复合固体推进剂中固体填料的安息角测试与仿真

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1313

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

复合固体推进剂含有固体颗粒较多，离散单元法是一种适合固体推进剂生产过程数值仿真的有效方法，颗粒物料的接触参数是保证离散单元法仿真精度的关键。本文以复合固体推进剂的主要组分铝粉和高氯酸铵固体颗粒为研究对象，通过实验测试获得了相关物料的安息角，利用专业离散元软件EDEM仿真模拟了安息角测试实验过程，建立了物料安息角与接触参数之间的联系。研究表明，滚动摩擦系数和滑动摩擦系数越大，安息角越大，物料流动性越差。对比仿真与实验结果，通过逆向反推法确定了物料的滑动摩擦系数和滚动摩擦系数两个关键接触参数。铝粉与高氯酸铵1∶2混合颗粒的滑动摩擦系数为0.2，滚动摩擦系数为0.05。为固体推进剂加工生产过程离散元数值仿真提供了关键基础数据。

关键词: 固体推进剂, 铝粉, 高氯酸铵, 安息角, 测试, 仿真, 离散单元法

Abstract:

The composite solid propellant contains many solid particles. The discrete element method is an effective method suitable for the numerical simulation of the production process of the solid propellant. The contact parameters of the granular materials are the key to ensure the simulation accuracy of the discrete element method. In this paper, the main components of the composite solid propellant (aluminum powder and ammonium perchlorate solid particles) were used as the research materials. The angle of repose of the relevant materials was obtained through experimental measurements. The experimental process of the angle of repose measurement was simulated by using the professional discrete element software EDEM. The relationship between the angle of repose of the materials and the contact parameters has been established. The results have shown that the greater the rolling and sliding friction coefficients, the greater the angle of repose and the poorer the fluidity of the material. By comparing the simulation and experimental results, the two key contact parameters of the rolling and sliding friction coefficients of the materials were determined by the backstepping approach. The sliding friction coefficient and the rolling friction coefficient of the 1∶2 mixture of aluminum powder and ammonium perchlorate were 0.2 and 0.05, respectively. It gives important data support for the discrete element numerical simulation of the production process of solid propellants.

Key words: solid propellant, aluminum powder, ammonium perchlorate, angle of repose, measurement, simulation, discrete element method

中图分类号:

TJ55

王建, 赵亚风, 乔晓林, 李兴刚, 赵慧. 复合固体推进剂中固体填料的安息角测试与仿真[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 312-318.

Jian WANG, Yafeng ZHAO, Xiaolin QIAO, Xinggang LI, Hui ZHAO. Measurement and simulation of the angle of repose of solid filler in composite solid propellant[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(S2): 312-318.

图/表 9

图1 安息角测试装置（俯视）1—挡板；2—围板；3—底板；4—被测物料；L=50mm；W=50mm

图2 铝粉、高氯酸铵粉末及其混合物的安息角测试实验照片

图3 物料快速填充稳定性分析

图4 铝粉安息角测试实验过程仿真

图5 铝粉安息角测试实验仿真得到的最终稳定形态SF—滑动摩擦系数；RF—滚动摩擦系数

表1 不同摩擦系数条件下3种物料的安息角测试实验仿真得到的安息角

物料	编号	滑动摩擦系数	滚动摩擦系数	安息角 /(°)
铝粉	1-1	0.3	0.06	26.46
	1-2	0.3	0.12	30.51
	1-3	0.3	0.18	40.1
	1-4	0.6	0.06	26.32
	1-5	0.6	0.12	31.18
	1-6	0.6	0.18	37.64
	1-7	0.9	0.06	25.29
	1-8	0.9	0.12	30.34
	1-9	0.9	0.18	40.09
高氯酸铵	2-1	0.1	0.01	7.13
	2-2	0.1	0.05	10.93
	2-3	0.1	0.1	13.89
	2-4	0.3	0.01	8.86
	2-5	0.3	0.05	15.02
	2-6	0.3	0.1	25.76
	2-7	0.5	0.01	11.67
	2-8	0.5	0.05	13.44
	2-9	0.5	0.1	28.07
铝粉与高氯酸铵2∶1混合物	3-1	0.2	0.01	6.34
	3-2	0.2	0.05	9.78
	3-3	0.2	0.1	14.23
	3-4	0.4	0.01	10.49
	3-5	0.4	0.05	12.05
	3-6	0.4	0.1	22.13
	3-7	0.6	0.01	10.75
	3-8	0.6	0.05	16.75
	3-9	0.6	0.1	25.64

