Research progress on the improving effect of additives on supported amine adsorbents for carbon capture

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1831

Abstract

Abstract:

Supported amine adsorbents are a prominent subject of research within the realm of solid adsorption techniques for CO₂ capture, representing an area of considerable interest and applicability in the field of flue gas carbon capture and direct air capture technologies, and have received extensive attention. Nevertheless, there exists substantial room for improvement regarding the adsorption-desorption performance and thermochemical stability of supported amine adsorbents. This review focused on the study of the performance improvement of supported amine adsorbents through introducing additives. It provided a review of recent research on enhancing the adsorption performance of supported amine adsorbents through the utilization of additives, encompassing surfactants, amine-based additives and inorganic additives. Additionally, it delved into the achievements of research efforts aimed at enhancing the thermochemical stability of supported amine adsorbents through the application of epoxides, chelators and sulfur-containing additives. Furthermore, this review elucidated the underlying mechanisms governing the performance improvement of supported amine adsorbents via various categories of additives and summarized the performance improvement characteristics of distinct types of additives for supported amine adsorbents under different carbon capture conditions. Despite some progress in research, the performance improvement of supported amine adsorbents through additives still faced challenges. Presently, research had not fully achieved the dual objectives of enhancing the adsorption performance and thermochemical stability of supported amine adsorbents. Moreover, given the significant variation in gas composition under different carbon capture conditions, future research needed to clarify the impact of additives on the thermodynamics, kinetics and thermochemical stability of supported amine adsorbents under different carbon capture scenarios, and design additive modification strategies accordingly.

Key words: CO₂ capture, adsorbents, stability, additives, surfactants, mixing

摘要：

固态胺是固体吸附CO₂捕集技术路线中的研究热点，是烟气碳捕集和直接空气碳捕集技术中最有应用前景的吸附剂材料，近年来受到广泛关注。目前，固态胺吸附剂的吸脱附性能以及热化学稳定性仍有较大提升空间。本文综述了近年来表面活性剂、胺类和无机物类，以及环氧化物、螯合剂和含硫化合物等添加剂对固态胺吸附剂吸附能力增强和热化学稳定性提升的研究成果。在此基础上，进一步介绍了不同种类添加剂对固态胺吸附剂的改性机理，总结了在不同碳捕集工况下添加剂对固态胺吸附剂的改性特点。尽管现有研究已经取得了一些进展，但添加剂改性固态胺吸附剂仍然面临挑战，尤其是目前尚未能充分实现增强固态胺吸附剂的吸附能力和热化学稳定性的双重目标。此外，鉴于不同碳捕集工况下气体成分显著不同，未来研究需要更加明晰不同碳捕集工况下添加剂对固态胺吸附剂吸脱附热力学、动力学以及热化学稳定性的影响，并根据具体碳捕集工况有针对性地设计添加剂改性方案。

关键词: 二氧化碳捕集, 吸附剂, 稳定性, 添加剂, 表面活性剂, 混合

CLC Number:

TQ028

MIAO Yihe, WANG Yaozu, LIU Yuhang, ZHU Xuancan, LI Jia, YU Lijun. Research progress on the improving effect of additives on supported amine adsorbents for carbon capture[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(5): 2739-2759.

苗诒贺, 王耀祖, 刘雨杭, 朱炫灿, 李佳, 于立军. 添加剂改性固态胺吸附剂用于碳捕集的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2739-2759.

