn L, et al. A bounding quantitative cancer risk assessment for occupational exposures to asphalt emissions during road paving operations[J]. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2018, 48(9): 713-737.
42	RHOMBERG Lorenz R, MAYFIELD David B, GOODMAN Julie E, et al. Quantitative cancer risk assessment for occupational exposures to asphalt fumes during built-up roofing asphalt (BURA) operations[J]. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2015, 45(10): 873-918.
43	鲍金奇, 王浩轩, 丛玉凤, 等. 道路沥青抑烟剂的研究进展[J]. 当代化工, 2020, 49(5): 988-992.
	BAO Jinqi, WANG Haoxuan, CONG Yufeng, et al. Research progress of road asphalt smoke suppressant[J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(5): 988-992.
44	肖月, 常郗文, 董前坤, 等. 道路沥青材料VOCs的指纹组分及其定量分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(10): 276-287.
	XIAO Yue, CHANG Xiwen, DONG Qiankun, et al. Fingerprint components and quantitative analysis of volatile organic compounds of asphalt materials[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(10): 276-287.
45	丁佳瑛. 石油沥青烟气排放及抑制规律的研究[D]. 太原: 太原科技大学, 2022.
	DING Jiaying. Research on fume emission and suppression law of petroleum asphalt[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, 2022.
46	LI Na, JIANG Qi, WANG Fusong, et al. Comparative assessment of asphalt volatile organic compounds emission from field to laboratory[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 278: 123479.
47	张红华. 抑烟沥青的性能及抑烟效果评价研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2014.
	ZHANG Honghua. Study on performance and suppression effect of inhibitors modified asphalts[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2014.
48	杨锡武, 彭绪亚, 张兴雨, 等. 沥青烟气抑制剂及沥青混合料性能的试验[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2013, 36(12): 70-78.
	YANG Xiwu, PENG Xuya, ZHANG Xingyu, et al. Experiments on the asphalt fume suppression agents and properties of asphalt concrete with fume suppression agent[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2013, 36(12): 70-78.
49	杨锡武, 彭绪亚, 钱诗林. 路面施工沥青烟气抑制剂及现场应用试验研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(6): 122-127.
	YANG Xiwu, PENG Xuya, QIAN Shilin. Experimental study on suppression agents of asphalt fume from pavement construction and its application[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(6): 122-127.
50	中华人民共和国交通部. 公路沥青路面施工技术规范: [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2005.
	Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specifications for construction of highway asphalt pavements: [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2005.
51	WANG Xinwen, ZHANG Weijun, Study on influencing factors of asphalt fume releasing and its hazards[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 209/210/211: 1257-1260.
52	曹嘉慧, 申峻, 王玉高, 等. 共混沥青烟中16种多环芳烃的释放规律[J]. 煤炭转化, 2019, 42(5): 88-96.
	CAO Jiahui, SHEN Jun, WANG Yugao, et al. Release of 16 kinds of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in blended asphalt fume[J]. Coal Conversion, 2019, 42(5): 88-96.
53	CUI P Q, WU S P, XIAO Y, et al. Experimental study on the reduction of fumes emissions in asphalt by different additives[J]. Materials Research Innovations, 2015, 19(S1): 158-161.
54	肖月, 常郗文, 张晓珊, 等. 氢氧化钙沸石的设计及其对沥青VOCs的抑制[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(4): 17-26.
	XIAO Yue, CHANG Xiwen, ZHANG Xiaoshan, et al. Design of Ca(OH)₂-incorporated zeolite and its inhibition effect on bitumen VOCs[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 39(4): 17-26.
55	TEKIN Burak, Yıldıray TOPCU. Novel hemp biomass-derived activated carbon as cathode material for aqueous zinc-ion hybrid supercapacitors: Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical performance[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 77: 109879.
56	LONG Yongshuang, WU Shaopeng, XIAO Yue, et al. VOCs reduction and inhibition mechanisms of using active carbon filler in bituminous materials[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 181: 784-793.
57	XIAO Y, WAN M, JENKINS K J, et al. Using activated carbon to reduce the volatile organic compounds from bituminous materials[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2017, 29(10): 04017166.
58	侯梅芳, 崔杏雨, 李瑞丰. 沸石分子筛在气体吸附分离方面的应用研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2001, 32(2): 135-139, 144.
	HOU Meifang, CUI Xingyu, LI Ruifeng. Application of zeolite molecular sieves adsorbents in gas separation[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2001, 32(2): 135-139, 144.
59	孙仕伟, 乔云雁, 杨晓菲, 等. 不同抑烟剂对沥青混合料动态性能的影响及抑烟效果研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2017, 44(1): 25-29.
