CO2原位矿化选址关键参数及其封存潜力评估研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0355

化工进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 1492-1505.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0355

• 资源与环境化工 • 上一篇

CO₂原位矿化选址关键参数及其封存潜力评估研究进展

张敏¹(), 叶航¹(), 包琦¹, 刘琦¹(), 荆铁亚², 袁浩伟², 赵文韬², 王晓龙², 鲜成钢¹

^1.中国石油大学（北京）非常规油气科学技术研究院，油气资源与工程全国重点实验室，北京 102249
^2.高效灵活煤电及碳捕集利用封存全国重点实验室，北京 102209

收稿日期:2023-03-09 修回日期:2023-07-10 出版日期:2024-03-10 发布日期:2024-04-11
通讯作者: 刘琦
作者简介:张敏（1992—），女，博士，博士后，研究方向为纳米水泥、碳封存与利用。E-mail：michelletiong@cup.edu.cn
叶航（1997—），男，博士研究生，研究方向为二氧化碳地质利用与安全封存。E-mail：yehang_cup@163.com。
基金资助:
中国石油大学（北京）科研基金(ZX20200133);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(2021ZD0020);华能清能院研究与开发基金(QNYJJ22-21);国家自然科学基金(51604288)

Review on key parameters and storage capacity potential assessment for in-situ carbon mineralization site

TIONG Michelle¹(), YE Hang¹(), BAO Qi¹, LIU Qi¹(), JING Tieya², YUAN Haowei², ZHAO Wentao², WANG Xiaolong², XIAN Chenggang¹

^1.Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, Beijing 102249, China
^2.National Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Flexible Coal Power Generation and Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage, Beijing 102209, China

Received:2023-03-09 Revised:2023-07-10 Online:2024-03-10 Published:2024-04-11
Contact: LIU Qi

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

温室气体特别是二氧化碳的大量排放，是导致全球变暖的主要原因之一。根据国际能源署的报道，碳捕集利用和封存（CCUS）技术是缓解全球气候变化的重要措施之一，约占累计碳减排量的15%。原位矿化封存技术基于快速CO₂矿化机制，以镁铁质岩石和超镁铁质岩石（玄武岩、橄榄岩等）地层为碳封存位点，利用CO₂与富含Ca、Mg元素矿物的矿化反应，转变为稳定的碳酸盐，从而达到永久且高效封存CO₂的目的。冰岛和美国的中试项目已经证明了该技术的可行性，但中国尚未进行相关示范项目。本文介绍了原位矿化封存技术的机理、CO₂封存潜力的评估手段及其面临的风险与挑战，讨论了已开展的案例项目及其技术细节，梳理了实施该技术所必需的选址关键参数（包括源-汇距离、矿物类型、注入性、封闭性等），并基于目前研究对其前景进行展望，以期提高我国对原位矿化技术的认识和重视，为推动该领域进一步发展提供理论指导。

关键词: CO₂原位矿化, CO₂地质封存, 玄武岩, 选址参数, 封存潜力

Abstract:

The significant greenhouse gases emission, especially CO₂ is the main cause of global warming. According to IEA report, carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) is proposed as an effective mitigation strategy which accounts for about 15% of cumulative carbon emission reduction. The in-situ mineralization sequestration technology is based on the rapid CO₂ mineralization mechanism, utilizing the formations of mafic rocks and ultramafic rocks (such as basalt and peridotite) as carbon storage sites. The mineralization reaction between CO₂ and calcium- and magnesium-rich minerals is used to transform them into stable carbonates, achieving permanent and efficient CO₂ sequestration. Pilot projects in Iceland and the United States have demonstrated the feasibility of this technology, but no demonstration project has been carried out in China yet. This review presents the mechanism of in-situ carbon mineralization, calculation methods for CO₂ storage capacity, and current technical challenges. In addition, the conducted case studies, including their technical details are discussed, while the key parameters required for implementing this technology (include source-sink distance, mineral types, injectivity, and confinement, etc) are provided. Based on the recent research, the future prospects are made, aiming to enhance China’s understanding and attention to the in-situ carbon mineralization technology, at the same time, serving as a guideline for future implementation in China.

Key words: in-situ carbon mineralization, CO₂ geological storage, basalt, site selection criterion, storage capacity

中图分类号:

TQ53

张敏, 叶航, 包琦, 刘琦, 荆铁亚, 袁浩伟, 赵文韬, 王晓龙, 鲜成钢. CO₂原位矿化选址关键参数及其封存潜力评估研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1492-1505.

TIONG Michelle, YE Hang, BAO Qi, LIU Qi, JING Tieya, YUAN Haowei, ZHAO Wentao, WANG Xiaolong, XIAN Chenggang. Review on key parameters and storage capacity potential assessment for in-situ carbon mineralization site[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(3): 1492-1505.

图/表 12

参考文献 80

30	KELEMEN Peter, BENSON Sally M, Hélène PILORGÉ, et al. An overview of the status and challenges of CO₂ storage in minerals and geological formations[J]. Frontiers in Climate, 2019, 1: 9.
31	ROSENQVIST Marija P, MEAKINS Max W J, PLANKE Sverre, et al. Reservoir properties and reactivity of the Faroe Islands Basalt Group: Investigating the potential for CO₂ storage in the North Atlantic Igneous Province[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2023, 123: 103838.
32	VOIGT Martin, PEARCE Christopher R, BALDERMANN Andre, et al. Stable and radiogenic strontium isotope fractionation during hydrothermal seawater-basalt interaction[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2018, 240: 131-151.
33	王秋华, 吴嘉帅, 张卫风. 碱性工业固废矿化封存二氧化碳研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1572-1582.
	WANG Qiuhua, WU Jiashuai, ZHANG Weifeng. Research progress of alkaline industrial solid wastes mineralization for carbon dioxide sequestration[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(3): 1572-1582.
34	Geological Survey U.S.. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2023[R]. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey, 2023.
35	SANDALOW D, AINES R, FRIEDMANN J, et al. Carbon Mineralization Roadmap[R]. Tokyo: Innovation for Cool Earth Forum (ICEF), 2021.
36	POWER I M, WILSON S A, DIPPLE G M. Serpentinite carbonation for CO₂ sequestration[J]. Elements, 2013, 9(2): 115-121.
37	GOLDBERG David, SLAGLE Angela L. A global assessment of deep-sea basalt sites for carbon sequestration[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 3675-3682.
38	WEISE F, FRIDRIKSSON T, ÁRMANNSSON H. CO₂ fixation by calcite in high-temperature geothermal systems in Iceland[R]. Iceland: Iceland Geosurvey, 2008.
39	Peter MCGRAIL B, Todd SCHAEF H, Anita M HO, et al. Potential for carbon dioxide sequestration in flood basalts[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2006, 111: B12201.
40	张亮, 温荣华, 耿松鹤, 等. CO₂在玄武岩中矿物封存研究进展及关键问题[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2022, 36(4): 473-480.
	ZHANG Liang, WEN Ronghua, GENG Songhe, et al. Mineral trapping of CO₂ in basalt rock: Progress and key issues[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2022, 36(4): 473-480.
41	BACHU Stefan, BONIJOLY Didier, BRADSHAW John, et al. CO₂ storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2007, 1(4): 430-443.
42	ANTHONSEN K L, AAGAARD P, BERGMO P E S, et al. CO₂ storage potential in the Nordic region[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 5080-5092.
43	KANG M, KIM J H, KIM K-O, et al. Assessment of CO₂ storage capacity for basalt caprock-sandstone reservoir system in the northern East China Sea[C]//20th EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna, Austria : European Geosciences Union (EGU), 2018: 5772.
44	LEI Zhihong, ZHANG Yanjun, ZHOU Ling, et al. Numerical simulation of CO₂ mineral sequestration in basalt reservoir through an abandoned oil well: A case study in Xujiaweizi Area, Northeast China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021, 80(16): 527.
45	吾尔娜, 陈琦, 王世伟, 等. 济阳坳陷玄武岩油气藏储层的CO₂封存潜力研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2017, 29(12): 98-100.
	WU Erna, CHEN Qi, WANG Shiwei, et al. Study on CO₂ storage potential of basalt reservoir in Jiyang depression[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2017, 29(12): 98-100.
46	叶航, 郝宁, 刘琦. CO₂咸水层封存关键参数及其实验表征技术研究进展[J]. 发电技术, 2022, 43(4): 562-573.
	YE Hang, HAO Ning, LIU Qi. Review on key parameters and characterization technology of CO₂ sequestration mechanism in saline aquifers[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(4): 562-573.
47	段先哲, 牛苏娟, 李赛, 等. Mg同位素示踪中国东部中生代深部碳循环[J]. 地质论评, 2022, 68(4): 1345-1360.
	DUAN Xianzhe, NIU Sujuan, LI Sai, et al. Mg isotope tracing the Mesozoic deep carbon cycle in Eastern China[J]. Geological Review, 2022, 68(4): 1345-1360.
48	MATTER Juerg M, Stute Martin, Snæbjörnsdottir Sandra Ó, et al. Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Science, 2016, 352(6291): 1312-1314.
49	WANG Fei, DREISINGER David, JARVIS Mark, et al. Quantifying kinetics of mineralization of carbon dioxide by olivine under moderate conditions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 360: 452-463.