Figures/Tables 14

References 77

1	International Energy Agency. Net zero by 2050—A roadmap for the global energy sector[R]. Paris, IEA, 2021.
2	张贤, 杨晓亮, 鲁玺, 等. 中国二氧化碳捕集利用与封存（CCUS）年度报告（2023）[R]. 北京, 中国21世纪议程管理中心，全球碳捕集与封存研究院，清华大学, 2023.
	ZHANG Xian, YANG Xiaoliang, Lu Xi, et al. CCUS progress in China—A status report (2023)[R]. Beijing, The Administrative Center for China’s Agenda 21, Global CCS Institute, Tsinghua University, 2023.
3	张贤, 李凯, 马乔，等. 碳中和目标下CCUS技术发展定位与展望[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(9): 29-33.
	ZHANG Xian, LI Kai, MA Qiao, et al. Orientation and prospect of CCUS development under carbon neutrality target[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(9): 29-33.
4	CUI Qingru, ZHAO Rui, WANG Tiankun, et al. A 150000t·a^-1 post-combustion carbon capture and storage demonstration project for coal-fired power plants[J]. Engineering, 2022, 14: 22-26.
5	Mai BUI, ADJIMAN Claire S, BARDOW André, et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(5): 1062-1176.
6	GAO Wanlin, LIANG Shuyu, WANG Rujie, et al. Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: State of the art and future challenges[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(23): 8584-8686.
7	KIM Chaehoon, Yejee HA, CHOI Minkee. Design of amine-containing nanoporous materials for postcombustion CO₂ capture from engineering perspectives[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2023, 56(21): 2887-2897
8	SHI Xiaoyang, XIAO Hang, AZARABADI Habib, et al. Sorbents for the direct capture of CO₂ from ambient air[J]. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed in English), 2020, 59(18): 6984-7006.
9	廖昌建, 张可伟, 王晶，等. 直接空气捕集二氧化碳技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023: 1-19.
	LIAO Changjian, ZHANG Kewei, WANG Jing, et al. Progress on direct air capture of carbon dioxide[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023: 1-19.
10	ZHU Xuancan, XIE Wenwen, WU Junye, et al. Recent advances in direct air capture by adsorption[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2022, 51(15): 6574-6651.
11	朱炫灿, 葛天舒, 吴俊晔，等. 吸附法碳捕集技术的规模化应用和挑战[J]. 科学通报, 2021, 66(22): 2861-2877.
	ZHU Xuancan, GE Tianshu, WU Junye, et al. Large-scale applications and challenges of adsorption-based carbon capture technologies[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(22): 2861-2877.
12	宋珂琛，崔希利，邢华斌. 二氧化碳直接空气捕集材料与技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1152-1162.
	SONG Kechen, CUI Xili, XING Huabin. Progress on direct air capture of carbon dioxide[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1152-1162.
13	DIDAS Stephanie A, CHOI Sunho, CHAIKITTISILP Watcharop, et al. Amine-oxide hybrid materials for CO₂ capture from ambient air[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2015, 48(10): 2680-2687.
14	王一茹, 宋小三, 水博阳，等. 胺功能化介孔二氧化硅捕集CO₂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 536-544.
	WANG Yiru, SONG Xiaosan, SHUI Boyang, et al. Progress in amine-functionalized mesoporous silica for CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(S1): 536-544.
15	KUMAR Dharam Raj, ROSU Cornelia, SUJAN Achintya R, et al. Alkyl-aryl amine-rich molecules for CO₂ removal via direct air capture[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020: acssuschemeng.0c03706.
16	SUJAN Achintya R, KUMAR Dharam Raj, Miles SAKWA-NOVAK, et al. Poly(glycidyl amine)-loaded SBA-15 sorbents for CO₂ capture from dilute and ultradilute gas mixtures[J]. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2019, 1(11): 3137-3147.
17	SANZ-PÉREZ Eloy S, MURDOCK Christopher R, DIDAS Stephanie A, et al. Direct capture of CO₂ from ambient air[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116(19): 11840-11876.
18	SRIKANTH Chakravartula S, CHUANG Steven S C. Spectroscopic investigation into oxidative degradation of silica-supported amine sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. ChemSusChem, 2012, 5(8): 1435-1442.
19	YUE M B, CHUN Y, CAO Y, et al. CO₂ capture by as-prepared SBA-15 with an occluded organic template[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2006, 16(13): 1717-1722.
20	ZHANG Guojie, ZHAO Peiyu, HAO Lanxia, et al. Amine-modified SBA-15(P): A promising adsorbent for CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 24: 22-33.
21	YUE Mingbo, SUN Linbing, CAO Yi, et al. Efficient CO₂ capturer derived from as-synthesized MCM-41 modified with amine[J]. Chemistry: A European Journal, 2008, 14(11): 3442-3451.
22	Aliakbar HEYDARI-GORJI, BELMABKHOUT Youssef, SAYARI Abdelhamid. Polyethylenimine-impregnated mesoporous silica: Effect of amine loading and surface alkyl chains on CO₂ adsorption[J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(20): 12411-12416.
23	HAN Yu, BAI Gaozhi, YANG Junhao, et al. Facile improvement of amine dispersion in KIT-1 with the alkyl chains template for enhanced CO₂ adsorption capacity[J]. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2020, 290: 121531.
24	QIAN Xingchi, YANG Junhao, FEI Zhaoyang, et al. A simple strategy to improve PEI dispersion on MCM-48 with long-alkyl chains template for efficient CO₂ adsorption[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(25): 10975-10983.
25	QI Luming, HAN Yu, BAI Gaozhi, et al. Role of brush-like additives in CO₂ adsorbents for the enhancement of amine efficiency[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(6): 106709.
26	QI Luming, YANG Wanyong, ZHANG Linlin, et al. Reinforced CO₂ capture on amine-impregnated organosilica with double brush-like additives modified[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2022, 61(40): 14859-14867.
27	XU Xiaochun, SONG Chunshan, ANDRÉSEN John M, et al. Preparation and characterization of novel CO₂ “molecular basket” adsorbents based on polymer-modified mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2003, 62(1/2): 29-45.
28	ZHANG Lin, WANG Xiaoxing, FUJII Mamoru, et al. CO₂ capture over molecular basket sorbents: Effects of SiO₂ supports and PEG additive[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2017, 26(5): 1030-1038.
29	TANTHANA Jak, CHUANG Steven S C. In situ infrared study of the role of PEG in stabilizing silica-supported amines for CO₂ capture[J]. ChemSusChem, 2010, 3(8): 957-964.
30	MILLER Duane D, CHUANG Steven S C. Control of CO₂ adsorption and desorption using polyethylene glycol in a tetraethylenepentamine thin film: An in situ ATR and theoretical study[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(44): 25489-25504.
31	WANG Linxi, Mohammed AL-AUFI, PACHECO Carlos N, et al. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) addition to polyethylenimine (PEI)-impregnated silica increases amine accessibility during CO₂ sorption[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(17): 14785-14795.
32	WANG Jitong, LONG Donghui, ZHOU Huanhuan, et al. Surfactant promoted solid amine sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(2): 5742-5749.
33	WANG Jitong, WANG Mei, ZHAO Beibei, et al. Mesoporous carbon-supported solid amine sorbents for low-temperature carbon dioxide capture[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(15): 5437-5444.
34	WANG Jitong, HUANG Haihong, WANG Mei, et al. Direct capture of low-concentration CO₂ on mesoporous carbon-supported solid amine adsorbents at ambient temperature[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(19): 5319-5327.
35	WANG Jitong, WANG Mei, LI Wencheng, et al. Application of polyethylenimine-impregnated solid adsorbents for direct capture of low-concentration CO₂ [J]. AIChE Journal, 2015, 61(3): 972-980.
36	WANG Mei, YAO Liwen, WANG Jitong, et al. Adsorption and regeneration study of polyethylenimine-impregnated millimeter-sized mesoporous carbon spheres for post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 168: 282-290.
37	SAKWA-NOVAK Miles A, TAN Shuai, JONES Christopher W. Role of additives in composite PEI/oxide CO₂ adsorbents: Enhancement in the amine efficiency of supported PEI by PEG in CO₂ capture from simulated ambient air[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(44): 24748-24759.
38	WANG Yaozu, MIAO Yihe, GE Bingyao, et al. Additives enhancing supported amines performance in CO₂ capture from air[J]. SusMat, 2023, 3: 416-430.
