槐糖脂-LAS-Na2SiO3复配修复石油污染土壤影响因素分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-2138

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选用阴离子型表面活性剂十二烷基苯磺酸钠（LAS）与内酯型槐糖脂复配，并使用硅酸钠（Na₂SiO₃）作为助剂修复石油污染土壤。使用吊片法测定单一表面活性剂以及复配药剂的临界胶束浓度，利用SPSS 软件对结果进行非线性拟合。正交实验表明，LAS和内酯型槐糖脂之间存在较强的交互协同作用，三者间的复配使得洗脱率达到了87.37%。优化的复配表面活性剂的配方为:内酯型槐糖脂溶液浓度为40mg/L，硅酸钠浓度为6g/L，LAS浓度为600mg/L。析因分析结果表明，液固比对石油污染土壤的洗脱效果影响较为显著，其次是振荡时间和氧化剂浓度，各因素交互影响不明显。

关键词: 石油污染土壤, 复配表面活性剂, 交互作用, 析因分析

Abstract:

Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (LAS), an anion surfactant, was used to repair petroleum contaminated soil. The critical micelle concentration of single surfactant and compound agent was determined by hanging plate method. The results were fitted by SPSS software. The orthogonal experiment showed that there was a strong interaction between LAS and sophorolipids, and the elution rate reached 87.37% due to the combination of the three. The optimized formula of the compound surfactant is that the concentration of sophorolipids solution is 40mg/L, the concentration of sodium silicate is 6g/L and the concentration of LAS is 600mg/L. The results of factorial analysis showed that liquid-solid ratio had a significant effect on the elution effect of oil-contaminated soil, followed by oscillating time and oxidant concentration, and the interaction of each factor was not obvious.

Key words: petroleum contaminated soil, compound surfactant, interaction, factorial analysis

中图分类号:

TX53

王晓峰, 陈晨, 宋瑶, 李春晓, 杜显元, 李薇. 槐糖脂-LAS-Na₂SiO₃复配修复石油污染土壤影响因素分析[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(06): 2933-2938.

Xiaofeng WANG, Chen CHEN, Yao SONG, Chunxiao LI, Xianyuan DU, Wei LI. Analysis on influencing factors of petroleum contaminated soil remediation with sophorolipids-LAS-Na₂SiO₃[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(06): 2933-2938.

