固体吸附材料脱除SO2研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-1835

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

SO₂由于对人类健康和生态环境的有害影响，成为当前人们关注和研究的焦点。吸附法脱除SO₂无含硫废水产生且能实现硫资源的回收利用，是SO₂治理的有效方法，其中吸附材料的选择是吸附系统设计和开发的关键。本文对近年来固体吸附材料脱除SO₂的研究现状进行了综述，重点梳理和分析了不同类型固体材料对SO₂的吸附性能及吸附机理，并进一步指出了不同类型固体材料在SO₂吸附脱除过程中所存在的问题。最后结合固体材料吸附脱除SO₂研究现状提出吸附法脱硫领域目前有待解决的主要问题，以期为吸附法脱硫技术的开发提供参考，并建议未来吸附法烟气治理领域向着一体化脱除多种烟气杂质的方向发展。

关键词: 吸附, 二氧化硫, 烟道气, 脱硫, 碳材料, 金属氧化物, 分子筛

Abstract:

SO₂ Emission has become an important issue, due to the harmful impact on human health and the ecological environment. Adsorption is an effective SO₂ removal method that could avoid producing sulfur-containing waste water and realize the recycling of sulfur resources. Adsorption materials play the key role in the design and development of the adsorption system. In this paper, researches about SO₂ removal by solid adsorption materials are reviewed and their adsorption performance, mechanisms and shortcomings are analyzed. Finally, the main problems for SO₂removal by adsorption are proposed to provide references for the development of adsorption desulfurization technology. It is suggested that the future adsorption purification of flue gas should be towards simultaneous removal of various flue gas impurities.

Key words: adsorption, sulfur dioxide (SO₂), flue gas, desulfurization, carbon materials, metal oxide, molecular sieves

中图分类号:

X511

武传朋, 李传坤, 杨哲, 苟成冬, 高新江. 固体吸附材料脱除SO₂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3840-3854.

WU Chuanpeng, LI Chuankun, YANG Zhe, GOU Chengdong, GAO Xinjiang. Research progress of SO₂ removal by solid adsorbents[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(7): 3840-3854.