39	CHENG Dandan, LIU Yue, WANG Haiqiang, et al. Enhanced CO₂ adsorptive performance of PEI/SBA-15 adsorbent using phosphate ester based surfactants as additives[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2015, 38: 1-7.
40	Duc Sy DAO, YAMADA Hidetaka, YOGO Katsunori. Large-pore mesostructured silica impregnated with blended amines for CO₂ capture[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(38): 13810-13817.
41	ZHAO Yuan, ZHU Yidi, ZHU Tianle, et al. Enhanced CO₂ adsorption over silica-supported tetraethylenepentamine sorbents doped with alkanolamines or alcohols[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(1): 156-164.
42	GOEPPERT Alain, METH Sergio, SURYA PRAKASH G K, et al. Nanostructured silica as a support for regenerable high-capacity organoamine-based CO₂ sorbents[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(12): 1949-1960.
43	ZHU Jiangyun, BAKER Sheila N. Lewis base polymers for modifying sorption and regeneration abilities of amine-based carbon dioxide capture materials[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2014, 2(12): 2666-2674.
44	YUE Mingbo, SUN Linbing, CAO Yi, et al. Promoting the CO₂ adsorption in the amine-containing SBA-15 by hydroxyl group[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2008, 114(1/2/3): 74-81.
45	Duc Sy DAO, YAMADA Hidetaka, YOGO Katsunori. Response surface optimization of impregnation of blended amines into mesoporous silica for high-performance CO₂ capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(2): 985-992.
46	Duc Sy DAO, YAMADA Hidetaka, YOGO Katsunori. Enhancement of CO₂ adsorption/desorption properties of solid sorbents using tetraethylenepentamine/diethanolamine blends[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(37): 23533-23541.
47	HE Zhijun, WANG Yaozu, MIAO Yihe, et al. Mixed polyamines promotes CO₂ adsorption from air[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(2): 107239.
48	MIAO Yihe, WANG Yaozu, GE Bingyao, et al. Mixed diethanolamine and polyethyleneimine with enhanced CO₂ capture capacity from air[J]. Advanced Science, 2023, 10(16): e2207253.
49	WANG Xia, GUO Qingjie, ZHAO Jun, et al. Mixed amine-modified MCM-41 sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 37: 90-98.
50	CHOI Sunho, GRAY McMahan L, JONES Christopher W. Amine-tethered solid adsorbents coupling high adsorption capacity and regenerability for CO₂ capture from ambient air[J]. ChemSusChem, 2011, 4(5): 628-635.
51	FAUTH D J, GRAY M L, PENNLINE H W, et al. Investigation of porous silica supported mixed-amine sorbents for post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(4): 2483-2496.
52	MA Juanjuan, LIU Qiming, CHEN Dandan, et al. Carbon dioxide adsorption using amine-functionalized mesocellular siliceous foams[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2014, 49(21): 7585-7596.
53	WILFONG Walter Christopher, KAIL Brian W, GRAY McMahan L. Rapid screening of immobilized amine CO₂ sorbents for steam stability by their direct contact with liquid H₂O[J]. ChemSusChem, 2015, 8(12): 2041-2045.
54	WILFONG Walter Christopher, KAIL Brian W, JONES Christopher W, et al. Spectroscopic investigation of the mechanisms responsible for the superior stability of hybrid class 1/class 2 CO₂ sorbents: A new class 4 category[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(20): 12780-12791.
55	SANZ Raúl, CALLEJA Guillermo, ARENCIBIA Amaya, et al. Development of high efficiency adsorbents for CO₂ capture based on a double-functionalization method of grafting and impregnation[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1(6): 1956-1962.
56	WANG Xia, CHEN Linlin, GUO Qingjie. Development of hybrid amine-functionalized MCM-41 sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 260: 573-581.
57	ZHANG Zhonghua, WANG Baodong, SUN Qi, et al. Enhancing sorption performance of solid amine sorbents for CO₂ capture by additives[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 205-210.
58	ZHANG Xiaoyun, ZHENG Xiuxin, ZHANG Sisi, et al. AM-TEPA impregnated disordered mesoporous silica as CO₂ capture adsorbent for balanced adsorption-desorption properties[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(46): 15163-15169.
59	Quyen T VU, YAMADA Hidetaka, YOGO Katsunori. Exploring the role of imidazoles in amine-impregnated mesoporous silica for CO₂ capture[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(7): 2638-2644.
60	WANG Xiaoxing, SONG Chunshan. New strategy to enhance CO₂ capture over a nanoporous polyethylenimine sorbent[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(12): 7742-7745.
61	WANG Heng, YANG Zuoyan, ZHOU Yuqi, et al. Direct air capture of CO₂ with metal nitrate-doped, tetraethylenepentamine-functionalized SBA-15 adsorbents[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62(41): 16579-16588.
62	LIU Fujian, HUANG Kuan, JIANG Lilong. Promoted adsorption of CO₂ on amine-impregnated adsorbents by functionalized ionic liquids[J]. AIChE Journal, 2018, 64(10): 3671-3680.
63	YU Qian, DE LA P DELGADO Jorge, VENEMAN Rens, et al. Stability of a benzyl amine based CO₂ capture adsorbent in view of regeneration strategies[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(12): 3259-3269.
64	MIAO Yihe, WANG Yaozu, ZHU Xuancan, et al. Minimizing the effect of oxygen on supported polyamine for direct air capture[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 298, 121583.
65	BALI Sumit, CHEN Thomas T, CHAIKITTISILP Watcharop, et al. Oxidative stability of amino polymer-alumina hybrid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(3): 1547-1554.
66	PANG Simon H, LIVELY Ryan P, JONES Christopher W. Oxidatively-stable linear poly(propylenimine)-containing adsorbents for CO₂ capture from ultradilute streams[J]. ChemSusChem, 2018, 11(15): 2628-2637.
67	SARAZEN Michele L, SAKWA-NOVAK Miles A, PING Eric W, et al. Effect of different acid initiators on branched poly(propylenimine) synthesis and CO₂ sorption performance[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(7): 7338-7345.
68	SAYARI Abdelhamid, LIU Qing, MISHRA Prashant. Enhanced adsorption efficiency through materials design for direct air capture over supported polyethylenimine[J]. ChemSusChem, 2016, 9(19): 2796-2803.
69	CHOI Woosung, MIN Kyungmin, KIM Chaehoon, et al. Epoxide-functionalization of polyethyleneimine for synthesis of stable carbon dioxide adsorbent in temperature swing adsorption[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 12640.
70	MIN Kyungmin, CHOI Woosung, KIM Chaehoon, et al. Oxidation-stable amine-containing adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 726.
71	PARK Sunghyun, CHOI Keunsu, YU Hyun Jung, et al. Thermal stability enhanced tetraethylenepentamine/silica adsorbents for high performance CO₂ capture[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(13): 4632-4639.
72	GOEPPERT Alain, ZHANG Hang, Raktim SEN, et al. Oxidation-resistant, cost-effective epoxide-modified polyamine adsorbents for CO₂ capture from various sources including air[J]. ChemSusChem, 2019, 12(8): 1712-1723.
73	GUO Mengzhi, LIANG Shengke, LIU Junteng, et al. Epoxide-functionalization of grafted tetraethylenepentamine on the framework of an acrylate copolymer as a CO₂ sorbent with long cycle stability[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(9): 3853-3864.
74	CHOI Woosung, PARK Jongbeom, CHOI Minkee. Cation effects of phosphate additives for enhancing the oxidative stability of amine-containing CO₂ adsorbents[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(17): 6147-6152.
75	Quyen T VU, YAMADA Hidetaka, YOGO Katsunori. Inhibitors of oxidative degradation of polyamine-modified silica sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(34): 15598-15605.
76	Aliakbar HEYDARI-GORJI, BELMABKHOUT Youssef, SAYARI Abdelhamid. Degradation of amine-supported CO₂ adsorbents in the presence of oxygen-containing gases[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2011, 145(1/2/3): 146-149.
77	MIAO Yihe, HE Zhijun, ZHU Xuancan, et al. Operating temperatures affect direct air capture of CO₂ in polyamine-loaded mesoporous silica[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 426: 131875.

载体与模板剂	胺组分	吸附气体氛围	吸附温度 /℃	脱附温度 /℃	脱附方式	测定方法	CO₂吸附量 /mmol·g^-1	胺效率 (CO₂/N)	参考文献
SBA-15	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.23	NA	[19]
SBA-15+P123	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.27	NA	[19]
MCM-41	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.27	NA	[21]
MCM-41+CTAB	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	4.80	NA	[21]
MCM-41+DTAB	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.50	NA	[21]
PE -MCM-41	55% PEI	纯CO₂	75	75	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.38	NA	[22]
PE -MCM-41+CTAB	55% PEI	纯CO₂	75	75	N₂吹扫	TGA	约10.06	NA	[22]
KIT-1	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.71	0.21	[23]
KIT-1+CTAB	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.19	0.36	[23]
KIT-1	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.3	约0.18	[23]
KIT-1+CTAB	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.1	约0.27	[23]
MCM-48	40% PEI	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.16	0.22	[24]
MCM-48+CTAB	40% PEI	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.59	0.30	[24]
MCM-48	40% PEI	15% CO₂/N₂	50	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.01	0.10	[24]
MCM-48+CTAB	40% PEI	15% CO₂/N₂	50	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.54	0.18	[24]
MMSN	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.08	0.18	[25]
MMSN+CTAC	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.55	0.25	[25]
MMSN	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.4	N/A	[25]
MMSN+CTAC	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.6	N/A	[25]
MMSN	50% TEPA	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.5	N/A	[25]
MMSN+CTAC	50% TEPA	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.68	N/A	[25]
MMON	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.46	0.20	[26]
MMON+CTAC	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.78	0.22	[26]
MMON+CTAC+BTES	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.04	0.33	[26]
MMON	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.4	N/A	[26]
MMON+CTAC	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.6	N/A	[26]
MMON+CTAC+BTES	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.6	N/A	[26]