图/表 12

参考文献 14

1	刘五星, 骆永明, 滕应, 等 . 石油污染土壤的生物修复研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2006, 38(5): 634-639.
	LIU Wuxing , LUO Yongming , TENG Ying , et al . Advances in bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soils[J]. Soil, 2006, 38(5): 634-639.
2	李佳, 曹兴涛, 隋红, 等 . 石油污染土壤修复技术研究现状与展望[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2017, 33(5): 811-833.
	LI Jia , CAO Xingtao , Hong SUI , et al . Present situation and prospect of oil contaminated soil remediation technology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2017, 33(5): 811-833.
3	LEE J , YANG J S , KIM H J, et al . Simultaneous removal of organic and inorganic contaminants by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed surfactant[J]. Desalination, 2005, 184(1): 395-407.
4	MAO X , JIANG R , XIAO W , et al . Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils：a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 285: 419-435.
5	SHI Z , CHEN J , LIU J , et al . Anionic-nonionic mixed-surfactant-enhanced remediation of PAH-contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Science & Pollution Research International, 2015, 22(16): 12769.
6	龙绛雪, 傅海燕, 高攀峰, 等 . 生物-非离子型生物表面活性剂对土壤石油污染的清楚[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(6): 1277-1280, 1326.
	LONG Jiangxue , FU Haiyan , GAO Panfeng , et al . Study on the effect of bio-nonionic biosurfactant on soil oil pollution[J]. Hubei Agricultural Science, 2014, 53(6): 1277-1280, 1326.
7	ZHU L , FENG S . Synergistic solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by mixed anionic-nonionic surfactants[J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 53(5): 459-467.
8	ZHANG Y , LONG Y , ZHANG Y , et al . Effect of a mixed anionic-nonionic surfactant adsorption on bentonite structure and on distribution of pentachlorophenol[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2012, 69(21): 93-98.
9	杜艳梅, 廉景燕, 杨坚, 等 . 表面活性剂处理重度石油污染土壤的改良[J]. 天津理工大学学报, 2009, 25(2): 7-9.
	DU Yanmei , LIAN Jingyan , YANG Jian , et al . Improvement of surfactant treatment of heavily petroleum contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology, 2009, 25(2): 7-9.
10	张文 . 应用表面活性剂强化石油污染土壤及地下水的生物修复[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2012.
	ZHANG Wen . Application of surfactants to enhance bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil and groundwater[D]. Beijing：North China Electric Power University, 2012.
11	马浩 . CMC增溶与SPS化学氧化联合修复石油烃污染土壤研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2016.
	Hao MA . Study on remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil by CMC solubilization combined with SPS chemical oxidation[D]. Chongqing：Chongqing University, 2016.
12	张伟娜, 殷永泉, 冉德钦, 等 . 阴-非离子表面活性剂复配修复石油污染的土壤[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 34(3): 279-283.
	ZHANG Weina , YIN Yongquan , RAN Deqin , et al . Compound anion-nonionic surfactant for remediation of petroleum contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Hebei University(Natural Science Edition), 2014,34(3): 279-283.
13	卢媛, 马小东, 孙红文, 等 . 表面活性剂清洗处理重度石油污染土壤[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009, 3(8): 1483-1487.
	LU Yuan , Xiaodong MA , SUN Hongwen , et al . Surfactant cleaning treatment of heavily petroleum contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(8): 1483-1487.
14	穆森 . 双子表面活性剂改性海泡石去除水中菲的实验研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2016.
	MU Sen . Experimental study on removal of phenanthrene from water by gemini surfactant modified sepiolite[D]. Beijing：North China Electric Power University, 2016.

实验试剂	试剂的纯度级别	分子式
内酯型槐糖脂	分析纯	C₃₄H₅₆O₁₄
十二烷基苯磺酸钠	分析纯	C₁₈H₂₉NaO₃S
硅酸钠	分析纯	Na₂SiO₃
无水硫酸钠	分析纯	Na₂SO₄
四氯化碳	分析纯	CCl₄
硅酸镁	分析纯	MgSiO₃
过硫酸钠	分析纯	Na₂S₂O₈
七水合硫酸亚铁	分析纯	FeSO₄·7H₂O

实验试剂	试剂的纯度级别	分子式
内酯型槐糖脂	分析纯	C₃₄H₅₆O₁₄
十二烷基苯磺酸钠	分析纯	C₁₈H₂₉NaO₃S
硅酸钠	分析纯	Na₂SiO₃
无水硫酸钠	分析纯	Na₂SO₄
四氯化碳	分析纯	CCl₄
硅酸镁	分析纯	MgSiO₃
过硫酸钠	分析纯	Na₂S₂O₈
七水合硫酸亚铁	分析纯	FeSO₄·7H₂O

实验号	A	空列	B	C	实验方案
1	1	1	1	1	A ₁ B ₁ C ₁
2	1	2	2	2	A ₁ B ₂ C ₂
3	1	3	3	3	A ₁ B ₃ C ₃
4	2	1	2	3	A ₂ B ₂ C ₃
5	2	2	3	1	A ₂ B ₃ C ₁
6	2	3	1	2	A ₂ B ₁ C ₂
7	3	1	3	2	A ₃ B ₃ C ₂
8	3	2	1	3	A ₃ B ₁ C ₃
9	3	3	2	1	A ₃ B ₂ C ₁

实验号	A	空列	B	C	实验方案
1	1	1	1	1	A ₁ B ₁ C ₁
2	1	2	2	2	A ₁ B ₂ C ₂
3	1	3	3	3	A ₁ B ₃ C ₃
4	2	1	2	3	A ₂ B ₂ C ₃
5	2	2	3	1	A ₂ B ₃ C ₁
6	2	3	1	2	A ₂ B ₁ C ₂
7	3	1	3	2	A ₃ B ₃ C ₂
8	3	2	1	3	A ₃ B ₁ C ₃
9	3	3	2	1	A ₃ B ₂ C ₁

