Three-dimensional temperature field reconstruction of flame based on LSMR algorithm

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1323

Abstract

Abstract:

The light field imaging technique can simultaneously record the spatial distribution information and propagation direction information of the incident light, and combined with relevant inversion algorithms, it can be used for the reconstruction of the three-dimensional temperature field of the flame. The least squares via QR factorization (LSQR) algorithm can effectively solve linear problems based on large sparse matrices, but it is difficult to ensure the nonnegativity and accuracy of the solution in the process of solving the flame radiation intensity. The non-negative least squares (NNLS) algorithm can guarantee the non-negativity of the solution, but the computational efficiency is too low. In this paper, we proposed to use the least square minimal residual (LSMR) method for three-dimensional temperature field reconstruction of flame light field imaging, and studied its reconstruction accuracy, computational efficiency, anti-noise performance and other indicators. Simulation experiments showed that the LSMR and NNLS algorithms can guarantee the non-negativity of solving the flame radiation intensity under different noise levels. In the case of noise of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%, both LSMR and NNLS algorithms improved the accuracy of solving the radiation intensity by more than 10% compared with LSQR, and the solution time of LSMR algorithm was reduced by one order of magnitude and four orders of magnitude compared with LSQR and NNLS, respectively. It could be seen that the LSMR algorithm can significantly improve the computational efficiency while ensuring the solution accuracy. Finally, the LSMR algorithm was used to reconstruct the temperature field of the simulated light field flame, and the average relative errors were kept within 1.2% under different noise levels, which verified the accuracy and reliability of the LSMR algorithm in reconstruction.

Key words: light field, imaging, flame, LSMR algorithm, 3D temperature field reconstruction

摘要：

光场成像技术可以同时记录入射光线的空间分布信息和传播方向信息，结合相关反演算法，可以进行火焰三维温度场的重建。最小二乘QR分解算法（least squares via QR factorization，LSQR）可以有效求解基于大型稀疏矩阵的线性问题，但是在对火焰辐射强度求解的过程中，难以保证求解的非负性和准确性。非负最小二乘算法（non-negative least squares，NNLS）可以保证求解的非负性，但是计算效率太低。本文提出将最小二乘残差方法（least square minimal residual，LSMR）用于火焰光场成像三维温度场重建，并研究其重建精度、计算效率、抗噪性能等指标。仿真实验表明，LSMR和NNLS算法可以在不同噪声水平下保证求解火焰辐射强度的非负性。在噪声为5%、10%、15%和20%的情况下，LSMR和NNLS算法对辐射强度的求解精度均比LSQR提高了10%以上，且LSMR算法的求解时间比LSQR和NNLS分别降低了一个数量级和四个数量级。可见，LSMR算法可以在保证求解精度的情况下大幅提高运算效率。最后用LSMR算法对模拟光场火焰进行温度场重建，在不同噪声水平下，平均相对误差都保持在1.2%以内，验证了LSMR算法在重建时的准确性和可靠性。

关键词: 光场, 成像, 火焰, LSMR算法, 三维温度场重建

CLC Number:

TK311

SHAN Liang, YANG Wenqi, HONG Bo, ZHOU Rongxing, KONG Ming. Three-dimensional temperature field reconstruction of flame based on LSMR algorithm[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(2): 659-666.

单良, 仰文淇, 洪波, 周荣幸, 孔明. 基于LSMR算法的火焰三维温度场重建[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 659-666.

Figures/Tables 9

References 23

1	岑可法, 姚强, 骆仲泱, 等. 高等燃烧学[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2002: 1-5.
	CEN Kefa, YAO Qiang, LUO Zhongyang, et al. Advanced combustion science[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2002: 1-5.
2	于英利, 付旭晨, 戴莹莹, 等. 燃煤电站锅炉水冷壁壁面高温腐蚀问题分析与对策[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S1): 90-96.
	YU Yingli, FU Xuchen, DAI Yingying, et al. Analysis and countermeasure of high temperature corrosion on water wall of coal-fired power plant boiler[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(S1): 90-96.
3	戴景民, 金钊. 火焰温度测量技术研究[J]. 计量学报, 2003(4): 297-302.
	DAI Jingmin, JIN Zhao. Study on the measurement techniques of flame temperature[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2003(4): 297-302.
4	王飞, 马增益, 严建华, 等. 利用火焰图像同时重建温度场和浓度场的试验研究[J]. 动力工程, 2003, 23(3): 2404-2408.
	WANG Fei, MA Zengyi, YAN Jianhua, et al. Experimental study of temperature and concentration distribution measurement based on flame image[J]. Power Engineering, 2003, 23(3): 2404-2408.
5	LUO Zixue, ZHOU Huaichun. A combustion-monitoring system with 3-D temperature reconstruction based on flame-image processing technique[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2007, 56(5): 1877-1882.
6	BRISLEY P M, LU Gang, YAN Yong, et al. Three-dimensional temperature measurement of combustion flames using a single monochromatic CCD camera[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2005, 54(4): 1417-1421.
7	ZHOU Huaichun, HAN Shudong, SHENG Feng, et al. Visualization of three-dimensional temperature distributions in a large-scale furnace via regularized reconstruction from radiative energy images: Numerical studies[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2002, 72(4): 361-383.
8	卫成业, 王飞, 严建华, 等. 利用代数重建技术根据火焰辐射图像测量煤粉火焰断面温度场[J]. 计量学报, 2001(2): 116-121.
	WEI Chengye, WANG Fei, YAN Jianhua, et al. The measurement of intersection temperature distribution of coal burning flame using algebra reconstruction technique (ART) based on radiation image[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2001(2): 116-121.
9	Ren NG, LEVOY M, BREDIF M, et al. Light field photography with a hand-held plenoptic camera[J]. Stanford Tech Report CTSR, 2005, 2(11): 1-11.
10	黄兴, 齐宏, 牛志田, 等. 基于光场成像技术的散射性火焰温度场重建[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(5): 952-959.
	HUANG Xing, QI Hong, NIU Zhitian, et al. Temperature field reconstruction of scattering flame based on light-field imaging[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(5): 952-959.
11	齐琪, 王长健, 仪建华, 等. 基于特征光线选择的多光场相机采样优化方法[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6581-6589.
	QI Qi, WANG Changjian, YI Jianhua, et al. Approach to optimize the sampling of multi-light field camera system based on feature rays selection[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(12): 6581-6589.
12	孙俊阳. 光场相机标定及火焰三维温度场重建方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2018.
	SUN Junyang. Study on calibration of light field camera and reconstruction of 3D temperature field of flame[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018.
13	单良, 赵腾飞, 黄荟云, 等. 基于阻尼LSQR-LMBC的火焰三维温度场重建[J]. 物理学报, 2022, 71(4): 21-32.
	SHAN Liang, ZHAO Tengfei, HUANG Huiyun, et al. Flame 3D temperature field reconstruction based on damped LSQR-LMBC[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(4): 21-32.
14	黄荟云. 基于光线追迹的火焰三维温度场重建[D]. 杭州: 中国计量大学, 2021.
	HUANG Huiyun. Reconstruction of three-dimensional flame temperature field based on ray tracing[D]. Hangzhou: China University of Metrology, 2021.
15	孙安泰. 基于深度学习的火焰三维温度场层析重建及预测研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.
	SUN Antai. Tomography reconstruction and prediction of three-dimensional temperature field of flame based on deep learning[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021.
16	SUN Jun, XU Chuanlong, ZHANG Biao, et al. Three-dimensional temperature field measurement of flame using a single light field camera[J]. Optics Express, 2016, 24(2): 1118.
17	孙俊. 基于光场成像的火焰三维温度场测量方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2018.
	SUN Jun. Three-dimensional temperature measurement of flame based on light field imaging[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018.
18	Chin-Lung FONG D, SAUNDERS M. LSMR: An iterative algorithm for sparse least-squares problems[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2011, 33(5): 2950-2971.
19	ZHAO Chao, HUANG Tingzhu, ZHAO Xile, et al. Two new efficient iterative regularization methods for image restoration problems[J]. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, 2013: 1-9.
20	XU Hao, HUANG Tingzhu, Xiaoguang LYU, et al. The implementation of LSMR in image deblurring[J]. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 2014, 8(6): 3041-3048.
21	GEORGIEV T, INTWALA C. Light field camera design for integral view photography[J]. Adobe Technical Report, 2006: 1-13.
22	PAIGE C C, SAUNDERS M A. LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares[J]. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 8(1): 43-71.
23	LAWSON C L, HANSON R J. Solving least squares problems[M]. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1995.

噪声/%	LSQR/s	NNLS/s	LSMR/s
1	2.91	2201	0.14
5	2.90	2215	0.14
10	2.90	2246	0.15
15	2.96	2255	0.15
20	3.05	2278	0.16

噪声/%	LSQR/s	NNLS/s	LSMR/s
1	2.91	2201	0.14
5	2.90	2215	0.14
10	2.90	2246	0.15
15	2.96	2255	0.15
20	3.05	2278	0.16

噪声/%	平均相对误差/%	最大相对误差/%
1	0.03	0.21
5	0.18	1.53
10	0.44	3.09
15	0.74	8.28
20	1.12	14.34

噪声/%	平均相对误差/%	最大相对误差/%
1	0.03	0.21
5	0.18	1.53
10	0.44	3.09
15	0.74	8.28
20	1.12	14.34

[1]	ZHOU Wu, GONG Wenchao, XU Rixin. Online measurement techniques for multi-parameters of particles based on defocus imaging [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(2): 586-592.
[2]	LI Guizhen, HU Yingyuan, ZHANG Bo, YANG Yaozu, ZHAI Rongjia, ZHAO Xin. Synthesis and properties of a Rhodamine lactam-based polymeric pH fluorescent probe [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(1): 473-479.
[3]	YANG Yudi, LI Wentao, QIAN Yongkang, HUI Junhong. Analysis of influencing factors of natural gas turbulent diffusion flame length in industrial combustion chamber [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 267-275.
[4]	LYU Chengyuan, ZHANG Han, YANG Mingwang, DU Jianjun, FAN Jiangli. Recent advances of dioxetane-based afterglow system for bio-imaging [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 4108-4122.
[5]	SHAN Xueying, ZHANG Meng, ZHANG Jiafu, LI Lingyu, SONG Yan, LI Jinchun. Numerical simulation of combustion of flame retardant epoxy resin [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.
[6]	GU Haiyang, WANG Dong, ZONG Yongzhong, FU Shaohai. Preparation and property of tanning sludge based biomass flame retardant coating protein for cotton fabric [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(2): 641-649.
[7]	ZHANG Shuaiguo, MA Wenyuan, ZHAO Haipeng, FENG Yu, CAI Xuping, YANG Shixiang, QIAN Xinyue, MI Jie. Progress of flame synthesis of carbon nanotubes based composites and their practical applications [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(12): 6409-6418.
[8]	FENG Lele, ZHOU Sibo, DONG Maifan, LIU Jie, WU Yuxin. Theoretical criterion of swirl flameless combustion based on CO₂ dilution [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1272-1282.
[9]	SHEN Hongyan, LIU Youzhi, ZHU Hailin, ZHAO Lingbo. Preparation and property of diatomite supported hydrophobic magnesium hydroxide [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(2): 848-853.
[10]	LI Ting, DU Shaohui, CUI Jinfeng, WANG Yanghui, LI Hulin, GUO Runlan, WANG Peng, WANG Zhenjun, GUO Junhong, YANG Baoping. Preparation and properties of waterborne polyurethane paper sizing agents with phosphorus-boron hybrid prepolymer blocks [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(10): 5549-5557.
[11]	SUN Tong, XU Dongdong, SONG Minhang, JIN Xing, HUANG Yun. Research progress of the burners in synthesis of TiO₂ by combustion method [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(1): 17-29.
[12]	CHENG Fangming, NAN Fan, WANG Jiayi, LYU Xiao’an, GE Tianjiao, QI Ke. Characteristics of dust explosion relief flame under high activation pressure [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(8): 4135-4143.
[13]	CHEN Shaoyun, TIAN Du, LI Qi, ZHONG Min, HU Chenglong, JI Hongbing. Study on the phase structure of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend film by Raman Mapping imaging [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(7): 3900-3908.
[14]	ZHOU Ning, XU Yingying, CHEN Bing, LI Xue, QIAO Shiwei, YUAN Xiongjun, LIU Jun, HUANG Weiqiu, ZHAO Huijun. Numerical simulation of the influence of vent conditions on H₂/air explosion characteristics [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(7): 3656-3663.
[15]	QI Qi, WANG Changjian, YI Jianhua, HUANG Yizhi, LI Jinjian, ZHANG Biao, XU Chuanlong. Approach to optimize the sampling of multi-light field camera system based on feature rays selection [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(12): 6581-6589.