	SUN Shiwei, QIAO Yunyan, YANG Xiaofei, et al. Effect of different smoke suppression agent on the dynamic performance of asphalt mixture and the effect of smoke suppression[J]. New Building Materials, 2017, 44(1): 25-29.
60	黄刚, 何兆益, 黄涛. 高温状态沥青烟释放室内测定与影响因素分析[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2015, 18(2): 322-327.
	HUANG Gang, HE Zhaoyi, HUANG Tao. Laboratory measurement and analysis of effect factor on asphalt fume under the elevated temperature[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2015, 18(2): 322-327.
61	黄刚. 高温条件下抑烟改性沥青开发及混合料性能研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2013.
	HUANG Gang. Exploitation of modified asphalt of fume suppression and study on performance of its mixture under the elevated temperature[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2013.
62	CAO Zhilong, GONG Guanyu, LIU Yu, et al. Effects of different inhibitors on emission characteristics, environmental impact and health risk of volatile organic compounds from asphalt binder[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 428: 139427.
63	HUANG Gang, HE Zhaoyi, HUANG Yangcheng, et al. Mechanism of fume suppression and performance on asphalt of expanded graphite for pavement under high temperature condition[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Materials Science Edition, 2014, 29(6): 1229-1236.
64	黄刚, 何兆益, 周超, 等. 膨胀石墨抑制沥青烟机理与抑烟沥青混合料动态性能[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(10): 1-10.
	HUANG Gang, HE Zhaoyi, ZHOU Chao, et al. Suppression mechanism of expanded graphite for asphalt fume and dynamic performance of asphalt mixture of fume suppression[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(10): 1-10.
65	XU Song, YU Jianying, WU Weifei, et al. Synthesis and characterization of layered double hydroxides intercalated by UV absorbents and their application in improving UV aging resistance of bitumen[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2015, 114: 112-119.
66	LIU Xing, WU Shaopeng, LIU Gang, et al. Effect of ultraviolet aging on rheology and chemistry of LDH-modified bitumen[J]. Materials, 2015, 8(8): 5238-5249.
67	CUI Peiqiang, WU Shaopeng, XIAO Yue, et al. Inhibiting effect of layered double hydroxides on the emissions of volatile organic compounds from bituminous materials[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 108: 987-991.
68	CUI P Q, ZHOU H G, LI C, et al. Characteristics of using layered double hydroxides to reduce the VOCs from bituminous materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 123: 69-77.
69	CUI Peiqiang, ZHANG Honghua, WU Shaopeng. Influence of high-temperature volatilization on performance of bituminous binder[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2014, 599: 164-167.
70	ZHU Kai, WANG Yunhe, TANG Daquan, et al. Flame-retardant mechanism of layered double hydroxides in asphalt binder[J]. Materials, 2019, 12(5): 801.
71	张新雨. 低烟气环保路用沥青及其混合料性能试验研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2011.
	ZHANG Xinyu. Green road with low flue gas asphalt and mixture experimental research[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2011.
72	王朝辉, 李彦伟, 葛娟, 等. Tourmaline改性沥青及其混合料热拌减排性能[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27(11): 17-24.
	WANG Chaohui, LI Yanwei, GE Juan, et al. Emission reduction effect of tourmaline modified asphalt and its mixtures under condition of hot-mix[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(11): 17-24.
73	WANG Chaohui, WANG Peng, LI Yanwei, et al. Laboratory investigation of dynamic rheological properties of tourmaline modified bitumen[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 80: 195-199.
74	WANG Chaohui, WANG Menghao, CHEN Qian, et al. Basic performance and asphalt smoke absorption effect of environment-friendly asphalt to improve pavement construction environment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 333: 130142.
75	常郗文, 龙永双, 仪明伟, 等. 道路沥青挥发性有机化合物减排材料的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(20): 247-262.
	CHANG Xiwen, LONG Yongshuang, YI Mingwei, et al. Research progress of emission reduction materials for volatile organic compounds reduction in asphalt pavement construction[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(20): 247-262.
76	SUN Guoqiang, LI Bin, SUN Daquan, et al. Chemo-rheological and morphology evolution of polymer modified bitumens under thermal oxidative and all-weather aging[J]. Fuel, 2021, 285: 118989.
77	SUN Guoqiang, NING Weidong, JIANG Xulai, et al. A comprehensive review on asphalt fume suppression and energy saving technologies in asphalt pavement industry[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 913: 169726.
78	ZHOU Bochao, GONG Guanyu, LIU Yu, et al. Technical and environmental performance assessment of VOCs inhibited asphalt binders and mixtures[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2023, 124: 103931.