50	POGGE VON STRANDMANN Philip A E, BURTON Kevin W, SNÆBJÖRNSDÓTTIR Sandra O, et al. Rapid CO₂ mineralisation into calcite at the CarbFix storage site quantified using calcium isotopes[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 1983.
51	CLARK Deirdre E, GUNNARSSON Ingvi, Aradóttir EDDA S, et al. Monitoring of CO₂ /H₂S gas mixture injection in basaltic rocks at Hellisheiði Geothermal Power Plant, Iceland[C]//EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna, Austria: European Geosciences Union (EGU), 2016: EPS C2016-14713.
52	GUNNARSSON Ingvi, ARADÓTTIR Edda S, OELKERS Eric H, et al. The rapid and cost-effective capture and subsurface mineral storage of carbon and sulfur at the CarbFix2 site[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 79: 117-126.
53	CARBFIX. Permanent and secure Geological storage of CO₂ by in-situ carbon mineralization[R]. Iceland: CARBFIX, 2022.
54	Monitor Geoengineering. Carbfix and climeworks’ large-scale plans to capture CO₂ and inject it into basalt formations in Iceland involve high consumption of scarce resources and potential risks [EB/OL].(2021-10-28)[2023-07-10]. .
55	International Organization for Standardization. Greenhouse gases Part 2: Specification with guidance at theproject level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements: [S]. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2019.
56	MCGRAIL B P, SPANE F A, AMONETTE J E, et al. Injection and monitoring at the wallula basalt pilot project[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 2939-2948.
57	MCGRAIL B P, SCHAEF H T, SPANE F A, et al. Wallula basalt pilot demonstration project: Post-injection results and conclusions[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 5783-5790.
58	WHITE Signe K, SPANE Frank A, Todd SCHAEF H, et al. Quantification of CO₂ mineralization at the wallula basalt pilot project[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(22): 14609-14616.
59	Action Climate. World’s first basalt CCS project to get underway in US[EB/OL].(2010-10-28)[2023-07-10]. .
60	WHITE S, XUE Z, SATO T, et al. Modeling and analysis of the pressure response in the CO₂ injection experiment conducted at Nagaoka, Japan[C]//8th Int. Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT 8. Trondheim, Norway: GHGT, 2006:242-243.
1	IEA. CO₂ Emissions in 2022[R]. Paris: IEA, 2023.
2	科学技术部社会发展科技司, 中国 21 世纪议程管理中心. 中国碳捕集利用与封存技术发展路线图（2019）[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
	Social development technology department of the ministry of science and technology, agenda China 21 management center. Roadmap for carbon capture, utilization and storage technology development in China(2019)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019.
3	秦积舜, 李永亮, 吴德斌, 等. CCUS全球进展与中国对策建议[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(1): 20-28.
	QIN Jishun, LI Yongliang, WU Debin, et al. CCUS global progress and China’s policy suggestions[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1): 20-28.
4	周红军, 周颖, 徐春明. 中国碳中和目标下CO₂转化的思考与实践[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3381-3385.
	ZHOU Hongjun, ZHOU Ying, XU Chunming. Exploration of the CO₂ conversion under China’s carbon neutrality goal[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(6): 3381-3385.
5	蔡博峰, 李琦, 张贤, 等. 中国二氧化碳捕集利用与封存(CCUS)年度报告(2021)——中国CCUS路径研究[R]. 北京: 生态环境部环境规划院, 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所, 21世纪议程管理中心, 2021.
	CAI Bofeng, Li Qi, Zhang Xian, et al. China CO₂ Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) Annual Report (2021) —China CCUS pathway study[R]. Beijing: Institute of Environmental Planning, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Wuhan Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Agenda 21 Management Center, 2021.
6	高志豪, 夏菖佑, 廖松林, 等. 玄武岩CO₂矿化封存潜力评估方法研究现状及展望[J]. 高校地质学报, 2023, 29(1): 66-75.
	GAO Zhihao, XIA Changyou, LIAO Songlin, et al. Progress of methods for assessing CO₂ mineralization storage potential in basalt[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2023, 29(1): 66-75.
7	WIGAND M, CAREY J W, SCHÜTT H, et al. Geochemical effects of CO₂ sequestration in sandstones under simulated in situ conditions of deep saline aquifers[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2008, 23(9): 2735-2745.
8	SNÆBJÖRNSDÓTTIR Sandra Ó, Bergur SIGFÚSSON, MARIENI Chiara, et al. Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1(2): 90-102.
9	CHEN Min, ZHANG Qiwu, LI Zhao, et al. Insights into the mechanochemical interfacial interaction between calcite and serpentine: Implications for ambient CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 401: 136715.
10	何民宇, 刘维燥, 刘清才, 等. CO₂矿物封存技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 1825-1833.
	HE Minyu, LIU Weizao, LIU Qingcai, et al. Research progress in CO₂ mineral sequestration technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(4): 1825-1833.
11	BEAULIEU E, GODDÉRIS Y, DONNADIEU Y, et al. High sensitivity of the continental-weathering carbon dioxide sink to future climate change[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2(5): 346-349.
12	National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine. Negative emissions technologies and reliable sequestration: A research agenda[M]. Washington, DC: The National Acadmies Press.
13	李晓媛, 常春, 于青春. CO₂矿化封存条件下玄武岩溶解反应速率模型[J]. 现代地质, 2013, 27(6): 1477-1483.
	LI Xiaoyuan, CHANG Chun, YU Qingchun. Model of basalt dissolution rate under CO₂ mineral sequestration conditions[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(6): 1477-1483.
14	朱辰, 赵良, 高雄, 等. 基于二氧化碳封存的水镁石反应动力学研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2011, 31(3): 438-446.
	ZHU Chen, ZHAO Liang, GAO Xiong, et al. CO₂ sequestration based study of reaction kinetics of brucite[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2011, 31(3): 438-446.
15	王晗, 赵良, 朱辰. 一种利用富镁矿物封存烟气中二氧化碳的装置及方法: CN109364715A[P]. 2019-02-22.
	WANG Han, ZHAO Liang, ZHU Chen. Device and method for sequestering carbon dioxide in smoke by means of magnesium-enriched minerals: CN109364715A[P]. 2019-02-22.
16	XIONG Wei, WELLS Rachel K, MENEFEE Anne H, et al. CO₂ mineral trapping in fractured basalt[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 66: 204-217.
61	MITO Saeko, XUE Ziqiu, OHSUMI Takashi. Case study of geochemical reactions at the Nagaoka CO₂ injection site, Japan[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, 2(3): 309-318.
62	YAMAMOTO Hajime, NAKAJIMA Takahiro, XUE Ziqiu. Quantitative interpretation of trapping mechanisms of CO₂ at nagaoka pilot project a history matching study for 10-year post-injection-[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 5058-5069.
63	BLONDES M, MERRILL M, ANDERSON Steven T, et al. Carbon dioxide mineralization feasibility in the United States[R]. Scientific Investigations Report-US Geological Survey, 2019
64	PEDRO Jorge, ARAÚJO António A, MOITA Patrícia, et al. Mineral carbonation of CO₂ in mafic plutonic rocks, Ⅰ—Screening criteria and application to a case study in southwest Portugal[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(14): 4879.
65	MOITA Patrícia, BERREZUETA Edgar, ABDOULGHAFOUR Halidi, et al. Mineral carbonation of CO₂ in mafic plutonic rocks, Ⅱ—Laboratory experiments on early-phase supercritical CO₂‒brine‒rock interactions[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(15): 5083.
66	GHOLAMI Raoof, RAZA Arshad, IGLAUER Stefan. Leakage risk assessment of a CO₂ storage site: A review[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 223: 103849.
67	DAVAL Damien. Carbon dioxide sequestration through silicate degradation and carbon mineralisation: Promises and uncertainties[J]. NPJ Materials Degradation, 2018, 2: 11.
68	CARBFIX. Where does it work? [EB/OL].(2021-6-16)[2023-07-10]. .
69	林锋, 黄润秋, 王胜, 等. 岩体体积节理数(J_v)的现场测量方法评价[J]. 工程地质学报, 2008, 16(5): 663-666.
	LIN Feng, HUANG Runqiu, WANG Sheng, et al. Evaluation of in situ measurement methods for counting volumetric joints of rock mass[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2008, 16(5): 663-666.
70	AMBROSE W A, LAKSHMINARASIMHAN S, HOLTZ M H, et al. Geologic factors controlling CO₂ storage capacity and permanence: Case studies based on experience with heterogeneity in oil and gas reservoirs applied to CO₂ storage[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 54(8): 1619-1633.
71	WATSON M N, GIBSON-POOLE C M. Reservoir selection for optimised geological injection and storage of carbon dioxide: A combined geochemical and stratigraphic perspective[C]//The fourth annual conference on carbon capture and storage. Alexandria: National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 2005: 2-5.
17	李鹏春, 江静练, 程锦辉, 等. 广东雷州半岛火山岩二氧化碳矿化封存潜力评估[J]. 高校地质学报, 2023, 29(1): 76-84.
	LI Pengchun, JIANG Jinglian, CHENG Jinhui, et al. Assessment of carbon dioxide mineralization sequestration potential of volcanic rocks in Leizhou peninsula, Guangdong Province, China[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2023, 29(1): 76-84.
18	SEIFRITZ W. CO₂ disposal by means of silicates[J]. Nature, 1990, 345(6275): 486.
19	ABDOLHOSSEINI QOMI M J, MILLER Q R S, ZARE S, et al. Molecular-scale mechanisms of CO₂ mineralization in nanoscale interfacial water films[J]. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2022, 6(9): 598-613.
20	SANDALOW D, AINES R, FRIEDMANN J, et al. Carbon Mineralization Roadmap Draft October 2021[R]. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), 2021.
21	王中辉, 苏胜, 尹子骏, 等. CO₂矿化及吸收-矿化一体化(IAM)方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 2318-2327.
	WANG Zhonghui, SU Sheng, YIN Zijun, et al. Research progress of CO₂ mineralization and integrated absorption-mineralization(IAM) method[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(4): 2318-2327.
22	姜禾禾, 王佳敏, 万博. 国际岩矿地球化学固碳技术研究进展[J]. 第四纪研究, 2023, 43(2): 494-508.
	JIANG Hehe, WANG Jiamin, WAN Bo. Review in research progress in carbon sequestration technology from a petrological and geochemical perspective[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2023, 43(2): 494-508.
23	RAZA Arshad, GLATZ Guenther, GHOLAMI Raoof, et al. Carbon mineralization and geological storage of CO₂ in basalt: Mechanisms and technical challenges[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2022, 229: 104036.
24	GRAS A, BEAUDOIN G, MOLSON J, et al. Atmospheric carbon sequestration in ultramafic mining residues and impacts on leachate water chemistry at the Dumont Nickel Project, Quebec, Canada[J]. Chemical Geology, 2020, 546: 119661.
25	GADIKOTA Greeshma. Carbon mineralization pathways for carbon capture, storage and utilization[J]. Communications Chemistry, 2021, 4(1): 23.
26	邱添, 曾令森, 申婷婷. 基性-超基性岩碳酸盐化固碳效应研究进展[J]. 中国地质调查, 2021, 8(4): 20-32.
	QIU Tian, ZENG Lingsen, SHEN Tingting. Progresses on carbon sequestration through carbonation of mafic-ultramafic rocks[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2021, 8(4): 20-32.
27	TURVEY Connor C, WILSON Sasha, HAMILTON Jessica L, et al. Hydrotalcites and hydrated Mg-carbonates as carbon sinks in serpentinite mineral wastes from the Woodsreef chrysotile mine, New South Wales, Australia: Controls on carbonate mineralogy and efficiency of CO₂ air capture in mine tailings[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 79: 38-60.
28	李万伦, 陈晶, 贾凌霄, 等. 玄武岩CO₂地质封存研究进展[J]. 地质论评, 2022, 68(2): 648-657.
	LI Wanlun, CHEN Jing, JIA Lingxiao, et al. Research progress of CO₂ geological sequestration in basalts[J]. Geological Review, 2022, 68(2): 648-657.
29	ZHANG Shuo, DEPAOLO Donald J. Rates of CO₂ mineralization in geological carbon storage[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2017, 50(9): 2075-2084.
72	BACCI Giacomo, KORRE Anna, DURUCAN Sevket. An experimental and numerical investigation into the impact of dissolution/precipitation mechanisms on CO₂ injectivity in the wellbore and far field regions[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(3): 579-588.
73	GANESH Priya Ravi, MISHRA Srikanta. Reduced physics modeling of CO₂ injectivity[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 3116-3125.
74	SOKAMA-NEUYAM Yen Adams, URSIN Jann Rune. CO₂ well injectivity: Effect of viscous forces on precipitated minerals[C]//Doha, Qatar. IPTC, 2015.
75	VILARRASA Victor, RINALDI Antonio P, RUTQVIST Jonny. Long-term thermal effects on injectivity evolution during CO₂ storage[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 64: 314-322.
76	LIU Danqing, AGARWAL Ramesh, LI Yilian, et al. Reactive transport modeling of mineral carbonation in unaltered and altered basalts during CO₂ sequestration[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 85: 109-120.
77	RAZA Arshad, REZAEE Reza, GHOLAMI Raoof, et al. A screening criterion for selection of suitable CO₂ storage sites[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 28: 317-327.
78	Andrea D'ANIELLO, Sigrún TÓMASDÓTTIR, Bergur SIGFÚSSON, et al. Modeling gaseous CO₂ flow behavior in Layered basalts: Dimensional analysis and aquifer response[J]. Ground Water, 2021, 59(5): 677-693.
79	JAYNE Richard S, WU Hao, POLLYEA Ryan M. A probabilistic assessment of geomechanical reservoir integrity during CO₂ sequestration in flood basalt formations[J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2019, 9(5): 979-998.
80	Research institute of innovative technology for the earth. Demonstration test and monitoring at the iwanohara test site[EB/OL].(2007-4-29)[2023-07-10]..

矿物种类	化学成分	每封存1t CO₂ 所需质量/t	潜在CO₂吸收率（质量分数）/%
硅灰石	CaSiO₃	9.68^①	38
镁橄榄石	Mg₂SiO₄	5.86^②	63
蛇纹石	Mg₃Si₂O₅(OH)₄	7.69^②	48
钙长石	CaAlSi₂O₈	23.1^①	16
玄武玻璃	Na_0.08K_0.08Fe(Ⅱ)_0.17	8.67^③	—
	Mg_0.28Ca_0.26
	Al_0.36Fe(Ⅲ)_0.02SiTi_0.02O_3.45

矿物种类	化学成分	每封存1t CO₂ 所需质量/t	潜在CO₂吸收率（质量分数）/%
硅灰石	CaSiO₃	9.68^①	38
镁橄榄石	Mg₂SiO₄	5.86^②	63
蛇纹石	Mg₃Si₂O₅(OH)₄	7.69^②	48
钙长石	CaAlSi₂O₈	23.1^①	16
玄武玻璃	Na_0.08K_0.08Fe(Ⅱ)_0.17	8.67^③	—
	Mg_0.28Ca_0.26
	Al_0.36Fe(Ⅲ)_0.02SiTi_0.02O_3.45

参数	适宜	不适宜
CO₂源汇匹配距离	<250km	>250km
目标储层位置	熔岩流的顶底部，拥有较好的孔隙结构、裂缝和角砾化发育程度	地层不具备孔隙结构发育、裂缝和角砾化
岩石矿物成分	硅灰石、镁橄榄石、蛇纹石、钙长石、玄武玻璃等较多	活性矿物含量较少
面积	>20km²	<10km²
体积	>20km³	<10km³
注入能力	低速注入	高速注入
环境条件（水资源、地表植被和社区）	远离	临近

参数	适宜	不适宜
CO₂源汇匹配距离	<250km	>250km
目标储层位置	熔岩流的顶底部，拥有较好的孔隙结构、裂缝和角砾化发育程度	地层不具备孔隙结构发育、裂缝和角砾化
岩石矿物成分	硅灰石、镁橄榄石、蛇纹石、钙长石、玄武玻璃等较多	活性矿物含量较少
面积	>20km²	<10km²
体积	>20km³	<10km³
注入能力	低速注入	高速注入
环境条件（水资源、地表植被和社区）	远离	临近

[1]	朱立平, 吕士武, 孙珊珊, 于守富, 杨成, 孙雪坤. 电极加热对玄武岩池窑熔制均匀性影响的模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(9): 3543-3549.
[2]	朱立平, 于守富, 吕士武, 吴嘉培, 唐秀凤, 孙雪坤. 玄武岩纤维池窑熔制过程的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(02): 940-948.
[3]	尚宝月1，杨绍斌2. 玄武岩纤维聚合物复合材料的研究进展 [J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(8): 1766-.

CO₂原位矿化选址关键参数及其封存潜力评估研究进展

Review on key parameters and storage capacity potential assessment for in-situ carbon mineralization site

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 80

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价