烟气组分对汞吸附影响的程序升温脱附

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.12.046

化工进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 4065-4071.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.12.046

烟气组分对汞吸附影响的程序升温脱附

陈明明, 段钰锋, 周强, 柳帅, 丁卫科, 刘猛

东南大学能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室, 江苏南京 210096

收稿日期:2016-05-03 修回日期:2016-05-19 出版日期:2016-12-05 发布日期:2016-12-05
通讯作者: 段钰锋,博士,教授,博士生导师。E-mail:yfduan@seu.edu.cn。
作者简介:陈明明(1990-),男,硕士研究生。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2016YFC020115，2016YFB0600604，2016YFB0600203）、国家自然科学基金（51376046，51576044）、江苏省环保科研课题（2016030）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金、江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划（CXZZ13_0093，KYLX_0115，KYLX_0184，KYLX15_0071）及东南大学优秀博士学位论文培育基金（YBJJ1505）项目。

Temperature programmed desorption(TPD)studies on the effect of flue gas component on mercury adsorption

CHEN Mingming, DUAN Yufeng, ZHOU Qiang, LIU Shuai, DING Weike, LIU Meng

Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China

Received:2016-05-03 Revised:2016-05-19 Online:2016-12-05 Published:2016-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前燃煤烟气活性炭脱汞技术已经很成熟，但机理方面的相关研究甚少或不全面，为了探讨汞与活性炭在燃煤烟气中的反应路径，本文在固定床上对商业活性炭（FAC）和1% NH₄Br改性活性炭（NBAC）进行了汞吸附实验，分别考察了O₂、SO₂、CO₂、NO及其混合烟气组分对吸附剂汞吸附的影响，然后利用程序升温脱附（temperature programmed desorption，TPD）技术分析了烟气组分对汞吸附的影响机理。固定床测试结果表明溴化铵改性可显著增加活性炭汞吸附性能，O₂、CO₂及NO可促进NBAC对汞的吸附，其中NO最好，而SO₂抑制NBAC对汞的吸附。TPD结果表明，溴素改性促进NBAC表面负载的溴与Hg⁰结合生成HgBr₂，O₂存在促进了Hg⁰的氧化生成HgO，NO存在显著增加了Hg₂（NO₃）₂的生成。SO₂与Hg⁰对活性炭表面的官能团存在竞争吸附的关系，生成C-S，与Hg⁰反应生成HgS。CO₂对NBAC吸附Hg⁰的反应机理影响不大。

关键词: 溴素改性, 活性炭, 汞, 烟气组分, 程序开温脱附

Abstract: Removing mercury technology of activated carbon in flue gases is very mature. However, the mechanism of the mercury reaction is seldom.Experiments on mercury capture by a commercial activated carbon and a 1% NH₄Br-modified activated carbon were carried out in a fixed-bed reactor under simulated flue gas to study the reaction path among the mercury,flue gas and activated carbon. The effect of single component such as O₂,CO₂,SO₂ and NO was investigated. Then the temperature programmed desorption technique was used to identify the mercury species on the adsorption products. The results showed that the bromine impregnation on the activated carbon has a great promotion on the mercury capture. O₂ and CO₂ play a positive role in the mercury capture process,while the SO₂ plays a negative function. According to the TPD analysis results,NO promotes mercury capture significantly because of the formation Hg₂(NO₃)₂ on the activated carbon surface. The elemental mercury was oxidized to generate HgO when O₂ was injected.SO₂ competed with Hg⁰ on the surface functional groups of activated carbon and HgS was formed because of C-S was formed to react with Hg⁰.CO₂ has little effect on the adsorption mechanism of NBAC.

Key words: brominated modification, activated carbon, mercury, flue gas component, temperature programmed desorption(TPD)

中图分类号:

X511

陈明明, 段钰锋, 周强, 柳帅, 丁卫科, 刘猛. 烟气组分对汞吸附影响的程序升温脱附[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(12): 4065-4071.

