化工进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 4009-4024.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2004
收稿日期:
2021-09-23
修回日期:
2021-12-14
出版日期:
2022-08-25
发布日期:
2022-08-22
通讯作者:
卫宏远
作者简介:
朱佳兴(1994—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为化工安全。E-mail:ZHU Jiaxing(), HAO Lin, LIU Guozhao, WEI Hongyuan()
Received:
2021-09-23
Revised:
2021-12-14
Online:
2022-08-25
Published:
2022-08-22
Contact:
WEI Hongyuan
摘要:
可持续性发展已经成为社会、生态和经济发展的关键。可持续制造的发展道路需要平衡环境、社会和经济各方面。本质安全设计是减少风险、实现化学工业可持续发展的最有效的方法之一,本质安全设计可以永久性地消除或减少化工过程中涉及的危害。本文综述了本质安全的历史发展、本质安全四大原则的概念、本质安全四大原则应用的使用潜力、本质安全设计评估工具,并系统介绍了本质安全设计评估方法的研究进展和存在的问题,包括基于参数的得分索引本质安全方法、基于参数的数值索引本质安全方法、基于图示的本质安全方法、基于风险分析的本质安全方法和基于多目标评价的本质安全方法,分析比较了各种方法的优缺点,并对本质安全评估方法的未来发展和完善提出了一些见解。
中图分类号:
朱佳兴, 郝琳, 刘国钊, 卫宏远. 化工过程本质安全评估方法研究进展与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4009-4024.
ZHU Jiaxing, HAO Lin, LIU Guozhao, WEI Hongyuan. Research progress and prospect on inherent safety assessment methods for chemical processes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(8): 4009-4024.
表1 化工过程不同阶段可以获取的信息
S/% | 分数 |
---|---|
0≤S<10 | 1 |
10≤S<20 | 2 |
20≤S<30 | 3 |
30≤S<40 | 4 |
40≤S<50 | 5 |
50≤S<60 | 6 |
60≤S<70 | 7 |
70≤S<80 | 8 |
80≤S<90 | 9 |
90≤S<100 | 10 |
表2 爆炸性得分表
S/% | 分数 |
---|---|
0≤S<10 | 1 |
10≤S<20 | 2 |
20≤S<30 | 3 |
30≤S<40 | 4 |
40≤S<50 | 5 |
50≤S<60 | 6 |
60≤S<70 | 7 |
70≤S<80 | 8 |
80≤S<90 | 9 |
90≤S<100 | 10 |
1 | HINRICHSEN D. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: our common future[R]. URV-Dow Chair for Sustainable Development,1987. |
2 | National Research Council. Sustainability and the U.S. EPA[M]. Washington D C: The National Academies Press, 2011. |
3 | CANO-RUIZ J A, MCRAE G J. Environmentally conscious chemical process design[J]. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1998, 23(1): 499-536. |
4 | NIKOLOPOULOU A, IERAPETRITOU M G. Optimal design of sustainable chemical processes and supply chains: a review[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2012, 44: 94-103. |
5 | GLAVIČ P, PINTARIČ Z N, BOGATAJ M. Process design and sustainable development: a European perspective[J]. Processes, 2021, 9(1): 148. |
6 | KLETZ T A. What you don’t have, can’t leak[J]. Chemistry & Industry, 1978, 42: 287-292. |
7 | KLETZ T A, AMYOTTE P. Process plants: a handbook for inherently safer design[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010. |
8 | KLETZ T A. Plant design for safety: a user-friendly approach[M]. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1991. |
9 | ECKERMAN I. Bhopal gas catastrophe 1984: causes and consequences[M]//NRIAGU J. Encyclopedia of environmental health. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019: 272-287. |
10 | KLETZ TREVOR A. Cheaper, safer plants or wealth and safety at work: notes on inherently safer and simpler plants[M]. Warwickshire: Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1985. |
11 | KLETZ T A. Inherently safer plants[J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1985, 4(3): 164-167. |
12 | Center for Chemical Process Safety. Inherently safer chemical processes: a life cycle approach[M]. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2010. |
13 | Center for Chemical Process Safety. Final report: definition for inherently safer technology in production, transportation, storage, and use[R]. New York: Chemical Security Analysis Center, 2010. |
14 | ANURADHA H B B, GUNASEKERA M Y, GUNAPALA O. Comparison of chemical routes based on inherent safety, health and environmental impacts of accidental and daily operational releases[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 133: 358-368. |
15 | Center for Chemical Process Safety. Guidelines for inherently safer chemical processes[M]. 3th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2019. |
16 | HURME M, RAHMAN M. Implementing inherent safety throughout process lifecycle[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2005, 18(4/5/6): 238-244. |
17 | KIDAM K, SAHAK H A, HASSIM M H, et al. Inherently safer design review and their timing during chemical process development and design[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 42: 47-58. |
18 | PARK S, XU S, ROGERS W, et al. Incorporating inherent safety during the conceptual process design stage: a literature review[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 63: 104040. |
19 | SRINIVASAN R, SRINIVASAN B, IQBAL M U, et al. Recent developments towards enhancing process safety: inherent safety and cognitive engineering[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2019, 128: 364-383. |
20 | ATHAR M, SHARIFF A M, BUANG A. A review of inherent assessment for sustainable process design[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 233: 242-263. |
21 | GAO X M, ABDUL RAMAN A A, HIZADDIN H F, et al. Review on the inherently safer design for chemical processes: past, present and future [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 305: 127154. |
22 | AHMAD S I, HO W S, HASSIM M H, et al. Development of quantitative SHE index for waste to energy technology selection[J]. Energy, 2020, 191: 116534. |
23 | AICHE. Dow’ fire & explosion index hazard classification guide[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1994. |
24 | KHAN F I, ABBASI S A. Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system[J]. Process Safety Progress, 1998, 17(3): 157-170. |
25 | ORTIZ-ESPINOZA A P, JIMÉNEZ-GUTIÉRREZ A, EL-HALWAGI M M, et al. Comparison of safety indexes for chemical processes under uncertainty[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 148: 225-236. |
26 | LAWRENCE D. Quantifying inherent safety of chemical process routes[D]. Loughborough: Loughborough University, 1996. |
27 | EDWARDS D W, LAWRENCE D. Assessing the inherent safety of chemical process routes: is there a relation between plant costs and inherent safety?[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 1993, 71: 252-258. |
28 | HEIKKIL A M. Inherent safety in process plant design: an index-based approach[D]. Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology, 1999. |
29 | PALANIAPPAN C, SRINIVASAN R, TAN R. Expert system for the design of inherently safer processes. 1. Route selection stage[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(26): 6698-6710. |
30 | PALANIAPPAN C, SRINIVASAN R, TAN R B. Expert system for the design of inherently safer processes. 2. Flowsheet development stage[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(26): 6711-6722. |
31 | LI X, ZANWAR A, JAYSWAL A, et al. Incorporating exergy analysis and inherent safety analysis for sustainability assessment of biofuels[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50(5): 2981-2993. |
32 | GANGADHARAN P, SINGH R, CHENG F Q, et al. Novel methodology for inherent safety assessment in the process design stage[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(17): 5921-5933. |
33 | LEONG C T, SHARIFF A M. Inherent safety index module (ISIM) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2008, 86(2): 113-119. |
34 | HASSIM M H, HURME M. Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(1): 127-138. |
35 | HASSIM M H, HURME M. Inherent occupational health assessment during preliminary design stage[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(3): 476-482. |
36 | HASSIM M H, HURME M. Inherent occupational health assessment during basic engineering stage[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(2): 260-268. |
37 | SO W Y, HASSIM M H, AHMAD S I, et al. Inherent occupational health assessment index for research and development stage of process design[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 147: 103-114. |
38 | GUNASEKERA M Y, EDWARDS D W. Chemical process route selection based upon the potential toxic impact on the aquatic, terrestrial and atmospheric environments[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(1): 60-69. |
39 | LIEW W H, HASSIM M H, NG D K S. Sustainability assessment for biodiesel production via fuzzy optimisation during research and development (R&D) stage[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2014, 16(7): 1431-1444. |
40 | LIEW W H, HASSIM M H, NG D K S, et al. Systematic framework for sustainability assessment of biodiesel production: preliminary engineering stage[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(50): 12615-12629. |
41 | LIEW W H, HASSIM M H, NG D K S. Systematic framework for sustainability assessment on chemical production pathway: basic engineering stage[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 104: 161-177. |
42 | EE A W L, KUZNETSOVA E, LEE T E J, et al. Extended inherent safety index: analysis of chemical, physical and biological inherent safety[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 248: 119258. |
43 | SULTANA S, HAUGEN S. Development of an inherent system safety index (ISSI) for ranking of chemical processes at the concept development stage[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 421: 126590. |
44 | GUPTA J P, EDWARDS D W. A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 104(1/2/3): 15-30. |
45 | SRINIVASAN R, NHAN N T. A statistical approach for evaluating inherent benign-ness of chemical process routes in early design stages[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2008, 86(3): 163-174. |
46 | GAO Xiaoming, ABDUL RAMAN A A, HIZADDIN H F, et al. Systematic inherent safety and its implementation in chlorine liquefaction process[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 65: 104133. |
