Evaluation of VOCs terminal treatment technology in pesticide production based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-1479

Abstract

Abstract:

The prevention and control of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) pollution is considered a core task of air pollution control. Taking scientific and reasonable evaluation and screening optimal treatment technologies are the key points of VOCs emission reduction. The comprehensive evaluation model of VOCs end treatment technology still lacks scientific and universal technical evaluation model. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) has the advantages of objectivity and accuracy in constructing quantitative and qualitative index evaluation models, which can solve this problem. The evaluation model of VOCs terminal treatment technology based on FAHP is studied introduced, which included three first-level indicators of economy, environment and technology and eleven second-level indicators. By analyzing the typical production process and the emission of VOCs from the pesticide production in Jingzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone, nine typical terminal treatment technologies of VOCs are evaluated quantitatively. The results show that catalytic combustion, thermal incineration and membrane separation technology has obvious environmental and economic advantages, besides, adsorption technology has obvious economic and technical advantages. Comprehensive evaluation results indicate that the comprehensive evaluation of catalytic combustion (0.143) is a potential strategy, thus is worthy to extend in the terminal treatment of VOCs. This study provides reference for screening VOCs terminal treatment technologies, which is beneficial in VOCs emission reduction strategy in chemical enterprises.

Key words: fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, technical evaluation model, pesticide production, terminal treatment technology, volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

摘要：

挥发性有机物（volatile organic compounds，VOCs）污染防控是大气污染控制的一项重点工作，科学合理地评价并筛选最优治理技术是VOCs减排的关键。VOCs末端治理技术综合评价模型仍缺乏具有科学性和普适性的技术评价模型。模糊层次分析法（fuzzy analytic hierarchy process，FAHP）在构建定量和定性指标评价模型中具有客观性和准确性的优点，能够解决这一问题。本文介绍了基于FAHP建立经济、环境、技术3个一级指标和11个二级指标的VOCs末端治理技术评价模型，通过分析荆州经济技术开发区农药生产中典型的生产工艺及产VOCs环节，对9项典型的VOCs末端治理技术进行量化分析评价。结果说明催化燃烧和热力焚烧以及膜分离技术在环境和经济方面优势明显，吸附技术在经济和技术方面优势明显，综合评价结果表明，催化燃烧（0.143）是VOCs末端治理中值得推荐的技术。本研究为农药生产VOCs末端治理技术的筛选提供新的参考，有益于化工企业制订VOCs减排策略。

关键词: 模糊层次分析法, 技术评价模型, 农药生产, 末端治理技术, 挥发性有机物

CLC Number:

X511

ZHENG Yamei, LIN Shengnan, JING Guohua, SHEN Huazhen, LYU Bihong. Evaluation of VOCs terminal treatment technology in pesticide production based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(6): 3372-3380.

郑亚梅, 林胜男, 荆国华, 申华臻, 吕碧洪. 基于FAHP的农药生产VOCs末端治理技术评价[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3372-3380.

Figures/Tables 11

序号	指标	含义
C1	投资成本	包括设计成本、设备、施工以及材料成本等一系列的投资
C2	设备运行费用	包括设备维修费、人工工资、设备折旧等一系列费用
C3	占地面积	指处理设备占地面积的多少
C4	技术收益	包括资源能源回收，如产热和产品回收带来的效益
C5	稳定达标率	表示技术处理污染物是否达到国家/地方规定的污染物排放限值
C6	二次污染	表征技术处理污染物过程中是否产生二次污染，如气体逸散和副产物等
C7	去除效率	对大气污染物VOCs的去除效果
C8	环境影响	采用污染物控制技术而产生的环境效益
C9	技术复杂性	技术操作管理难易程度、设备构造的复杂程度等综合指标
C10	技术成熟度	包括污染控制技术的市场应用情况、技术安全性、运行稳定性、技术故障率等综合指标
C11	技术适用性	表征某项污染控制技术适用范围

重要性标度	定义
d_ij₌1	i因素较j因素，同等重要
d_ij =3	i因素较j因素，稍微重要
d_ij =5	i因素较j因素，明显重要
d_ij =7	i因素较j因素，非常重要
d_ij =9	i因素较j因素，极端重要
d_ij =2、4、6、8	介于以上两两比较的中间状态
倒数	v_ij =1/v_ji

A	B1	B2	B3	一致性检验
B1	1	2	2	λ_max=3.0536
B2	$12$	1	$12$	CI=0.0268
B3	$12$	$12$	1	CR=0.0516

A	B1	B2	B3	一致性检验
B1	1	2	2	λ_max=3.0536
B2	$12$	1	$12$	CI=0.0268
B3	$12$	$12$	1	CR=0.0516

B-C判断矩阵					一致性检验
B1	C1	C2	C3	C4	λ_max=4.2427 CI=0.0809 CR=0.0909
C1	1	2	2	4
C2	$12$	1	3	1
C3	$12$	$13$	1	$12$
C4	$14$	1	2	1
B2	C5	C6	C7	C8	λ_max=4.1752 CI=0.0584 CR=0.0656
C5	1	$13$	$14$	$12$
C6	3	1	$14$	$12$
C7	4	4	1	$13$
C8	2	2	3	1
B3	C9	C10	C11		λ_max=3.0536 CI=0.0268 CR=0.0516
C9	1	$12$	$12$
C10	2	1	$12$
C11	2	2	1

B-C判断矩阵					一致性检验
B1	C1	C2	C3	C4	λ_max=4.2427 CI=0.0809 CR=0.0909
C1	1	2	2	4
C2	$12$	1	3	1
C3	$12$	$13$	1	$12$
C4	$14$	1	2	1
B2	C5	C6	C7	C8	λ_max=4.1752 CI=0.0584 CR=0.0656
C5	1	$13$	$14$	$12$
C6	3	1	$14$	$12$
C7	4	4	1	$13$
C8	2	2	3	1
B3	C9	C10	C11		λ_max=3.0536 CI=0.0268 CR=0.0516
C9	1	$12$	$12$
C10	2	1	$12$
C11	2	2	1

目标层	准则层	权重	指标层	指标权重
VOCs末端治理技术评价模型	经济层	0.493	投资成本	0.223
			设备运行费用	0.119
			占地面积	0.061
			技术收益	0.091
	环境层	0.311	稳定达标率	0.029
			二次污染	0.051
			去除效率	0.164
			环境影响	0.067
	技术层	0.196	技术复杂性	0.038
			技术成熟度	0.097
			技术适用性	0.061

指标	热力焚烧	催化燃烧	生物降解	低温等离子体反应	光催化反应	吸附	吸收	冷凝	膜分离
投资成本/万元	150	135	60	75	90	45	150	180	60
设备运行费用/万元	90	66	106	113	89	162.2	111.6	178	162.5
占地面积	较大	较大	大	小	小	中	较大	较大	中
技术收益	较高	高	较高	较低	较低	中	中	低	中
稳定达标率/%	95	95	60	100	95	90	80	90	90
二次污染	无	无	较多	较少	较少	多	多	无	无
去除效率/%	90~98	95~99	60~99	50~90	50~95	50~80	60~70	70~85	90~99
环境影响	较好	较好	差	较好	较好	一般	较差	较差	较好
技术复杂性	中	较高	较高	较低	低	较低	低	较低	中
技术成熟度	高	较高	较低	低	低	高	较高	中	中
技术适用性	广	较广	较少	少	少	较广	中	较少	较少

指标	热力焚烧	催化燃烧	生物降解	低温等离子体反应	光催化反应	吸附	吸收	冷凝	膜分离	指标权重
投资成本	0.058	0.045	0.173	0.110	0.115	0.217	0.061	0.036	0.186	0.223
设备运行费用	0.136	0.191	0.116	0.116	0.190	0.042	0.127	0.041	0.041	0.119
占地面积	0.049	0.049	0.087	0.219	0.219	0.124	0.078	0.078	0.098	0.061
技术收益	0.225	0.152	0.225	0.051	0.058	0.061	0.090	0.047	0.090	0.091
稳定达标率	0.158	0.141	0.033	0.204	0.158	0.085	0.050	0.085	0.085	0.029
二次污染	0.166	0.166	0.035	0.098	0.098	0.054	0.051	0.166	0.166	0.051
去除效率	0.226	0.226	0.073	0.058	0.047	0.033	0.026	0.083	0.226	0.164
环境影响	0.155	0.155	0.034	0.155	0.155	0.087	0.053	0.063	0.142	0.067
技术复杂性	0.069	0.031	0.031	0.177	0.106	0.192	0.135	0.192	0.069	0.038
技术成熟度	0.136	0.221	0.050	0.033	0.035	0.143	0.226	0.078	0.078	0.097
技术适用性	0.164	0.241	0.059	0.037	0.037	0.241	0.101	0.061	0.061	0.061
B1得分	0.053	0.050	0.078	0.056	0.067	0.067	0.042	0.022	0.061	—
B2得分	0.056	0.056	0.016	0.025	0.023	0.014	0.011	0.026	0.055	—
B3得分	0.026	0.037	0.010	0.012	0.011	0.036	0.033	0.019	0.014	—
综合得分	0.135	0.143	0.104	0.093	0.100	0.117	0.086	0.067	0.130	—

References 27

1	李洁. 南京市农药生产企业污染现状及防治对策[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(12): 129, 134.
	LI Jie. Pollution status and control measures of pesticide manufacturers in Nanjing city[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 26(12): 129, 134.
2	北京市质量技术监督局. 中华人民共和国地震行业标准: 大气污染物综合排放标准 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
	Beijing Municipal Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. Earthquake Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing comprehensive emission standard of air pollutants [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017.
3	王海林, 王俊慧, 祝春蕾, 等. 包装印刷行业挥发性有机物控制技术评估与筛选[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(7): 2503-2507.
	WANG Hailin, WANG Junhui, ZHU Chunlei, et al. Evaluation and selection of VOCs treatment technologies in packaging and printing industry[J]. Environmental Science, 2014, 35(7): 2503-2507.
4	李佳羽, 刘利民, 韩建华, 等. 典型化工园区VOCs排放控制技术的评价[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(4): 1250-1256.
	LI Jiayu, LIU Limin, HAN Jianhua, et al. Evaluation of VOCs emission control technologies in typical chemical industry park[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(4): 1250-1256.
5	阿克木·吾马尔, 蔡思翌, 赵斌, 等. 油品储运行业挥发性有机物排放控制技术评估[J]. 化工环保, 2015, 35(1): 64-68.
	AKEMU Wumaer, CAI Siyi, ZHAO Bin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of volatile organic compounds control technologies for oil storage and transportation[J]. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2015, 35(1): 64-68.
6	王新雷, 罗家松, 田雪沁, 等. 京津冀地区烟气脱硝工艺现状及综合评价[J]. 节能技术, 2018, 36(2): 145-150.
	WANG Xinlei, LUO Jiasong, TIAN Xueqin, et al. Technics situation and synthesis evaluation of flue gas de-NO _x in Jing-Jin-Ji district[J]. Energy Conservation Technology, 2018, 36(2): 145-150.
7	席富娟. 长三角地区石化行业大气污染物排放状况及VOCs控制技术分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
	XI Fujuan. Analysis of pollutants emission status and evaluation of VOCs control technologies for petrochemical industry in Yangtze River Delta[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018.
8	MADŽAREVIĆ A R, IVEZIĆ D D, TANASIJEVIĆ M L, et al. The Fuzzy-AHP synthesis model for energy security assessment of the Serbian natural gas sector[J]. Symmetry-Basel, 2020, 12(6): 908.
9	马双忱, 范紫瑄, 温佳琪, 等. 基于模糊层次分析的燃煤电厂脱硫废水处理可利用技术评价[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(11): 4451-4459.
	MA Shuangchen, FAN Zixuan, WEN Jiaqi, et al. Evaluation on technology of desulfurization wastewater from coal-fired power plant based on fuzzy AHP[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(11): 4451-4459.
10	孙现伟, 邓双, 朱云, 等. 大气污染物控制技术的评估方法研究[J]. 能源与环境, 2015(6): 39-42.
	SUN Xianwei, DENG Shuang, ZHU Yun, et al. Method for evaluation of air pollution control technologies, 2015(6): 39-42.
11	HU Wei, LIU Guangbing, TU Yong. Wastewater treatment evaluation for enterprises based on Fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation: a case study in industrial park in Taihu Basin, China[J]. SpringerPlus, 2016, 5(1): 907.
12	张驰, 陈涛, 倪顺江. 基于层次分析和模糊综合评价的电网系统应急能力评估[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(2): 180-186.
	ZHANG Chi, CHEN Tao, NI Shunjiang. Evaluation on emergency capability of power grid system based on AHP and FCE[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(2): 180-186.
13	王敏, 尹崇鑫, 程金兰, 等. 层次分析-模糊综合评价法在制浆造纸水污染控制技术评估中的应用[J]. 林业工程学报, 2021, 6(4): 107-113.
	WANG Min, YIN Chongxin, CHENG Jinlan, et al. Application of AHP-FCE evaluation on the pulping and papermaking water pollution control technology[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2021, 6(4): 107-113.
14	孙英杰. 惠州龙溪电镀基地镀锌清洁生产关键技术评估研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2014.
	SUN Yingjie. Research on the assessment of key technologies for cleaner production in Galvanization in Huizhou longxi plating base[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2014.
15	田新, 邱运仁, 杨兆光. 氯碱工业(电石法PVC)污染防治最佳可行技术评估[J]. 中国氯碱, 2016(8): 28-31, 48.
	TIAN Xin, QIU Yunren, YANG Zhaoguang. Assessment on best available technologies of pollution prevention and control for PVC production by calcium carbide method of chlor-alkali industry[J]. China Chlor-Alkali, 2016(8): 28-31, 48.
16	佟欧. 印染行业节水减排清洁生产指标体系的构建及最佳可行技术研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2011.
	TONG Ou. The establishment of water-conservation and waste-reduction clean production indicator system in textile-printing industry and the research of bat[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2011.
17	沈达, 刘金吉, 周飞, 等. 化工企业VOCs治理评估指标体系的建立与应用[J]. 环境监控与预警, 2020, 12(4): 51-55.
	SHEN Da, LIU Jinji, ZHOU Fei, et al. Construction and application of evaluation index system for VOCs control in chemical enterprises[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning, 2020, 12(4): 51-55.
18	王灿, 席劲瑛, 胡洪营, 等. 挥发性有机物控制技术评价指标体系初探[J]. 化工环保, 2011, 31(1): 73-76.
	WANG Can, XI Jinying, HU Hongying, et al. Evaluation index system of volatile organic compound control technology[J]. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2011, 31(1): 73-76.
19	吕庆志, 曾小岚, 朱天乐, 等. 大气污染控制技术评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2017, 40(7): 188-192.
	Qingzhi LYU, ZENG Xiaolan, ZHU Tianle, et al. Method for evaluation of air pollution control technologies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 40(7): 188-192.
20	谢双蔚, 王铁宇, 吕永龙, 等. 基于AHP的POPs污染控制技术评价方法研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(2): 692-698.
	XIE Shuangwei, WANG Tieyu, Yonglong LYU, et al. AHP-based assessment on POPs pollution control technologies[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(2): 692-698.
21	余姝洁, 李明, 甘慧慧. 珠江三角洲地区家具行业VOCs控制技术的评估与选择[J]. 广东化工, 2016, 43(13): 196-198.
	YU Shujie, LI Ming, GAN Huihui. Evaluation and selection of VOCs treatment technologies in the furniture manufacturing operations in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2016, 43(13): 196-198.
22	周苏华, 邢静康, 张运强, 等. 基于模糊层次分析法的预应力锚索加固顺层边坡稳定性评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(5): 1695-1704.
	ZHOU Suhua, XING Jingkang, ZHANG Yunqiang, et al. An assessment model based on the hierarchical fuzzy analysis process for the bedding slope with the prestressed anchor cable frame reinforcement[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2020, 20(5): 1695-1704.
23	田静. 新乡市典型工业VOCs控制技术综合评估分析[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2019.
	TIAN Jing. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of typical industrial VOCs control technology in Xinxiang city[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2019.
24	张亚青, 王相, 孟凡荣, 等. 基于熵权和层次分析法的VOCs处理技术综合评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(6): 2946-2955.
	ZHANG Yaqing, WANG Xiang, MENG Fanrong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of VOCs processing technology based on entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(6): 2946-2955.
25	户英杰, 王志强, 程星星, 等. 燃烧处理挥发性有机污染物的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(1): 319-329.
	HU Yingjie, WANG Zhiqiang, CHENG Xingxing, et al. Recent progress in the removal of volatile organic compounds by combustion[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(1): 319-329.
26	王集军. 典型行业恶臭废气的污染特征及其生物降解研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2019.
	WANG Jijun. Pollution profiles and biodegradation of typical industry odor waste gas[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2019.
27	栾志强, 王喜芹, 郝郑平, 等. 有机废气治理行业2017年发展综述[J]. 中国环保产业, 2018(6): 13-24.
	LUAN Zhiqiang, WANG Xiqin, HAO Zhengping, et al. Development report on organic waste-gas treatment industry in 2017[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2018(6): 13-24.

[1]	DENG Liping, SHI Haoyu, LIU Xiaolong, CHEN Yaoji, YAN Jingying. Non-noble metal modified vanadium titanium-based catalyst for NH₃-SCR denitrification simultaneous control VOCs [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[2]	GE Yafen, SUN Yu, XIAO Peng, LIU Qi, LIU Bo, SUN Chengying, GONG Yanjun. Research progress of zeolite for VOCs removal [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[3]	XU Wei, LI Kaijun, SONG Linye, ZHANG Xinghui, YAO Shunhua. Research progress of photocatalysis and co-electrochemical degradation of VOCs [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3520-3531.
[4]	DU Jiahui, LIU Jia, YANG Juping, QI Hongyi, DOU Xiaona, LI Jian. Recent advances in biological combined technology for VOCs treatment [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(5): 2802-2812.
[5]	WANG Xu, WU Yushuai, YANG Xin, CHEN Huiyong, ZHANG Jianbo, MA Xiaoxun. Review of adsorptive removal of volatile organic compounds by zeolite [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(5): 2813-2826.
[6]	WEI Jinghui, FENG Yongchao, YU Qingjun, YI Honghong, TANG Xiaolong, ZHANG Yuanyuan, MENG Xianzheng, YUAN Yuting. Research progress of catalytic oxidation of typical VOCs in cooking oil fumes [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(10): 5730-5746.
[7]	Meng LI, Wei LI, Shuai ZHANG, Yuwei LI, Fang LIU, Chaocheng ZHAO, Yongqiang WANG. Research progress on adsorption of VOCs by MOF and its composite [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(1): 415-426.
[8]	Lingbo LI,Long LI,Mengting CHENG,Xiangchen FANG. Current status and future developments in monitoring of fugitive VOC emissions from petroleum refining and petrochemical industry [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(3): 1196-1208.
[9]	Chunlin ZHAO, Ziran MA, Baodong WANG, Ge LI, Hongyan WANG, Jiali ZHOU, Guangjie LU, Yuting XIAO, Jianhui YANG, Jinfeng LU. Research progress of catalyst coating process for exhaust gas treatment from fixed source [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(10): 4015-4023.
[10]	Jinjin LI,Feiran CHEN,Xiuwei MA,Zhi ZHANG,Linjun YANG. Emission of coal-fired VOCs and prospect of control technology [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(12): 5539-5547.
[11]	HU Yingjie, WANG Zhiqiang, CHENG Xingxing, LIU Ming, MA Chunyuan. Recent progress in the removal of volatile organic compounds by combustion [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(01): 319-329.