CHEN Mingming, DUAN Yufeng, ZHOU Qiang, LIU Shuai, DING Weike, LIU Meng. Temperature programmed desorption(TPD)studies on the effect of flue gas component on mercury adsorption[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2016, 35(12): 4065-4071.

参考文献

[1] 吴福全,梁柱,王雅玲,等.全球大气汞排放清单研究现状[J].环境监测管理与技术,2015(3):18-21.
[2] 曾少军,曾凯超,杨来.中国汞污染治理的现状与策略研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(3):92-96.
[3] LEE S H,RHIM Y J,CHO S P,et al.Carbon-based novel sorbent for removing gas-phase mercury[J].Fuel,2006,85(2):219-226.
[4] LEE S S,LEE J Y,KEENER T C.The effect of methods of preparation on the cupric chloride-impregnated sorbents for the removal of mercury from flue gases[J].Fuel,2009,88(10):2053-2056.
[5] 曹银霞.活性炭对模拟烟气中汞的脱除及其形态转化的实验与机理研究[D].上海:上海电力学院,2015.
[6] OCHIAI R,UDDIN M A,SASAOKA E,et al.Effects of HCl and SO₂ concentration on mercury removal by activated carbon sorbents in coal-derived flue gas[J].Energy & Fuels,2009,23:4734-4739.
[7] KIM C S,RYTUBA J J,BROWN JR G E.Geological and anthropogenic factors influencing mercury speciation in mine wastes:an EXAFS spectroscopy study[J].Applied Geochemistry,2004,19(3):379-393.
[8] KIM C S,BLOOM N S,RYTUBA J J,BROWN JR G E.Mercury speciation by X-ray adsorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy and sequential chemical extractions:a comparison of speciation methods[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2003,37(22):5102-5108.
[9] RUBIO R,RAURET G.Validation of the methods for heavy metal speciation in soils and sediments[J].Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry,1996,208(2):529-540.
[10] RUMAYOR M,LOPEZ-ANTON M A,DĺAZ-SOMOANO M,et al.A new approach to mercury speciation in solids using a thermal desorption technique[J].Fuel,2015,160:525-530.
[11] RUMAYOR M,FEMANDEZ-MIRANDA N,LOPEZ-ANTON M A,et al.Application of mercury temperature programmed desorption (HgTPD) to ascertain mercury/char interactions[J].Fule Processing Technology,2015,132:9-14.
[12] 朱纯,段钰锋,尹建军,等.卤化铵盐改性生物质稻壳焦的汞吸附特性[J],东南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,43(1):99-104.
[13] ZHOU Q,DUAN Y F,HONG Y G,et al.Experimental and kinetic studies of gas-phase mercury adsorption by raw and bromine modified activated carbon[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2015,134:325-332.
[14] RUMAYOR M,DĺAZ-SOMOANO M,LOPEZ-ANTON M A,et al.Mercury compounds characterization by thermal desorption[J].Talanta,2013,114:318-322.
[15] LI Y H,LEE C W,GULLETT B K.Importance of activated carbon's oxygen surface functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption[J].Fuel,2003,82:451-457.
[16] DUNHAM G E,MILLER S J,CHANG R,et al.Mercury capture by an activated carbon in a fixed-bed bench-scale system[J].Environmental Progress,1998,17(3):203-208.
[17] ZHANG Yongsheng,ZHAO Lilin,GUO Ruitao,et al.Mercury adsorption characteristics of HBr-modified fly ash in an entrained-flow reactor[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2015,33:156-162.
[18] KARTZA D,Lancia A,PRISCIANDARO M,et al.Influence of oxygen on adsorption of elemental mercury vapors onto activated carbon[J].Fuel,2013,111:485-491.
[19] LIU J,CHENEY M A,WU F,et al.Effects of chemical functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption on carbonaceous surfaces[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,186:108-113.
[20] HALL B,SCHAGER P,WEESMAA J.The homogeneous gas-phase reaction of mercury with oxygen,and the corresponding heterogeneous reactions in the presence of activated carbon and fly ash[J].Chemosphere,1995,30(4):611-627.
[21] 谢菲.球形活性炭对CO₂吸附行为研究[D].上海:华东理工大学,2011.
[22] KARATEPE N,ORBAKİ,YAVUZ R,et al.Sulfur dioxide adsorption by activated carbon having different textural and chemical properties[J].Fuel,2008,87:3207-3215.
[23] NIKSA S,HELBLE J J,FUJIWARA N.Kinetic modeling of homogeneous mercury oxidation:the importance of NO and H₂O in predicting oxidation in coal-derived systems[J].Environmental Science &Technology,2001,35(18):3701-3706.
[24] NORTON G A,YANG H Q,BROWN R C,et al.Heterogeneous oxidation of mercury in simulated post combustion conditions[J].Fuel,2003,82(2):107-116.
[25] 屈文麒,刘晶,袁锦洲,等.NO对未燃尽炭吸附汞影响的机理研究[J].工程热物理学报,2010,31(3):523-526.
[26] FUENTE-CUESTA A,LOPEZ-ANTON M A,DĺAZ-SOMOANO M,et al.Retention of mercury by low-cost sorbents:influence of flue gas composition and fly ash occurrence[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2012,213:16-21.

