Advances in carbon-confined iron-based catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-2085

Abstract

Abstract:

Production of liquid fuels or chemicals via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) from coal- or biomass-derived syngas meets national resource characteristics and strategic demand. The development of high-performance iron-based catalysts promotes this process. The support structure and electronic environment affect the properties of the catalysts significantly. Carbon supports have attracted much attention in Fe-FTS catalysts. We review the recent advances in carbon-confined materials (e.g. carbon nanotubes, mesoporous carbon, organic derivatives, graphene, etc.) for FTS, and focus on the confinement effect from two aspects: geometric and electronic effects, such as gas diffusion and local concentrations, reduction and carbonization of iron species, the stability of phase and particle size, etc. The key points of the future work will be aimed at the controllable preparation of catalysts, the high stability of carbon materials under industrial conditions, and a clear mechanism of carbon-confined materials on iron carbide formation and reaction.

Key words: syngas, hydrogenation, catalyst, carbon support, confinement effect

摘要：

利用费托合成工艺，将煤、生物质等原料气化产生的合成气转化为液体燃料或化学品，符合我国能源特点和战略需求，而高性能铁基费托合成催化剂的开发能够推动该工艺进步，载体的结构和电子环境会显著影响催化剂的性质。碳材料是铁基费托合成催化剂备受关注的一类载体。本文回顾了不同种类的碳限域载体（包括碳纳米管、介孔碳、有机物衍生、石墨烯等）在费托合成中的最新进展，并重点从几何效应和电子效应两方面阐述了碳材料对铁基费托合成催化剂的限域作用，如对气体扩散和局部浓度、铁物种还原和碳化、碳化铁的相态和晶粒尺寸的稳定性等方面的影响。今后的研究重点是解决催化剂可控制备及碳材料本身在工业操作条件下的稳定性问题，并进一步探明碳包覆结构对碳化铁物相形成和反应机理的影响机制。

关键词: 合成气, 加氢, 催化剂, 碳载体, 限域效应

CLC Number:

TQ426

HAN Xiaoxue, CHEN Yanxi, ZHAO Qiao, CHEN Jiajia, HUANG Shouying, LYU Jing, MA Xinbin. Advances in carbon-confined iron-based catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(4): 1917-1927.

韩小雪, 陈妍希, 赵俏, 陈佳佳, 黄守莹, 吕静, 马新宾. 碳限域铁基费托合成催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 1917-1927.

Figures/Tables 2

References 79

1	邹才能, 潘松圻, 赵群. 论中国“能源独立”战略的内涵、挑战及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2): 416-426.
	ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, ZHAO Qun. On the connotation, challenge and significance of China’s “energy independence” strategy[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 416-426.
2	高鹏, 崔勖, 钟良枢, 等. CO/CO₂加氢高选择性合成化学品和液体燃料[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(1): 183-195.
	GAO Peng, CUI Xu, ZHONG Liangshu, et al. CO/CO₂ hydrogenation to chemicals and liquid fuels with high selectivity[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(1): 183-195.
3	LU Fangxu, CHEN Xin, LEI Zhigang, et al. Revealing the activity of different iron carbides for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 281: 119-521.
4	CAGNOLI M V, MARCHETTI S G, GALLEGOS N G, et al. Influence of the support on the activity and selectivity of high dispersion Fe catalysts in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1990, 123(1): 21-30.
5	CHERNYAK S A, SUSLOVA E V, IVANOV A S, et al. Co catalysts supported on oxidized CNTs: evolution of structure during preparation, reduction and catalytic test in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2016, 523: 221-229.
6	DAS S, PÉREZ-RAMÍREZ J, GONG Jinlong, et al. Core-shell structured catalysts for thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, and electrocatalytic conversion of CO₂[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(10): 2937-3004.
7	TIAN Hao, LI Xinyu, ZENG Liang, et al. Recent advances on the design of group Ⅷ base-metal catalysts with encapsulated structures[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(8): 4959-4977.
8	薛丽君, 张迪, 魏杰, 等. 催化剂的孔道限域效应[J]. 化学进展, 2016, 28(4): 450-458.
	XUE Lijun, ZHANG Di, WEI Jie, et al. Pore confinement effects of catalysts[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2016, 28(4): 450-458.
9	李娟, 吴梁鹏, 邱勇, 等. 费托合成催化剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(S1): 100-109.
	LI Juan, WU Liangpeng, QIU Yong, et al. Research advances in catalysts for progress for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2013, 32(S1): 100-109.
10	ABBASLOU R M M, TAVASSOLI A, SOLTAN J, et al. Iron catalysts supported on carbon nanotubes for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: effect of catalytic site position[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2009, 367(1/2): 47-52.
11	TANG Qinghu, ZHANG Qinghong, WANG Ping, et al. Characterizations of cobalt oxide nanoparticles within faujasite zeolites and the formation of metallic cobalt[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2004, 16(10): 1967-1976.
12	XIONG Haifeng, ZHANG Yuhua, WANG Shuguo, et al. Preparation and catalytic activity for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of Ru nanoparticles confined in the channels of mesoporous SBA-15[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(26): 9706-9709.
13	JIANG Nan, YANG Guohui, ZHANG Xiongfu, et al. A novel silicalite-1 zeolite shell encapsulated iron-based catalyst for controlling synthesis of light alkenes from syngas[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2011, 12(11): 951-954.
14	ZHU Can, ZHANG Mingwei, HUANG Chao, et al. Carbon-encapsulated highly dispersed FeMn nanoparticles for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis to light olefins[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2018, 42(4): 2413-2421.
15	SANTEN R A VAN. Complementary structure-sensitive and insensitive catalytic relationships[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2010, 40(16): 57-66.
16	GOODMAN E D, SCHWALBE J A, CARGNELLO M. Mechanistic understanding and the rational design of sinter-resistant heterogeneous catalysts[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(10): 7156-7173.
17	MOULIJN J A, DIEPEN A E VAN, KAPTEIJN F. Catalyst deactivation: is it predictable? What to do?[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001, 212(1): 3-16.
18	DE SMIT E, WECKHUYSEN B M. The renaissance of iron-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: on the multifaceted catalyst deactivation behaviour[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2008, 37(12): 2758-2781.
19	ZHUO Ou, YANG Lijun, GAO Fujie, et al. Stabilizing the active phase of iron-based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts for lower olefins: mechanism and Strategy[J]. Chemical Science, 2019, 10(24): 6083-6090.
20	HUANG Xiao, YIN Zongyou, WU Shixin, et al. Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications[J]. Small, 2011, 7(14): 1876-1902.
21	MOUSSA S O, PANCHAKARLA L S, HO M Q, et al. Graphene-supported, iron-based nanoparticles for catalytic production of liquid hydrocarbons from synthesis gas: the role of the graphene support in comparison with carbon nanotubes[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4(2): 535-545.
22	BLASE X, BENEDICT L X, SHIRLEY E L, et al. Hybridization effects and metallicity in small radius carbon nanotubes[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1994, 72(12): 1878-1881.
23	GUAN Jing, PAN Xiulian, LIU Xin, et al. Syngas segregation induced by confinement in carbon nanotubes: a combined first-principles and Monte Carlo study[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(52): 21687-21692.
24	PAN Xiulian, BAO Xinhe. Reactions over catalysts confined in carbon nanotubes[J]. Chemical Communications, 2008, 47: 6271-6281.
25	YAO Dawei, WANG Yue, LI Ying, et al. A high-performance nanoreactor for carbon-oxygen bond hydrogenation reactions achieved by the morphology of nanotube-assembled hollow spheres[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(2): 1218-1226.
26	CHEN Xiaoqi, DENG Dehui, PAN Xiulian, et al. N-doped graphene as an electron donor of iron catalysts for CO hydrogenation to light olefins[J]. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(1): 217-220.