模型汇总					参数估计值
R ²	F	df ₁	df ₂	Sig.	a	b ₁
0.968	269.978	1	9	.000	3.336	2.143
0.860	73.506	1	12	.000	3.434	6.449

槐糖脂-LAS-Na₂SiO₃复配修复石油污染土壤影响因素分析

Analysis on influencing factors of petroleum contaminated soil remediation with sophorolipids-LAS-Na₂SiO₃

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 14

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

序号	复配药剂浓度A /mg·L^-1		液固比B		振荡时间C /h		氧化剂浓度D /mol·L^-1
序号	编码水平	实际水平	编码水平	实际水平	编码水平	实际水平	编码水平	实际水平
1	-1	500	-1	0.1	-1	6	1	0.1
2	-1	500	1	0.2	-1	6	1	0.1
3	1	1500	1	0.2	-1	6	1	0.1
4	-1	500	-1	0.1	1	24	1	0.1
5	-1	500	1	0.2	-1	6	-1	0
6	1	1500	1	0.2	1	24	-1	0
7	-1	500	1	0.2	1	24	1	0.1
8	1	1500	-1	0.1	1	24	1	0.1
9	1	1500	-1	0.1	-1	6	1	0.1
10	-1	500	-1	0.1	-1	6	-1	0
11	-1	500	1	0.2	1	24	-1	0
12	1	1500	-1	0.1	-1	6	-1	0
13	1	1500	1	0.2	-1	6	-1	0
14	1	1500	-1	0.1	1	24	-1	0
15	-1	500	-1	0.1	1	24	-1	0
16	1	1500	1	0.2	1	24	1	0.1

实验组号	A	空列	B	C	洗脱率/%
1	1	1	1	1	73.59
2	1	2	2	2	84.50
3	1	3	3	3	85.45
4	2	1	2	3	87.37
5	2	2	3	1	80.95
6	2	3	1	2	75.59
7	3	1	3	2	78.42
8	3	2	1	3	68.07
9	3	3	2	1	78.59
K ₁	81.18	79.79	72.42	77.71
K ₂	81.30	77.84	83.49	79.50
K ₃	75.03	79.88	81.61	80.30
R	6.28	2.04	11.07	2.59

方程	模型汇总					参数估计值
方程	R ²	F	df ₁	df ₂	Sig.	a	b ₁
S	0.818	67.454	1	15	.000	3.466	71.268

数据源	总方差	自由度	平均方差	F值	P值
模型	0.18	10	0.018	16.73	0.0031
A	9.312×10^-6	1	9.312×10^-6	8.497×10^-3	0.9301
B	0.076	1	0.076	69.47	0.0004
C	0.046	1	0.046	41.79	0.0013
D	0.032	1	0.032	29.60	0.0028
AB	8.643×10^-5	1	8.643×10^-5	0.079	0.7901
AC	4.087×10^-3	1	4.087×10^-3	3.73	0.1113
AD	0.014	1	0.014	12.63	0.0163
BC	6.989×10^-3	1	6.989×10^-3	6.38	0.0528
BD	3.196×10^-3	1	3.196×10^-3	2.92	0.1484
CD	7.674×10^-4	1	7.674×10^-4	0.70	0.4408
纯误差	5.480×10^-3	5	1.096×10^-3
总和	0.19	15

[1]	郑昕, 贾里, 王彦霖, 张靖超, 陈世虎, 乔晓磊, 樊保国. 污泥与煤泥混烧对重金属固留特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3233-3241.
[2]	刁潘1，刘静2，张永奎3，刘瑾1，姚太平2. 阴离子/非离子表面活性剂体系洗涤含油污泥[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(10): 2753-2757.
[3]	张秀霞，刘永博，徐娜娜，白雪晶，孔甜甜，李进辉，张腾. 固定化MM-7修复石油污染土壤影响因素重要性[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(02 ): 448-452.
[4]	杜云贵，刘涛，辜敏，卢义玉，鲜学福. 脱碳MEA/叔胺的性能[J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(12): 2787-.