载体与模板剂	胺组分	吸附气体氛围	吸附温度 /℃	脱附温度 /℃	脱附方式	测定方法	CO₂吸附量 /mmol·g^-1	胺效率 (CO₂/N)	参考文献
SBA-15	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.23	NA	[19]
SBA-15+P123	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.27	NA	[19]
MCM-41	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.27	NA	[21]
MCM-41+CTAB	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	4.80	NA	[21]
MCM-41+DTAB	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	He吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.50	NA	[21]
PE -MCM-41	55% PEI	纯CO₂	75	75	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.38	NA	[22]
PE -MCM-41+CTAB	55% PEI	纯CO₂	75	75	N₂吹扫	TGA	约10.06	NA	[22]
KIT-1	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.71	0.21	[23]
KIT-1+CTAB	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.19	0.36	[23]
KIT-1	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.3	约0.18	[23]
KIT-1+CTAB	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.1	约0.27	[23]
MCM-48	40% PEI	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.16	0.22	[24]
MCM-48+CTAB	40% PEI	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.59	0.30	[24]
MCM-48	40% PEI	15% CO₂/N₂	50	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.01	0.10	[24]
MCM-48+CTAB	40% PEI	15% CO₂/N₂	50	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.54	0.18	[24]
MMSN	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.08	0.18	[25]
MMSN+CTAC	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.55	0.25	[25]
MMSN	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.4	N/A	[25]
MMSN+CTAC	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.6	N/A	[25]
MMSN	50% TEPA	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.5	N/A	[25]
MMSN+CTAC	50% TEPA	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.68	N/A	[25]
MMON	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.46	0.20	[26]
MMON+CTAC	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.78	0.22	[26]
MMON+CTAC+BTES	50% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.04	0.33	[26]
MMON	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.4	N/A	[26]
MMON+CTAC	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.6	N/A	[26]
MMON+CTAC+BTES	50% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.6	N/A	[26]