27	CHEN Wei, PAN Xiulian, WILLINGER M G, et al. Facile autoreduction of iron oxide/carbon nanotube encapsulates[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2006, 128(10): 3136-3137.
28	CHEN Wei, PAN Xiulian, BAO Xinhe. Tuning of redox properties of iron and iron oxides via encapsulation within carbon nanotubes[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, 129(23): 7421-7426.
29	LU Jinzhao, YANG Lijun, XU Bolian, et al. Promotion effects of nitrogen doping into carbon nanotubes on supported iron Fischer-Tropsch catalysts for lower olefins[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4(2): 613-621.
30	FAN Zhongli, CHEN Wei, PAN Xiulian, et al. Catalytic conversion of syngas into C₂ oxygenates over Rh-based catalysts—Effect of carbon supports[J]. Catalysis Today, 2009, 147(2): 86-93.
31	LIU Renjie, XU Yan, LI Zhenhua, et al. A facile and efficient modification of CNTs for improved Fischer-Tropsch performance on iron catalyst: alkali modification[J]. ChemCatChem, 2016, 8(8): 1454-1458.
32	GALVIS H M T, DE JONG K P. Catalysts for production of lower olefins from synthesis gas: a review[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2013, 3(9): 2130-2149.
33	DE SMIT E, CINQUINI F, BEALE A M, et al. Stability and reactivity of ϵ-χ-θ iron carbide catalyst phases in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: controlling μ_c[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(42): 14928-14941.
34	WEZENDONK T A, SUN Xiaohui, DUGULAN A I, et al. Controlled formation of iron carbides and their performance in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2018, 362: 106-117.
35	LU Kuan, HUO Chunfang, HE Yurong, et al. Grain boundary plays a key role in carbon diffusion in carbon irons revealed by a ReaxFF study[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(40): 23191-23199.
36	WEZENDONK T A, SANTOS V P, NASALEVICH M A, et al. Elucidating the nature of Fe species during pyrolysis of the Fe-BTC MOF into highly active and stable Fischer-Tropsch catalysts[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(5): 3236-3247.
37	TENG Xinsheng, HUANG Shouying, WANG Jian, et al. Fabrication of Fe₂C embedded in hollow carbon apheres: a high-performance and stable catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. ChemCatChem, 2018, 10(17): 3883-3891.
38	SANTOS V P, WEZENDONK T A, JAEN J J D, et al. Metal organic framework-mediated synthesis of highly active and stable Fischer-Tropsch catalysts[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 8.
39	Shuai LYU, LIU Chengchao, WANG Guanghui, et al. Structural evolution of carbon in an Fe@C catalyst during the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis reaction[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2019, 9(4): 1013-1020.
40	Shuai LYU, WANG Li, LI Zhe, et al. Stabilization of ε-iron carbide as high-temperature catalyst under realistic Fischer-Tropsch synthesis conditions[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 6219.
41	CHEN Wei, FAN Zhongli, PAN Xiulian, et al. Effect of confinement in carbon nanotubes on the activity of Fischer-Tropsch iron catalyst[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, 130(29): 9414-9419.
42	ABBASLOU R M M, SOLTAN J, DALAI A K. Effects of nanotubes pore size on the catalytic performances of iron catalysts supported on carbon nanotubes for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2010, 379(1/2): 129-134.
43	CHEN Xiaoqi, DENG Dehui, PAN Xiulian, et al. Iron catalyst encapsulated in carbon nanotubes for CO hydrogenation to light olefins[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 36(9): 1631-1637.
44	GU Bang, HE Shun, PERON D V, et al. Synergy of nanoconfinement and promotion in the design of efficient supported iron catalysts for direct olefin synthesis from syngas[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2019, 376: 1-16.
45	Kyoung-Su HA, KWAK Geunjae, Ki-Won JUN, et al. Ordered mesoporous carbon nanochannel reactors for high-performance Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Chemical Communications, 2013, 49(45): 5141-5143.
46	OSCHATZ M, DEELEN T W VAN, WEBER J L, et al. Effects of calcination and activation conditions on ordered mesoporous carbon supported iron catalysts for production of lower olefins from synthesis gas[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2016, 6(24): 8464-8473.
47	KANG Shin Wook, KIM Kyeounghak, CHUN Dong Hyun, et al. High-performance Fe₅C₂@CMK-3 nanocatalyst for selective and high-yield production of gasoline-range hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 349: 66-74.
48	SUN Zhenkun, SUN Bo, QIAO Minghua, et al. A general chelate-assisted co-assembly to metallic nanoparticles-incorporated ordered mesoporous carbon catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134(42): 17653-17660.
49	HWANG Sunmi, ZHANG Chundong, HAN Seungju, et al. Mesoporous carbon as an effective support for Fe catalyst for CO₂ hydrogenation to liquid hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2020, 37: 65-73.
50	CHEN Qingjun, LIU Guoguo, DING Shuya, et al. Design of ultra-active iron-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts over spherical mesoporous carbon with developed porosity[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 334: 714-724.
51	LIU Guoguo, CHEN Qingjun, OYUNKHAND E, et al. Nitrogen-rich mesoporous carbon supported iron catalyst with superior activity for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Carbon, 2018, 130: 304-314.
52	NI Zhijiang, QIN Hengfei, KANG Shifei, et al. Effect of graphitic carbon modification on the catalytic performance of Fe@SiO₂-GC catalysts for forming lower olefins via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2018, 516: 16-22.
53	NI Zhijiang, ZHANG Xuefei, BAI Jirong, et al. Potassium promoted core-shell-structured FeK@SiO₂-GC catalysts used for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis to olefins without further reduction[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2020, 44(1): 87-94.
54	LIU Junhui, ZHANG Anfeng, LIU Min, et al. Fe-MOF-derived highly active catalysts for carbon dioxide hydrogenation to valuable hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2017, 21: 100-107.
55	WEZENDONK T A, WARRINGA Q S E, SANTOS V P, et al. Structural and elemental influence from various MOFs on the performance of Fe@C catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Faraday Discussions, 2017, 197: 225-242.
56	LIU Junhui, SUN Yanwei, JIANG Xiao, et al. Pyrolyzing ZIF-8 to N-doped porous carbon facilitated by iron and potassium for CO₂ hydrogenation to value-added hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 25: 120-127.
57	DONG Zichao, ZHAO Jie, TIAN Yajie, et al. Preparation and performances of ZIF-67-derived FeCo bimetallic catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to light olefins[J]. Catalysts, 2020, 10(4): 17.
58	YANG Xiangping, GUO Xiaoxue, ZHANG Chenghua, et al. Synthesis and catalytic properties of iron based Fischer-Tropsch catalyst mediated by MOFs Fe-MIL-100[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2017, 75(4): 360-366.
59	RAMIREZ A, GEVERS L, BAVYKINA A, et al. Metal organic framework-derived iron catalysts for the direct hydrogenation of CO₂ to short chain olefins[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(10): 9174-9182.
60	AN Bing, CHENG Kang, WANG Cheng, et al. Pyrolysis of metal-organic frameworks to Fe₃O₄@Fe₅C₂ core-shell nanoparticles for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(6): 3610-3618.
61	LIU Junhui, ZHANG Anfeng, JIANG Xiao, et al. Overcoating the surface of Fe-based catalyst with ZnO and nitrogen-doped carbon toward high selectivity of light olefins in CO₂ hydrogenation[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(10): 4017-4023.
62	YU Guobin, SUN Bo, PEI Yan, et al. Fe_xO_y@C spheres as an excellent catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(3): 935-937.
63	HONG Seok-Yong, CHUN Dong-Hyun, YANG Jung-Il, et al. A new synthesis of carbon encapsulated Fe₅C₂ nanoparticles for high-temperature Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(40): 16616-16620.
64	TU Junling, DING Mingyue, ZHANG Qian, et al. Design of carbon-encapsulated Fe₃O₄ nanocatalyst with enhanced performance for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. ChemCatChem, 2015, 7(15): 2323-2327.
65	MA Guangyuan, WANG Xianzhou, XU Yanfei, et al. Enhanced conversion of syngas to gasoline-range hydrocarbons over carbon encapsulated bimetallic FeMn nanoparticles[J]. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018, 1(8): 4304-4312.
66	XUE Yingying, ZHAI Yongbiao, CHEN Zheng, et al. Sol-gel autocombustion combined carbothermal synthesis of iron-based catalysts for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction[J]. ChemCatChem, 2018, 10(4): 831-836.
67	QIN Hengfei, WANG Bin, ZHANG Chunyong, et al. Lignin based synthesis of graphitic carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles as effective catalyst for forming lower olefins via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2017, 96: 28-31.
68	QIN Hengfei, ZHOU Yue, BAI Jirong, et al. Lignin-derived thin-walled graphitic carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles: growth, characterization, and applications[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 1917-1923.
69	秦恒飞, 赵晶艳, 周月, 等. 木质素基Fe@GC材料的制备及其费托性能研究[J]. 现代化工, 2018, 38(12): 95-98, 100.
	QIN Hengfei, ZHAO Jingyan, ZHOU Yue, et al. Lignin-derived graphitic carbon coated iron nanoparticles and application in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2018, 38(12): 95-98, 100.
70	YAN Qiangu, STREET J, YU Fei. Synthesis of carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles from wood derived sugars by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and their application to convert bio-syngas into liquid hydrocarbons[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2015, 83: 85-95.
71	ZHANG Jianli, FANG Kegong, ZHANG Kan, et al. Carbon dispersed iron-manganese catalyst for light olefin synthesis from CO hydrogenation[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 26(3): 890-894.
72	ZHANG Qian, GU Juwen, CHEN Jianfeng, et al. Facile fabrication of porous Fe@C nanohybrids from natural magnetite as excellent Fischer-Tropsch catalysts[J]. Chemical Communications, 2020, 56(33): 4523-4526.
73	WU Jianghong, WANG Liancheng, Baoliang LYU, et al. Facile Fabrication of BCN nanosheet-encapsulated nano-iron as highly stable Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalyst[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(16): 14319-14327.
74	Jin-Hee LEE, Hack-Keun LEE, CHUN Dong-Hyun, et al. Phase-controlled synthesis of thermally stable nitrogen-doped carbon supported iron catalysts for highly efficient Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Nano Research, 2019, 12(10): 2568-2575.
75	WANG Yifei, HUANG Shouying, TENG Xinsheng, et al. Controllable Fe/HCS catalysts in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: effects of crystallization time[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 802-812.
76	WANG Chao, ZHAI Peng, ZHANG Zhichao, et al. Synthesis of highly stable graphene-encapsulated iron nanoparticles for catalytic syngas conversion[J]. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 2015, 32(1): 29-34.
77	LIU Jia, JI Qingmin, IMAI T, et al. Sintering-resistant nanoparticles in wide-mouthed compartments for sustained catalytic performance[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 41773.
78	WU Tijun, LIN Jun, CHENG Yi, et al. Porous graphene-confined Fe-K as highly efficient catalyst for CO₂ direct hydrogenation to light olefins[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(28): 23439-23443.
79	CHENG Yi, TIAN Jing, LIN Jun, et al. Potassium-promoted magnesium ferrite on 3D porous graphene as highly efficient catalyst for CO hydrogenation to lower olefins[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2019, 374: 24-35.

[1]	ZHANG Mingyan, LIU Yan, ZHANG Xueting, LIU Yake, LI Congju, ZHANG Xiuling. Research progress of non-noble metal bifunctional catalysts in zinc-air batteries [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[2]	SHI Yongxing, LIN Gang, SUN Xiaohang, JIANG Weigeng, QIAO Dawei, YAN Binhang. Research progress on active sites in Cu-based catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	XIE Luyao, CHEN Songzhe, WANG Laijun, ZHANG Ping. Platinum-based catalysts for SO₂ depolarized electrolysis [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	YANG Xiazhen, PENG Yifan, LIU Huazhang, HUO Chao. Regulation of active phase of fused iron catalyst and its catalytic performance of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[5]	WANG Lele, YANG Wanrong, YAO Yan, LIU Tao, HE Chuan, LIU Xiao, SU Sheng, KONG Fanhai, ZHU Canghai, XIANG Jun. Influence of spent SCR catalyst blending on the characteristics and deNO _x performance for new SCR catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[6]	DENG Liping, SHI Haoyu, LIU Xiaolong, CHEN Yaoji, YAN Jingying. Non-noble metal modified vanadium titanium-based catalyst for NH₃-SCR denitrification simultaneous control VOCs [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[7]	CHENG Tao, CUI Ruili, SONG Junnan, ZHANG Tianqi, ZHANG Yunhe, LIANG Shijie, PU Shi. Analysis of impurity deposition and pressure drop increase mechanisms in residue hydrotreating unit [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[8]	WANG Peng, SHI Huibing, ZHAO Deming, FENG Baolin, CHEN Qian, YANG Da. Recent advances on transition metal catalyzed carbonylation of chlorinated compounds [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4649-4666.
[9]	ZHANG Qi, ZHAO Hong, RONG Junfeng. Research progress of anti-toxicity electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in PEMFC [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4677-4691.
[10]	GE Quanqian, XU Mai, LIANG Xian, WANG Fengwu. Research progress on the application of MOFs in photoelectrocatalysis [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4692-4705.
[11]	WANG Weitao, BAO Tingyu, JIANG Xulu, HE Zhenhong, WANG Kuan, YANG Yang, LIU Zhaotie. Oxidation of benzene to phenol over aldehyde-ketone resin based metal-free catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4706-4715.
[12]	GE Yafen, SUN Yu, XIAO Peng, LIU Qi, LIU Bo, SUN Chengying, GONG Yanjun. Research progress of zeolite for VOCs removal [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[13]	WU Haibo, WANG Xilun, FANG Yanxiong, JI Hongbing. Progress of the development and application of 3D printing catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 3956-3964.
[14]	MAO Shanjun, WANG Zhe, WANG Yong. Group recognition hydrogenation: From concept to application [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 3917-3922.
[15]	XIANG Yang, HUANG Xun, WEI Zidong. Recent progresses in the activity and selectivity improvement of electrocatalytic organic synthesis [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 4005-4014.