基于全寿命周期成本的压缩空气储能系统储气装置经济性分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-1116

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 67-74.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-1116

基于全寿命周期成本的压缩空气储能系统储气装置经济性分析

何青, 罗宁, 刘文毅

华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院, 北京 102206

收稿日期:2018-05-30 修回日期:2018-06-13 出版日期:2018-11-30 发布日期:2018-12-13
通讯作者: 罗宁,硕士研究生,研究方向为电站设备故障诊断与状态监测、压缩空气储能技术。
作者简介:何青(1963-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFB0903601）。

Economic analysis of gas storage devices for compressed air energy storage system based on life cycle cost

HE Qing, LUO Ning, LIU Wenyi

School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2018-05-30 Revised:2018-06-13 Online:2018-11-30 Published:2018-12-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 综合考虑压缩空气储能系统经济性对于储能系统的设计和大规模应用具有重要意义。本文基于全寿命周期成本模型分析的方法，建立了不同类型的储气装置成本模型。通过计算储气装置的理论金属消耗量、储气装置的数量，同时在考虑制造难易程度的基础上来确定不同类型储气装置的最佳参数。通过对不同类型的储气装置进行全寿命周期成本分析和比较，可作为设计压缩空气储能系统及其经济性分析的参考。储气装置的全寿命周期成本（LCC）包括早期和后期成本。早期成本主要由原材料和设备成本构成，后期成本主要是运行维护成本。根据分析结果，储气管道的投资成本最低，且没有压力限制。地面储气装置的设备成本一般在2USD/kW·h左右。在确保安全的前提下，降低地面储气装置的LCC有利于压缩空气储能系统的推广实施和工程应用，大规模、有效地提高可再生能源的利用率，降低可再生能源的间歇性对电网运行的影响。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 储气装置, 经济性分析, 全寿命周期成本

Abstract: The comprehensive consideration of compressed air energy storage economy is of great significance for the design and large-scale application of energy storage system. Based on life cycle cost analysis, a cost model of gas storage device is established. By calculating the theoretical metal consumption of the gas storage device and considering the difficulty of manufacturing and the number of gas storage devices, the best parameters of the gas storage device can be determined. Through the comprehensive analysis and comparison of the whole life cycle cost of different types of storage devices, it can be used as a reference for designing compressed air energy storage system and its economic analysis. The life cycle cost of gas storage devices includes early and late costs. The early cost is mainly composed of the cost of raw materials and equipment, and the later cost is mainly the cost of operation and maintenance. According to the analysis results, the investment cost of gas storage pipeline is the lowest and there is no pressure limit. The cost of equipment for surface gas storage is generally around 2USD/kW·h. Under the premise of ensuring safety, reducing the LCC of the ground gas storage device is beneficial to the promotion and application of the compressed air energy storage system. It can improve the utilization of renewable energy on a large scale and effectively, and reduce the influence of the intermittent energy on the operation of the power grid.

Key words: compressed air storage, gas storage device, economic analysis, life cycle cost

中图分类号:

TK021.5

何青, 罗宁, 刘文毅. 基于全寿命周期成本的压缩空气储能系统储气装置经济性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(S1): 67-74.

HE Qing, LUO Ning, LIU Wenyi. Economic analysis of gas storage devices for compressed air energy storage system based on life cycle cost[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(S1): 67-74.

参考文献

[1] IBRAHIM H, ILINCA A, PERRON J. Energy storage systems-characteristics and comparisons[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(5):1221-1250.
[2] LINDEN S V D. Bulk energy storage potential in the USA, current developments and future prospects[J]. Energy, 2006, 31(15):3446-3457.
[3] CHEN H, CONG T H, YANG W, et al. Progress in electrical energy storage system:a critical review[J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2009, 19(3):291-312.
[4] SWIDER D J. Compressed air energy storage in an electricity system with significant wind power generation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2007, 22(1):95-102.
[5] LEE Sang-Seung, KIM Young-Min, PARK Jong-Keun, et al. Compressed air energy storage units for power generation and DSM in Korea[C]//Power Engineering Society General Meeting 2007. IEEE, Tampa, Florida, 2007:1-6.
[6] ZAFIRAKIS D, KALDELLIS J K. Economic evaluation of the dual mode CAES solution for increased wind energy contribution in autonomous island networks[J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(5):1958-1969.
[7] 庞永超, 韩中合. 压气储能系统中储气装置的性能分析与改进[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(s2):75-79.
[8] 张新敬, 陈海生, 刘金超, 等. 压缩空气储能技术研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2012, 1(1):26-40.
[9] GIRAMONTI A J, LESSARD R D, BLECHER W A, et al. Conceptual design of compressed air energy storage electric power systems[J]. Applied Energy, 1978, 4(4):231-249.
[10] 蒋跃军. 电力系统全寿命周期成本管理与智能电网建设[J]. 浙江电力, 2011, 30(6):57-60.
[11] 叶季蕾, 陶琼, 薛金花, 等. 风电并网集成应用中的储能经济性进展分析[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(s2):137-143.
[12] 蔡亦竹, 柳璐, 程浩忠, 等. 全寿命周期成本(LCC)技术在电力系统中的应用综述[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2011, 39(17):149-154.
[13] 韩天祥, 黄华炜, 陆一春. LCC管理技术在国外电力系统的研究与应用[J]. 上海电力, 2004(3):192-194.
[14] MEYER C, DONCKER R W D. LCC analysis of different resonant circuits and solid-state circuit breakers for medium-voltage grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2006, 21(3):1414-1420.
[15] POLITANO D, FROHLICH K. Calculation of stress-dependent life cycle costs of a substation Subsystem-demonstrated for controlled energization of unloaded power transformers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2006, 21(4):2032-2038.
[16] 罗宁, 何青, 刘文毅. 压缩空气储能系统储气装置研究现状与分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2018, 7(3):489-494.
[17] 丁勤, 储志军, 夏锦宁. 关于GB150. 1-2011耐压试验压力的探讨[C]//压力容器分会设计委员会委员会议, 2014.
[18] 中国索引学会. 中华人民共和国标准GB/T 22466-2008索引编制规则(总则)[J]. 中国索引, 2009(2):2-15.
[19] 彭小弟. 新版GB/T5310《高压锅炉用无缝钢管》国家标准解析[J]. 钢管, 2017, 46(5):77-82.
[20] 梅懿嫚. 工业气瓶仓储与配送安全管理[J]. 中国集体经济, 2016(10):146-147.
[21] 王国丽, 管伟, 刘飞军. 西气东输二线管道工程采用X80钢管的方案研究[J]. 石油规划设计, 2010, 21(4):1-5.
[22] 黄志潜. X80级管线钢在高压大流量输气管道上的应用与发展前景[J]. 焊管, 2005, 28(2):1-10.
[23] 金贵才, 陈振业, 罗登, 等. X80级管线钢的开发研究[J]. 武汉科技大学学报, 2009, 32(4):364-368.
[24] LIU J, ZHANG X, XU Y, et al. Economic analysis of using above ground gas storage devices for compressed air energy storage system[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2014, 23(6):535-543.
[25] 应道宴, 车全贤. 工业管道的规格标准化[J]. 化工设备与管道, 2006, 43(5):1-12.
[26] 中华人民共和国特种设备安全法[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2013.
[27] 国家质量技术监督局. 气瓶安全监察规程[M]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2000.

基于全寿命周期成本的压缩空气储能系统储气装置经济性分析

Economic analysis of gas storage devices for compressed air energy storage system based on life cycle cost

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭文杰, 翟玉玲, 陈文哲, 申鑫, 邢明. Al₂O₃-CuO/水混合纳米流体对流传热性能及热经济性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2315-2324.
[2]	唐志伟, 刘静, 石英, 陆颖, 肖荣晖, 王昊. 低碳供热技术节能指标与经济效益综合分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 156-162.
[3]	魏书梅, 徐亚荣, 聂宏元, 朱学栋. 甲醇耦合轻烃反应制芳烃/烯烃研究进展与经济性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S1): 116-122.
[4]	吕宏卿,王鑫,刘洪锟,邢玉雷,韩旭,齐春华,徐克,李华. 海水淡化用薄壁卷焊钛管传热及耐蚀性能[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(08): 3556-3561.
[5]	李艳辉, 王树众, 孙盼盼, 杨闯, 王来升, 张拓, 郭洋. 湿式氧化降解高氯化工废水实验研究及经济性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(05): 1906-1913.
[6]	韩中合, 庞永超. 储气室热力学特性对AA-CAES性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(01): 47-52.
[7]	庞永超, 韩中合. 压气储能系统中储气装置的性能分析与改进[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(S2): 75-79.
[8]	马有福, 杨丽娟. 褐煤锅炉冷端优化热力系统技术经济性比较[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(12): 4088-4095.