图6 高氯酸铵安息角测试实验仿真得到的最终稳定形态SF—滑动摩擦系数；RF—滚动摩擦系数

图7 铝粉与高氯酸铵混合物安息角测试实验仿真得到的最终稳定形态SF—滑动摩擦系数；RF—滚动摩擦系数

图8 仿真中滑动摩擦系数与滚动摩擦系数对安息角的影响SF—滑动摩擦系数；RF—滚动摩擦系数

参考文献 15

1	张端庆. 固体火箭推进剂[J].兵器知识, 2004(3): 70-71.
	ZHANG Duanqing. Solid rocket propellant[J]. Ordnance Knowledge, 2004(3): 70-71.
2	谭惠民. 固体推进剂化学与技术[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2015.
	TAN Huimin. Solid propellant chemistry and technology [M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2015: 1-542.
3	李广超. 基于气流粉碎法的钝感超细类球形高氯酸铵的制备及性能研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2018.
	LI Guangchao. Preparation and performance study of insensitive superfine spherical ammonium perchlorate based on airflow crushing method[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2018.
4	HE Z Q, ZHOU K, YIN S P. Security analysis on single-screw extrusion process of solid propellant by numerical simulation[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 997: 605-609.
5	ZHOU K, HE Z Q, YIN S P, et al. Numerical simulation for exploring the effect of viscosity on single-screw extrusion process of propellant[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 84: 933-939.
6	ZHONG Tingting, RAO Guoning, PENG Jinhua. Numerical simulation of three dimensional flow fields for extrusion process of GR-35 double-base propellant[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 84: 920-926.
7	YU A B. Discrete element method: an effective way for particle scale research of particulate matter [J]. Engineering Computations, 2004, 21: 205-214.
8	WU Y, AN X, YU A B. DEM simulation of cubical particle packing under mechanical vibration[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 314: 89-101.
9	TANGRI H, GUO Y, CURTIS J S. Packing of cylindrical particles: DEM simulations and experimental measurements[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 317: 72-82.
10	刘万锋, 徐武彬, 李冰, 等. 滚动摩擦系数的测定及EDEM仿真分析[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2018(9): 132-135.
	LIU Wanfeng, XU Wubin, LI Bing, et al. Measurement and simulation of rolling friction coefficient [J]. Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, 2018(9): 132-135.
11	余学闯, 谌炎辉, 谢国进. 基于EDEM的不同颗粒粒径对物料安息角的影响研究[J]. 机械研究与应用, 2017, 30(6): 7-11.
	YU Xuechuang, CHEN Yanhui, XIE Guojin. Research on influences of the particle size on the reposed angle based on EDEM [J]. Mechanical Research and Application, 2017, 30(6): 7-11.
12	陈辉, 赵先琼, 刘义伦. 变重力场中散体颗粒堆的安息角及接触力分布[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(6): 1141-1146.
	CHEN Hui, ZHAO Xianqiong, LIU Yilun. Angle of repose and contact-force distribution in granular pile under variable gravity field [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(6): 1141-1146.
13	LI Y, XU Y, THORNTON C. A comparison of discrete element simulations and experiments for ‘sandpiles’ composed of spherical particles[J]. Powder Technology, 2005, 160(3): 219-228.
14	王猛, 韩刚. 散状物料流动特性测定理论研究与数值模拟[J]. 太原科技大学学报, 2017, 38(2): 162-166.
	WANG Meng, HAN Gang. Theoretical study and numerical simulation of the measurement of the flow characteristics of bulk materials [J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, 2017, 38(2): 162-166.
15	刘义伦, 王燕鹏, 赵先琼. 颗粒粒径对回转窑内散体物料休止角的影响规律[J]. 中南大学学报, 2017, 48(12): 3256-3263.
	LIU Yilun, WANG Yanpeng, ZHAO Xianqiong. Influence of particle size on repose angle of bulk materials in rotary kiln[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 48(12): 3256-3263.

[1]	刘广平, 陆振能, 龚宇烈. 高温热泵蒸汽系统的动态响应及扰动优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1719-1727.
[2]	陈佳昆, 汤健, 夏恒, 乔俊飞. 城市固废炉排炉焚烧过程二𫫇英排放浓度数值仿真[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1061-1072.
[3]	邱沫凡, 蒋琳, 刘荣正, 刘兵, 唐亚平, 刘马林. 气固流化床化学反应数值模拟中颗粒尺度模型研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5047-5058.
[4]	颜子涵, 陈群云, 李卓, 付融冰, 李彦伟, 吴志根. 改进型土壤破碎混拌结构的性能数值分析与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 72-80.
[5]	向晟, 王超, 庄钰, 顾偲雯, 张磊, 都健. 变压精馏分离乙酸甲酯-甲醇-乙酸乙酯体系的设计与控制[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4065-4076.
[6]	邹鹏程, 金光远, 李臻峰, 宋春芳, 韩太柏, 祝玉莲. 一种具有模式搅拌的微波反应釜内多物理场特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2301-2310.
[7]	姬峰, 郑博文, 罗若尹, 杜玮, 邓呈维, 杨声, 刘志强. 高温质子交换膜燃料电池电堆稳定性分析与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5325-5331.
[8]	王戈, 孙志伟, 谭蔚, 邱威, 朱国瑞. 异形纤维阵列过滤特性的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 30-39.
[9]	宣颖, 刘雪东, 周成奇, 刘文明, 刘红梅, 顾宇彤, 彭涛. 粉体混合过程及搅拌功率的DEM数值模拟和实验[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(7): 3598-3607.
[10]	冯海涛, 刘晓菊, 张弛, 王艳丽, 马晓燕. 复合固体推进剂用新型二茂铁类燃速催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2560-2573.
[11]	胡旺盛, 张少杰, 张昌建, 熊楚超, 孙鹏飞. 相变式U形管太阳能集热器的性能[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 771-777.
[12]	崔堂武, 袁波, 凌晨, 方彬任, 毛向阳, 费强. 木质素降解酶的酶活测试方法的评价与分析[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(12): 5189-5202.
[13]	祁亮, 张波, 尚秦玉, 王雁冰, 曹志凯, 李薇, 周华. 一维平推流反应器动态模型的新型求解方法[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(s1): 70-76.
[14]	苏杨, 雷全虎, 陈松, 罗志龙, 袁战伟. 物料无桨混合过程数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(s1): 59-63.
[15]	李小龙,朱法华,段玖祥,李军状,杨柳,张文杰. 固定污染源排放可凝结颗粒物研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(11): 5091-5102.