47 | GENTILE M, ROGERS W J, MANNAN M S. Development of a fuzzy logic-based inherent safety index[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2003, 81(6): 444-456. |
48 | TADIC D, SAVOVIC I, MISITA M, et al. Development of a fuzzy logic-based inherent safety index for food industries[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 228(1): 3-13. |
49 | SONG D, YOON E S, JANG N. A framework and method for the assessment of inherent safety to enhance sustainability in conceptual chemical process design[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 54: 10-17. |
50 | VÁZQUEZ D, RUIZ-FEMENIA R, CABALLERO J A. OFISI, a novel optimizable inherent safety index based on fuzzy logic[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2019, 129: 106526. |
51 | LEONG C T, SHARIFF A M. Process route index (PRI) to assess level of explosiveness for inherent safety quantification[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(2): 216-221. |
52 | SHARIFF A M, LEONG C T, ZAINI D. Using process stream index (PSI) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(4): 1098-1103. |
53 | ZAINI D, AZMI M S, LEONG C T. Three-tier inherent safety quantification (3-TISQ) for toxic release at preliminary design stage[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 625: 426-430. |
54 | PASHA M, ZAINI D, MOHD SHARIFF A. Inherently safer design for heat exchanger network[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 48: 55-70. |
55 | ATHAR M, SHARIFF A M, BUANG A, et al. Inherent safety for sustainable process design of process piping at the preliminary design stage[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 209: 1307-1318. |
56 | ATHAR M, SHARIFF A M, BUANG A, et al. Process equipment common attributes for inherently safer process design at preliminary design stage[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 128: 14-29. |
57 | ATHAR M, SHARIFF A M, BUANG A, et al. Equipment-based route index of inherent safety[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2019, 39: e12108. |
58 | CASAL J. Fire accidents[M]//Evaluation of the effects and consequences of major accidents in industrial plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018: 75-150. |
59 | AHMAD S I, HASHIM H, HASSIM M H. Numerical descriptive inherent safety technique (NuDIST) for inherent safety assessment in petrochemical industry[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2014, 92(5): 379-389. |
60 | GUPTA J P, EDWARDS D W. A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 104(1): 15-30. |
61 | HASSIM M H, HURME M, EDWARDS D W, et al. Simple graphical method for inherent occupational health assessment[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2013, 91(6): 438-451. |
62 | SHAH S, FISCHER U, HUNGERBÜHLER K. A hierarchical approach for the evaluation of chemical process aspects from the perspective of inherent safety[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2003, 81(6): 430-443. |
63 | AHMAD S I, HASHIM H, HASSIM M H. A graphical method for assessing inherent safety during research and development phase of process design[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 42: 59-69. |
64 | AHMAD S I, HASHIM H, HASSIM M H, et al. A graphical inherent safety assessment technique for preliminary design stage[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 130: 275-287. |
65 | KHAN F I, ABBASI S A. Inherently safer design based on rapid risk analysis[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1998, 11(6): 361-372. |
66 | SHARIFF A M, RUSLI R, LEONG C T, et al. Inherent safety tool for explosion consequences study[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(5): 409-418. |
67 | SHARIFF A M, ZAINI D. Toxic release consequence analysis tool(TORCAT) for inherently safer design plant[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 182(1/2/3): 394-402. |
68 | SHARIFF A M, ZAINI D. Inherent risk assessment methodology in preliminary design stage: a case study for toxic release[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(4): 605-613. |
69 | SHARIFF A M, LEONG C T. Inherent risk assessment: a new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2009, 87(6): 371-376. |
70 | SHARIFF A M, WAHAB N A. Inherent fire consequence estimation tool(IFCET) for preliminary design of process plant[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2013, 59: 47-54. |
71 | SHARIFF A M, WAHAB N A, RUSLI R. Assessing the hazards from a BLEVE and minimizing its impacts using the inherent safety concept[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 41: 303-314. |
72 | RATHNAYAKA S, KHAN F, AMYOTTE P. Risk-based process plant design considering inherent safety[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 70: 438-464. |
73 | KHAN F I, AMYOTTE P R. I2SI: a comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2005, 18(4/5/6): 310-326. |
74 | KHAN F I, AMYOTTE P R. Integrated inherent safety index(I2SI): a tool for inherent safety evaluation[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2004, 23(2): 136-148. |
75 | TUGNOLI A, LANDUCCI G, COZZANI V. Key performance indicators for inherent safety: application to the hydrogen supply chain[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2009, 28(2): 156-170. |
76 | ORTIZ-ESPINOZA A P, JIMÉNEZ-GUTIÉRREZ A, EL-HALWAGI M M. Including inherent safety in the design of chemical processes[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(49): 14507-14517. |
77 | AHMAD S I, HASHIM H, HASSIM M H, et al. Inherent safety and economic graphical rating(InSafE) method for inherent safety and economic assessment[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 149: 602-609. |
78 | MEDINA-HERRERA N, GROSSMANN I E, MANNAN M S, et al. An approach for solvent selection in extractive distillation systems including safety considerations[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(30): 12023-12031. |
79 | EINI S, SHAHHOSSEINI H R, JAVIDI M, et al. Inherently safe and economically optimal design using multi-objective optimization: the case of a refrigeration cycle[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 104: 254-267. |
80 | EINI S, SHAHHOSSEINI H, DELGARM N, et al. Multi-objective optimization of a cascade refrigeration system: exergetic, economic, environmental, and inherent safety analysis[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 107: 804-817. |
81 | FONSECA J D, COMMENGE J M, CAMARGO M, et al. Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: a multi-objective optimization approach[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 290: 116746. |
82 | MEDINA H, ARNALDOS J, CASAL J. Process design optimization and risk analysis[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(5): 566-573. |
83 | MEDINA-HERRERA N, JIMÉNEZ-GUTIÉRREZ A, MANNAN M S. Development of inherently safer distillation systems[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 29: 225-239. |
84 | GUILLEN-CUEVAS K, ORTIZ-ESPINOZA A P, OZINAN E, et al. Incorporation of safety and sustainability in conceptual design via a return on investment metric[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 1411-1416. |
85 | Shin Yee TEH, CHUA Kian Boon, HONG Boon Hooi, et al. A hybrid multi-objective optimization framework for preliminary process design based on health, safety and environmental impact[J]. Processes, 2019, 7(4): 200. |
86 | NAWAZ W, LINKE P, KOҪ M. Safety and sustainability nexus: a review and appraisal[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 216: 74-87. |
[1] | 索寒生, 贾梦达, 宋光, 刘东庆. 数字孪生技术助力石化智能工厂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3365-3373. |
[2] | 孙逊, 赵越, 玄晓旭, 赵珊, YOON Joon Yong, 陈颂英. 基于水力空化的化工过程强化研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2243-2255. |
[3] | 李欣铜, 陈志冰, 魏志强, 李苏桐, 陈旭, 宋凯. 具有输入数据注意力机制的卷积神经网络用于氟化工产品质量预测[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 593-600. |
[4] | 姚羽曼, 罗文嘉, 戴一阳. 数据驱动方法在化工过程故障诊断中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 1755-1764. |
[5] | 邹志云, 朱文超, 刘英莉, 孟磊, 郭宁, 于蒙. 小型特种精细化工过程自动化和信息化研究发展趋势探讨[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 269-275. |
[6] | 李俊杰,程婉静,梁媚,严晓辉,杨靖东,张岳玲,冯连勇,田亚峻,谢克昌. 基于熵权-层次分析法的中国现代煤化工行业可持续发展综合评价[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(4): 1329-1338. |
[7] | 何皓,邢子恒,李顶杰,张佳,张家仁,王凌. 可持续航空生物燃料的推广应用及行业影响与应对措施[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(08): 3497-3507. |
[8] | 袁健宝,王政,徐一凡,杨燕霞,贾小平,王芳. 基于复杂网络边负载分配理论的化工过程级联故障风险传播路径[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(08): 3525-3533. |
[9] | 李洪, 孟莹, 李鑫钢, 高鑫. 蒸馏过程强化技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(04): 1212-1228. |
[10] | 刘有智. 谈过程强化技术促进化学工业转型升级和可持续发展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(04): 1203-1211. |
[11] | 姜英, 王政, 秦艳, 袁健宝, 贾小平, 王芳. 基于复杂网络的化工过程层次符号有向图模型建立及关键节点识别[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(02): 444-451. |
[12] | 孙冰, 朱红伟, 姜杰, 石宁. 微混合与微反应技术在提升化工安全中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(08): 2756-2763. |
[13] | 宋泓阳, 孙晓岩, 项曙光. 人工神经网络在化工过程中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(12): 3755-3762. |
[14] | 韦朝海, 廖建波, 胡芸 . 煤的基本化工过程与污染特征分析[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(06): 1875-1883. |
[15] | 杨贺勤, 刘志成, 谢在库. 绿色化工技术研究新进展[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(06): 1575-1586. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号 版权所有 © 《化工进展》编辑部 地址:北京市东城区青年湖南街13号 邮编:100011 电子信箱:hgjz@cip.com.cn 本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn |