橡胶骨料复合封层长期水稳定性及抗滑性能

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-1178

化工进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 5161-5173.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-1178

• 材料科学与技术 • 上一篇

橡胶骨料复合封层长期水稳定性及抗滑性能

吴淑娟¹^,²^,³(), 林家玮¹, 李廉¹^,³(), 王婷¹

^1.兰州理工大学土木工程学院，甘肃兰州 730050
^2.兰州理工大学西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心，甘肃兰州 730050
^3.长安大学特殊地区公路工程教育部重点实验室，陕西西安 710064

收稿日期:2024-07-22 修回日期:2024-09-02 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-09-30
通讯作者: 李廉
作者简介:吴淑娟（1986—），女，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为绿色环保路面材料开发与利用、道路环境融合感知与智能养护、分子动力学仿真等。E-mail：wushujuan09@126.com。
基金资助:
甘肃省科技计划(24JRRA959);甘肃省科技计划(23JRRA791);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(300102213505);兰州理工大学红柳优秀青年人才支持计划(062212)

Long-term water stability and skid resistance of rubber aggregate composite seal

WU Shujuan¹^,²^,³(), LIN Jiawei¹, LI Lian¹^,³(), WANG Ting¹

^1.School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China
^2.Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China
^3.Key Laboratory for Special Area Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China

Received:2024-07-22 Revised:2024-09-02 Online:2025-09-25 Published:2025-09-30
Contact: LI Lian

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

汽车废旧轮胎在道路行业中的广泛应用，可以实现资源的回收利用，减少黑色污染。本文目的是探讨橡胶骨料复合封层的长期水稳定性和抗滑性能，验证2D灰度值法确定路面构造深度的可行性。本文采用矩阵分析法，以橡胶颗粒处理方式、替代粒径、替代比例为影响因素，将湿轮磨耗值和负轮黏砂量作为评价指标，确定了微表处混合料的最佳橡胶颗粒替代方案；将微表处与碎石封层压实形成橡胶骨料复合封层，并对其耐磨耗性能、抗车辙性能、长期水稳定性和抗滑性能进行了分析。结果表明，采用NaOH溶液浸泡的橡胶颗粒（2~4mm）替代碎石（2.36~4.75mm）的最佳量为30%，由此制备的橡胶骨料复合封层具有较高的耐磨耗性能、抗车辙性能、抗滑性能和长期抗冻融性能。采用2D灰度值法确定的经验系数α值为0.92，相关系数为0.989，验证了通过经验系数α确定路面构造深度是可行的。橡胶骨料复合封层与普通复合封层相比，造价有所增加，但是幅度很小。

关键词: 复合封层, 橡胶颗粒, 矩阵分析法, 2D灰度值分析, 经验系数

Abstract:

The wide application of automotive scrap tires in the road industry allows for the recycling of resources and the reduction of black pollution. The purpose of this article was to investigate the long-term water stability and skid resistance of rubber aggregate composite seal, and to verify the feasibility of the 2D gray value method to determine the texture depth of pavement. In this article, the matrix analysis method was used to determine the optimal crumb rubber substitution scheme for the mixture at the micro-surface by taking the crumb rubber treatment method, substitution particle size and substitution proportion as the influencing factors, and the wet track abrasion value and the loaded wheel amount as the evaluation indexes. The micro-surface was compacted with the chip seal to form the rubber aggregate composite seal, and its wear resistant, rutting resistant, long-term water stability and skid resistant performance were analyzed. The results showed that the optimum amount of rubber particles (2—4mm) soaked in NaOH solution to replace crushed stone (2.36—4.75mm) was 30%, and the resulting rubber aggregate composite seal had high wear resistance, rutting resistance, skid resistance and long-term freeze-thaw resistance. The value of the empirical coefficient α determined by the 2D gray value method was 0.92 and the correlation coefficient was 0.989, which verified that it was feasible to determine the texture depth of pavement by the empirical coefficient α. Compared with ordinary composite seal, the cost of rubber aggregate composite seal increased, but the magnitude was small.

Key words: composite seal, crumb rubber, matrix analysis method, 2D gray value analysis, empirical coefficient

中图分类号:

U416.217

吴淑娟, 林家玮, 李廉, 王婷. 橡胶骨料复合封层长期水稳定性及抗滑性能[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5161-5173.

WU Shujuan, LIN Jiawei, LI Lian, WANG Ting. Long-term water stability and skid resistance of rubber aggregate composite seal[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2025, 44(9): 5161-5173.

图/表 17

参考文献 38

[1]	朱荣军. 人工砂混凝土配合比设计方法及抗裂性能的研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学, 2011.
	ZHU Rongjun. Study for mix proportion design method of manufactured sand concrete and its cracking resistant behavior[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2011.
[2]	Dóra MENTES, TÓTH Csenge Emese, Gábor NAGY, et al. Investigation of gaseous and solid pollutants emitted from waste tire combustion at different temperatures[J]. Waste Management, 2022, 149: 302-312.
[3]	ZHAO Shulan, LIU Menghan, MENG Xiuying, et al. Waste rubber-black pollution reframed as a global issue: Ecological challenges and sustainability initiatives[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2024, 356: 124291.
[4]	HASSAN Mohammad R, RODRIGUE Denis. Application of waste tire in construction: A road towards sustainability and circular economy[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(9): 3852.
[5]	LIU Shengjie, ZHOU Shengbo, PENG Aihong, et al. Analysis of the performance and mechanism of desulfurized rubber and low-density polyethylene compound-modified asphalt[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019, 136(45): 48194.
[6]	郑凯翔. 隧道温拌阻燃橡胶沥青及其混合料设计与性能研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023.
	ZHENG Kaixiang. Research on design and performance of warm-mix flame retardant rubber modified asphalt and its mixture used in tunnel[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2023.
[7]	马清文, 乐金朝, 姜燕. NaOH预处理对橡胶混凝土力学性能的影响[J]. 中外公路, 2011, 31(6): 229-233.
	MA Qingwen, LE JinZhao, JIANG Yan. Effect of NaOH pretreatment on mechanical properties of rubber concrete[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2011, 31(6): 229-233.
[8]	谢娟, 陈学儒, 罗浩宸, 等. 不同活化方式对橡胶沥青-集料黏附性的影响[J]. 表面技术, 2023, 52(9): 322-330.
	XIE Juan, CHEN Xueru, LUO Haochen, et al. Effect of different activation methods on adhesion performance of rubber asphalt-aggregate[J]. Surface Technology, 2023, 52(9): 322-330.
[9]	李静, 谢娟, 马云龙. 基于涂层活化的橡胶粉改性沥青制备及性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(10): 3179-3186, 3192.
	LI Jing, XIE Juan, MA Yunlong. Experimental investigation on preparation and performance of modified asphalt by crumb rubber of coating activation[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(10): 3179-3186, 3192.
[10]	ZHANG Peng, LI Dongna, LI Bo, et al. The properties of sodium-hypochlorite-activated crumb rubber and the influence of aging on the rheological properties of activated asphalt rubber[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(3): 712.
[11]	RAJAGOPAL M R, BHAVYA M, Jyothi KUMARI G. Study on the impact of pre-treatment method and admixture on the mechanical and durability properties of crumb rubber concrete[C]//International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering 2022. Chandwad, India. Almaty, Kazakhstan: AIP, 2024, 3010: 020010-1–020010-13.
[12]	郭金科. 废旧橡胶粉干法微表处微观结构与宏观性能研究[D]. 济南: 山东交通学院, 2018.
	GUO Jinke. Study on microstructure and macroscopic properties of waste rubber powder at brying micro-surfacing[D]. Jinan: Shandong Jiaotong University, 2018.
[13]	ZHAO Meiling, ZHAO Zhijie. Study on noise reduction mechanism and surface performance of crumb rubber micro-surfacing material[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2014, 599: 257-260.
[14]	李微, 韩森, 孙培, 等. 橡胶-纤维微表处混合料路用性能及降噪特性研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2017, 14(8): 1623-1631.
	LI Wei, HAN Sen, SUN Pei, et al. Research on road performances and noise reduction characteristic of rubber-fiber micro-surfacing mixture[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 14(8): 1623-1631.
[15]	王晨, 李秀君, 朱思杨, 等. 基于橡胶粉降噪微表处路用性能研究的配合比优化[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2020, 42(3): 291-297.
	WANG Chen, LI Xiujun, ZHU Siyang, et al. Mix ratio optimization for rubber powder noise reduction micro-surfacing based on road performance analysis[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2020, 42(3): 291-297.
[16]	肖飞鹏, 王涛, 王嘉宇, 等. 橡胶沥青路面降噪技术原理与研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(4): 73-91.
	XIAO Feipeng, WANG Tao, WANG Jiayu, et al. Mechanism and research development of noise reduction technology of rubberized asphalt pavement[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(4): 73-91.
[17]	王锦余. 废旧橡胶颗粒碎石封层材料设计与性能研究[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2022.
	WANG Jinyu. Study on design and performance of chip seal using recycled rubber particles as aggregate[D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Science & Technology, 2022.
[18]	GHENI Ahmed A, LUSHER Steven M, ELGAWADY Mohamed A. Retention behavior of crumb rubber as an aggregate in innovative chip seal surfacing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 197: 1124-1136.
[19]	POURHASSAN Alireza, GHENI Ahmed A, ELGAWADY Mohamed A. Raveling performance of conventional and rubberized chip seal under field and laboratory traffic loading[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 370: 130674.
[20]	朱其涛. 掺加橡胶颗粒的双层碎石封层减振降噪性能研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
	ZHU Qitao. Research on vibration and noise reduction performance of double chip seal with rubber particles[D]. Xi’an: Changan University, 2017.
[21]	季节, 刘禄厚, 索智, 等. 水性环氧树脂改性乳化沥青微表处性能[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(5): 23-30.
	JI Jie, LIU Luhou, SUO Zhi, et al. Performances of micro-surfacing with waterborne epoxy resin modified emulsified asphalt[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 37(5): 23-30.
[22]	王坤, 崔亚新. 超薄复合封层罩面技术在城镇道路路面养护中的技术应用分析[J]. 城市道桥与防洪, 2020(8): 86-88, 12.
	WANG Kun, CUI Yaxin. Analysis on technical application of ultrathin composite sealing overlay technology in maintenance of urban road pavement[J]. Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control, 2020(8): 86-88, 12.
[23]	吴进良, 高彦芝, 叶磊, 等. 沥青复合封层罩面施工技术与质量控制[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 28(6): 1046-1048.
	WU Jinliang, GAO Yanzhi, YE Lei, et al. Asphalt composite seal overlay construction and quality control technology[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2009, 28(6): 1046-1048.
[24]	刘惠民. 新型复合改性乳化沥青及微表处性能研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2021.
	LIU Huimin. Research on new composite modified emulsified asphalt and its micro-surfacing performance[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University of Technology, 2021.
[25]	USMAN K R, HAININ M R, IDHAM M K, et al. Performance evaluation of asphalt micro surfacing—A review[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 527(1): 012052.
[26]	李栓. 微表处混合料设计分析及级配优化研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2008.
	LI Shuan. Research on design of micro-surfacing mixture and gradation optimization[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2008.
[27]	WU Shujuan, ZHENG Mulian, LI Lian, et al. Research on a laboratory technique to prepare a rejuvenating composite seal and test its long-term water stability[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2024, 36(3): 04023631.
[28]	何丽红, 赵智博, 李青林, 等. 水性环氧-SBR乳化沥青微表处混合料路用性能研究[J]. 化工新型材料, 2024, 52(2): 294-298.
	HE Lihong, ZHAO Zhibo, LI Qinglin, et al. Pavement performance of waterborne epoxy-SBR emulsified asphalt micro-surfacing mixture[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2024, 52(2): 294-298.
[29]	王端宜, 李维杰, 张肖宁. 用数字图像技术评价和测量沥青路表面构造深度[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 32(2): 42-45.
	WANG Duanyi, LI Weijie, ZHANG Xiaoning. Evaluation and measurement of asphalt pavement surface texture depth with digital image technique[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2004, 32(2): 42-45.
[30]	黄志福, 翟晓静, 梁乃兴. 基于数字图像处理技术的沥青路面构造深度评价方法研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 40(10): 1382-1388.
	HUANG Zhifu, ZHAI Xiaojing, LIANG Naixing. Study of evaluation method of asphalt pavement structure depth based on digital image processing technology[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2017, 40(10): 1382-1388.
[31]	郑木莲, 陈旺, 王海阳. 基于图像处理技术的低噪声微表处纹理与噪声评价[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2023, 23(1): 80-92.
	ZHENG Mulian, CHEN Wang, WANG Haiyang. Evaluation of texture and noise of low-noise micro-surface based on image processing technology[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(1): 80-92.
[32]	中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路工程沥青及沥青混合料试验规程: [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2011.
	China Ministry of Transportation. Standard test methods of bitumen and bituminous mixtures for highway engineering: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021.
[33]	马瑞卿. 活化废胶粉改性沥青及混合料路用性能研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2017.
	MA Ruiqing. Study on the performance of activated waste rubber powder modified asphalt and asphalt mixture[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2017.
[34]	于凯, 张琛, 王欢, 等. 次氯酸钠氧化废轮胎胶粉对改性沥青性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(1): 350-354.
	YU Kai, ZHANG Chen, WANG Huan, et al. Influence of sodium hypochlorite oxidization of crumb tire rubber on performance of modified bitumen[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 350-354.
[35]	Ovidijus ŠERNAS, VAITKUS Audrius, Deimantė KILAITĖ, et al. The effect of the crumb rubber type and amount on dry process modified asphalt mixture and on low-temperature cracking and high-temperature rutting[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2023, 24(1): 2259574
[36]	YOUSSF Osama, MILLS Julie E, HASSANLI Reza. Assessment of the mechanical performance of crumb rubber concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 125: 175-183.
[37]	SUGIMAN Sugiman, RIZALDI Didin, MULYANTO Arif, et al. Water absorption and tensile properties of ground tire rubber/epoxy composites: Effect of surface treatment[J]. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 2023, 52(4): 216-226.
[38]	陈福丰. 开普封层在重庆市县乡公路中的应用研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2009.
	CHEN Fufeng. The research on application of Cape seal atcounty road in Chongqing[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2009.

实验项目	实测值		技术要求	测试方法^[32]
实验项目	微表处乳化沥青	碎石封层乳化沥青	技术要求	测试方法^[32]
筛上剩余量（1.18mm筛）/%	0.07	0.07	≤0.1	T0652—1993
电荷	阳离子（+）	阳离子（+）	正电荷	T0653—1993
蒸发残留物质量分数/%	62.14	66.75	≥55	T0610—2011
蒸发残留物性质
针入度（100g，25℃，5s）/0.1mm	70	66.5	45~150	T0604—2011
软化点/℃	57.5	59.5	≥53	T0606—2011
延度（5℃）/cm	150	138.59	≥20	T0605—2011
贮存稳定性
1天/%	0.6	0.55	≤1	T0655—1993
5天/%	4.2	3.17	≤5	T0655—1993

实验项目	实测值		技术要求	测试方法^[32]
实验项目	微表处乳化沥青	碎石封层乳化沥青	技术要求	测试方法^[32]
筛上剩余量（1.18mm筛）/%	0.07	0.07	≤0.1	T0652—1993
电荷	阳离子（+）	阳离子（+）	正电荷	T0653—1993
蒸发残留物质量分数/%	62.14	66.75	≥55	T0610—2011
蒸发残留物性质
针入度（100g，25℃，5s）/0.1mm	70	66.5	45~150	T0604—2011
软化点/℃	57.5	59.5	≥53	T0606—2011
延度（5℃）/cm	150	138.59	≥20	T0605—2011
贮存稳定性
1天/%	0.6	0.55	≤1	T0655—1993
5天/%	4.2	3.17	≤5	T0655—1993

实验序号	湿轮磨耗值/g·m^-2	负轮黏砂量/g·m^-2
1	122.22	350.38
2	95.31	395.02
3	112.51	672.80
4	112.51	385.79
5	138.99	387.65
6	439.02	389.52
7	475.20	341.06
8	216.64	367.77
9	116.93	273.97

实验序号	湿轮磨耗值/g·m^-2	负轮黏砂量/g·m^-2
1	122.22	350.38
2	95.31	395.02
3	112.51	672.80
4	112.51	385.79
5	138.99	387.65
6	439.02	389.52
7	475.20	341.06
8	216.64	367.77
9	116.93	273.97

指标	参数	A	B	C
湿轮磨耗值	K_i₁	110.013	248.265	259.295
	K_i₂	241.793	150.312	119.867
	K_i₃	269.591	222.820	242.234
	R_i	159.578	97.953	139.428
	优水平	A₁	B₂	C₂
负轮黏砂量	K_i₁	472.765	359.078	369.225
	K_i₂	387.655	383.513	351.623
	K_i₃	327.601	445.430	467.174
	R_i	145.163	86.353	115.551
	优水平	A₃	B₁	C₂

橡胶骨料复合封层长期水稳定性及抗滑性能

Long-term water stability and skid resistance of rubber aggregate composite seal

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 38

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

筛孔尺寸/mm	MS-3级配上限/%	MS-3级配下限/%	合成级配/%
9.5	100	100	100
4.75	90	70	80
2.36	70	45	58
1.18	50	28	38
0.6	34	19	26
0.3	25	12	18
0.15	18	7	12
0.075	15	6	10

实验序号	因素
实验序号	A/mm	B/%	C
1	2.36~4.75	20	不处理
2	2.36~4.75	30	NaOH预处理
3	2.36~4.75	40	NaClO预处理
4	1.18~2.36	20	NaOH预处理
5	1.18~2.36	30	NaClO预处理
6	1.18~2.36	40	不处理
7	0.3~0.6	20	NaClO预处理
8	0.3~0.6	30	不处理
9	0.3~0.6	40	NaOH预处理

构造深度/mm	测量值	计算值	差值
1	0.673	0.691	0.018
2	0.722	0.723	0.001
3	0.667	0.691	0.024
4	0.695	0.702	0.007
5	0.711	0.670	0.041
6	0.708	0.702	0.006
7	0.800	0.715	0.085
8	0.757	0.697	0.06
9	0.788	0.728	0.06
10	0.746	0.671	0.075

[1]	谢娟, 贺文, 赵勖丞, 李帅辉, 卢真真, 丁哲宇. 分子动力学模拟在沥青体系中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4432-4449.
[2]	赵毅, 杨臻, 王佳, 李静雯, 郑煜. 沥青胶结料自愈合行为分子动力学模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 803-813.