79	PENG Xuya, QIAN Shilin, XIAO Fei, et al. The experimental study on the road asphalt fumes suppressive effect of SBS and nano calcium carbonate[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 233/234/235: 507-511.
80	郭寅川, 王涵, 申爱琴, 等. ATH/OMMT复合改性沥青阻燃抑烟性能与机理分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(6): 1989-1997.
	GUO Yinchuan, WANG Han, SHEN Aiqin, et al. Analysis of flame-retarding and smoke suppressing performance and mechanism of ATH/OMMT modified asphalt[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 39(6): 1989-1997.
81	孙吉书, 李文霞, 李宁利, 等. 可膨胀石墨/氢氧化铝复合抑烟沥青制备及机理分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2022, 62(4): 386-393.
	SUN Jishu, LI Wenxia, LI Ningli, et al. Preparation and mechanism analysis of expandable graphite/aluminum hydroxide composite smoke suppression asphalt[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2022, 62(4): 386-393.
82	GUO Tengteng, FU Hao, WANG Chaohui, et al. Road performance and emission reduction effect of graphene/tourmaline-composite-modified asphalt[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(16): 8932.
83	GROSSO Mario, CERNUSCHI Stefano, GIUGLIANO Michele, et al. Environmental release and mass flux partitioning of PCDD/Fs during normal and transient operation of full scale waste to energy plants[J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 67(9): S118-S124.
84	李旭阳, 索智, 罗亮. 温拌沥青混合料在生产阶段的节能减排量化分析[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(S1): 209-212.
	LI Xuyang, SUO Zhi, LUO Liang. Quantitative analysis on energy saving and emission reduction of warm-mix asphalt mixture in production stage[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(S1): 209-212.
85	程玲, 闫国杰, 陈德珍, 等. 温拌沥青混合料摊铺节能减排效果的定量化研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2010, 4(9): 2151-2155.
	CHENG Ling, YAN Guojie, CHEN Dezhen, et al. Quantitative investigation on energy conservation and emission reduction related to warm mix asphalt (WMA)[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2010, 4(9): 2151-2155.
86	邱延峻, 罗浩原, 张家康, 等. 热拌与温拌沥青路面生产施工排放物对比[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(1): 30-39.
	QIU Yanjun, LUO Haoyuan, ZHANG Jiakang, et al. Comparative of emissions from production and construction of hot mix and warm mix asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 40(1): 30-39.
87	宋云连, 丁楠, 刘恒, 等. 温拌剂种类及掺量对不同沥青流变性能的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(2): 451-459.
	SONG Yunlian, DING Nan, LIU Heng, et al. Effect of warm mix agents type and dosage on rheological property of different asphalt[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(2): 451-459.
88	周国庆. 有机类温拌橡胶沥青流变改性机理研究[J]. 公路工程, 2014, 39(6): 330-336.
	ZHOU Guoqing. Investigation on the rheological modification mechanism of organic wax additives of crumb rubber modified asphalt[J]. Highway Engineering, 2014, 39(6): 330-336.
89	冯娟. 温拌沥青胶结料降黏机理研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2013.
	FENG Juan. Study on the mechanism of warm mix asphalt binder viscosity reduction[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2013.
90	王文奇, 邱延峻, 郭玉金, 等. 有机降黏型温拌沥青添加剂发展现状及展望[J]. 化工新型材料, 2017, 45(4): 210-212.
	WANG Wenqi, QIU Yanjun, GUO Yujin, et al. Present situation and prospect of organic reduced sticky additive for warm mix asphalt[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2017, 45(4): 210-212.
91	季节, 马童, 任万艳, 等. 温拌橡胶沥青降黏作用机理研究[J]. 中外公路, 2022, 42(6): 168-173.
	JI Jie, MA Tong, REN Wanyan, et al. Mechanism of rubber asphalts viscosity reduction by warm additives[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2022, 42(6): 168-173.
92	CAPITÃO S D, PICADO-SANTOS L G, MARTINHO F. Pavement engineering materials: Review on the use of warm-mix asphalt[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 36: 1016-1024.
93	梁波, 张海涛, 梁缘, 等. 温拌沥青技术研究综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2023, 23(2): 24-46.
	LIANG Bo, ZHANG Haitao, LIANG Yuan, et al. Review on warm mixing asphalt technology[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(2): 24-46.
94	司特, 刘又诚, 汤雄, 等. 表面活性类温拌剂对SBS改性沥青性能的影响研究[J]. 西部交通科技, 2023(3): 70-73.
