基于旋转浮阀的复合曝气器在曝气池中的应用及CFD模拟

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-0569

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于气体通过阀片后能在阀盖四周形成旋转流场的特点，本文将旋转浮阀应用于曝气池中，以提高其充氧性能。在旋转浮阀四周均匀排布6个气泡石，即旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；在长宽高为800mm×600mm×910mm的透明有机玻璃池内，以空气-清水为体系，进行曝气实验。为了考察旋转浮阀形成的旋转流场对曝气的影响，以塔内件领域常见的F1浮阀以及气泡石为基准进行实验比较。结果表明，与F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器相比，旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器的中心测量点与边界测量点的溶解氧浓度更接近，充氧均匀性指数也更小，说明了旋转浮阀能促进气泡分布均匀，减少传质死区。相比于F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器，旋转浮阀气泡石复合曝气器提高了氧总传质系数、氧传质速率、氧传质效率和曝气效率；相比于气泡石曝气器，旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器提高了氧总传质系数、氧传质速率，但降低了氧传质效率和曝气效率。本文还利用CFD模拟流场分布，解释了旋转流场的产生及其提高曝气充氧能力的原因。

关键词: 旋转浮阀, 曝气, 数值模拟, 充氧均匀性指数, 计算流体力学

Abstract:

Based on the property of forming rotating flow field around the valve cover after gas passing through valve, rotary float valve is applied to aeration tank to improve its oxygenation performance. By assigning evenly 6 bubble stones around the rotary float valve, a rotary float valve-bubble stone composite aerator is formed. The aeration performances of the composite aerator were experimentally characterized in an organic glass aeration tank with an inner length, width and height of 800mm×600mm×910mm, by using an air-water system. In order to investigate the effect of the rotating flow field formed by the rotary float valve, the typical column internal unit F1 float valve and the common bubble stone aerator were introduced as experimental controls. The experimental results showed that the dissolved oxygen concentrations at the central and the boundary measuring points of the rotary float valve-bubble stone composite aerator were closer than those of F1 float valve-bubble stone composite aerator. The oxygenation uniformity index of the former was lower than that of the later. It was shown that the rotary float valve could promote the distribution uniformity of bubbles and decrease the dead zone for mass transfer. The rotary float valve - bubble stone composite aerator can improve the oxygen transfer coefficient, oxygen transfer rate, oxygen transfer efficiency and aeration efficiency compared with the F1 float valve-bubble stone composite aerator. The rotary float valve-bubble stone composite aerator can improve the oxygen transfer coefficient, oxygen transfer rate, and reduce oxygen transfer efficiency and aeration efficiency compared with the bubble stone aerator. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was introduced to simulate the flow field distribution and explicate the generation of rotary flow field and the reasons for the improvement of oxygen aeration capacity of rotary flow field in the aeration tank.

Key words: rotary float valve, aeration, numerical simulation, oxygenation uniformity index, CFD

中图分类号:

X703

王斌杰,沈绍传,姚克俭. 基于旋转浮阀的复合曝气器在曝气池中的应用及CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(1): 95-102.

Binjie WANG,Shaochuan SHEN,Kejian YAO. Application of composite aerator in aeration tank based on rotary float valve and CFD simulation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(1): 95-102.

图/表 17

图1 曝气实验流程1—风机；2—空气流量计；3—鼓风管道；4—气室；5—气体分布板；6—曝气塔节；7—旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；8—溶解氧测量仪；9—曝气池

图2 曝气池俯视图（单位：mm）

图3 旋转浮阀与F1浮阀结构

图4 曝气池物理模型

图5 模型网格划分和局部放大示意图

图6 不同气量曝气池中心与边界溶解氧浓度之差绝对值对比A—旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；B—F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器

图7 旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器和F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器的充氧均匀性指数比较A1—292mm（旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器）；B1—292mm（F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器）；A2—296mm（旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器）；B2—296mm（F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器）

图8 氧总传质系数比较A—旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；B—F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；C—气泡石曝气器

图9 氧传质速率比较A—旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；B—F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；C—气泡石曝气器

图10 氧传质效率比较A—旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；B—F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；C—气泡石曝气器

图11 曝气效率比较A—旋转浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；B—F1浮阀-气泡石复合曝气器；C—气泡石曝气器

图12 F1浮阀X-Y剖面气相流场速度矢量图(Z=0)

图13 图12局部

图14 旋转浮阀X-Y剖面气相流场速度矢量图（Z=0）

图15 图14局部

图16 F1浮阀与气泡石X-Z剖面气相流线图(Y=0)

图17 旋转浮阀与单个气泡石X-Z剖面气相流线图(Y=0)

参考文献 22

1	夏维, 刘德华. 曝气器技术研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 环境研究与监测, 2015, 28(2): 38-40.
	XIA W, LIU D H. Research status and development trend of aerator technology[J]. Environmental Study and Monitoring, 2015, 28(2): 38-40.
2	张利平, 夏军, 胡志芳. 中国水资源状况与水资源安全问题分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 116-120.
	ZHANG L P, XIA J, HU Z F. Situation and problem analysis of water resource security in China[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2009, 18(2): 116-120.
3	钱正英, 张星斗. 中国可持续发展水资源战略研究综合报告[J]. 中国工程科学, 2000, 2(8): 1-17.
	QIAN Z Y, ZHANG X D. Strategic research on sustainable development of water resource in China[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2000, 2(8): 1-17.
4	原建光, 孙娟, 宛丽, 等. 污水处理厂节能降耗的运行措施[J]. 中国给水排水, 2013, 29(18): 149-150.
	YUAN J G, SUN J, WAN L, et al. Operation measures for saving energy and reducing consumption in sewage treatment plant[J]. China Water and Wastewater, 2013, 29(18): 149-150.
5	ZHOU X H, WU Y Y, SHI H C, et al. Evaluation of oxygen transfer parameters of fine-bubble aeration system in plug flow aeration tank of wastewater treatment plant[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2013(2): 295-301.
6	庄健, 王洪臣, 齐鲁, 等. 孔径对微孔曝气充氧性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(5): 1723-1726.
	ZHUANG J, WANG H C, QI L, et al. Effects of pore diameter on oxygenation performance in fine pore aeration[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(5): 1723-1726.
7	张斌, 郝玉萍, 周京徽. 橡胶膜微孔曝气器的清水充氧性能试验研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(12F): 304-305.
	ZHANG B, HAO Y P, ZHOU J H. Experimental study on oxygenation performance of rubber membrane microporous aerator[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 33(12F): 304-305.
8	陈雷. 微孔弹性膜片软管曝气器的结构与特点[J]. 新世纪水泥导报, 2012, 18(5): 33-35.
	CHEN L. Structure and characteristics of microporous elastic diaphragm hose aerator[J]. Cement Guide for New Epoch, 2012, 18(5): 33-35.
9	鹏博. 世界染料工业发展现状[J]. 上海染料, 2002, 30(1): 5-10.
	PENG B. Current situation of dyestuffs industry in the world[J]. Shanghai Dyestuffs, 2002, 30(1): 5-10.
10	李家珍. 染料、染色工业废水处理[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1997: 3.
	LI J Z. Treatment of wastewater from dyestuff and dyeing industry[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 1997: 3
11	王祖恒, 朱菊香, 沈绍传, 等. 旋转曝气器的曝气充氧性能研究[J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(6): 161-165.
	WANG Z H, ZHU J X, SHEN S C, et al. Study on aeration and oxygenation performances of rotary bubble diffuser[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(6): 161-165.
12	张绪满, 姚克俭, 何健烽, 等. 旋转浮阀塔板的流体力学性能研究[J]. 石油化工, 2012, 41(8): 916-920.
	ZHANG X M, YAO K J, HE J F, et al. Hydrodynamic performance of rotary valve trays[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2012, 41(8): 916-920.
13	袁云峰, 齐亮, 姚克俭. 旋转浮阀塔板的气含率分布研究[J]. 石油化工, 2013, 42(9): 990-995.
	YUAN Y F, QI L, YAO K J. Distribution of gas hold-up fraction on rotary valve tray[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2013, 42(9): 990-995.
14	詹宇木, 齐亮, 刘静, 等. 主动旋转阀的流体力学性能研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2016, 30(2): 332-340.
	ZHAN Y M, QI L, LIU J, et al. Hydrodynamic properties of a forced-rotary valve[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2016, 30(2): 332-340.
15	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 微孔曝气器清水氧传质性能测定: CJ/T 475—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
	Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Construction of the People's Republic of China. Measurement of oxygen mass transfer in clean water for fine bubble diffuser: CJ/T 475—2015 [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2015.
16	张绪满. 旋转浮阀塔板的流体力学性能研究及流场CFD模拟[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2012.
	ZHANG X M. Hydrodynamic performance of rotary valve trays[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2012.
17	郑瑞朋, 齐亮, 田端正, 等. 三溢流分隔壁塔板上气含率的研究[J]. 石油化工, 2013, 42(6): 646-650.
	ZHENG R P, QI L, TIAN D Z, et al. Study on gas hold-up fraction on three-pass dividing wall tray[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2013, 42(6): 646-650.
18	陶红歌, 陈焕新, 谢军龙, 等. 基于面积加权平均速度和质量加权平均速度的流体流动均匀性指标探讨[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(s2): 116-120.
	TAO H G, CHEN H X, XIE J L, et al. Flow uniformity index based on area weighted and mass weighted average velocity[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(s2): 116-120.
19	熊长川, 李卫星, 邢卫红. 柱式膜组件曝气过程的气液两相流模拟[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2017, 31(5): 1052-1061.
	XIONG C C, LI W X, XING W H. Simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in aeration processes of a column type membrane module[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2017, 31(5): 1052-1061.
20	王乐, 苏军伟, 郑西朋, 等. 塔式曝气池内非牛顿活性污泥气液两相数值模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(5): 1783-1791.
	WANG L, SU J W, ZHEN X P, et al. Numerical simulation of gas/liquid two-phase flow in the aeration tank with non-Newtonian activated sludge[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(5): 1783-1791.
21	杜堂正, 李德昌, 聂丽华. 一种新型曝气设备及其气液传质研究[J]. 化工进展, 2005, 24(5): 526-531.
	TANG T Z, LI D C, NIE L H. New kind of agitated aeration equipment and research on its oxygen transfer[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2005, 24(5): 526-531.
22	崔觉剑. 折边固定阀塔板流场的实验研究和数值模拟[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2007.
	CUI J J. Experimental and numerical study of flow field on folded-downward edge fixed valve tray[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2007.

[1]	王莹, 韩云平, 李琳, 李衍博, 李慧丽, 颜昌仁, 李彩侠. 城市污水厂病毒气溶胶逸散特征研究现状与未来展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 439-446.
[2]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[3]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[4]	王云飞, 秦蕊, 郑利军, 李焱, 李清平. 旋转填充床CFD模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 1-9.
[5]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[6]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[7]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[8]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[9]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[10]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[11]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[12]	叶振东, 刘涵, 吕静, 张亚宁, 刘洪芝. 基于钙镁二元盐的热化学储能反应器的性能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4307-4314.
[13]	奚永兰, 王成成, 叶小梅, 刘洋, 贾昭炎, 曹春晖, 韩挺, 张应鹏, 田雨. 微纳米气泡在厌氧消化中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4414-4423.
[14]	俞俊楠, 俞建峰, 程洋, 齐一搏, 化春键, 蒋毅. 基于深度学习的变宽度浓度梯度芯片性能预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3383-3393.
[15]	单雪影, 张濛, 张家傅, 李玲玉, 宋艳, 李锦春. 阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.