火灾环境液化石油气卧罐稳定性与静态可靠性分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016-1834

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (07): 2353-2359.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016-1834

火灾环境液化石油气卧罐稳定性与静态可靠性分析

贾梅生, 陈国华

华南理工大学安全科学与工程研究所, 广东广州 510640

收稿日期:2016-10-10 修回日期:2016-12-08 出版日期:2017-07-05 发布日期:2017-07-05
通讯作者: 陈国华,教授,博士生导师,从事工业安全与风险评价技术研究。
作者简介:贾梅生(1988-),男,博士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（21576102）及国家重点研究开发计划（2016YFC0801500）项目。

Stability and static reliability of horizontal LPG tank exposed to fire

JIA Meisheng, CHEN Guohua

Institute of Safety Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China

Received:2016-10-10 Revised:2016-12-08 Online:2017-07-05 Published:2017-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 沸腾液体扩展蒸汽云爆炸（BLEVE）是液化烃介质压力容器处于火灾环境而极易发生的一类多米诺效应灾难事故。本文针对液化石油气（LPG）卧罐，考虑LPG热力学性质与安全阀泄压过程，构建一个两节点集中温度参数模型，并与美国陆军弹道实验室（BRL）现场实验数据进行对比验证；基于热量平衡原理导出LPG卧罐的稳定状态，分析表明处于稳定状态的体系温度与安全阀动作可以直接影响BLEVE是否发生；在稳定性分析基础之上，应用一次可靠度法与响应面法，分析研究LPG卧罐的静态可靠性。稳定性与静态可靠性分析可以为多米诺效应定量风险评价以及火灾环境压力容器本质安全设计提供理论与方法支持。

关键词: 沸腾液体扩展蒸汽云爆炸, 多米诺效应, 火灾, 液化石油气卧罐, 稳定性, 可靠性

Abstract: The liquefied hydrocarbon pressure vessel exposed to heat radiation from fire is extremely dangerous which may incur the boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE) of disaster domino effect.In this paper,the stability and static reliability of a horizontal LPG tank exposed to fire were studied.A two-node lumped temperature model (LTM) was proposed by considering LPG thermodynamic properties and pressure relief process of the safety valve.The LTM was validated using the experimental results of U.S.Army Ballistic Research Laboratory (BRL).According to the heat balance,a stable state of the LTM was derived,which showed that the dry wall and LPG temperature and the safety valve action could together determine whether the BLEVE would occur.Following the stability analysis,a limit state equation(LSE) was derived.The static reliability of the tank was obtained by applying the first-order reliability method (FORM) and response surface method (RSM) to LSE.The proposed analysis method of stability and static reliability is helpful to both quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of domino effect and inherently safer design(ISD) of pressure equipment.

Key words: boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion(BLEVE), domino effect, fire, LPG horizontal tank, stability, reliability

中图分类号:

TQ086
X937

贾梅生, 陈国华. 火灾环境液化石油气卧罐稳定性与静态可靠性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(07): 2353-2359.

JIA Meisheng, CHEN Guohua. Stability and static reliability of horizontal LPG tank exposed to fire[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(07): 2353-2359.

参考文献

[1] MANNAN S. Lees' loss prevention in the process industries:hazard identification,assessment and control[M]. 3rd ed. Elsevier,2005.
[2] KHAN F I,ABBASI S A. Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries[J]. Process Safety Progress,1998,17(2):107-123.
[3] COZZANI V,GUBINELLI G,ANTONIONI G,et al. The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2005,127(1/3):14-30.
[4] KADRI F,CHATELET E,CHEN G P. Method for quantitative assessment of the domino effect in industrial sites[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2013,91(6):452-462.
[5] 张新梅,陈国华. 化工罐区爆炸碎片多米诺效应影响概率计算模型[J]. 化工学报,2008,59(11):2946-2953. ZHANG X M,CHEN G H. Impact probability of Domino effect caused by explosion fragments in chemical tank area[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China),2008,59(11):2946-2953.
[6] 钱新明,徐亚博,刘振翼. 球罐BLEVE碎片抛射的Monte-Carlo分析[J]. 化工学报,2009,60(4):1057-1061. QIAN X M,XU Y B,LIU Z Y. Monte-Carlo analysis of fragments projectile from spherical tank[J]. CIESC Journal,2009,60(4):1057-1061.
[7] 孙东亮,蒋军成,张明广,等. 基于最大熵原理的卧罐爆炸碎片数量概率分布[J]. 化工学报,2011,62(s1):219-224. SUN D L,JIANG J C,ZHANG M G,et al. Probabilistic distribution of fragments number from explosion of horizontal tank based on maximum entropy principle[J]. CIESC Journal,2011,62(s1):219-224.
[8] HEMMATIAN B,PLANAS E,CASAL J. Fire as a primary event of accident Domino sequences:the case of BLEVE[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2015,139:141-148.
[9] ANDERSON C,TOWNSEND W,ZOOK J,et al. The effects of a fire environment on a rail tank car filled with LPG[R]. Maryland:Ballistic Research Laboratories,1974.
[10] KIELEC D J,BIRK A M. Analysis of fire-induced ruptures of 400L propane tanks[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology,Transactions of the ASME,1997,119:365-373.
[11] BIRK A M,VANDERSTEEN J D J. On the transition from non-BLEVE to BLEVE failure for a 1.8m³ propane tank[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology,Transactions of the ASME,2006,128:648-655.
[12] LANDUCCI G,MOLAG M,REINDERS J,et al. Experimental and analytical investigation of thermal coating effectiveness for 3m³ LPG tanks engulfed by fire[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,161(2/3):1182-1192.
[13] MANU C C,BIRK A M,KIM I Y. Stress rupture predictions of pressure vessels exposed to fully engulfing and local impingement accidental fire heat loads[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2009,16(4):1141-1152.
[14] D'AULISA A,TUGNOLI A,COZZANI V,et al. CFD modeling of LPG vessels under fire exposure conditions[J]. AIChE Journal,2014,60(12):4292-4305.
[15] BIRK A M. Review of AFFTAC thermal model[R]. Kingston:Transportation Development Centre,2000.
[16] SALZANO E,PICOZZI B,VACCARO S,et al. Hazard of pressurized tanks involved in fires[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2003,42(8):1804-1812.
[17] 杨世铭,陶文铨. 传热学[M]. 4版. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006. YANG S M,TAO W Q. Heat transfer theory[M]. 4th ed. Beijing:Higher Education Press,2006.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理化委员会. 安全阀一般要求:GB/T 12241-2005[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2005. General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Safety valves-General requirements:GB/T 12241-2005[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2005.
[19] POLING B E,THOMSON G H,FRIEND D G,et al. Perry's chemical engineers' handbook-Section 2:Physical and chemical data[M]. 8th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc.,2008.
[20] 郑津洋,董其伍,桑芝富. 过程设备设计[M]. 3版. 北京:化学工业出版社,2010. ZHENG J Y,DONG Q W,SANG Z F. Process equipment design[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2010.
[21] 郑咸义,姚仰新,雷秀仁,等. 应用数值分析[M]. 广州:华南理工大学出版社,2008. ZHENG X Y,YAO Y X,LEI X R,et al. Applied numerical analysis[M]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology,2008.
[22] 张明. 结构可靠度分析-方法与程序[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2008. ZHANG M. Structural reliability analysis-Methods and programs[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2008.

火灾环境液化石油气卧罐稳定性与静态可靠性分析

Stability and static reliability of horizontal LPG tank exposed to fire

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王鑫, 王兵兵, 杨威, 徐志明. 金属表面PDA/PTFE超疏水涂层抑垢与耐腐蚀性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4315-4321.
[2]	陆洋, 周劲松, 周启昕, 王瑭, 刘壮, 李博昊, 周灵涛. CeO₂/TiO₂吸附剂煤气脱汞产物的浸出规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3875-3883.
[3]	吴展华, 盛敏. 绝热加速量热仪在反应安全风险评估应用中的常见问题[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3374-3382.
[4]	单雪影, 张濛, 张家傅, 李玲玉, 宋艳, 李锦春. 阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.
[5]	谢志伟, 吴张永, 朱启晨, 蒋佳骏, 梁天祥, 刘振阳. 植物油基Ni_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄磁流体的黏度特性及磁黏特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3623-3633.
[6]	杨竞莹, 施万胜, 黄振兴, 谢利娟, 赵明星, 阮文权. 改性纳米零价铁材料制备的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2975-2986.
[7]	杨扬, 孙志高, 李翠敏, 李娟, 黄海峰. 静态条件下表面活性剂OP-13促进HCFC-141b水合物生成[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2854-2859.
[8]	赵景斌, 王彦富, 王涛, 马伟恺, 王琛. 基于蒙特卡洛模拟和动态事件树的储罐脆弱性评估[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2751-2759.
[9]	李玲, 马超峰, 卢春山, 于万金, 石能富, 金佳敏, 张建君, 刘武灿, 李小年. 新型含氟替代品1,1,2-三氟乙烯的合成工艺与催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1822-1831.
[10]	殷铭, 郭晋, 庞纪峰, 吴鹏飞, 郑明远. 铜催化剂在涉氢反应中的失活机制和稳定策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1860-1868.
[11]	李云闯, 谢方明, 席亚男, 万新月, 孙玉虎, 赵永峰, 李根, 刘宏海, 高雄厚, 刘洪涛. 高水热稳定性介孔分子筛的低成本合成研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1877-1884.
[12]	王钰琢, 李刚. 硫、氮共掺杂三维石墨烯的全固态超级电容器[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1974-1982.
[13]	谭德新, 曾佳欣, 梁莉敏, 申思慧, 曾子倩, 王艳丽. 取代烷基变化对芳炔单体及其聚合物性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2031-2037.
[14]	宗悦, 张瑞君, 高珊珊, 田家宇. “特殊稳定型”压力驱动薄膜复合（TFC）脱盐膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2058-2067.
[15]	李光文, 华渠成, 黄作鑫, 达志坚. 聚甲基丙烯酸酯类黏度指数改进剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1562-1571.