	SI Te, LIU Youcheng, TANG Xiong, et al. Study on the influence of surface active warm mix agent on the properties of SBS modified asphalt[J]. Western China Communications Science & Technology, 2023(3): 70-73.
95	董昭, 徐书东, 柳久伟, 等. 不同类型温拌剂对沥青性能影响[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(1): 18-24.
	DONG Zhao, XU Shudong, LIU Jiuwei, et al. Effect of different types of warm mix agents on asphalt properties[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2023, 53(1): 18-24.
96	王维一, 张家文, 陈子钰, 等. 温拌沥青混合料的制备技术及评价[J]. 上海公路, 2017(4): 69-72, 6.
	WANG Weiyi, ZHANG Jiawen, CHEN Ziyu, et al. Preparation technology and evaluation of warm mix asphalt[J]. Shanghai Highways, 2017(4): 69-72, 6.
97	张童童, 高阳, 贺显威, 等. 基于LCA的温拌再生沥青路面建设期节能减排效果研究[J]. 公路, 2019, 64(4): 287-293.
	ZHANG Tongtong, GAO Yang, HE Xianwei, et al. Research on energy saving and emission reduction of the warm-mix asphalt recycling pavement during construction period based on life cycle assessment[J]. Highway, 2019, 64(4): 287-293.
98	杨凯凯. 地聚合物沥青混合料温拌剂的制备与性能研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳建筑大学, 2020.
	YANG Kaikai. Preparation and performance of warm mix asphalt additives based on geopolymer[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Jianzhu University, 2020.
99	SUKHIJA Mayank, SABOO Nikhil. A comprehensive review of warm mix asphalt mixtures-laboratory to field[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 274: 121781.
100	杨小龙, 申爱琴, 蒋宜馨, 等. 基于阻燃抑烟的纳米黏土改性沥青综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(5): 42-61.
	YANG Xiaolong, SHEN Aiqin, JIANG Yixin, et al. Review on nano clay modified asphalt based on flame retardant and smoke suppression[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 42-61.
101	赵毅, 田于锋, 郝增恒, 等. 隧道沥青路面阻燃抑烟技术及机理研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2021, 50(5): 1430-1438.
	ZHAO Yi, TIAN Yufeng, HAO Zengheng, et al. Research progress of flame retardant and smoke suppression technology and mechanism of tunnel asphalt pavement[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2021, 50(5): 1430-1438.
102	董芃伯. 聚磷酸铵阻燃沥青性能研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2012.
	DONG Pengbo. The research on performace of ammonium polyphosphate flame retardant asphalt[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2012.
103	何立平, 申爱琴, 梁军林, 等. 阻燃沥青及沥青混合料的阻燃性能及路用性能[J]. 公路交通科技, 2013, 30(12): 15-22.
	HE Liping, SHEN Aiqin, LIANG Junlin, et al. Flame retardant and pavement performance of flame retardant asphalt and asphalt mixture[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 30(12): 15-22.
104	党力, 吕智慧. 无机阻燃剂的研究进展[J]. 中国塑料, 2018, 32(9): 1-8.
	DANG Li, Zhihui LYU. Research progress on inorganic flame retardants[J]. China Plastics, 2018, 32(9): 1-8.
105	何兆益, 谭洋伟, 李家琪, 等. 埃洛石纳米管协效阻燃改性沥青性能及机理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(2): 72-79.
	HE Zhaoyi, TAN Yangwei, LI Jiaqi, et al. Study on the performance and mechanism of asphalt synergistically modified by halloysite nanotubes and conventional flame retardant[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(2): 72-79.
106	申爱琴, 苏宇轩, 杨小龙, 等. ATH/MMT阻燃剂对沥青混合料性能的影响[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(2): 1-9.
	SHEN Aiqin, SU Yuxuan, YANG Xiaolong, et al. Influencing of compounding flame retardants with ATH/MMT on performance of asphalt mixture[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 40(2): 1-9.

