考虑多因素的危险气体探测器选址优化方法

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016-2279

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (08): 2809-2815.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016-2279

考虑多因素的危险气体探测器选址优化方法

章博^1,2, 慕超¹, 王志刚³, 王彦富^1,2

1. 中国石油大学(华东)海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 中国石油大学(华东)海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心, 山东青岛 266580;
3. 中国石油化工集团天然气分公司广西天然气管道有限责任公司, 广西南宁 530000

收稿日期:2016-12-08 修回日期:2017-04-17 出版日期:2017-08-05 发布日期:2017-08-05
通讯作者: 章博(1980-),男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为油气安全工程。
作者简介:章博(1980-),男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为油气安全工程。E-mail:zhangbo@upc.edu.cn。
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金（ZR2016EEM27）及国家自然科学基金（51409260）项目。

An approach for dangerous gas detectors placement optimization considering multi-factors

ZHANG Bo^1,2, MU Chao¹, WANG Zhigang³, WANG Yanfu^1,2

1. College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering in China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
2. Center for Offshore Equipment and Safety Technology in China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
3. Guangxi Natural Gas Pipeline Co., Ltd., Nanning 530000, Guangxi, China

Received:2016-12-08 Revised:2017-04-17 Online:2017-08-05 Published:2017-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 危险气体探测器是炼化装置安全的重要保护层，合理的选址可大幅提高检测效率，降低泄漏事故损失。本文从削减气体泄漏风险的角度提出了一种危险气体探测器选址的定量优化方法。基于多种影响危险气体泄漏扩散的外界因素，确定了危险气体泄漏场景发生概率、泄漏后果以及泄漏风险的定量表征方法。以累积泄漏风险最小化为优化目标，针对气体探测器的工作失效模式和冗余结构等内部因素，建立了考虑气体探测器不可用性、表决逻辑和条件风险值约束的选址优化模型，并提出求解优化方案的粒子群算法。以某柴油加氢装置为例进行算例研究，结果表明优化方案可有效削减气体泄漏风险，且效果明显优于原布设方案。后继还将开展优化模型的验证试验及多目标优化研究，以进一步提高优化模型的实用性。

关键词: 气体探测器, 炼化装置, 泄漏风险, 优化模型, 求解算法

Abstract: As an important protective layer of petroleum refinery installations,gas detectors can greatly improve the detection efficiency and reduce the loss if they are placed in a reasonable position. From the perspective of minimizing leakage risks,a quantitative optimization method of gas detectors placement was proposed. Several external factors of leakage diffusion process were quantified to calculate the scenarios occurrence probability,leakage consequence and risks. According to the failure mode and redundancy structure,a minimal risk p-median problems(MRPMP-UVCVaR)optimization model was demonstrated,as well as unavailability,voting effects and Conditional-Value-at-Risk(CVaR) was considered. Particle swarm optimization(PSO)was used to solve the model. The applicability of the methodology was shown in a case study and the results were compared with the original scheme,improving the design of detection systems on a risk-oriented basis. Future work including the research of the experimental validation and multi-objective optimization will be taken to improve the practicability of the optimization model.

Key words: gas detectors, petroleum refinery installations, leakage risks, optimization model, solution algorithm

中图分类号:

TE687

章博, 慕超, 王志刚, 王彦富. 考虑多因素的危险气体探测器选址优化方法[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(08): 2809-2815.

ZHANG Bo, MU Chao, WANG Zhigang, WANG Yanfu. An approach for dangerous gas detectors placement optimization considering multi-factors[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(08): 2809-2815.

参考文献

[1] Health and Safety Executive. Offshore hydrocarbon releases statistics:Offshore hydrocarbon releases1992-2015[R]. UK:HSE,2016.
[2] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 石油化工可燃气体和有毒气体检测报警设计规范:GB50493-2009[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2009. General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Code for the design of combustible gas and toxic gas detection and alarm for petrochemical industry:GB50493-2009[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press,2009.
[3] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 含硫油气田硫化氢监测与人身安全防护规程:SY/T6277-2005[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2005. National Development and Reform Commission. Specification of hydrogen sulfide monitoring and protecting for operation personnel in oil and gas field involving hydrogen sulfide:SY/T6277-2005[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2005.
[4] DEFRIEND S,DEJMEK M,PORTER L,et al. A risk-based approach to flammable gas detector spacing[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,159(1):142-151.
[5] GOMES E G,MEDRONHO R D A,ALVES J V B. Gas detector placement in petroleum process unit using computational fluid dynamics[J]. International Journal of Modeling & Simulation for the Petroleum Industry,2014,8(1):117-124.
[6] 尚胜美,王海清,刘俊芳. FPSO火灾气体探测器的优化布置研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工,2013,42(3):311-315. SHANG S M,WANG H Q,LIU J F. Study on optimized layout of fire and gas detectors in FPSO[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas,2013,42(3):311-315.
[7] 梁双华,汪云甲,魏连江. 矿井瓦斯监测点优化选址[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(4):499-504. LIANG S H,WANG Y J,WEI L J. Optimal locations of mine methane monitoring points[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Natural Science),2013,32(4):499-504.
[8] 朱远星. 高含硫天然气净化厂气体检测仪优化设置方法研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2015. ZHU Y X. Study on high sulfur gas purification plants gas detector optimal placement[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2015.
[9] LEGG S W,WANG C,Benavides S A J,et al. Optimal gas detector placement under uncertainty considering Conditional-Value-at-Risk[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2013,26(3):410-417.
[10] LEGG S W,Benavides S A J,SⅡROLA J D,et al. A stochastic programming approach for gas detector placement using CFD-based dispersion simulations[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering,2012,47(12):194-201.
[11] BENAVIDES S A J,MANNAN M S,LAIRD C D. A quantitative assessment on the placement practices of gas detectors in the process industries[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2014,35:339-351.
[12] Benavides S A J,LEGG S W,VAZQUEZ R R,et al. A stochastic programming approach for the optimal placement of gas detectors:unavailability and voting strategies[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2014,53(13):5355-5365.
[13] GARRICK B J. The use of risk assessment to evaluate waste disposal facilities in the United States of America[J]. Safety Science,2002,40(1):135-151.
[14] 吴禹力,郑有志,孙国亮. 指挥决策风险三元组模型的数据挖掘[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术,2012,3(2):23-26. WU Y L,ZHENG Y Z,SUN G L. Data mining of triad model for command decision-making risk[J]. Command Information System and Technology,2012,3(2):23-26.
[15] 章博,王志刚,王彦富,等. 基于场景集的危险气体检测报警仪选址方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(6):156-162. ZHANG B,WANG Z G,WANG Y F,et al. An approach to placement optimization of gas detectors based on leakage scenario set[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2016,40(6):156-162.
[16] RAMIREZ M C,DIAZ O C,VAZQUEZ R R,et al. A stochastic approach for risk analysis in vapor cloud explosion[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2015,35:249-256.
[17] 张春伟,崔国民. 一种新型Powell粒子群算法同步综合换热网络[J]. 化工进展,2016,35(10):3092-3100. ZHANG C W,CUI G M. A novel Powell particle swarm optimization algorithm for simultaneous synthesis of heat exchanger networks[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2016,35(10):3092-3100.
[18] 孙延吉,潘艳秋. 基于全局优化改进混沌粒子群遗传算法的物料平衡数据校正[J]. 化工进展,2016,35(9):2663-2669. SUN Y J,PAN Y Q. Material balance data correction based on global optimization improved chaos particle swarm genetic algorithms[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2016,35(9):2663-2669.
[19] 章博,王磊,王志刚,等. 炼油装置有害气体泄漏区域风险等级划分[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(5):144-149. ZHANG B,WANG L,WANG Z G,et al. Area risk level classification for hazardous gas release in petroleum refining installations[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2015,39(5):144-149.
[20] 章博,王志刚,王彦富. 高硫炼油装置硫化氢泄漏场景集定量分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):73-78. ZHANG B,WANG Z G,WANG Y F. Quantitative analysis on scenario set of hydrogen sulfide leakage for high-sulfur oil refinery installations[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2015,11(10):73-78.

考虑多因素的危险气体探测器选址优化方法

An approach for dangerous gas detectors placement optimization considering multi-factors

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	章博, 赵日彬. 失效情景下气体探测器多目标布置优化[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(03): 867-874.
[2]	陈培珠陈国华周利兴门金坤. 化工园区多Agent协同应急智能决策体系[J]. 化工进展, , (): 0-0.