烟气组分对汞吸附影响的程序升温脱附

Temperature programmed desorption(TPD)studies on the effect of flue gas component on mercury adsorption

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	顾永正, 张永生. HBr改性飞灰对Hg⁰的动态吸附及动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[2]	张耀杰, 张传祥, 孙悦, 曾会会, 贾建波, 蒋振东. 煤基石墨烯量子点在超级电容器中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4340-4350.
[3]	张婷婷, 潘大伟, 巨晓洁, 刘壮, 谢锐, 汪伟, 褚良银. Hg²⁺响应型智能凝胶检测光栅的构建与性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4143-4152.
[4]	张丽宏, 金要茹, 程芳琴. 煤气化渣资源化利用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4447-4457.
[5]	陆洋, 周劲松, 周启昕, 王瑭, 刘壮, 李博昊, 周灵涛. CeO₂/TiO₂吸附剂煤气脱汞产物的浸出规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3875-3883.
[6]	邢献军, 罗甜, 卜玉蒸, 马培勇. H₃PO₄活化核桃壳制备活性炭及在Cr(Ⅵ)吸附中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1527-1539.
[7]	范昀培, 金晶, 刘敦禹, 王静杰, 刘秋祺, 许开龙. CaSO₄载氧体在煤气化化学链燃烧中的脱汞[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1638-1648.
[8]	刘雅娟. 浸没式PAC-AMBRs系统中PAC缓解膜污染的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 457-468.
[9]	孙宪航, 任铸, 张国军, 孙媛, 范开峰, 黄维秋. 超临界CO₂作用下甲苯在活性炭中的脱附机理[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 631-636.
[10]	刘楠, 胡一铭, 杨颖, 李红晋, 高竹青, 郝秀丽. 废旧聚丙烯/活性炭微波共裂解制取可燃裂解气与轻质裂解油[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 150-159.
[11]	张辛亥, 赵思琛, 朱辉, 张首石, 王凯. 多种碳材料与碳酸钠复合后脱硫性能对比[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 424-435.
[12]	袁权, 李海红, 刘浩杰. HNO₃改性活性炭对不同价态离子的电吸附规律[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4986-4994.
[13]	何晨露, 邱晨茜, 方娟, 杨旋, 赖建军, 郑新宇, 吕建华, 陈燕丹, 黄彪. 基于低共熔溶剂体系的氮掺杂超级电容炭[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4946-4953.
[14]	熊永志, 刘艳艳, 陈晓荭, 卢贝丽, 黄彪, 林冠烽. 甘蔗渣基磷掺杂活性炭的制备及其电化学性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4397-4405.
[15]	郑敏, 徐垒, 陈晨, 徐忠宁, 付明来. 稀硝酸催化还原工艺中Pd/AC制备条件优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3938-3946.