Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 3465-3474.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-1633

• Chemical processes and equipment • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of heat transfer and resistance performance of U-shaped baffle heat exchanger

GU Xin1(), ZHANG Qianxin1, WANG Chaopeng2, FANG Yunge1, LI Ning1, WANG Yongqing1()   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Process Heat Transfer and Energy Saving of Henan Province, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2.Pingdingshan Branch of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Safety Testing Institute of Henan Province, Pingdingshan 467000, Henan, China
  • Received:2021-08-02 Revised:2021-09-09 Online:2022-07-23 Published:2022-07-25
  • Contact: WANG Yongqing

U形导流板换热器传热和阻力性能分析

古新1(), 张前欣1, 王超鹏2, 方运阁1, 李宁1, 王永庆1()   

  1. 1.郑州大学河南省过程传热与节能重点实验室,河南 郑州 450002
    2.河南省锅炉压力容器安全检测研究院 平顶山分院,河南 平顶山 467000
  • 通讯作者: 王永庆
  • 作者简介:古新(1978—),男,博士,教授,研究方向为传热传质。E-mail: guxin@zzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(21776263);河南省科技攻关项目(182102310022);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(18A470001)

Abstract:

Periodic whole cross-section models of U-shaped baffle heat exchanger and torsional flow heat exchanger were established, and the shell side performance of two heat exchangers was numerically studied by using computational fluid dynamics(CFD) method. Compared with the torsional flow heat exchanger, the results showed that the pressure drop in the shell side of the U-shaped baffle heat exchanger was reduced by 45.3%—47.5%, the heat transfer coefficient was reduced by 9.9%—13.5%, the uniformity was improved by 2.4%—4.0%, and the comprehensive performance was improved by 4.0%—14.6%. The field synergy results showed that the synergy of fluid velocity and pressure gradient in the shell side of U-shaped baffle heat exchanger was superior to that of the torsional flow heat exchanger, while the synergy of fluid velocity and temperature gradient was not as good as that of the torsional flow heat exchanger. The Laser Doppler Velocimeter (LDV) experiment verifies the accuracy of the simulation method and the reliability of the simulation results. The influence of U-shaped baffle structure parameters and arrangement on the pressure drop and heat transfer performance of the heat exchanger shell side is studied. The results show that the angle and arrangement of the baffles have a significant impact on the performance, while the width and spacing of baffles have little impact.

Key words: U-shaped baffle, shell and tube heat exchanger, computational fluid dynamics(CFD), numerical simulation

摘要:

建立U形导流板换热器和扭转流换热器全截面周期模型,利用计算流体力学(CFD)方法对两种换热器壳程性能进行数值研究。相较于扭转流换热器,U形导流板换热器的壳程压降降低45.3%~47.5%,传热系数降低9.9%~13.5%,均匀性提高2.4%~4.0%,综合性能提高4.0%~14.6%。场协同结果表明,U形导流板换热器壳程流体速度与压力梯度的协同性优于扭转流换热器,而流体速度与温度梯度的协同性不如扭转流换热器。本文利用激光多普勒测速仪(LDV)验证了模拟方法准确性和模拟结果的可靠性;分析了U形导流板结构参数及布置方式对换热器壳程压降和传热性能的影响。结果表明,U形导流板的布置角度和布置方式对性能影响显著,导流板宽度和导流板间距的影响较小。

关键词: U形导流板, 管壳式换热器, 计算流体力学, 数值模拟

CLC Number: 

京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号
Copyright © Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: hgjz@cip.com.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd