Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (02): 629-634.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.02.045

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A study on the removal of Cu(Ⅱ) by zero-valent iron

FU Xin1, JI Na2, CHEN Qun3, LI Xiaoqin1   

  1. 1 College of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China;
    2 Guangzhou Water Engineering Construction Management Center, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
    3 Guangdong Provincial Academy of Building Research, Guangzhou 510500, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2015-08-05 Revised:2015-09-19 Online:2016-02-05 Published:2016-02-05

零价铁去除水中Cu(Ⅱ)的研究

付欣1, 吉娜2, 陈群3, 李筱琴1   

  1. 1 华南理工大学环境与能源学院, 广东 广州 510006;
    2 广州市水务工程建设管理中心, 广东 广州510640;
    3 广东省建筑科学研究院, 广东 广州 510500
  • 通讯作者: 李筱琴,副教授,主要研究方向为重金属及有机污染土壤和水体的纳米修复技术。E-mail:xqli306@scut.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:付欣(1990-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事零价铁处理重金属的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(41103050)及国家自然科学基金面上项目(41173104)。

Abstract: Heavy metal pollution in water environment is one of the common concerns in China. Since zero-valent iron has great advantages on heavy metal removal,iron filing and iron powder were applied to Cu(Ⅱ) in Cu(Ⅱ) spiked Shijing River water. XRD and XPS results indicate that both iron filing and iron powder have a core-shell structure with Fe(110) as the core and Fe(Ⅱ) oxides as the shell. During the reaction process,the iron particles were oxidized progressively and formed Fe3O4 at the surface. Batch experimental results showed that both iron filling and iron powder can quickly remove Cu(Ⅱ) from water and the reactions follow pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics. The removal rate and the reaction rate constant kobs increased with the increase of iron dosage,and decreased with the increase of initial concentration of Cu(Ⅱ). At Cu(Ⅱ) initial concentration of 45mg/L and zero-valent iron dosage of 10g/L,Cu(Ⅱ) was completely removed by iron powder after 3h,while the removal rate was only 75% for iron filling. kobs are 1.07h-1 and 0.59h-1,respectively. Column tests showed that iron filing and iron powder have high removal capacity for Cu(Ⅱ),which were 75.67mg/g and 78.60mg/g, respectively. Overall,iron powder shows higher removal capacity and efficiency than that of iron filling.

Key words: zero-valent iron, copper ion, column test, reaction kinetics, pollution, immobilization

摘要: 重金属污染是我国河道中普遍关注的环境问题。本文以石井河为对象,采用批实验和柱实验模拟铁屑和铁粉两种零价铁去除水中Cu(Ⅱ)。XRD和XPS表征结果表明:铁屑和铁粉具有核壳结构,核为Fe(110)型Fe0,反应前壳为以Fe(Ⅱ)为主的铁氧化物。反应过程中,Cu(Ⅱ)主要被还原并固定在零价铁颗粒表面,Fe0不断氧化生成Fe3O4。批实验表明,两种零价铁都能较快速地去除水中的Cu(Ⅱ)。零价铁去除Cu(Ⅱ)符合准一级动力学方程,去除率和反应速率kobs随着铁屑或铁粉投加量的增加而上升,随着Cu(Ⅱ)初始浓度的增加而降低。当Cu(Ⅱ)初始浓度为45mg/L、零价铁投加量为10g/L时,3h之后铁粉对Cu(Ⅱ)去除率几乎达到100%,而铁屑的去除率为75%,其表观反应速率kobs分别为1.07h-1和0.59h-1。柱实验结果表明,铁屑和铁粉对Cu(Ⅱ)具有较高的去除容量,分别为75.67mg/g和78.60mg/g,铁粉对Cu(Ⅱ)的处理效果略优于铁屑。

关键词: 零价铁, 铜离子, 柱实验, 反应动力学, 污染, 固定化

CLC Number: 

京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号
Copyright © Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: hgjz@cip.com.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd