原位热解对油页岩物性及地下水水质影响探索

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1394

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 3309-3318.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1394

• 资源与环境化工 • 上一篇

原位热解对油页岩物性及地下水水质影响探索

李若琳¹^,²(), 何少林³^,⁴, 苑宏英¹^,²^,⁴, 刘伯约¹^,²^,⁴(), 纪冬丽¹^,²^,⁴, 宋阳³^,⁴, 刘博³^,⁴, 余绩庆³^,⁴, 徐英俊³^,⁴

^1.天津城建大学环境与市政工程学院，天津 300384
^2.天津市水质科学与技术重点实验室，天津 300384
^3.北京中陆咨询有限公司（中国石油规划总院），北京 100089
^4.国家油页岩生态环境分中心，北京 100089

收稿日期:2022-07-26 修回日期:2022-09-28 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-06-29
通讯作者: 刘伯约
作者简介:李若琳（1998—），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为水污染控制工程。E-mail：leerl1104@126.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2019YFA0705504);天津市科技计划(20JCQNJC00910)

Effect of in-situ pyrolysis on physical properties of oil shale and groundwater quality

LI Ruolin¹^,²(), HE Shaolin³^,⁴, YUAN Hongying¹^,²^,⁴, LIU Boyue¹^,²^,⁴(), JI Dongli¹^,²^,⁴, SONG Yang³^,⁴, LIU Bo³^,⁴, YU Jiqing³^,⁴, XU Yingjun³^,⁴

^1.School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
^2.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
^3.Beijing Zhonglu Consulting Co. , Ltd. (Petrochina Co. , Ltd. , Planning Headquarter), Beijing 100089, China
^4.The Ecology and Environment Branch of State Center for Research and Development of Oil Shale Exploitation, Beijing 100089, China

Received:2022-07-26 Revised:2022-09-28 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-06-29
Contact: LIU Boyue

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

油页岩原位热解开采后，其岩性和组分会发生显著变化，地下水入侵采矿区会导致水质的污染。因此本文针对不同热解温度下油页岩半焦释放重金属和可萃取石油类物质对地下水水质的影响进行了探索。选取两组油页岩制成粒径≤2mm的样品，进行100~500℃常压热解半焦物性表征实验，研究测定了油页岩热解前后的比表面积、油页岩微观结构、元素含量占比变化，同时将热解半焦进行浸泡实验，检测水样中重金属Fe、Mn、Cr含量，最高浓度可达到9.07mg/L、5.26mg/L、0.053mg/L，超出地下水质量标准（GB/T 14848—2017）Ⅴ类水标准。分析表明，重金属元素超标主要为热解后油页岩中的矿物成分浸入水中所致，与油页岩热解后物性变化相关。同时发现，可萃取石油类物质对地下水的影响在热解温度为400℃时达到最大。

关键词: 油页岩, 热解, 浸泡实验, 重金属, 石油烃

Abstract:

After the process of in-situ pyrolysis mining of oil shale, its lithology and composition would change significantly, then the groundwater intrusion of the mining area will lead to water pollution. Therefore, this study explored the effects of heavy metals and extractable petroleum substances released from oil shale char at different pyrolysis temperatures on the groundwater quality. The pyrolysis of oil shale semi-coke which at 100—500℃ under normal pressure was selected for physical property characterization experiments, and it was divided into two groups with particle size ≤2mm. The study was on the specific surface area, and the microstructure of oil shale and the changes of proportion of elements before and after pyrolysis of oil shale were measured. At the same time, the pyrolysis semi-coke was soaked to detect the content of heavy metals Fe, Mn and Cr in water samples. The maximum concentration reached 9.07mg/L, 5.26mg/L, 0.053mg/L, and the result showed that it exceeded the class V water standard of groundwater quality standard (GB/T 14848—2017), in the mean while the analysis showed that the excessive heavy metal elements were mainly caused by the immersion of mineral components of oil shale into water after pyrolysis, which was related to the changes in physical properties of oil shale caused by in-situ pyrolysis. At the same time, it was found that the effect of extractable petroleum substances on groundwater reached the maximum when the pyrolysis temperature was 400℃.

Key words: oil shale, pyrolysis, immersion experiment, heavy metal, petroleum hydrocarbon

中图分类号:

X824

李若琳, 何少林, 苑宏英, 刘伯约, 纪冬丽, 宋阳, 刘博, 余绩庆, 徐英俊. 原位热解对油页岩物性及地下水水质影响探索[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3309-3318.

LI Ruolin, HE Shaolin, YUAN Hongying, LIU Boyue, JI Dongli, SONG Yang, LIU Bo, YU Jiqing, XU Yingjun. Effect of in-situ pyrolysis on physical properties of oil shale and groundwater quality[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3309-3318.

图/表 9

表1 重金属元素标准曲线与检出限

序号	元素	y	R	检测限/μg·L^-1
1	Fe	0.0225x+0.9227	0.9997	5.606
2	Mn	0.0170x+0.0291	1.0000	0.109
3	Cu	0.0211x+0.0644	1.0000	0.043
4	Zn	0.0064x+0.1747	0.9918	1.000
5	As	0.0022x+0.0007	1.0000	0.048
6	Cd	0.0030x+0.0008	1.0000	0.010
7	Cr	0.0028x+0.1256	1.0000	0.426
8	Pb	0.0058x+0.0061	1.0000	0.047
9	Sb	0.0085x+0.0010	1.0000	0.012
10	Ni	0.0212x+0.1442	1.0000	0.893
11	Co	0.0355x+0.0007	1.0000	0.020
12	Mo	0.0071x+0.0022	1.0000	0.139

图1 样品拉曼光谱

图2 不同热解温度下两批油页岩失重率

图3 不同热解温度两批油页岩热解半焦比表面积

图4 样品1[(a)~(f)]与样品2[(g)~(l)]不同温度下SEM图

图5 不同热解温度下样品各元素占比

图6 不同热解温度下样品矿物成分占比

图7 不同温度下样品1与样品2的pH和Fe、Mn、Cr浓度变化

图8 不同热解温度下烃类物质的占比、可萃取性石油烃变化

参考文献 30

1	孙友宏, 郭威, 邓孙华. 油页岩地下原位转化与钻采技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 钻探工程, 2021, 48(1): 57-67.
	SUN Youhong, GUO Wei, DENG Sunhua. The status and development trend of in situ conversion and drilling exploitation technology for oil shale[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2021, 48(1): 57-67.
2	张传文, 孟庆强, 唐玄. 油页岩开采技术现状与展望[J]. 矿产勘查, 2021, 12(8): 1798-1805.
	ZHANG Chuanwen, MENG Qingqiang, TANG Xuan. Present situation and prospect of oil shale mining technology[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2021, 12(8): 1798-1805.
3	何璐, 王丽, 马跃, 等. 油页岩热解过程中微量元素迁移及其作用规律[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3912-3922.
	HE Lu, WANG Li, MA Yue, et al. Volatility and catalysis of trace elements during oil shale pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10): 3912-3922.
4	IDAVAIN Jane, LANG Katrin, TOMASOVA Jelena, et al. Cancer incidence trends in the oil shale industrial region in Estonia[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(11): 3833.
5	唐巨鹏, 余泓浩, 张昕, 等. 油页岩原位注热开采储层有效热解区变化规律分析[J/OL]. 计算力学学报: 1-8[2022-09-12]. .
	TANG Jupeng, YU Honghao, ZHANG Xin, et al. Analysis on variation of effective pyrolysis zones in reservoir by in situ heat injection production of oil shale[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics: 1-8[2022-09-12]. .
6	WANG Han, ZHANG Wenjing J, QIU Shuwei, et al. Release characteristics of Pb and BETX from in situ oil shale transformation on groundwater environment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 16166.
7	HU S Y, XIAO C L, LIANG X J, et al. Influence of water-rock interaction on the pH and heavy metals content of groundwater during in situ oil shale exploitation[J]. Oil Shale, 2020, 37(2): 104-118.
8	邱淑伟, 张冬旺, 王占川. 油页岩热解油气对地下水环境影响实验研究——以抚顺地区油页岩为例[J]. 河北地质大学学报, 2020, 43(4): 1-5.
	QIU Shuwei, ZHANG Dongwang, WANG Zhanchuan. Experimental study on the effect of pyrolysis of oil shale on groundwater environment—a case study of oil shale in Fushun area[J]. Journal of Hebei GEO University, 2020, 43(4): 1-5.
9	姜雪. 油页岩原位开采对地下水环境的影响研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2014.
	JIANG Xue. Study about the impacts of oil shale in situ mining on groundwater environment[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2014.
10	ZHAO Huiling, BAI Zongqing, GUO Zhenxing, et al. In situ study of the decomposition of pyrite in coal during hydropyrolysis[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2021, 154(13): 105024.
11	Aleksandra STRUGALA-WILCZEK, STANCZYK Krzysztof, BEBEK Krzysztof. Comparison of metal adsorption from aqueous solutions on coal and char remaining after in situ underground coal gasification (UCG)[J]. Mine Water and the Environment, 2020, 39(2): 369-379.
12	中华人民共和国环境保护部. 固体废物浸出毒性浸出方法水平振荡法: [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2010.
	Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. Solid waste-Extraction procedure for leaching toxicity-Horizontal vibration method: [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2010.
13	中华人民共和国环境保护部. 水质65种元素的测定电感耦合等离子体质谱法: [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2014.
	Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. Water quality—Determination of 65 elements—Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2014.
14	国家环境分析监测中心. 水质可萃取性石油烃(C₁₀~C₄₀)的测定气相色谱法: [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2017.
	National Environmental Analysis and Monitoring Center. Water quality—Determination of extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (C₁₀~C₄₀)—Gas chromatography: [S]. Beijing: China Environment Science Press, 2017.
15	刘强, 柳少波, 鲁雪松, 等. 拉曼光谱在油气地质应用中的研究进展[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(9): 2679-2688.
	LIU Qiang, LIU Shaobo, LU Xuesong, et al. Research progress in the application of Raman spectroscopy in petroleum geology[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2022, 42(9): 2679-2688.
16	KHATIBI Seyedalireza, OSTADHASSAN Mehdi, TUSCHEL David, et al. Raman spectroscopy to study thermal maturity and elastic modulus of kerogen[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 185: 103-118.
17	郭晋宇. 油页岩热解过程中物理力学特性规律研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2019.
	GUO Jinyu. Study on the laws of physical and mechanical properties during oil shale pyrolysis[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2019.
18	YAN Junwei, JIANG Xiumin, HAN Xiangxin. Study on the characteristics of the oil shale and shale char mixture pyrolysis[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(12): 5792-5797.
19	邱淑伟. 油页岩原位开采对地下水化学特征的影响实验研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016.
	QIU Shuwei. Experimental study on the impacts of oil shale in situ pyrolysis on groundwater hydrochemical characteristics[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2016.
20	SAIF Tarik, LIN Qingyang, BIJELJIC Branko, et al. Microstructural imaging and characterization of oil shale before and after pyrolysis[J]. Fuel, 2017, 197: 562-574.
21	姚亚彬, 张荣新, 芮昀, 等. 海相页岩储层孔隙比表面积特征研究[J]. 测井技术, 2021, 45(5): 503-508.
	YAO Yabin, ZHANG Rongxin, RUI Yun, et al. Pore specific surface area characteristics of the marine shale reservoir[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2021, 45(5): 503-508.
22	王淑娟, 金玉杰. 不同产地油页岩半焦的物理化学特性研究[J]. 吉林建筑大学学报, 2018, 35(3): 58-62, 68.
	WANG Shujuan, JIN Yujie. Research on physicochemical properties of the kerosene shale semi-coke from different origin regions[J]. Journal of Jilin Jianzhu University, 2018, 35(3): 58-62, 68.
23	ALSTADT Kristin N, KATTI Dinesh R, KATTI Kalpana S. An in situ FTIR step-scan photoacoustic investigation of kerogen and minerals in oil shale[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2012, 89: 105-113.
24	BAI Jingru, SONG Kuntong, CHEN Jiabin. The migration of heavy metal elements during pyrolysis of oil shale in Mongolia[J]. Fuel, 2018, 225: 381-387.
25	SHAWABKEH Reyad, Adnan AL-HARAHSHEH, Awni AL-OTOOM. Copper and zinc sorption by treated oil shale ash[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2004, 40(3): 251-257.
26	高鹤, 姜星宇, 刘雪景, 等. 油页岩矿物质催化半焦燃烧特性及机理[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(12): 5568-5577.
	GAO He, JIANG Xingyu, LIU Xuejing, et al. Characteristics and mechanism of catalytic effect of inner minerals on combustion of oil shale coke[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(12): 5568-5577.
27	HU Shuya, XIAO Changlai, LIANG Xiujuan, et al. The influence of oil shale in situ mining on groundwater environment: a water-rock interaction study[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 228: 384-389.
28	柏静儒, 陈定形, 张伟, 等. 油页岩中微量元素赋存形态的研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2014, 42(11): 1295-1301.
	BAI Jingru, CHEN Dingxing, ZHANG Wei, et al. Mode of occurrences of trace elements in oil shale[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2014, 42(11): 1295-1301.
29	宋坤桐. 蒙古国油页岩热解燃烧过程中微量元素迁移特性研究[D]. 吉林: 东北电力大学, 2019.
	SONG Kuntong. The migration of trace elements during the pyrolysis and combustion process of Mongolia oil shale[D]. Jilin: Northeast Dianli University, 2019.
30	郑伦举, 秦建中, 何生, 等. 地层孔隙热压生排烃模拟实验初步研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2009, 31(3): 296-302, 306.
	ZHENG Lunju, QIN Jianzhong, HE Sheng, et al. Preliminary study of formation porosity thermocompression simulation experiment of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2009, 31(3): 296-302, 306.

[1]	李世霖, 胡景泽, 王毅霖, 王庆吉, 邵磊. 电渗析分离提取高值组分的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 420-429.
[2]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[3]	李卫华, 于倩雯, 尹俊权, 吴寅凯, 孙英杰, 王琰, 王华伟, 杨玉飞, 龙於洋, 黄启飞, 葛燕辰, 何依洋, 赵灵燕. 酸雨环境下填埋飞灰吨袋破损后重金属的溶出行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4917-4928.
[4]	邵志国, 任雯, 许世佩, 聂凡, 许毓, 刘龙杰, 谢水祥, 李兴春, 王庆吉, 谢加才. 终温对油基钻屑热解产物分布和特性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4929-4938.
[5]	李志远, 黄亚继, 赵佳琪, 于梦竹, 朱志成, 程好强, 时浩, 王圣. 污泥与聚氯乙烯共热解重金属特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4947-4956.
[6]	李海东, 杨远坤, 郭姝姝, 汪本金, 岳婷婷, 傅开彬, 王哲, 何守琴, 姚俊, 谌书. 炭化与焙烧温度对植物基铁碳微电解材料去除As(Ⅲ)性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3652-3663.
[7]	姚丽铭, 王亚琢, 范洪刚, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 餐厨垃圾处理现状及其热解技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3791-3801.
[8]	张杉, 仲兆平, 杨宇轩, 杜浩然, 李骞. 磷酸盐改性高岭土对生活垃圾热解过程中重金属的富集[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3893-3903.
[9]	李栋先, 王佳, 蒋剑春. 皂脚热解-催化气态加氢制备生物燃料[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2874-2883.
[10]	郑昕, 贾里, 王彦霖, 张靖超, 陈世虎, 乔晓磊, 樊保国. 污泥与煤泥混烧对重金属固留特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3233-3241.
[11]	庄捷, 薛锦辉, 赵斌成, 张文艺. 猪粪厌氧消化进程中重金属与腐殖质的有机结合机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3281-3291.
[12]	王志伟, 郭帅华, 吴梦鸽, 陈颜, 赵俊廷, 李辉, 雷廷宙. 生物质与塑料催化共热解技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2655-2665.
[13]	李卫华, 吴寅凯, 孙英杰, 尹俊权, 辛明学, 赵友杰. 垃圾焚烧飞灰重金属毒性浸出评价方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2666-2677.
[14]	常占坤, 张弛, 苏冰琴, 张聪政, 王健, 权晓慧. H₂S气态基质对污泥生物沥滤处理效能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2733-2743.
[15]	梁贻景, 马岩, 卢展烽, 秦福生, 万骏杰, 王志远. La_1-_x Sr _x MnO₃钙钛矿涂层的抗结焦性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1769-1778.

原位热解对油页岩物性及地下水水质影响探索

Effect of in-situ pyrolysis on physical properties of oil shale and groundwater quality

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价