载体	胺与添加剂组分	吸附气体氛围	吸附温度 /℃	脱附温度 /℃	脱附方式	测定方法	CO₂吸附量 /mmol·g^-1	胺效率（CO₂/N）	参考文献
MCM-41	30% PEI	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.56	N/A	[27]
	30% PEI+20% PEG	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.75	N/A	[27]
SBA-15	30% PEI	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2	约0.27	[28]
	30% PEI+10% PEG200	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.68	约0.35	[28]
	20% PEI	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约1.36	约0.29	[28]
	20% PEI+20% PEG200	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.22	约0.43	[28]
	40% PEI	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.27	约0.27	[28]
SiO₂	25% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	真空	固定床	1.23	0.18	[18]
	25% TEPA+25% PEG200	纯CO₂	25	100	真空	固定床	2.44	0.37	[18]
	25% TEPA+25% PEG600	纯CO₂	25	100	真空	固定床	1.81	0.27	[18]
MSU-F	70% TEPA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	4.17	0.23	[40]
	40% TEPA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	3.13	0.30	[40]
	40% TEPA+30% PEG	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	3.32	0.31	[40]
SiO₂	TEPA	15% CO₂/Ar	55	115	Ar吹扫	固定床+质谱	2.09	N/A	[29]
	TEPA+PEG200	15% CO₂/Ar	55	115	Ar吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.11	N/A	[29]
SiO₂	40% PEI	10% CO₂/He	25	95	He吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.58	N/A	[31]
	36% PEI+4% PEG200	10% CO₂/He	25	95	He吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.46	N/A	[31]
多孔SiO₂	30% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.89	约0.25	[41]
	40% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.81	约0.26	[41]
	50% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.42	约0.11	[41]
	30% TEPA+20%PEG4000	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.78	约0.24	[41]
	30% TEPA+20% PEG400	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.5	约0.34	[41]
多孔氧化硅(HPS)	65% PEI	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.93	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+5% DTAB	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.32	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+5% CTAB	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.35	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+5% SATB	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.59	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% SDBS	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.39	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% SDS	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.20	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% PC	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.37	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% F127	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.36	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% P123	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.24	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% Span80	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.61	N/A	[32]
介孔碳	60% PEI	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.82	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% DTAB	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.35	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% CTAB	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.32	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% SATB	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.20	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% SDS	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.67	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% PC	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.32	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% Span 80	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.35	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% F127	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.35	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% X100	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.13	N/A	[33]
介孔碳	50% PEI（M_n≈10000）	15% CO₂/ N₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.39	N/A	[36]
	50% PEI（M_n≈10000）+ 20% PEG（M_n≈6000）	15% CO₂/ N₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.07	N/A	[36]
树脂 (HP2MGL)	50% PEI	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.13	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% Span 80	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.81	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% CTAB	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.82	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% PEG	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.64	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约1.90	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% Span 80	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.08	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% CTAB	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.08	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% PEG	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约1.99	N/A	[35]
介孔碳	55% PEI	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.53	NA	[34]
	55% PEI+ 5% Span 80	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.34	NA	[34]
	55% PEI	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约1.5	NA	[34]
	55% PEI+ 5% Span 80	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.25	NA	[34]
SBA-15	PEI	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.63	0.10	[37]
	PEI+CTAB	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.55	0.10	[37]
	PEI+PEG200	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.73	0.10	[37]
	PEI+PEG1000	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.71	0.10	[37]
SBA-15	40% TEPA	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.74	0.17	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% PEG200	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.03	0.22	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% P123	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.60	0.18	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% Span80	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.42	0.17	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% SDS	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.52	0.17	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% CTAB	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.39	0.15	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% PC	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.56	1.75	[38]
SBA-15	45% PEI	9.5% CO₂/ N₂	75	105	N₂吹扫	固定床+CO₂分析仪	约1.80	约0.17	[39]
	45% PEI+5% TEP	9.5% CO₂/ N₂	75	105	N₂吹扫	固定床+CO₂分析仪	约1.90	约0.20	[39]
	45% PEI+5% BEP	9.5% CO₂/ N₂	75	105	N₂吹扫	固定床+CO₂分析仪	约1.70	NA	[39]

载体	胺与添加剂组分	吸附气体氛围	吸附温度 /℃	脱附温度 /℃	脱附方式	测定方法	CO₂吸附量 /mmol·g^-1	胺效率（CO₂/N）	参考文献
MCM-41	30% PEI	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.56	N/A	[27]
	30% PEI+20% PEG	纯CO₂	75	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.75	N/A	[27]
SBA-15	30% PEI	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2	约0.27	[28]
	30% PEI+10% PEG200	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.68	约0.35	[28]
	20% PEI	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约1.36	约0.29	[28]
	20% PEI+20% PEG200	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.22	约0.43	[28]
	40% PEI	纯CO₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.27	约0.27	[28]
SiO₂	25% TEPA	纯CO₂	25	100	真空	固定床	1.23	0.18	[18]
	25% TEPA+25% PEG200	纯CO₂	25	100	真空	固定床	2.44	0.37	[18]
	25% TEPA+25% PEG600	纯CO₂	25	100	真空	固定床	1.81	0.27	[18]
MSU-F	70% TEPA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	4.17	0.23	[40]
	40% TEPA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	3.13	0.30	[40]
	40% TEPA+30% PEG	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	3.32	0.31	[40]
SiO₂	TEPA	15% CO₂/Ar	55	115	Ar吹扫	固定床+质谱	2.09	N/A	[29]
	TEPA+PEG200	15% CO₂/Ar	55	115	Ar吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.11	N/A	[29]
SiO₂	40% PEI	10% CO₂/He	25	95	He吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.58	N/A	[31]
	36% PEI+4% PEG200	10% CO₂/He	25	95	He吹扫	固定床+质谱	1.46	N/A	[31]
多孔SiO₂	30% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.89	约0.25	[41]
	40% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.81	约0.26	[41]
	50% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.42	约0.11	[41]
	30% TEPA+20%PEG4000	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.78	约0.24	[41]
	30% TEPA+20% PEG400	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.5	约0.34	[41]
多孔氧化硅(HPS)	65% PEI	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.93	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+5% DTAB	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.32	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+5% CTAB	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.35	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+5% SATB	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.59	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% SDBS	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.39	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% SDS	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.20	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% PC	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.37	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% F127	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.36	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% P123	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.24	N/A	[32]
	65% PEI+ 5% Span80	纯CO₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.61	N/A	[32]
介孔碳	60% PEI	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	3.82	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% DTAB	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.35	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% CTAB	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.32	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% SATB	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.20	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% SDS	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	4.67	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% PC	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.32	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% Span 80	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.35	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% F127	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.35	N/A	[33]
	60% PEI+5% X100	纯CO₂	30	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约4.13	N/A	[33]
介孔碳	50% PEI（M_n≈10000）	15% CO₂/ N₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约2.39	N/A	[36]
	50% PEI（M_n≈10000）+ 20% PEG（M_n≈6000）	15% CO₂/ N₂	75	110	N₂吹扫	TGA	约3.07	N/A	[36]
树脂 (HP2MGL)	50% PEI	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.13	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% Span 80	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.81	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% CTAB	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.82	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% PEG	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.64	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约1.90	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% Span 80	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.08	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% CTAB	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约2.08	N/A	[35]
	50% PEI+5% PEG	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约1.99	N/A	[35]
介孔碳	55% PEI	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.53	NA	[34]
	55% PEI+ 5% Span 80	0.5% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.34	NA	[34]
	55% PEI	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	约1.5	NA	[34]
	55% PEI+ 5% Span 80	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	110	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.25	NA	[34]
SBA-15	PEI	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.63	0.10	[37]
	PEI+CTAB	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.55	0.10	[37]
	PEI+PEG200	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.73	0.10	[37]
	PEI+PEG1000	0.04% CO₂/He	30	110	He吹扫	TGA	0.71	0.10	[37]
SBA-15	40% TEPA	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.74	0.17	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% PEG200	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	2.03	0.22	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% P123	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.60	0.18	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% Span80	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.42	0.17	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% SDS	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.52	0.17	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% CTAB	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.39	0.15	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% PC	0.04% CO₂/N₂	25	80	N₂吹扫	TGA	1.56	1.75	[38]
SBA-15	45% PEI	9.5% CO₂/ N₂	75	105	N₂吹扫	固定床+CO₂分析仪	约1.80	约0.17	[39]
	45% PEI+5% TEP	9.5% CO₂/ N₂	75	105	N₂吹扫	固定床+CO₂分析仪	约1.90	约0.20	[39]
	45% PEI+5% BEP	9.5% CO₂/ N₂	75	105	N₂吹扫	固定床+CO₂分析仪	约1.70	NA	[39]

载体	胺与添加剂组分	吸附气体氛围	吸附温度 /℃	脱附温度 /℃	脱附方式	测定方法	CO₂吸附量 /mmol·g^-1	胺效率（CO₂/N）	参考文献
SBA-15	50% TEPA	99.999% CO₂	75	100	N/A	固定床+气相色谱	3.23	约0.8	[44]
	30% TEPA+20% DEA	99.999% CO₂	75	100	N/A	固定床+气相色谱	3.70	约0.93	[44]
MSU-F	40% TEPA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	3.13	0.30	[40]
	70% TEPA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	4.17	0.23	[40]
	70% DEA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	3.38	0.51	[40]
	40% TEPA+30% DEA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	5.62	0.42	[40]
	40% TEPA+30% DEAP	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	5.13	0.41	[40]
	40% TEPA+30% MEA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	3.64	0.24	[40]
	40% TEPA+30% TEA	100kPa CO₂	40	N/A	真空脱附	CO₂吸附等温线	4.89	0.39	[40]
多孔SiO₂	30% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.89	约0.25	[41]
	50% TEPA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	1.42	约0.11	[41]
	30% TEPA+20% MEA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.74	约0.25	[41]
	30% TEPA+20% DEA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.75	约0.39	[41]
	30% TEPA+20% TEA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.25	约0.36	[41]
	30% TEPA+20% AMP	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.58	约0.26	[41]
	30%TEPA+20%AEEA	2% CO₂/Ar	25	80	Ar吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.89	约0.25	[41]
SBA-15	40% TEPA	0.04% CO₂	25	80	N/A	TGA	1.74	0.18	[38]
	40% TEPA+10% DEA	0.04% CO₂	25	80	N/A	TGA	2.24	0.22	[38]
SBA-15	50% PEI	0.04% CO₂	25	90	N/A	TGA	1.11	0.1	[48]
	25% PEI+25% DEA	0.04% CO₂	25	90	N/A	TGA	1.62	0.2	[48]
MCM-41	60% TEPA	15% CO₂/N₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	2.45	NA	[49]
	30% TEPA+30% AMP	15% CO₂/N₂	70	100	N₂吹扫	固定床+气相色谱	3.01	NA	[49]