图/表 20

参考文献 82

4	LIU Y, BISSON T M, YANG H Q, et al. Recent developments in novel sorbents for flue gas clean up[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(10): 1175-1197.
5	GAO X, LIU S J, ZHANG Y, et al. Physicochemical properties of metal-doped activated carbons and relationship with their performance in the removal of SO₂ and NO[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 188(1/2/3): 58-66.
6	BAI B C, LEE C W, LEE Y S, et al. Metal impregnate on activated carbon fiber for SO₂ gas removal: a ssessment of pore structure, Cu supporter, breakthrough, and bed utilization[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 509: 73-79.
7	ZHANG K, HE Y, WANG Z H, et al. Multi-stage semi-coke activation for the removal of SO₂and NO[J]. Fuel，2017，210: 738-747.
8	CHENG G, ZHANG C X. Desulfurization and denitrification technologies of coal-fired flue gas[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2018, 27(2): 481-489.
9	LIU S J, YU X N, LIN G X, et al. Insights into the effect of adsorption-desorption cycles on SO₂ removal over an activated carbon[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2019, 19(2): 411-421.
10	LI B, MA C Y. Study on the mechanism of SO₂ removal by activated carbon[J]. Energy Procedia, 2018, 153: 471-477.
11	KARATEPE N, ORBAK İ, YAVUZ R, et al. Sulfur dioxide adsorption by activated carbons having different textural and chemical properties[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(15/16): 3207-3215.
12	RAYMUNDO-PIÑERO E, CAZORLA-AMORÓS D, SALINAS-MARTINEZ DE LECEA C, et al. Factors controling the SO₂ removal by porous carbons: relevance of the SO₂ oxidation step[J]. Carbon, 2000, 38(3): 335-344.
13	WANG A N, FAN R Q, PI X X, et al. Nitrogen-doped microporous carbons derived from pyridine ligand-based metal-organic complexes as high-performance SO₂ adsorption sorbents[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(43): 37407-37416.
14	LI Y Q, YU Y F, LIU L, et al. Synthesis of N-doped carbon spheres using extended stöber method for SO₂ adsorption[J]. Nano, 2017, 12(1): 1750004.
15	QIE Z P, SUN F, GAO J H, et al. Enhanced SO₂ fluidized adsorption dynamic by hierarchically porous activated coke[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2020, 93(2): 802-810.
16	ZHANG X, ZHENG H H, LI G Y, et al. Ammoniated and activated microporous biochar for enhancement of SO₂ adsorption[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2021, 156: 105119.
17	ALVAREZ-MERINO M A, CARRASCO-MARÍN F, MORENO-CASTILLA C. Adsorption of SO₂ from flowing air by alkaline-oxide-containing activated carbons[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1997, 13(3/4): 229-240.
18	GUO J, LUA A C. Adsorption of sulfur dioxide onto activated carbons prepared from oil-palm shells impregnated with potassium hydroxide[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2000, 75(11): 971-976.
19	LIU D D, SU R, HAO Z K, et al. Catalytic effect of NaCl on the improvement of the physicochemical structure of coal-based activated carbons for SO₂ adsorption[J]. Processes, 2019, 7(6): 338.
20	FORTIER H, ZELENIETZ C, DAHN T R, et al. SO₂ adsorption capacity of K₂CO₃-impregnated activated carbon as a function of K₂CO₃ content loaded by soaking and incipient wetness[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2007, 253(6): 3201-3207.
21	LI J H, CHANG H Z, MA L, et al. Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO _x with NH₃ over metal oxide and zeolite catalysts: a review[J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 175(1): 147-156.
22	YUAN J, JIANG X, ZOU M J, et al. Copper ore-modified activated coke: highly efficient and regenerable catalysts for the removal of SO₂ [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(46): 15731-15739.
23	SILAS K, GHANI W A W A K, CHOONG T S Y, et al. Breakthrough studies of Co₃O₄ supported activated carbon monolith for simultaneous SO₂/NO _x removal from flue gas[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 180: 155-165.
24	DAVINI P. Influence of surface properties and iron addition on the SO₂ adsorption capacity of activated carbons[J]. Carbon, 2002, 40(5): 729-734.
1	REZAEI F, ROWNAGHI A A, MONJEZI S, et al. SO _x /NO _x removal from flue gas streams by solid adsorbents: a review of current challenges and future directions[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(9): 5467-5486.
2	MATHIEU Y, TZANIS L, SOULARD M, et al. Adsorption of SO _x by oxide materials: a review[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 114: 81-100.
25	MA J R, LIU Z Y, LIU S J, et al. A regenerable Fe/AC desulfurizer for SO₂ adsorption at low temperatures[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2003, 45(4): 301-309.
26	CARABINEIRO S A C, RAMOS A M, VITAL J, et al. Adsorption of SO₂ using vanadium and vanadium-copper supported on activated carbon[J]. Catalysis Today, 2003, 78(1/2/3/4): 203-210.
3	ABDULRASHEED A A, JALIL A A, TRIWAHYONO S, et al. Surface modification of activated carbon for adsorption of SO₂ and NO _x : a review of existing and emerging technologies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 94: 1067-1085.
27	TSENG H H, WEY M Y. Study of SO₂ adsorption and thermal regeneration over activated carbon-supported copper oxide catalysts[J]. Carbon, 2004, 42(11): 2269-2278.
28	YAO L, YANG L, JIANG W J, et al. Removal of SO₂ from flue gas on a copper-modified activated coke prepared by a novel one-step carbonization activation blending method[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(34): 15693-15700.
29	MARCU I C, SANDULESCU I. Study of sulfur dioxide adsorption on Y zeolite[J]. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 2004, 69(7): 563-569.
30	ROUF S A, EIĆ M. Adsorption of SO₂ from wet mixtures on hydrophobic zeolites[J]. Adsorption, 1998, 4(1): 25-33.
31	TANTET J, EIĆ M, DESAI R. Breakthrough study of the adsorption and separation of sulfur dioxide from wet gas using hydrophobic zeolites[J]. Gas Separation & Purification, 1995, 9(3): 213-220.
32	NASLUZOV V A, SHOR A M, NÖRTEMANN F, et al. Density functional study of SO₂ adsorption in HY zeolites[J]. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1999, 466(1/2/3): 235-244.
33	KIRSCHHOCK C E A, SULTANA A, GODARD E, et al. Adsorption chemistry of sulfur dioxide in hydrated Na-Y zeolite[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 43(28): 3722-3724.
34	SAKURAI Y, TAKAHASHI Y, MAKINO T. Laboratory measurement of absorption and oxidation of sulphur dioxide by zeolite[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1998, 64(1/2/3): 315-319.
35	LANIECKI M, ZIOLEK M, KARGE H G. Effect of water on the formation of bisulfite ions upon sulfur dioxide adsorption onto faujasite-type zeolites[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1987, 91(1): 4-6.
36	SRINIVASAN A, GRUTZECK M W. The adsorption of SO₂ by zeolites synthesized from fly ash[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, 33(9): 1464-1469.
37	PEDROLO D R S, DE MENEZES QUINES L K, DE SOUZA G, et al. Synthesis of zeolites from Brazilian coal ash and its application in SO₂ adsorption[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2017, 5(5): 4788-4794.
38	GOLLAKOTA S V, CHRISWELL C D. Study of an adsorption process using silicalite for sulfur dioxide removal from combustion gases[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1988, 27(1): 139-143.
39	BU N J, WU J, MAO R, et al. Characterization of activated carbon-13X zeolite composite and its adsorption mechanism on SO₂ [J]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2016, 16(8): 8839-8845.
40	IVANOVA E, KOUMANOVA B. Adsorption of sulfur dioxide on natural clinoptilolite chemically modified with salt solutions[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 167(1/2/3): 306-312.
41	TERAOKA Y, MOTOI Y, YAMASAKI H, et al. Adsorption of sulfur dioxide on Y-type zeolites[J]. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 1997, 105: 1787-1793.
42	SHIN C S, NIIYAMA H. Oxidative sorption of SO₂ by Cu/zeolite[J]. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 1988, 31(2): 147-153.
43	DATHE H, SEDLMAIR C, JENTYS A, et al. Adsorption of SO₂ on different metal impregnated zeolites[J]. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 2004, 154: 3003-3009.
44	MATHIEU Y, SOULARD M, PATARIN J, et al. Mesoporous materials for the removal of SO₂ from gas streams[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2012, 99: 35-42.
45	DEBERRY D W, SLADEK K J. Rates of reaction of SO₂ with metal oxides[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1971, 49(6): 781-785.
46	LOWELL P S, SCHWITZGEBEL K, PARSONS T B, et al. Selection of metal oxides for removing SO₂ from flue gas[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1971, 10(3): 384-390.
47	WAQIF M, SAAD A M, BENSITEL M, et al. Comparative study of SO₂ adsorption on metal oxides[J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, 1992, 88(19): 2931.
48	PHAM X M, PHAM D L, HANH N T, et al. An initial evaluation on the adsorption of SO₂ and NO₂ over porous Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles synthesized by facile scalable method[J]. Journal of Chemistry, 2019, 2019: 1-7.
49	LUO Y G, LI D J. Experimental study of nanometer TiO₂ for use as an adsorbent for SO₂ removal[J]. Developments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing, 2002, 10(3/4): 443-457.
50	RODRÍGUEZ J. Environmental catalysis and the chemistry of SO₂ on oxide surfaces: fundamental principles for the cleavage of S—O bonds[J]. Ciencia, 2011, 9(2): 139-154.
51	BALTRUSAITIS J, JAYAWEERA P M, GRASSIAN V H. Sulfur dioxide adsorption on TiO₂ nanoparticles: influence of particle size, coadsorbates, sample pretreatment, and light on surface speciation and surface coverage[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115(2): 492-500.
52	ZHANG X Y, ZHUANG G S, CHEN J M, et al. Heterogeneous reactions of sulfur dioxide on typical mineral particles[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(25): 12588-12596.
53	FU H B, WANG X, WU H B, et al. Heterogeneous uptake and oxidation of SO₂ on iron oxides[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007, 111(16): 6077-6085.
54	WANG H L, HAO R, GAO M P, et al. High temperature adsorption of SO₂ on mixed oxides derived from CaAl hydrotalcite-like compounds[J]. Processes, 2021, 9(2): 325.
55	MA C B, YI H H, TANG X L, et al. Improving simultaneous removal efficiency of SO₂ and NO _x from flue gas by surface modification of MgO with organic component[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 230: 508-517.
56	ZHAO L, BI S N, PEI J S, et al. Adsorption performance of SO₂ over ZnAl₂O₄ nanospheres[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016, 41: 151-157.
57	ZHAO L, LI X Y, HAO C, et al. SO₂ adsorption and transformation on calcined NiAl hydrotalcite-like compounds surfaces: an in situ FTIR and DFT study[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 117/118: 339-345.
58	ZHAO L, LI X, QUAN X, et al. Effects of surface features on sulfur dioxide adsorption on calcined NiAl hydrotalcite-like compounds[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(12): 5373-5379.
59	ZHAO L, LI X Y, ZHAO J. Correlation of structural and chemical characteristics with catalytic performance of hydrotalcite-based CuNiAl mixed oxides for SO₂ abatement[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 223: 164-171.
60	WAQIF M, SAUR O, LAVALLEY J C, et al. Nature and mechanism of formation of sulfate species on copper/alumina sorbent-catalysts for sulfur dioxide removal[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1991, 95(10): 4051-4058.
61	XIE G Y, LIU Z Y, ZHU Z P, et al. Reductive regeneration of sulfated CuO/Al₂O₃ catalyst-sorbent in ammonia[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2003, 45(3): 213-221.
62	JEONG S M, KIM S D. Enhancement of the SO₂ sorption capacity of CuO/γ‍-Al₂O₃ sorbent by an alkali-salt promoter[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1997, 36(12): 5425-5431.
63	DATHE H, JENTYS A, HAIDER P, et al. On the trapping of SO _x on CaO-Al₂O₃-based novel high capacity sorbents[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2006, 8(13): 1601-1613.
64	KYLHAMMAR L, CARLSSON P A, INGELSTEN H H, et al. Regenerable ceria-based SO _x traps for sulfur removal in lean exhausts[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008, 84(1/2): 268-276.
65	SINHA A, SUZUKI K, TAKAHARA M, et al. Mesostructured manganese oxide/gold nanoparticle composites for extensive air purification[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2007, 46(16): 2891-2894.
66	DIAF A, GARCIA J L, BECKMAN E J. Thermally reversible polymeric sorbents for acid gases: CO₂, SO₂, and NO _x [J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1994, 53(7): 857-875.
67	DIAF A, BECKMAN E J. Thermally reversible polymeric sorbents for acid gases, Ⅳ. Affinity tuning for the selective dry sorption of NO _x [J]. Reactive Polymers, 1995, 25(1): 89-96.
68	KHATRI R A, CHUANG S S C, SOONG Y, et al. Thermal and chemical stability of regenerable solid amine sorbent for CO₂ capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2006, 20(4): 1514-1520.
69	BELMABKHOUT Y, SAYARI A. Isothermal versus non-isothermal adsorption-desorption cycling of triamine-grafted pore-expanded MCM-41 mesoporous silica for CO₂ capture from flue gas[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(9): 5273-5280.
70	LEE H J, LEE K I, KIM M, et al. Diamine-anchored polystyrene resins for reversible SO₂ adsorption[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2016, 4(4): 2012-2019.
71	WEI L, GAO Z, WANG Y. Integrated two-stage adsorption for selective removal of CO₂ and SO₂ by amine-functionalized SBA-15[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 12(4): 660-670.
72	YU X, HAO J L, XI Z C, et al. Investigation of low concentration SO₂ adsorption performance on different amine-modified Merrifield resins[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2019, 10(2): 404-411.
73	SHAO J G, ZHANG J J, ZHANG X, et al. Enhance SO₂ adsorption performance of biochar modified by CO₂ activation and amine impregnation[J]. Fuel, 2018, 224: 138-146.
74	XU X C, SONG C S, MILLER B G, et al. Adsorption separation of carbon dioxide from flue gas of natural gas-fired boiler by a novel nanoporous "molecular basket” adsorbent[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, 86(14/15): 1457-1472.
75	UYANGA I J, IDEM R O. Studies of SO_2‍- and O_2‍- induced degradation of aqueous MEA during CO₂ capture from power plant flue gas streams[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(8): 2558-2566.
76	DATHE H, JENTYS A, LERCHER J A. Adsorption of SO₂ on Ba impregnated metal organic framework materials[M]//Molecular sieves: from basic research to industrial applications, proceedings of the 3rd international zeolite symposium. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005: 995-1002.
77	FERNANDEZ C A, THALLAPALLY P K, MOTKURI R K, et al. Gas-induced expansion and contraction of a fluorinated metal-organic framework[J]. Crystal Growth & Design, 2010, 10(3): 1037-1039.
78	BRITT D, TRANCHEMONTAGNE D, YAGHI O M. Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases[J]. PNAS, 2008, 105(33): 11623-11627.
79	TAN K, ZULUAGA S, WANG H, et al. Interaction of acid gases SO₂ and NO₂ with coordinatively unsaturated metal organic frameworks: M-MOF-74 (M=Zn, Mg, Ni, Co)[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2017, 29(10): 4227-4235.
80	HUNGERFORD J, BHATTACHARYYA S, TUMULURI U, et al. DMOF-1 as a representative MOF for SO₂ adsorption in both humid and dry conditions[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(41): 23493-23500.
81	GLOMB S, WOSCHKO D, MAKHLOUFI G, et al. Metal-organic frameworks with internal urea-functionalized dicarboxylate linkers for SO₂ and NH₃ adsorption[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(42): 37419-37434.
82	ZHANG Y, CHEN Z H, LIU X, et al. Efficient SO₂ removal using a microporous metal-organic framework with molecular sieving effect[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(2): 874-882.

吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	体积分数φ/%				参考文献
吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	SO₂	O₂	H₂O	其他气体	参考文献
AC	184.9	300	25	0.48	0	0	N₂	［11］
AC	<70	300	100	0.48	0	0	N₂	［11］
AC	200	620	30	0.2	5	0	N₂	［12］
NPCs	118.1	—	25	0.20	0	0	N₂	［13］
NCS	75.34	80	25	0.2	0	0	N₂	［14］
ZD-HC-AC	46.3	500	—	0.1	0	0	N₂	［15］
SSN	175.9	100	30	1	0	0	N₂	［16］
SSN	115.4	100	120	1	0	0	N₂	［16］

吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	体积分数φ/%				参考文献
吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	SO₂	O₂	H₂O	其他气体	参考文献
AC	184.9	300	25	0.48	0	0	N₂	［11］
AC	<70	300	100	0.48	0	0	N₂	［11］
AC	200	620	30	0.2	5	0	N₂	［12］
NPCs	118.1	—	25	0.20	0	0	N₂	［13］
NCS	75.34	80	25	0.2	0	0	N₂	［14］
ZD-HC-AC	46.3	500	—	0.1	0	0	N₂	［15］
SSN	175.9	100	30	1	0	0	N₂	［16］
SSN	115.4	100	120	1	0	0	N₂	［16］

吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	体积分数φ/%				参考文献
吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	SO₂	O₂	H₂O	其他气体	参考文献
6.4% Rb/AC	110	60	300	2.00	0	0	N₂	［17］
6.2% K/AC	116	60	300	2.00	0	0	N₂	［17］
6.6% Na/AC	140	60	300	2.00	0	0	N₂	［17］
10% KOH/AC	76	—	25	0.20	0	0	N₂	［18］
10% KOH/AC	8	—	100	0.20	0	0	N₂	［18］
3% Na/AC	140.2	200	80	0.15	5	10	N₂	［19］
12% K₂CO₃/AC	106	200	—	0.10	0	0	空气	［20］

吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	体积分数φ/%				参考文献
吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	SO₂	O₂	H₂O	其他气体	参考文献
6.4% Rb/AC	110	60	300	2.00	0	0	N₂	［17］
6.2% K/AC	116	60	300	2.00	0	0	N₂	［17］
6.6% Na/AC	140	60	300	2.00	0	0	N₂	［17］
10% KOH/AC	76	—	25	0.20	0	0	N₂	［18］
10% KOH/AC	8	—	100	0.20	0	0	N₂	［18］
3% Na/AC	140.2	200	80	0.15	5	10	N₂	［19］
12% K₂CO₃/AC	106	200	—	0.10	0	0	空气	［20］

吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	体积分数φ/%				参考文献
吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	SO₂	O₂	H₂O	其他气体	参考文献
AC-Cop	174.8	1200	80	0.30	10	—	N₂	［22］
Co₃O₄/ACM	123.1	400	100	0.03	—	—	—	［23］
1.3% Fe/AC	125	50	100	0.10	5	10	N₂	［24］
3.5% Fe/AC	35	—	200	0.12	6	5	Ar	［25］
4%Cu-4%V/AC	140	100	20	0.47	0	0	Ar	［26］
10% Cu/AC	42	—	250	0.04	7.68	0	N₂	［27］
6%AC-Cu	219.2	350	80	0.3	10	10	N₂	［28］

固体吸附材料脱除SO₂研究进展

Research progress of SO₂ removal by solid adsorbents

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 20

参考文献 82

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[2]	王胜岩, 邓帅, 赵睿恺. 变电吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[5]	陈崇明, 陈秋, 宫云茜, 车凯, 郁金星, 孙楠楠. 分子筛基CO₂吸附剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 411-419.
[6]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[7]	顾永正, 张永生. HBr改性飞灰对Hg⁰的动态吸附及动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[8]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[9]	葛亚粉, 孙宇, 肖鹏, 刘琦, 刘波, 孙成蓥, 巩雁军. 分子筛去除VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[10]	杨莹, 侯豪杰, 黄瑞, 崔煜, 王兵, 刘健, 鲍卫仁, 常丽萍, 王建成, 韩丽娜. 利用煤焦油中酚类物质Stöber法制备碳纳米球用于CO₂吸附[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5011-5018.
[11]	张振, 李丹, 陈辰, 吴菁岚, 应汉杰, 乔浩. 吸附树脂对唾液酸的分离纯化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4153-4158.
[12]	王云刚, 焦健, 邓世丰, 赵钦新, 邵怀爽. 冷凝换热与协同脱硫性能实验分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4230-4237.
[13]	王晓晗, 周亚松, 于志庆, 魏强, 孙劲晓, 姜鹏. 不同晶粒尺寸Y分子筛的合成及其加氢裂化反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4283-4295.
[14]	姜晶, 陈霄宇, 张瑞妍, 盛光遥. 载锰生物炭制备及其在环境修复中应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4385-4397.
[15]	于静文, 宋璐娜, 刘砚超, 吕瑞东, 武蒙蒙, 冯宇, 李忠, 米杰. 一种吲哚基超交联聚合物In-HCP对水中碘的吸附作用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3674-3683.

吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	体积分数φ/%				参考文献
吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	SO₂	O₂	H₂O	其他气体	参考文献
Y （FAU）	约170	135	25	1.850	0	0	N₂	［29］
ZSM-5 （MFI）	13~39	2000	50	0.200	0	0	N₂	［30］
丝光沸石（MOR）	25~171	2000	50	0.200	0	0	N₂	［30］
丝光沸石（MOR）	28~164	150	50	0.200	0	0	N₂	［31］
粉煤灰基Y/X	7	600	室温	0.200	10	0	N₂	［36］
粉煤灰基分子筛	49	100	25	0.200	0	0	N₂	［37］
硅质岩分子筛	8~38	150	25~800	0.190	10.1	0	N₂	［38］
活性炭-13X	50.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	［39］

吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	体积分数φ/%				参考文献
吸附剂	吸附容量 /mg·g^-1	气体流量 /mL·min^-1	吸附温度 /℃	SO₂	O₂	H₂O	其他气体	参考文献
Y （FAU）	约170	135	25	1.850	0	0	N₂	［29］
ZSM-5 （MFI）	13~39	2000	50	0.200	0	0	N₂	［30］
丝光沸石（MOR）	25~171	2000	50	0.200	0	0	N₂	［30］
丝光沸石（MOR）	28~164	150	50	0.200	0	0	N₂	［31］
粉煤灰基Y/X	7	600	室温	0.200	10	0	N₂	［36］
粉煤灰基分子筛	49	100	25	0.200	0	0	N₂	［37］
硅质岩分子筛	8~38	150	25~800	0.190	10.1	0	N₂	［38］
活性炭-13X	50.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	［39］