方法	烟气产物	检测出组分数量	优点	缺点
重量法	烟颗粒物	无法单独确定颗粒物成分	原理简单；操作简便；实验成本低；可搭配其他方法使用	无法分析气体组分与含量；无法单独确定颗粒物成分；实验时间长；实验误差随着收集装置的差异而变化
紫外光度法	气体	1种	送检成本较低；检测时间短；结果精度高	无法确定沥青颗粒物质量；难以确定其他组分含量与占比
便携式检测仪	烟颗粒物	1~4种	实时检测；操作简便；检测时间短；现场施工常用	仪器成本高；使用年限较短；精度因检测仪器而异；检测烟颗粒物与气体种类较少
便携式检测仪	气体	1~6种	实时检测；操作简便；检测时间短；现场施工常用	仪器成本高；使用年限较短；精度因检测仪器而异；检测烟颗粒物与气体种类较少
GC-MS及其衍生技术	气体	10种以上	检测多种组分与含量；实验精度高；检测时间短	无法确定沥青颗粒物质量；送检成本高；组分分析依赖数据库

方法	烟气产物	检测出组分数量	优点	缺点
重量法	烟颗粒物	无法单独确定颗粒物成分	原理简单；操作简便；实验成本低；可搭配其他方法使用	无法分析气体组分与含量；无法单独确定颗粒物成分；实验时间长；实验误差随着收集装置的差异而变化
紫外光度法	气体	1种	送检成本较低；检测时间短；结果精度高	无法确定沥青颗粒物质量；难以确定其他组分含量与占比
便携式检测仪	烟颗粒物	1~4种	实时检测；操作简便；检测时间短；现场施工常用	仪器成本高；使用年限较短；精度因检测仪器而异；检测烟颗粒物与气体种类较少
便携式检测仪	气体	1~6种	实时检测；操作简便；检测时间短；现场施工常用	仪器成本高；使用年限较短；精度因检测仪器而异；检测烟颗粒物与气体种类较少
GC-MS及其衍生技术	气体	10种以上	检测多种组分与含量；实验精度高；检测时间短	无法确定沥青颗粒物质量；送检成本高；组分分析依赖数据库

通气装置	除水措施	烟颗粒物收集	气体收集与分析	参考文献
无	疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径37mm，孔径0.45μm）	XAD-2吸附剂	[10]
无	疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径25mm，孔径0.22μm）	气袋（GC-MS）	[11]
抽气泵	无水氯化钙；疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径37mm，孔径0.1μm）	环己烷溶液（紫外光度法）	[12]
充气泵抽气泵	无	玻璃纤维滤筒	气袋（GC-MS）；环己烷溶液（紫外光度法）	[19]
无	冻干处理	聚丙烯纤维棉	无	[4-5, 20-21]
充气泵	烘干处理	聚丙烯滤膜	无	[22-23]
无	疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径47mm，孔径0.22μm）	气袋（GC-MS）；便携式VOCs检测仪	[24]

通气装置	除水措施	烟颗粒物收集	气体收集与分析	参考文献
无	疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径37mm，孔径0.45μm）	XAD-2吸附剂	[10]
无	疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径25mm，孔径0.22μm）	气袋（GC-MS）	[11]
抽气泵	无水氯化钙；疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径37mm，孔径0.1μm）	环己烷溶液（紫外光度法）	[12]
充气泵抽气泵	无	玻璃纤维滤筒	气袋（GC-MS）；环己烷溶液（紫外光度法）	[19]
无	冻干处理	聚丙烯纤维棉	无	[4-5, 20-21]
充气泵	烘干处理	聚丙烯滤膜	无	[22-23]
无	疏水滤膜	PTFE滤膜（直径47mm，孔径0.22μm）	气袋（GC-MS）；便携式VOCs检测仪	[24]

多孔材料	特点	材料参数	试验方法	试验对象	掺量/%	抑制效果/%	参考文献
活性炭	比表面积大；表面存在活性基团；表面多孔；表面存在能量差；微孔介孔共存	纯度95%	重量法紫外光度法 TG-MS	PJ90^#	3.0	27.8	[47]
		密度0.5g/cm³			4.0	30.3
		粒度D₉₀=50μm			5.0	33.5
		含水率≤2%			6.0	30.8
		纯度95% 密度0.5g/cm³ 粒度D₉₀=50μm	紫外光度法	PJ90^#	3.0	33.9	[53]
					4.0	38.4
					5.0	42.0
					6.0	39.3
		pH=5~7 干燥失重10.0% 灼烧残渣2.0%	重量法	SK90^#	1.0	83.4	[23]
					2.0	29.4
					3.0	83.0
					4.0	72.6
沸石	比表面积大；微孔/介孔共存；热稳定性强	自制Ca(OH)₂沸石	便携式检测仪 GC-MS	沥青混合料	2.0	74.3	[30-31]
					4.0	80.5
					6.0	83.1
		密度1.98g/cm³ 细度D₅₀=29.162μm D₁₀₀=88.255μm	PY-GC-MS	70^#基质沥青	5.0	37.2	[54]
		硅铝比250~350	TD-GC-MS	70^# C级	A类	16.0	[38]
		硅铝比500~700			C类	11.1
		硅铝比900~1500			E类	42.9